Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -8.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -150.2%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.6B | $2.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.5B | $1.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -8.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 18.88 | 4.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 7.59 | 1.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 76.4% | 76.4% | 97.0% | 86.2% | 89.5% | 88.1% | 84.2% | 85.6% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 96.6% |
| Operating Margin | -211.1% | -211.1% | -37.7% | -393.1% | -405.2% | -3116.6% | -5332.9% | -4014.9% | -5074.8% | -2064.9% | -1495.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -216.5% | -216.5% | -41.3% | -417.0% | -421.0% | -2803.4% | -5442.6% | -10202.7% | -5072.8% | -1872.9% | -1406.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -150.2% | -150.2% | -235.2% | -386.3% | -107.5% | -75.2% | -78.0% | -166.3% | — | — | — |
| ROA | -36.7% | -36.7% | -15.8% | -34.7% | -30.6% | -33.5% | -46.2% | -121.6% | -38.1% | -20.2% | -18.2% |
| ROIC | -114.1% | -114.1% | -36.9% | -86.0% | -95.3% | -134.7% | -212.0% | -385.5% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -62.5% | -62.5% | -24.5% | -49.6% | -37.5% | -43.1% | -54.0% | -54.8% | -42.5% | -25.7% | -22.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.48 | 1.48 | 6.09 | 25.42 | 4.39 | 0.88 | 0.63 | 0.11 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.37 | 1.58 | 10.28 | 0.78 | -0.50 | -0.58 | -0.87 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -22.42 | -22.42 | -5.13 | -8.71 | -15.81 | -48.74 | -106.99 | -345.82 | -9.36 | -1.07 | -36.00 |
Net cash position: cash ($2.5B) exceeds total debt ($2.0B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.79 | 1.79 | 1.26 | 1.44 | 1.86 | 5.22 | 3.91 | 4.50 | 9.41 | 5.21 | 5.97 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.26 | 1.42 | 1.85 | 5.21 | 3.91 | 4.50 | 9.41 | 5.21 | 5.97 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.06 | 1.14 | 1.67 | 4.73 | 3.69 | 4.35 | 9.23 | 5.02 | 5.82 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.14 | 0.37 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.60 | 4.60 | 4.41 | 1.89 | 2.33 | 0.85 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 165.42 | 36.88 | 268.90 | 107.02 | 707.86 | 14.07 | 63.53 | 281.67 | 452.96 | 395.52 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.1% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $89M | $76M | $18M | $16M | $16M | $13M | $13M | $13M | $13M | $13M |
Clinical milestone dependency
Based on reported figures, Ascentage trades at a P/S multiple of 18.88, which appears to reflect investor optimism regarding the company's apoptosis platform rather than its current, highly volatile revenue stream that remains heavily dependent on non-recurring licensing milestones rather than steady-state commercial product sales.
The elevated P/S ratio suggests that the market is pricing the company as a high-growth biotech asset, yet this valuation is disconnected from the current negative earnings profile. Investors should monitor whether the recent Takeda partnership provides a sufficient catalyst to justify this premium, as the current multiple implies significant future royalty expectations that have yet to materialize in the income statement.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -61.0% in 2025Q4, which highlights the structural challenge of generating positive returns on invested capital while the firm remains in a heavy, non-revenue-generating investment phase for its clinical pipeline.
The persistent decay in ROIC suggests that the capital deployed into R&D is not yet yielding the commercial returns necessary to offset the high cost of clinical development. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's capital allocation strategy is prioritizing long-term pipeline breadth over the immediate, efficient commercialization of its lead assets.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's cash conversion cycle remains erratic, swinging from -80 in 2025Q4 to -5275 in 2021Q4, which indicates that working capital management is heavily influenced by the timing of large, sporadic milestone payments rather than standard operational efficiency.
The extreme fluctuations in the cash conversion cycle suggest that the company lacks a predictable operational rhythm, making it difficult to assess underlying working capital health. Investors should be wary of interpreting these metrics as signs of operational improvement, as they are likely artifacts of accounting recognition for licensing deals rather than improvements in core business processes.
Based on the provided financial data, the debt-to-equity ratio has risen to 1.48 as of 2025Q4, suggesting that management is increasingly relying on debt financing to bridge the gap between high R&D burn rates and the realization of long-term commercial milestones.
While the current cash position provides a buffer, the rising leverage indicates a shift toward debt-funded growth, which increases the company's sensitivity to interest rate environments and refinancing risks. This strategy appears to be a calculated risk to maintain clinical momentum, but it warrants close monitoring to ensure that debt service obligations do not eventually constrain future R&D flexibility.
The price-to-sales ratio is frequently misapplied to Ascentage, as it obscures the reality that the company's revenue is driven by non-recurring licensing milestones rather than sustainable commercial product sales, leading to a potentially distorted view of the company's true underlying commercial value.
Analysts should instead focus on the R&D-to-revenue ratio and the cash burn rate, as these metrics provide a more accurate picture of the company's operational sustainability. Relying on P/S multiples in a milestone-heavy business model risks overestimating the company's current commercial traction and underestimating the volatility inherent in its revenue recognition.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AAPG stock.
Ascentage Pharma Group International's current P/E ratio is -8.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Ascentage Pharma Group International's return on equity (ROE) is -150.2%. The historical average is -171.2%.
Based on historical data, Ascentage Pharma Group International is trading at a P/E of -8.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ascentage Pharma Group International has 76.4% gross margin and -211.1% operating margin.