Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 32.8x · EV/EBITDA 13.3x · ROE 16.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $17.6B | $14.6B | $17.0B | $18.2B | $16.4B | $31.9B | $31.1B | $22.0B | $16.2B | $13.5B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $23.4B | $20.4B | $22.1B | $26.1B | $25.2B | $39.5B | $37.8B | $28.3B | $22.2B | $20.0B | $19.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 32.75 | 16.05 | 4.24 | 25.79 | 22.73 | 36.33 | 53.25 | 38.96 | 35.64 | 33.79 | 53.61 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.16 | 1.11 | 1.44 | 1.52 | 1.07 | 2.29 | 2.65 | 1.92 | 1.39 | 1.23 | 1.34 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.36 | 2.70 | 2.87 | 4.75 | 4.64 | 8.66 | 9.32 | 7.29 | 4.55 | 3.34 | 3.42 |
| P/FCF | 29.15 | 18.55 | — | 22.29 | — | 938.96 | 97.53 | 23.15 | 21.60 | 14.65 | — |
| P/OCF | 13.91 | 11.58 | 147.75 | 9.79 | 57.83 | 18.14 | 21.73 | 14.21 | 10.34 | 9.14 | 62.46 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.55 | 1.87 | 2.17 | 1.65 | 2.84 | 3.22 | 2.47 | 1.91 | 1.82 | 2.10 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.29 | 10.15 | 13.72 | 14.02 | 14.97 | 20.45 | 19.18 | 16.82 | 13.67 | 10.47 | 16.65 |
| EV / EBIT | 16.80 | 13.90 | 26.36 | 24.31 | 20.86 | 30.97 | 39.67 | 30.15 | 23.43 | 24.58 | 43.11 |
| EV / FCF | — | 25.91 | — | 31.92 | — | 1162.31 | 118.63 | 29.74 | 29.61 | 21.73 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 14.9% | 15.6% | 14.3% | 11.5% | 14.6% | 16.0% | 14.5% | 13.5% | 13.9% | 14.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 10.6% | 8.4% | 9.8% | 6.6% | 8.8% | 11.1% | 8.7% | 7.9% | 10.8% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.9% | 6.9% | 34.0% | 5.9% | 4.7% | 6.3% | 5.0% | 4.9% | 3.9% | 3.4% | 2.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.1% | 16.1% | 82.1% | 19.2% | 19.9% | 25.0% | 18.4% | 17.2% | 11.9% | 9.9% | 11.0% |
| ROA | 4.9% | 4.9% | 21.7% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 4.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| ROIC | 9.4% | 9.4% | 6.5% | 7.3% | 6.4% | 8.7% | 10.1% | 8.0% | 6.9% | 8.4% | 6.3% |
| ROCE | 10.4% | 10.4% | 7.7% | 9.0% | 7.6% | 8.9% | 10.2% | 8.3% | 7.2% | 9.0% | 6.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.01 | 2.23 | 2.67 | 2.21 | 2.43 | 2.67 | 1.89 | 1.72 | 2.13 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.49 | 3.49 | 3.73 | 4.60 | 5.58 | 4.22 | 4.10 | 4.80 | 4.14 | 3.64 | 6.58 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.07 | 0.86 | 2.05 | 2.51 | 2.06 | 2.02 | 2.07 | 1.69 | 1.61 | 1.96 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.88 | 2.88 | 3.18 | 4.23 | 5.25 | 3.93 | 3.41 | 3.73 | 3.70 | 3.41 | 6.06 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 7.36 | — | 9.63 | — | 223.35 | 21.09 | 6.59 | 8.01 | 7.07 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 4.68 | 4.68 | 2.86 | 2.33 | 3.86 | 4.73 | 3.47 | 2.96 | 3.15 | 2.86 | 1.93 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 1.05 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.58 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.54 | 0.75 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.56 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.57 | 5.57 | 6.74 | 6.73 | 6.21 | 6.63 | 7.30 | 7.69 | 7.92 | 6.20 | 5.46 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 72.27 | 67.01 | 62.47 | 61.92 | 67.07 | 53.95 | 51.97 | 56.54 | 54.25 | 60.05 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 24.1% | 24.1% | 6.1% | 35.6% | 35.3% | 26.1% | 33.8% | 32.2% | 30.2% | 34.5% | 31.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.1% | 6.2% | 23.6% | 3.9% | 4.4% | 2.8% | 1.9% | 2.6% | 2.8% | 3.0% | 1.9% |
| FCF Yield | 3.4% | 5.4% | — | 4.5% | — | 0.1% | 1.0% | 4.3% | 4.6% | 6.8% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 7.5% | 9.0% | 10.1% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 2.4% | 0.2% | 4.4% | 4.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.7% | 10.5% | 11.5% | 1.4% | 5.3% | 3.1% | 0.8% | 5.2% | 5.4% | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $276M | $308M | $317M | $320M | $332M | $334M | $340M | $352M | $357M | $323M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BALL stock.
Ball Corporation's current P/E ratio is 32.8x. The historical average is 25.4x. This places it at the 69th percentile of its historical range.
Ball Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 13.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.0x.
Ball Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 16.1%. The historical average is 22.2%.
Based on historical data, Ball Corporation is trading at a P/E of 32.8x. This is at the 69th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ball Corporation's current dividend yield is 1.21% with a payout ratio of 24.1%.
Ball Corporation has 14.9% gross margin and 10.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Ball Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Aluminum pass-through margin lag
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Price in Earnings Recovery
Based on reported trailing figures, BALL trades at 20.28x trailing P/E and 11.74x EV/EBITDA, a premium to CCK's 19.10x P/E on earnings but a discount to its 9.04x EV/EBITDA, suggesting the market is paying up for near-term earnings momentum rather than current cash generation.
The gap between trailing P/E of 20.28 and forward P/E of 16.66 implies the market expects roughly 20% earnings growth over the next twelve months, consistent with the recent EPS beat and raised guidance. A PEG of 1.50 is not cheap for a conversion-margin business with a 14.9% gross margin, so the premium appears to rest on the expected durability of the specialty can mix and volume recovery rather than on the current P/FCF of 22.61. Investors should monitor whether forward earnings converge toward these estimates, since a miss would leave the multiple resting on a thin base.
Thin Conversion Margins Mask Volatility
According to reported quarterly figures, BALL's gross margin averaged roughly 15-18% over most of the period but fell to -1.8% in 2026Q3, while net margin swung between roughly -2% and 10%, indicating earnings are highly sensitive to pass-through timing.
Because aluminum costs are passed through to customers, revenue inflates without a matching profit increase, which compresses reported margin percentages and makes the headline gross margin a weak guide to earning power. The sharp 2026Q3 reversal to negative gross and operating margins may reflect lagging pass-through during a commodity spike rather than structural deterioration, but this inference cannot be confirmed from the supplied data. EBITDA per unit or operating profit per thousand cans would give a cleaner read on true operational efficiency than the percentage margins shown.
ROIC Recovering From a Low Base
Based on reported ratios, BALL's ROIC moved from roughly 1.1% in 2025Q2 to 2.0-2.6% in most other quarters and turned negative at -0.5% in 2026Q3, a level well below CCK's 14.1% and SEE's 11.2%.
The low absolute ROIC, held against a capital-heavy asset base in which net PPE and goodwill dominate total assets, indicates that the company is not yet earning a clear spread over its cost of capital on the capital it deploys. The ROE of 3.7-3.9% in recent quarters is supported by leverage rather than strong returns, which means the equity return is more fragile than headline ROE suggests. Sustained improvement would need margin recovery combined with better asset turnover, which at roughly 0.2x per quarter currently appears constrained.
Reported Leverage Metrics Conflict
As reported in the quarterly data, BALL's debt-to-equity ranged from 0.83 to 1.40 across the period and sits at 1.27 in 2026Q3, while interest coverage swung from roughly 1.1x to 22x, a dispersion too wide to read as a stable solvency trend.
The D/EBITDA reading of 84.70 in 2026Q3 and the negative interest coverage of -0.93x in the same quarter are consistent with the negative operating earnings in that period, but they are also the kind of figures that may reflect a temporary EBITDA trough rather than a change in debt service capacity. Taken together with the 1.29 debt-to-equity figure flagged elsewhere in the data, these readings warrant verification before drawing firm conclusions about refinancing risk. Investors should monitor whether interest coverage recovers toward the 10-15x range seen in several earlier quarters.
Current Ratio Holds But Cash Buffer Thins
Based on reported figures, BALL's current ratio has held near 1.0-1.1 and its quick ratio near 0.64-0.88 over the ten quarters, while the balance sheet data shows cash falling from about $1.4B in 2024Q3 to roughly $410M in 2026Q3.
A current ratio around 1.04 combined with a quick ratio of 0.64 indicates that the company depends on inventory and receivables converting to cash to meet current obligations, leaving limited headroom under a severe demand or pricing shock. The decline in cash, alongside acquisition outflows reported in recent quarters, suggests the liquidity buffer was partly redeployed rather than retained. Under stress, the thin quick ratio would likely make the business reliant on credit access, which the supplied data does not confirm.
Lagging Returns Versus Crown Holdings
According to peer figures, BALL's ROE of roughly 3.7% and ROIC of about 2.2% trail CCK's 23.2% ROE and 14.1% ROIC, while its 1.2% dividend yield sits below CCK's 0.9% only marginally, leaving the returns gap as the defining difference.
The return gap appears structural rather than temporary, since it persists across multiple quarters and reflects a capital base and margin profile that CCK has converted into materially higher returns. BALL's premium valuation relative to CCK on P/E therefore rests on expected recovery rather than on a demonstrated return advantage, which increases the sensitivity of the stock to execution. The comparison suggests the market is assigning value to strategic positioning and sustainability credentials that current ratios do not yet reflect.
Net Margin Misapplied to a Pass-Through Model
Net margin is the ratio most commonly misapplied to BALL, because aluminum pass-through inflates revenue and deflates the percentage, so a 5-6% net margin understates the operating economics per unit sold.
Net margin divides earnings by a revenue base that includes aluminum cost pass-through, which makes margin comparisons with CCK or AptarGroup misleading unless metal content is adjusted for. A more appropriate lens would be EBITDA or operating profit per thousand cans, which isolates conversion economics from commodity price moves. Investors relying on headline net margin may misjudge both the strength of the operating franchise during good periods and its exposure during pass-through lags.