Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 26.2x · EV/EBITDA 16.9x · ROE 5.8%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.1B | $11.9B | $13.8B | $13.0B | $10.5B | $14.2B | $9.2B | $7.9B | $5.8B | $5.8B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $16.1B | $16.9B | $18.6B | $17.5B | $15.0B | $18.0B | $11.9B | $10.7B | $8.6B | $8.2B | $7.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 26.21 | 27.20 | 34.65 | 35.60 | 42.45 | 106.37 | 107.14 | 90.38 | 249.37 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.95 | 6.38 | 7.97 | 8.03 | 7.07 | 10.89 | 7.86 | 6.94 | 5.44 | 6.01 | 5.59 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.49 | 1.54 | 1.75 | 1.70 | 1.47 | 2.11 | 1.42 | 1.31 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 |
| P/FCF | 14.89 | 15.96 | 19.96 | 21.56 | 20.01 | 30.03 | 24.95 | 20.34 | 16.39 | 16.56 | 19.56 |
| P/OCF | 12.85 | 13.77 | 16.97 | 17.65 | 15.84 | 23.85 | 19.43 | 17.17 | 14.22 | 14.95 | 17.61 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 9.07 | 10.76 | 10.75 | 10.07 | 13.84 | 10.18 | 9.42 | 8.03 | 8.54 | 8.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.87 | 17.70 | 13.80 | 13.86 | 12.99 | 17.81 | 13.06 | 12.03 | 10.12 | 10.46 | 10.72 |
| EV / EBIT | 35.69 | 24.23 | 46.41 | 49.49 | 48.78 | 66.40 | 51.56 | 45.26 | 38.30 | 41.22 | 50.26 |
| EV / FCF | — | 22.68 | 26.96 | 28.87 | 28.50 | 38.18 | 32.31 | 27.60 | 24.17 | 23.54 | 30.72 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 3.4% | 3.4% | 55.6% | 54.4% | 53.8% | 53.8% | 53.1% | 53.7% | 54.1% | 55.3% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | 24.2% | 24.2% | 50.6% | 49.7% | 49.1% | 49.4% | 49.0% | 49.9% | 50.7% | 51.7% | 51.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 24.3% | 24.3% | 23.9% | 23.4% | 18.3% | 14.5% | 12.0% | 12.5% | 10.1% | 8.4% | 0.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.3% | 5.1% | 3.9% | 2.9% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 0.2% |
| ROA | 3.4% | 3.4% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 2.4% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 1.6% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 0.1% |
| ROIC | 2.7% | 2.7% | 5.3% | 5.1% | 4.9% | 4.9% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.6% | 4.8% |
| ROCE | 3.4% | 3.4% | 6.9% | 6.8% | 6.7% | 6.6% | 6.3% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 6.1% | 6.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.59 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.36 | 5.36 | 3.73 | 3.56 | 3.93 | 3.85 | 3.13 | 3.21 | 3.29 | 3.16 | 4.06 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.57 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.25 | 5.25 | 3.58 | 3.51 | 3.87 | 3.80 | 2.98 | 3.16 | 3.26 | 3.10 | 3.90 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.72 | 7.00 | 7.31 | 8.48 | 8.15 | 7.36 | 7.26 | 7.78 | 6.97 | 11.17 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.77 | 3.77 | 2.42 | 2.52 | 2.28 | 2.37 | 1.98 | 1.85 | 1.83 | 1.77 | 1.17 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 62.90 | 62.90 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 1.31 | 1.03 | 0.45 | 0.61 | 1.70 |
| Quick Ratio | 62.90 | 62.90 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 1.31 | 1.03 | 0.45 | 0.61 | 1.70 |
| Cash Ratio | 24.93 | 24.93 | 0.50 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.53 | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.75 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.9% | 3.7% | 2.8% | 2.5% | 2.4% | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.7% | 1.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 98.5% | 98.5% | 93.0% | 84.0% | 92.4% | 77.3% | 43.5% | 42.4% | 53.9% | 48.0% | 719.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.8% | 3.7% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.4% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.7% | 6.3% | 5.0% | 4.6% | 5.0% | 3.3% | 4.0% | 4.9% | 6.1% | 6.0% | 5.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.4% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.5% | 3.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 2.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.2% | 5.0% | 2.8% | 2.5% | 3.9% | 4.5% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 1.6% | 0.7% | 2.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $371M | $368M | $362M | $350M | $326M | $307M | $300M | $294M | $264M | $234M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AMH stock.
American Homes 4 Rent's current P/E ratio is 26.2x. The historical average is 63.4x.
American Homes 4 Rent's current EV/EBITDA is 16.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 17.6x.
American Homes 4 Rent's return on equity (ROE) is 5.8%. The historical average is 1.8%.
Based on historical data, American Homes 4 Rent is trading at a P/E of 26.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
American Homes 4 Rent's current dividend yield is 3.89% with a payout ratio of 98.5%.
American Homes 4 Rent has 3.4% gross margin and 24.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
American Homes 4 Rent's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Interest rate sensitivity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium P/FFO Reflects Development Optionality
AMH trades at 20.6x forward FFO, a premium to INVH's 17.7x EV/EBITDA, as per market data, suggesting investors are paying for the built-to-rent pipeline's growth potential.
The P/FFO multiple has remained remarkably stable between 20.6x and 21.2x over the past ten quarters, indicating the market has consistently priced AMH's development platform at a premium to its acquisition-focused peers. This premium appears justified if the built-to-rent strategy delivers the anticipated lower maintenance capex and higher NOI margins, but it leaves little room for execution missteps. The implied cap rate, derived from NOI and enterprise value, sits below private market transaction cap rates for single-family rentals, suggesting the stock may be pricing in superior growth that has yet to fully materialize in same-store metrics.
NOI Margin Volatility Masks Core Stability
NOI margin swung from 58.4% in Q2 2026 to 3.5% in Q1 2026, as per financial statements, yet the 10-quarter average near 55% indicates the anomaly is likely a data classification issue.
The extreme quarterly volatility in NOI margin—ranging from 3.5% to 58.4%—appears inconsistent with a stable rental portfolio and likely reflects a reclassification of property-level expenses or a one-time charge in Q1 2026. Excluding that outlier, the underlying NOI margin has been remarkably consistent, hovering between 53.6% and 58.4%, which suggests the mature same-store portfolio is generating steady profitability. FFO per share growth of 3.7% year-over-year in Q2 2026, outpacing revenue growth of 2.8%, indicates that expense discipline is driving modest margin expansion, though the sustainability of this in an inflationary environment warrants monitoring.
Payout Ratio Provides Modest Cushion
FFO payout ratio of 50.1% in Q2 2026, as reported, indicates AMH retains nearly half of its FFO, though AFFO coverage is thinner at 1.8x, leaving a moderate safety margin.
The FFO payout ratio has trended upward from 38.6% in Q4 2024 to 50.1% in Q2 2026, suggesting that dividend growth is outpacing FFO growth, which could pressure the payout ratio if FFO growth stalls. However, AFFO coverage of 2.0x in Q2 2026, up from 1.8x a year earlier, indicates that after accounting for maintenance capex, the dividend is well covered. The retained cash flow, approximately $122M in Q2 2026, provides a buffer for reinvestment or debt reduction, but investors should monitor whether the rising payout ratio signals a shift toward returning more capital to shareholders at the expense of growth.
Leverage Creeps Higher, Coverage Adequate
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.69 in Q2 2026 from 0.59 in Q1 2024, as per SEC filings, while interest coverage of 2.51x remains thin but stable, indicating manageable refinancing risk.
The gradual increase in leverage, from 0.59 to 0.69 over ten quarters, reflects the capital intensity of the built-to-rent development pipeline, which requires funding ahead of stabilization. Interest coverage of 2.51x in Q2 2026 is below the 3.0x level often considered comfortable for REITs, but it has remained above 2.0x throughout the period, suggesting that operating cash flow is sufficient to service debt. The company's exposure to floating-rate debt and upcoming maturities, combined with a higher-for-longer rate environment, could pressure coverage ratios, though the recent EPS beat and guidance raise suggest some cushion.
Purpose-Built Shift Enhances Efficiency
Property, plant and equipment of $11.7B, as reported, represents 89% of total assets, with the built-to-rent strategy likely reducing maintenance capex and improving tenant retention.
The concentration of assets in newer, purpose-built communities, as opposed to scattered-site homes, appears to be a structural advantage that may lower turnover costs and maintenance expenditures over time. This shift is reflected in the stable same-store NOI margin of approximately 58% in recent quarters, which suggests the mature portfolio is operating efficiently. However, geographic concentration in Sunbelt markets like Atlanta and Phoenix exposes AMH to localized economic downturns, and the increasing legislative scrutiny of institutional landlords could impose compliance costs that erode margins.
P/E Misleads; FFO Is the Correct Lens
AMH's P/E of 29.28, as per market data, is distorted by non-cash depreciation, whereas P/FFO of 20.6x provides a truer valuation, highlighting the need for FFO-based metrics.
The standard P/E ratio for AMH is deeply misleading because GAAP net income is reduced by substantial non-cash depreciation charges, which do not reflect the economic value of the real estate. In Q2 2026, FFO exceeded net income by 2.5x, underscoring the distortion. Investors should instead use P/FFO or P/AFFO, which adjust for depreciation and other non-cash items, to compare AMH against peers like INVH. Additionally, the reported gross margin of 3.37% is anomalous for a REIT and likely reflects a specific expense classification, so analysts should rely on NOI margin as the primary profitability metric.