Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 8.4x · EV/EBITDA 9.4x · ROE 21.1%. (2002–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.7B | $25.3B | $18.6B | $16.9B | $14.0B | $9.7B | $5.8B | $8.4B | $5.9B | $8.8B | $7.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $68.8B | $67.4B | $62.8B | $61.9B | $59.1B | $58.6B | $33.4B | $37.8B | $34.2B | $35.6B | $33.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 8.35 | 6.75 | 8.87 | 5.39 | — | 9.75 | — | 7.29 | 5.80 | 8.18 | 7.54 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.07 | 3.09 | 2.33 | 2.23 | 2.00 | 2.12 | 1.30 | 1.69 | 1.23 | 1.75 | 1.57 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.63 | 1.38 | 1.08 | 1.02 | 0.87 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.89 | 0.66 | 1.02 | 0.92 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 10.79 | 5.12 | 6.15 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 4.96 | 4.69 | 3.42 | 3.22 | 2.71 | 2.64 | 2.73 | 2.69 | 2.07 | 2.80 | 2.33 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.23 | 7.85 | 8.16 | 8.43 | 12.76 | 7.44 | 7.65 | 7.12 | 7.06 | 6.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.39 | 9.78 | 9.37 | 9.73 | 10.21 | 14.82 | 8.51 | 8.62 | 8.45 | 8.57 | 8.13 |
| EV / EBIT | 16.21 | 11.10 | 13.98 | 11.66 | 74.44 | 24.38 | 14.64 | 13.96 | 14.43 | 14.67 | 14.10 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 45.48 | 30.76 | 35.30 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 59.8% | 59.8% | 57.6% | 57.3% | 54.2% | 55.2% | 56.2% | 60.2% | 55.7% | 55.0% | 52.9% |
| Operating Margin | 51.9% | 51.9% | 51.5% | 51.2% | 48.5% | 48.2% | 50.8% | 54.8% | 49.4% | 48.1% | 46.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 45.8% | 45.8% | 26.2% | 41.4% | -10.4% | 21.8% | -6.6% | 23.2% | 21.2% | 21.4% | 20.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 21.1% | 21.1% | 12.4% | 19.1% | -4.4% | 7.8% | -3.3% | 12.5% | 11.6% | 12.5% | 12.3% |
| ROA | 5.2% | 5.2% | 2.9% | 4.4% | -1.0% | 1.7% | -0.7% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 2.6% | 2.5% |
| ROIC | 5.2% | 5.2% | 5.0% | 4.7% | 4.0% | 3.3% | 4.5% | 5.3% | 4.9% | 5.2% | 5.0% |
| ROCE | 6.2% | 6.2% | 5.9% | 5.6% | 4.8% | 3.9% | 5.4% | 6.4% | 5.7% | 5.9% | 5.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.38 | 2.38 | 2.64 | 2.81 | 2.88 | 3.04 | 3.23 | 3.25 | 3.32 | 3.29 | 3.23 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.32 | 6.32 | 6.77 | 7.32 | 8.06 | 12.79 | 7.34 | 6.97 | 7.29 | 6.85 | 6.71 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.30 | 2.57 | 2.71 | 2.78 | 2.93 | 3.09 | 3.14 | 3.19 | 3.10 | 2.99 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.10 | 6.10 | 6.59 | 7.07 | 7.78 | 12.35 | 7.02 | 6.71 | 6.99 | 6.45 | 6.22 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 34.69 | 25.64 | 29.15 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 3.06 | 3.06 | 2.17 | 2.84 | 0.47 | 1.95 | 1.83 | 2.09 | 2.02 | 2.18 | 2.18 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 3.17 | 3.73 | 4.12 | 3.71 | 3.78 | 3.66 | 3.09 | 4.18 | 3.39 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 3.12 | 3.68 | 4.08 | 3.68 | 3.78 | 3.66 | 3.06 | 4.14 | 3.35 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 1.17 | 1.01 | 1.40 | 1.27 | 1.23 | 1.63 | 1.88 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 37.29 | 37.79 | 57.52 | 42.34 | — | 622.13 | 68.63 | 58.12 | 45.07 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 82.73 | 157.46 | 184.52 | 182.29 | 325.61 | 152.41 | 118.60 | 106.67 | 112.35 | 82.81 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 5.1% | 5.1% | 6.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 12.0% | 14.8% | 11.3% | 18.5% | — | 10.3% | — | 13.7% | 17.2% | 12.2% | 13.3% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 9.3% | 19.5% | 16.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 9.5% | 10.0% | 8.2% | 15.6% | 0.1% | 0.8% | 2.2% | 7.7% | 14.2% | 12.9% | 12.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 10.1% | 10.8% | 8.9% | 15.6% | 0.1% | 0.8% | 2.2% | 7.7% | 14.2% | 12.9% | 12.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $176M | $194M | $228M | $240M | $149M | $128M | $136M | $149M | $167M | $190M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 24 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AER stock.
AerCap Holdings N.V.'s current P/E ratio is 8.4x. The historical average is 8.4x. This places it at the 56th percentile of its historical range.
AerCap Holdings N.V.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.1x.
AerCap Holdings N.V.'s return on equity (ROE) is 21.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -4.8%.
Based on historical data, AerCap Holdings N.V. is trading at a P/E of 8.4x. This is at the 56th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
AerCap Holdings N.V.'s current dividend yield is 0.64% with a payout ratio of 5.1%.
AerCap Holdings N.V. has 59.8% gross margin and 51.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
AerCap Holdings N.V.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage tied to fleet funding
Low Multiples Reflect Leverage Discount
Based on reported figures, AER trades at a 7.80 trailing P/E and 7.17 forward EV/EBITDA, multiples that sit well below the 14.64 to 19.90 EV/EBITDA range of GATX and FTAI, and well below its own 2024 to 2025 trough-period levels.
The discount appears to reflect the market's concern with a 2.32 debt-to-equity ratio and roughly $43.3B of total debt rather than near-term earnings momentum alone. A forward P/E of 7.93 near the trailing 7.80 implies the market is not pricing meaningful earnings expansion, which suggests investors are treating current net income as reasonably representative. Investors should monitor whether the valuation gap versus Air Lease, at 7.00 P/E and 9.66 EV/EBITDA, narrows as leverage declines.
Net Margin Overstates Operating Earning Power
Operating margin of 59.3% in 2026Q3 is far more stable than the 64.2% and 66.7% net margins reported in 2025Q3 and 2025Q2, suggesting non-operating items are inflating bottom-line profitability in some periods.
Gross margin ranged from 32.0% to 66.3% across ten quarters, a volatility that points to pricing and cost-timing sensitivity rather than a steady earnings base. Net margin exceeding operating margin in several quarters indicates that reported net income depends on items outside core leasing operations, which may not recur. Operating margin is therefore the more reliable gauge of underlying earning power for this model.
Deleveraging Driven by Retained Earnings
According to recent SEC filings, AER's debt-to-equity ratio eased from 2.69 in 2025Q1 to 2.32 in 2026Q3, while interest coverage improved from 2.48 to 2.89, indicating debt service is becoming somewhat more comfortable.
The improvement is largely the result of equity compounding through retained earnings rather than debt reduction, which means the leverage trend remains sensitive to the durability of net income. Interest coverage below 3.0 times is thin for a business carrying this debt load, leaving limited room if lease rates or utilization weaken. Refinancing exposure and covenant headroom are not fully visible in the supplied data and warrant further investigation.
Sub-1.0 Current Ratio Relies on Fleet Financing
As reported in financial statements, AER's current ratio of 0.78 in 2026Q3 sits below 1.0, though it has risen from 0.61 in 2025Q4 alongside cash growth to $2.7B.
A current ratio below 1.0 is common for lessors whose aircraft are long-lived and whose debt is structured around fleet funding, so the figure alone does not signal distress. The sharp rise in cash balance from $1.5B at year-end 2025 improves near-term coverage, but the position still depends on continued access to refinancing markets. Under severe stress, the company's liquidity would likely rely heavily on lease cash flows and funding availability that the supplied data does not fully characterize.
Asset Turnover Misreads Fleet Economics
Asset turnover of 0.03 and a negative cash conversion cycle of -129 days are frequently read as efficiency signals for AER, but for an aircraft lessor these figures primarily reflect the capital-heavy nature of the fleet rather than operating performance.
Lessors are commonly evaluated on working capital metrics borrowed from manufacturing or retail, yet AER's inventory-like aircraft assets are held as long-lived lease assets, not turned over. A negative cash conversion cycle here reflects lease prepayments and payables timing more than supplier leverage, and it should not be read as a sign of working capital strength. A more appropriate lens is lease yield on net book value, utilization, and fleet age, which the supplied ratio set does not capture.