Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.0x · EV/EBITDA 5.4x · ROE 17.4%. (2003–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.1B | $4.4B | $3.4B | $2.4B | $2.2B | $2.8B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $2.6B | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $3.5B | $2.9B | $1.8B | $608M | $1.5B | $2.7B | $78M | $1.8B | $2.5B | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.97 | 10.23 | 7.46 | 7.78 | 9.03 | 13.03 | 7.41 | 10.94 | 17.19 | 11.46 | 9.57 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.07 | 3.57 | 3.13 | 2.68 | 3.08 | 4.44 | 2.37 | 3.48 | 5.97 | 4.04 | 3.48 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.93 | 1.65 | 1.47 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 2.00 | 1.10 | 1.58 | 2.73 | 1.85 | 1.67 |
| P/FCF | 11.60 | 10.15 | 12.45 | 14.35 | 11.14 | 6.98 | 4.99 | 9.22 | 16.81 | 8.12 | 7.27 |
| P/OCF | 10.32 | 9.03 | 10.99 | 12.14 | 10.03 | 6.80 | 4.77 | 8.32 | 15.63 | 7.76 | 6.82 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.31 | 1.67 | 0.68 | 2.17 | 4.21 | 0.14 | 3.72 | 5.72 | 4.27 | 4.49 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.44 | 4.46 | 2.70 | 1.33 | 4.21 | 7.93 | 0.26 | 7.92 | 10.12 | 6.81 | 7.01 |
| EV / EBIT | 5.70 | 4.67 | 2.82 | 1.41 | 4.51 | 8.72 | 0.30 | 8.53 | 10.48 | 6.99 | 7.18 |
| EV / FCF | — | 6.58 | 6.65 | 3.65 | 7.86 | 6.63 | 0.29 | 9.85 | 16.10 | 8.57 | 9.39 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 95.5% | 95.5% | 97.0% | 97.3% | 96.6% | 96.2% | 92.6% | 94.4% | 94.1% | 97.1% | 97.0% |
| Operating Margin | 49.4% | 49.4% | 59.2% | 48.5% | 48.2% | 48.3% | 45.9% | 43.6% | 54.5% | 61.0% | 62.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 34.9% | 34.9% | 41.9% | 34.5% | 34.1% | 34.1% | 32.0% | 31.8% | 34.7% | 35.3% | 36.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.4% | 17.4% | 21.4% | 17.3% | 15.8% | 16.4% | 15.9% | 15.3% | 17.0% | 17.8% | 19.6% |
| ROA | 1.8% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| ROIC | 16.0% | 16.0% | 18.8% | 14.2% | 12.2% | 12.4% | 11.6% | 10.1% | 11.9% | 11.4% | 10.9% |
| ROCE | 18.1% | 18.1% | 21.4% | 15.0% | 11.6% | 12.4% | 13.1% | 12.0% | 15.3% | 15.0% | 14.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.86 | 1.20 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.99 | 1.54 | 1.71 | 1.61 | 2.74 | 2.06 | 2.99 | 3.90 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.58 | -0.68 | -0.93 | -0.39 | -0.10 | -1.04 | 0.11 | -0.12 | 0.10 | 0.48 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.43 | -2.43 | -2.36 | -3.91 | -1.76 | -0.42 | -4.29 | 0.51 | -0.45 | 0.36 | 1.58 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -3.58 | -5.80 | -10.70 | -3.28 | -0.35 | -4.70 | 0.63 | -0.71 | 0.45 | 2.12 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 1.15 | 6.47 | 3.86 | 1.81 | 1.36 | 2.25 | 3.14 | 3.61 |
Net cash position: cash ($1.9B) exceeds total debt ($373M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.4% | 9.8% | 13.4% | 12.9% | 11.1% | 7.7% | 13.5% | 9.1% | 5.8% | 8.7% | 10.4% |
| FCF Yield | 8.6% | 9.8% | 8.0% | 7.0% | 9.0% | 14.3% | 20.0% | 10.8% | 5.9% | 12.3% | 13.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.2% | 1.3% | 2.9% | 2.0% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 2.9% | 3.3% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.2% | 1.3% | 2.9% | 2.0% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 2.9% | 3.3% | 1.4% | 0.4% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $58M | $59M | $61M | $61M | $61M | $61M | $62M | $64M | $65M | $64M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 23 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AX stock.
Axos Financial, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 12.0x. The historical average is 16.5x. This places it at the 57th percentile of its historical range.
Axos Financial, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 21.2x.
Axos Financial, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 17.4%. The historical average is 14.0%.
Based on historical data, Axos Financial, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 12.0x. This is at the 57th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Axos Financial, Inc. has 95.5% gross margin and 49.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Axos Financial, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.6x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Fee income volatility and efficiency ratio deterioration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
P/B Premium Reflects Structural Cost Advantage
At a P/B of 2.12, Axos trades at a significant premium to regional peers like Western Alliance (1.08) and Customers Bancorp (1.32), suggesting the market prices its branchless cost structure and consistent 10%+ book value growth as a sustainable competitive moat.
The P/B multiple implies the market expects Axos to generate a superior and durable return on tangible equity relative to its peers. This premium appears justified if the bank maintains its efficiency ratio advantage, which was 55.2% in Q4 2026 versus the typical 60%+ for traditional regionals. However, with the current ROE trending around 4.0-4.5% quarterly (approx. 16-18% annualized), the valuation requires continued double-digit growth in tangible book value to avoid multiple compression.
DuPont Analysis: Leverage Drives Returns, Not Margin
Axos's return on equity is primarily driven by high asset leverage (Equity/Assets of ~10.5%) rather than exceptional net interest margin, which at 1.1% in Q4 2026 is modest, indicating profitability hinges on scaling a lower-margin asset base efficiently.
The decomposition reveals a business model reliant on volume over spread. With NIM compressed between 1.0%-1.2% over the last ten quarters, the path to a high ROE is through a large, efficiently funded balance sheet and a low efficiency ratio. The recent spike in the efficiency ratio to 55.2% demonstrates how vulnerable the model is to non-interest income volatility, as a single weak quarter in the Securities segment can materially erode the profitability advantage created by the low-cost deposit franchise.
Efficiency Ratio Volatility Undermines Margin Stability
The efficiency ratio spiked sharply to 55.2% in Q4 2026 from a stable range of 44-48%, driven by a decline in non-interest income rather than rising expenses, highlighting that the bank's cost control is sound but its revenue mix remains inherently lumpy.
This volatility is a direct function of the Securities segment's transactional revenue. While the core banking efficiency is likely structurally low due to the digital model, the consolidated metric is unreliable for forecasting. The Q4 result suggests that in quarters where clearing and custody activity is subdued, the bank's profitability profile more closely resembles a traditional regional bank, temporarily eroding its key differentiator.
Provision Volatility Signals Unseen Risk Reassessment
Provision for loan losses surged to $41.0 million in Q3 2026 before retreating to $17.9 million in Q4, a pattern that may indicate a tactical reserve build for specific loan cohorts like jumbo mortgages or structured settlements, warranting close monitoring of future charge-off trends.
The provision swing, viewed alongside the prior period's strong credit performance, suggests management is proactively addressing potential stress in niche parts of the portfolio rather than reacting to widespread deterioration. For a bank specializing in non-conforming loans, this is a prudent approach, but the lack of disclosure on the specific loan types driving the reserve build makes it difficult to assess the true underlying risk. Investors should watch for any corresponding increase in non-performing loans in upcoming quarters to validate this hypothesis.
Digital Cost Structure Commands Valuation Premium
Axos trades at a P/B of 2.12 versus peers like Western Alliance at 1.08, a premium that appears justified by its structurally lower efficiency ratio and higher tangible book value growth trajectory, though its reported ROE is currently lower than some peers.
The valuation gap underscores the market's preference for the branchless scalability model over the traditional regional franchise. While peers like Banner Corporation may post a higher ROE, they operate with higher overhead and less deposit franchise stability. The key risk is that if Axos's ROE does not expand to the 12-15% annualized range achieved by peers, the premium valuation could become difficult to sustain, as investors may question whether the cost advantage is being fully translated into shareholder returns.
P/B Multiple Ignores Securities Portfolio Duration Risk
The P/B multiple of 2.12 is the most commonly misapplied ratio for Axos, as it does not adequately account for the substantial unrealized losses embedded in the $26.6 billion securities portfolio, which at 8.9x equity creates a significant duration mismatch.
Book value per share is presented as tangible and stable, but a significant portion of the asset base is held in investment securities subject to interest rate risk. The equity-to-assets ratio of 10.7% provides a thin buffer against potential mark-to-market volatility in this portfolio. A more appropriate metric for valuation in this context would be Price to Tangible Book Value adjusted for unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, which would provide a clearer picture of the economic capital supporting the balance sheet versus the stated book value.