Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.1x · EV/EBITDA 36.3x · ROE 39.9%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.4B | $4.6B | $3.1B | $5.1B | $2.6B | $3.7B | $8.4B | $6.3B | $2.0B | $3.7B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.2B | $4.5B | $2.8B | $5.0B | $2.5B | $3.7B | $8.1B | $6.1B | $1.9B | $3.6B | $3.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.10 | 11.66 | 13.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.06 | 4.27 | 3.19 | 7.06 | 4.98 | 7.74 | 19.04 | 18.57 | 9.15 | 29.56 | 192.80 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.55 | 3.73 | 4.17 | 11.88 | 6.43 | 6.93 | 13.41 | 9.01 | 4.27 | 11.01 | 6.45 |
| P/FCF | 41.41 | 43.53 | 19.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 39.65 | 41.67 | 19.36 | 307.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.15 | 2.91 | 6.88 | 4.87 | 7.57 | 18.41 | 18.04 | 8.54 | 29.00 | 183.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 36.28 | 38.19 | 11.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 40.35 | 32.05 | 33.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 42.34 | 17.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 91.7% | 91.7% | 91.5% | 93.7% | 98.0% | 96.0% | 95.3% | 94.2% | 91.8% | 89.5% | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 9.8% | 24.1% | -10.1% | -43.2% | -35.2% | -64.9% | -72.7% | -110.6% | -234.1% | -1574.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 36.5% | 36.5% | 23.6% | -8.4% | -41.8% | -34.7% | -63.7% | -69.4% | -109.6% | -231.7% | -1565.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 39.9% | 39.9% | 38.9% | -14.7% | -45.9% | -28.7% | -42.5% | -39.9% | -60.2% | -67.8% | -75.6% |
| ROA | 28.4% | 28.4% | 23.4% | -9.2% | -33.5% | -22.6% | -36.0% | -35.6% | -53.0% | -61.2% | -69.3% |
| ROIC | 10.0% | 10.0% | 45.2% | -17.0% | -41.6% | -31.6% | -49.4% | -42.8% | -60.8% | -70.7% | -90.5% |
| ROCE | 10.1% | 10.1% | 35.8% | -15.3% | -41.9% | -26.6% | -41.4% | -41.5% | -60.6% | -68.5% | -75.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.01 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.10 | -0.37 | -0.30 | -0.13 | -0.15 | -0.44 | -0.26 | -0.28 | -0.21 | -0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.08 | -1.08 | -1.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.19 | -1.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($178M) exceeds total debt ($52M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.83 | 3.83 | 2.38 | 2.42 | 4.04 | 6.43 | 6.77 | 10.16 | 8.83 | 7.62 | 12.87 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.71 | 3.71 | 2.32 | 2.28 | 3.99 | 6.35 | 6.68 | 10.08 | 8.76 | 7.51 | 12.77 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.96 | 2.96 | 1.91 | 1.73 | 3.32 | 5.42 | 5.96 | 9.32 | 7.95 | 6.96 | 12.42 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.69 | 0.81 | 0.97 | 0.88 | 0.69 | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.57 | 2.57 | 3.73 | 1.28 | 1.53 | 2.43 | 2.12 | 3.09 | 4.50 | 2.49 | 1.06 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 50.49 | 39.90 | 51.43 | 44.51 | 49.26 | 41.55 | 40.77 | 45.32 | 53.86 | 150.37 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.0% | 8.6% | 7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.4% | 2.3% | 5.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $171M | $166M | $164M | $162M | $160M | $157M | $147M | $127M | $123M | $116M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ACAD stock.
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 11.1x. The historical average is 9.4x. This places it at the 33th percentile of its historical range.
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 36.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 17.3x.
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 39.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -46.5%.
Based on historical data, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. is trading at a P/E of 11.1x. This is at the 33th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. has 91.7% gross margin and 9.8% operating margin.
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Medicare pricing and pipeline concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Stability Masks Operating Leverage
Gross margin held at 90.8% in 2026Q2, but operating margin swung to 12.3% from -1.7% in 2026Q1, reflecting SG&A leverage, as reported in quarterly results.
The stability of gross margin near 91% underscores the low marginal cost of manufacturing specialty CNS drugs, but the real story is the operating margin recovery. The 14-percentage-point swing in operating margin between Q1 and Q2 2026 suggests that the company is gaining traction in controlling SG&A relative to revenue, a trend that may continue if Daybue's launch scales. However, the net margin of 10.2% in 2026Q2 is still modest for a biotech with such high gross margins, indicating that the cost structure remains heavy with R&D and commercialization expenses. Investors should monitor whether the operating leverage is sustainable or if it reflects one-time cost controls.
Return on Capital Inflects on Operating Efficiency
ROIC improved to 2.8% in 2026Q2 from -0.3% in 2026Q1, per reported figures, but remains below the cost of capital, indicating early-stage value creation.
The return on invested capital has been volatile, with a spike to 24.6% in 2024Q4 driven by a one-time gain, but the underlying trend shows a gradual improvement from negative territory in early 2026. The 2026Q2 ROIC of 2.8% is still far below the cost of capital, suggesting that the company is not yet generating economic profits on its invested capital. The improvement is driven by margin expansion rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover has remained low at 0.18. This implies that the company's capital base is growing faster than its operating income, a common pattern for commercial-stage biotechs investing in pipeline and infrastructure. The key question is whether the recent revenue acceleration can translate into sustained ROIC above the cost of capital.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves but Remains Stretched
Cash conversion cycle improved to 58 days in 2026Q2 from 128 days in 2026Q1, per reported data, driven by faster inventory turnover and extended payables.
The cash conversion cycle has been highly volatile, ranging from 58 to 275 days over the past ten quarters, reflecting the lumpy nature of specialty pharmaceutical sales and inventory management. The recent improvement to 58 days is notable, as it suggests better alignment between receivables collection, inventory holding, and supplier payments. However, the DSO of 46 days and DIO of 103 days remain elevated, indicating that the company may be carrying excess inventory or facing slower collections from payers. The extension of DPO to 91 days suggests the company is leveraging supplier terms to fund operations, which may not be sustainable if suppliers tighten credit. Investors should watch whether the CCC can stabilize at lower levels, as working capital swings have historically distorted cash flow.
Minimal Leverage Masks Strategic Flexibility
Debt-to-equity remains low at 0.06 in 2026Q2, with D/EBITDA at 1.80, per reported figures, indicating ample balance sheet capacity for future investments.
ACAD's leverage is minimal, with total debt of $73.9 million against a growing equity base, resulting in a D/E ratio of 0.06. The D/EBITDA ratio of 1.80 is modest, suggesting that the company's debt service is comfortable, though interest coverage data is unavailable. The low leverage provides strategic flexibility, allowing the company to fund pipeline development or potential acquisitions without immediate refinancing risk. However, the company has historically relied on equity financing, and if cash reserves dwindle, future dilution could be a concern. The recent improvement in cash flow and the strong balance sheet position suggest that the company is not under financial stress, but the lack of interest coverage data warrants monitoring.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens Amid Revenue Growth
Current ratio improved to 3.39 in 2026Q2 from 2.04 in 2024Q1, with cash at $385.0 million, per reported balance sheets, providing a robust cushion.
The current ratio has steadily improved over the past two years, reaching 3.39 in 2026Q2, indicating that current assets comfortably cover current liabilities. The quick ratio of 3.30 suggests that the liquidity is not dependent on inventory, which is a positive sign for a company with high inventory days. Cash and cash equivalents have more than doubled since 2024Q1, providing a strong buffer against operational shocks or unexpected clinical trial costs. However, the company's reliance on U.S. reimbursement and the potential for Medicare price negotiation could pressure cash flows in the future. The strong liquidity position suggests that the company can weather near-term uncertainties, but investors should monitor whether the cash balance is being deployed efficiently.
P/E Misleads on Earnings Quality
The trailing P/E of 12.86 is misleading due to one-time gains and stock-based compensation, per reported figures, obscuring the true earnings power.
The trailing P/E of 12.86 appears attractive, but it is distorted by a one-time gain in 2024Q4 that inflated net income, as well as significant stock-based compensation charges that reduce reported earnings. The forward P/E of 51.66 provides a more realistic view of the market's expectations for future earnings, but it still relies on projections that may not materialize. A more appropriate valuation metric for ACAD would be EV/EBITDA, which at 42.18 reflects the company's operating performance before non-cash charges and capital structure effects. However, even EV/EBITDA is elevated, suggesting that the market is pricing in significant growth from Daybue and the pipeline. Investors should focus on cash flow-based metrics, such as P/FCF, which at 47.96 indicates that the market is paying a premium for the company's cash generation potential.