Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 18.5x · EV/EBITDA 6.6x · ROE 19.3%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $902M | $985M | $908M | $891M | $702M | $1.2B | $839M | $773M | $622M | $360M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.0B | $1.4B | $1.1B | $997M | $872M | $538M |
| P/E Ratio → | 18.47 | 19.02 | 26.05 | 19.38 | 9.51 | 39.45 | — | — | 58.82 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 1.68 | 2.65 | 1.80 | 1.86 | 1.45 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.50 | 3.60 | 3.50 | 4.49 | 3.93 | 7.78 | 6.56 | — | 1.41 | 0.83 |
| P/FCF | 14.56 | 15.91 | 16.61 | 17.55 | 11.59 | 15.21 | — | 31.21 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 5.98 | 6.53 | 7.49 | 6.73 | 6.50 | 11.13 | — | 16.97 | 4417.78 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.05 | 1.87 | 3.32 | 2.33 | 2.60 | 2.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.61 | 7.06 | 7.76 | 7.04 | 7.10 | 11.76 | 55.57 | 17.28 | 14.45 | 13.00 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.36 | 12.09 | 13.63 | 11.86 | 8.77 | 23.19 | — | 422.99 | 35.06 | 28.54 |
| EV / FCF | — | 21.28 | 22.35 | 23.09 | 16.83 | 16.97 | — | 40.27 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 31.8% | 31.8% | 30.2% | 30.2% | 30.8% | 32.8% | 33.3% | 34.2% | 35.1% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 8.2% | 7.4% | 9.2% | 10.0% | 9.6% | -7.8% | 3.1% | 7.4% | 7.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.9% | 3.9% | 2.9% | 3.9% | 7.6% | 4.3% | -0.1% | -8.6% | 3.2% | -0.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 19.3% | 19.3% | 15.4% | 24.2% | 44.0% | 22.0% | -1.0% | -18.5% | 2.5% | -0.1% |
| ROA | 4.7% | 4.7% | 3.6% | 5.1% | 10.0% | 5.2% | -0.1% | -7.6% | 2.4% | -0.1% |
| ROIC | 13.8% | 13.8% | 12.9% | 16.5% | 18.2% | 16.4% | -7.1% | 2.6% | 3.1% | 2.2% |
| ROCE | 11.3% | 11.3% | 10.5% | 13.6% | 14.7% | 12.9% | -4.9% | 2.9% | 5.5% | 4.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.30 | 2.30 | 2.30 | 2.73 | 3.04 | 2.16 | 2.70 | — | 0.57 | 0.41 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.37 | 3.37 | 3.78 | 3.26 | 3.77 | 2.92 | 18.30 | 6.06 | 4.16 | 4.31 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.22 | 1.21 | 1.42 | 1.78 | 0.90 | 1.65 | — | 0.57 | 0.41 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.78 | 1.78 | 1.99 | 1.69 | 2.21 | 1.22 | 11.18 | 3.89 | 4.15 | 4.30 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.37 | 5.75 | 5.53 | 5.24 | 1.76 | — | 9.06 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 2.94 | 2.94 | 2.50 | 2.98 | 5.38 | 4.67 | -0.26 | 0.18 | 2.58 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.61 | 2.61 | 2.76 | 2.85 | 3.33 | 3.45 | 2.90 | 2.76 | 404.05 | 3.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.55 | 2.55 | 2.69 | 2.78 | 3.25 | 3.45 | 2.90 | 2.76 | 404.05 | 3.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.26 | 2.26 | 2.38 | 2.39 | 2.85 | 3.21 | 2.57 | 2.48 | 365.30 | 2.36 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.18 | 1.17 | 1.28 | 1.12 | 1.19 | 0.53 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.55 |
| Inventory Turnover | 110.33 | 110.33 | 105.82 | 106.39 | 96.66 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 6.39 | 3.13 | 4.20 | 4.20 | 2.54 | 3.85 | 3.33 | 2.29 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.4% | 5.3% | 3.8% | 5.2% | 10.5% | 2.5% | — | — | 1.7% | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.9% | 6.3% | 6.0% | 5.7% | 8.6% | 6.6% | — | 3.2% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 4.4% | 4.0% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 11.2% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.4% | 4.0% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 11.2% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $86M | $85M | $87M | $91M | $95M | $83M | $62M | $62M | $37M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ACEL stock.
Accel Entertainment, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 18.5x. The historical average is 28.7x. This places it at the 17th percentile of its historical range.
Accel Entertainment, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.7x.
Accel Entertainment, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 19.3%. The historical average is 12.0%.
Based on historical data, Accel Entertainment, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 18.5x. This is at the 17th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Accel Entertainment, Inc. has 31.8% gross margin and 8.2% operating margin.
Accel Entertainment, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Illinois regulatory concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margins Capped by Revenue Share
Gross margin has hovered near 31% for ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at 31.4%, reflecting statutory revenue-sharing with venues and state taxes, as reported in financial statements. Operating margin improved to 8.7% in 2026Q2, suggesting modest operating leverage.
The gross margin's narrow band around 31% underscores the structural ceiling imposed by mandated splits, leaving little room for expansion without legislative changes. Operating margin's uptick to 8.7% from 8.0% a year earlier indicates that SG&A discipline is partially offsetting the fixed cost base. Net margin volatility, swinging from 2.2% to 4.7% over the past year, appears driven by non-operating items and tax effects rather than core operations, warranting a focus on EBITDA as the cleaner earnings measure.
ROIC Stuck in Low Single Digits
ROIC has remained between 2.9% and 4.0% over the past ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at 4.0%, according to reported figures. This suggests the company is not compounding returns on invested capital, likely due to heavy acquisition-related intangibles.
Despite record revenue, ROIC's persistence in the 3-4% range indicates that each dollar of invested capital is generating minimal incremental return, a concern for a growth-through-M&A strategy. The gap between ROIC and the cost of capital appears narrow, implying that acquisitions may be value-accretive only if synergies materialize. Investors should monitor whether the Century Gaming integration and Nebraska/Georgia expansions can lift ROIC above the 5% threshold, as the current level suggests limited economic profit.
Negative CCC Reflects Route Model
The cash conversion cycle has been consistently negative, at -7 days in 2026Q2, based on reported figures, driven by a DPO of 18 days and minimal inventory. This indicates Accel collects cash from gaming operations before paying suppliers, a structural advantage of the route model.
The negative CCC, ranging from -8 to -12 days over the past year, highlights the working capital efficiency inherent in the distributed gaming model, where player payouts are settled immediately but venue and tax payments lag. Asset turnover remains low at 0.34, reflecting the capital intensity of route hardware and intangibles, but the negative CCC partially offsets this by reducing the need for external funding. The slight lengthening of CCC from -12 to -7 days over the past year suggests a modest deterioration in working capital management, though it remains favorable.
Leverage Eases Despite Debt Growth
Debt-to-equity improved from 2.67 in 2024Q1 to 1.99 in 2026Q2, even as total debt rose to $573.3M, according to recent SEC filings. Interest coverage has strengthened to 4.29x in 2026Q2 from 2.71x a year earlier, indicating more comfortable debt service.
The improvement in D/E is driven by retained earnings growth, which nearly doubled to $213.4M, rather than debt reduction, suggesting the company is funding growth through internal accruals. Interest coverage at 4.29x, while still modest, has improved from 2.71x in 2024Q2, reflecting both higher EBITDA and potentially lower effective interest costs. However, D/EBITDA remains elevated at 10.88x, which appears high for the sector, though this may be distorted by the capitalization of route contracts; investors should verify the treatment of operating leases and amortization.
Liquidity Cushion Remains Solid
The current ratio stood at 2.47 in 2026Q2, with quick ratio at 2.40, according to reported figures, indicating ample short-term coverage. Cash of $255.5M provides a buffer for acquisitions and operational needs, though the ratio has declined from 3.05 in 2024Q2.
Liquidity remains robust, with current assets covering current liabilities nearly 2.5 times, and the quick ratio nearly identical, suggesting inventory is not a significant factor. The decline from 3.05 to 2.47 over two years indicates a gradual deployment of cash into growth initiatives, but the absolute cash balance still provides a cushion. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a regulatory tax hike, the liquidity position appears sufficient to absorb margin compression without immediate solvency concerns.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on Route Model
EV/EBITDA of 7.08x appears low, but this metric understates the true cost of the route model because it ignores capitalized location acquisition costs and amortization of route contracts, as reported in financial statements. Adjusted EBITDA may overstate cash generation.
The market often compares ACEL to traditional casinos using EV/EBITDA, but the company's heavy investment in route contracts and intangibles means EBITDA does not capture the full capital outlay required to maintain and grow the network. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDAR or EV/(EBITDA - maintenance capex - cash taxes), which would likely show a higher multiple and a less attractive valuation. Additionally, the low P/S of 0.74 may mislead, as revenue is reported gross of taxes and venue splits, inflating the denominator; investors should use net revenue or gross profit for a more accurate comparison.