VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
AAPGAscentage Pharma Group International
$16.77$1.6B
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. AAPG
  4. Financial Ratios

Ascentage Pharma Group International (AAPG) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -8.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -150.2%. (2016–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

AAPG Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Market Cap$1.6B$2.3B—————————
Enterprise Value$1.5B$1.8B—————————
P/E Ratio →-8.40——————————
P/S Ratio18.884.18—————————
P/B Ratio7.591.75—————————
P/FCF———————————
P/OCF———————————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

AAPG EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
EV / Revenue—3.30—————————
EV / EBITDA———————————
EV / EBIT———————————
EV / FCF———————————

AAPG Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Gross Margin76.4%76.4%97.0%86.2%89.5%88.1%84.2%85.6%100.0%100.0%96.6%
Operating Margin-211.1%-211.1%-37.7%-393.1%-405.2%-3116.6%-5332.9%-4014.9%-5074.8%-2064.9%-1495.0%
Net Profit Margin-216.5%-216.5%-41.3%-417.0%-421.0%-2803.4%-5442.6%-10202.7%-5072.8%-1872.9%-1406.5%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
ROE-150.2%-150.2%-235.2%-386.3%-107.5%-75.2%-78.0%-166.3%———
ROA-36.7%-36.7%-15.8%-34.7%-30.6%-33.5%-46.2%-121.6%-38.1%-20.2%-18.2%
ROIC-114.1%-114.1%-36.9%-86.0%-95.3%-134.7%-212.0%-385.5%———
ROCE-62.5%-62.5%-24.5%-49.6%-37.5%-43.1%-54.0%-54.8%-42.5%-25.7%-22.2%

AAPG Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Debt / Equity1.481.486.0925.424.390.880.630.11———
Debt / EBITDA———————————
Net Debt / Equity—-0.371.5810.280.78-0.50-0.58-0.87———
Net Debt / EBITDA———————————
Debt / FCF———————————
Interest Coverage-22.42-22.42-5.13-8.71-15.81-48.74-106.99-345.82-9.36-1.07-36.00

Net cash position: cash ($2.5B) exceeds total debt ($2.0B)

AAPG Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Current Ratio1.791.791.261.441.865.223.914.509.415.215.97
Quick Ratio1.771.771.261.421.855.213.914.509.415.215.97
Cash Ratio1.501.501.061.141.674.733.694.359.235.025.82
Asset Turnover—0.140.370.090.070.010.010.010.010.010.01
Inventory Turnover4.604.604.411.892.330.85—————
Days Sales Outstanding—165.4236.88268.90107.02707.8614.0763.53281.67452.96395.52

AAPG Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Dividend Yield———————————
Payout Ratio———————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Earnings Yield———————————
FCF Yield———————————
Buyback Yield0.1%0.4%—————————
Total Shareholder Yield0.1%0.4%—————————
Shares Outstanding—$89M$76M$18M$16M$16M$13M$13M$13M$13M$13M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeMixed
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetHealthy
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Clinical milestone dependency

Premium Pricing Amidst Clinical Uncertainty

Based on reported figures, Ascentage trades at a P/S multiple of 18.88, which appears to reflect investor optimism regarding the company's apoptosis platform rather than its current, highly volatile revenue stream that remains heavily dependent on non-recurring licensing milestones rather than steady-state commercial product sales.

The elevated P/S ratio suggests that the market is pricing the company as a high-growth biotech asset, yet this valuation is disconnected from the current negative earnings profile. Investors should monitor whether the recent Takeda partnership provides a sufficient catalyst to justify this premium, as the current multiple implies significant future royalty expectations that have yet to materialize in the income statement.

Capital Efficiency Constrained by R&D

As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -61.0% in 2025Q4, which highlights the structural challenge of generating positive returns on invested capital while the firm remains in a heavy, non-revenue-generating investment phase for its clinical pipeline.

The persistent decay in ROIC suggests that the capital deployed into R&D is not yet yielding the commercial returns necessary to offset the high cost of clinical development. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's capital allocation strategy is prioritizing long-term pipeline breadth over the immediate, efficient commercialization of its lead assets.

Working Capital Volatility and Leverage

According to recent SEC filings, the company's cash conversion cycle remains erratic, swinging from -80 in 2025Q4 to -5275 in 2021Q4, which indicates that working capital management is heavily influenced by the timing of large, sporadic milestone payments rather than standard operational efficiency.

The extreme fluctuations in the cash conversion cycle suggest that the company lacks a predictable operational rhythm, making it difficult to assess underlying working capital health. Investors should be wary of interpreting these metrics as signs of operational improvement, as they are likely artifacts of accounting recognition for licensing deals rather than improvements in core business processes.

Debt Utilization for Pipeline Funding

Based on the provided financial data, the debt-to-equity ratio has risen to 1.48 as of 2025Q4, suggesting that management is increasingly relying on debt financing to bridge the gap between high R&D burn rates and the realization of long-term commercial milestones.

While the current cash position provides a buffer, the rising leverage indicates a shift toward debt-funded growth, which increases the company's sensitivity to interest rate environments and refinancing risks. This strategy appears to be a calculated risk to maintain clinical momentum, but it warrants close monitoring to ensure that debt service obligations do not eventually constrain future R&D flexibility.

Misapplication of P/S Multiples

The price-to-sales ratio is frequently misapplied to Ascentage, as it obscures the reality that the company's revenue is driven by non-recurring licensing milestones rather than sustainable commercial product sales, leading to a potentially distorted view of the company's true underlying commercial value.

Analysts should instead focus on the R&D-to-revenue ratio and the cash burn rate, as these metrics provide a more accurate picture of the company's operational sustainability. Relying on P/S multiples in a milestone-heavy business model risks overestimating the company's current commercial traction and underestimating the volatility inherent in its revenue recognition.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

AAPG — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AAPG stock.

What is Ascentage Pharma Group International's P/E ratio?

Ascentage Pharma Group International's current P/E ratio is -8.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.

What is Ascentage Pharma Group International's ROE?

Ascentage Pharma Group International's return on equity (ROE) is -150.2%. The historical average is -171.2%.

Is AAPG stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Ascentage Pharma Group International is trading at a P/E of -8.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are Ascentage Pharma Group International's profit margins?

Ascentage Pharma Group International has 76.4% gross margin and -211.1% operating margin.