Free cash flow remains deeply negative at -$71.5M in 2026Q2 (FCF margin -34.3%), despite revenue growth, with working capital swings of over $100M in several quarters obscuring true cash burn and stock-based compensation of $44.1M adding to dilution.
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) cash flow statement — 9-year operating, investing & financing cash flows
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 |
|---|
| Cash from Operations | -586.61M | -445.91M | -520.73M | -527.72M | -419.49M | -497.93M | -399.71M | -253.59M | -136.64M | -40.49M |
| Operating CF Margin % | - | -88.81% | -234.66% | -5672.58% | -540.25% | -714.23% | -4845.61% | -625.21% | - | - |
| Operating CF Growth % | -65.4% | 14.37% | 1.33% | -25.8% | 15.75% | -24.57% | -57.62% | -85.58% | -237.49% | - |
| Net Income | -696.24M | -724.93M | -543.35M | -643.2M | -484.65M | -586.45M | -505.49M | -288.58M | -169.45M | -43.83M |
| Depreciation & Amortization | 6.59M | 5.97M | 6.08M | 6.49M | 6.77M | 5.84M | 3.09M | 859K | 245K | 260K |
| Stock-Based Compensation | 111.95M | 133.02M | 95.8M | 0 | 91.56M | 99.5M | 58.46M | 21.37M | 6.07M | 1.84M |
| Deferred Taxes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -30.93M | -1.87M | -859K | -14.89M | -260K |
| Other Non-Cash Items | 96.85M | 191.09M | -111.3M | 103.93M | -61.25M | 18.5M | 31.16M | 24.54M | 18.89M | 260K |
| Working Capital Changes | -106.55M | -51.06M | 32.04M | 5.06M | 28.08M | -4.4M | 14.93M | -10.91M | 22.49M | 1.24M |
| Change in Receivables | -177.62M | -134.72M | -2.97M | 15.33M | 15.17M | -19.75M | 2.85M | -2.85M | 0 | 0 |
| Change in Inventory | -36.89M | -25.31M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.75M | -2.85M | 2.85M | 0 | 0 |
| Change in Payables | 1.07M | 26.61M | 1.51M | 2.78M | -349K | 2.83M | -735K | -4.66M | 16.7M | 1.58M |
| Cash from Investing | -34.14M | -24.49M | 60.78M | 54.03M | 453.15M | -200.83M | -52.99M | -217.25M | -21.04M | -464K |
| Capital Expenditures | -3.42M | -1.1M | -933K | -1.31M | -4.82M | -48.25M | -7.52M | -5.14M | -18.18M | -464K |
| CapEx % of Revenue | 0.49% | 0.22% | 0.42% | 14.04% | 6.21% | 69.2% | 91.14% | 12.67% | - | - |
| Acquisitions | 600K | 0 | -140K | 0 | 0 | -35M | 21.24M | -5.49M | -2.86M | 2.84M |
| Investments | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Investing | 2.3M | -6.19M | -7.97M | -503K | 118.5M | 48.65M | -21.09M | 784K | -2.86M | 0 |
| Cash from Financing | 247.36M | 359.29M | 748.46M | 451.54M | -13.13M | 736.45M | 447.19M | 398.79M | 501.55M | 112.98M |
| Debt Issued (Net) | 593.96M | 385.5M | 476.58M | 0 | -20.49M | 1.08B | 550M | 36.94M | 56.38M | 4.13M |
| Equity Issued (Net) | -183.31M | -14.13M | 307.21M | 442.93M | 3.29M | -204.75M | -75.71M | 366.24M | 430.53M | 107.02M |
| Dividends Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -997K | 0 | -1.15M |
| Share Repurchases | -210M | -48.28M | -7.53M | -6.88M | -1.56M | -204.75M | -75.71M | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Financing | -163.3M | -12.08M | -35.34M | 8.61M | 4.06M | -138.49M | -27.1M | -4.38M | 14.64M | 1.83M |
| Net Change in Cash | -373.16M | -111.1M | 288.51M | -22.15M | 20.52M | 37.69M | -5.52M | -72.05M | 343.87M | 72.03M |
| Free Cash Flow | -592.12M | -447.01M | -521.66M | -529.03M | -425.81M | -546.18M | -407.23M | -258.73M | -154.82M | -40.95M |
| FCF Margin % | -85.59% | -89.03% | -235.09% | -5686.62% | -548.39% | -783.44% | -4936.74% | -637.88% | - | - |
| FCF Growth % | 11.29% | 14.31% | 1.39% | -24.24% | 22.04% | -34.12% | -57.4% | -67.11% | -278.05% | - |
| FCF per Share | -3.02 | -2.27 | -2.80 | -3.25 | -2.89 | -3.78 | -3.45 | -2.46 | -1.68 | -0.44 |
| FCF Conversion (FCF/Net Income) | 0.85x | 0.61x | 0.97x | 0.82x | 0.87x | 0.89x | 0.89x | 0.97x | 1.05x | 1.32x |
| Interest Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61.11M | 54.44M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Taxes Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BBIO stock.
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) generated $-445.9M in net cash from operating activities in 2025. This reflects the cash generated directly from core business operations.
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) reported negative free cash flow of $447.0M in 2025, indicating capital requirements exceeded cash from operations.
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) spent $1.1M on capital expenditures in 2025. CapEx represents the cash invested in physical assets like property, plant, and equipment to maintain or grow the business.
In 2025, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) spent $48.3M on share repurchases. This shows the company's commitment to returning capital to its equity investors.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Commercial execution and cash burn
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Earnings Quality Masked by Working Capital Swings
Operating cash flow swung from -$219.5M in 2024Q1 to +$74.7M in 2024Q2, driven by a $246.4M working capital benefit, but 2026Q2 OCF/NI of 0.47 suggests persistent cash underperformance relative to losses.
The relationship between net income and operating cash flow is highly volatile, with working capital changes often dominating the gap. In 2024Q2, a $246.4M working capital inflow flipped OCF positive despite a net loss, but this reversed in subsequent quarters. The 2026Q2 OCF/NI of 0.47 indicates that cash burn is less severe than net losses, partly due to non-cash charges like SBC, yet the underlying trend remains negative.
FCF Deeply Negative Despite Revenue Inflection
Free cash flow remained deeply negative at -$71.5M in 2026Q2, with FCF margin of -34.3%, despite revenue surging to $208.5M, according to reported financials, indicating that commercial scaling has not yet translated into cash generation.
The FCF trajectory shows no improvement despite the Attruby launch; FCF margins have oscillated between -33.8% and -172.2% over the past ten quarters. The latest quarter's -34.3% margin is an improvement from prior quarters but still reflects heavy cash consumption. This suggests that while revenue is growing, operating expenses and working capital needs are absorbing the cash inflows, delaying any path to positive FCF.
Minimal CapEx Reflects Asset-Light Model
Capital expenditures averaged under $1M per quarter, with CapEx/Revenue below 2.4% in most periods, indicating a highly asset-light biotech model where R&D and commercialization costs, not physical assets, drive cash burn.
CapEx is negligible, never exceeding $2.9M in a quarter, which is typical for a biotech relying on outsourced manufacturing and partnerships. This means the cash burn is almost entirely operational, tied to R&D and SG&A. The low capital intensity suggests that future cash flow positivity will depend on revenue scaling and expense discipline rather than asset efficiency.
Working Capital Volatility Masks True Burn
Working capital changes swung from -$225.2M in 2024Q1 to +$246.4M in 2024Q2, and again to -$124.7M in 2026Q1, according to reported figures, indicating that collections and milestone timing significantly distort quarterly operating cash flow.
The working capital swings are large relative to the company's size, often exceeding $100M in a quarter. These swings likely reflect milestone payments from partners and timing of payables, not operational efficiency. Investors should focus on the underlying cash burn, which remains substantial, as evidenced by the cumulative negative OCF over the period.
Buybacks and Acquisitions Signal Strategic Shift
BridgeBio repurchased $127.5M of stock in 2026Q2 and $82.5M in 2026Q1, while paying no dividends, according to SEC filings, suggesting management is using cash to support share price despite ongoing operational losses.
The buyback activity is notable given the company's cash burn, indicating a deliberate capital allocation choice. This may be aimed at offsetting dilution from SBC, which totaled $44.1M in 2026Q2. However, with no dividends and minimal acquisition activity, the primary cash outflows remain operational, and the buybacks add to the cash consumption, potentially straining liquidity if losses persist.
Cumulative Losses Outpace Cash Burn
Over the past ten quarters, cumulative net losses exceeded $1.6B while operating cash flow was only -$1.2B, according to reported data, indicating that non-cash charges like SBC and working capital timing have narrowed the cash gap.
The cumulative divergence between net income and operating cash flow is significant, with OCF being less negative than net income by roughly $400M. This suggests that a portion of the losses are non-cash, such as stock-based compensation and depreciation. However, the cash burn remains substantial, and the company's ability to reach cash flow positivity will depend on whether revenue growth can outpace the still-heavy operating expenses.
What the Cash Flow Statement Obscures
Stock-based compensation totaled $44.1M in 2026Q2, and working capital swings of over $100M in several quarters, according to reported figures, may obscure the true cash burn and the impact of non-cash charges on reported losses.
The cash flow statement reveals that SBC is a significant non-cash expense, but it also masks the potential dilution to shareholders. Additionally, the large working capital swings, likely from milestone payments, can distort quarterly OCF, making it difficult to assess the underlying operational cash burn. Investors should adjust for these items to gauge the sustainability of the company's cash position.