Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -17.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.9B | $15.1B | $5.1B | $6.6B | $1.1B | $2.4B | $8.4B | $3.7B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $15.0B | $17.2B | $6.2B | $7.9B | $2.5B | $3.7B | $8.5B | $3.4B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -17.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 25.63 | 30.05 | 23.01 | 706.43 | 14.47 | 34.54 | 1017.17 | 90.82 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | 77.77 | 7.74 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 34.35 | 27.74 | 853.04 | 31.82 | 53.65 | 1034.11 | 84.12 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 94.4% | 94.4% | 98.3% | 73.7% | 95.6% | 95.5% | 100.0% | 93.8% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -113.3% | -113.3% | -267.2% | -6528.8% | -659.6% | -827.1% | -5752.0% | -656.4% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -145.3% | -145.3% | -241.4% | -6913.9% | -619.7% | -806.9% | -5439.7% | -642.1% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | -153.7% | -139.1% | — | — |
| ROA | -78.6% | -78.6% | -73.1% | -110.0% | -58.8% | -65.5% | -67.2% | -47.5% | -46.4% | -31.2% |
| ROIC | -524.0% | -524.0% | — | -738.8% | -135.1% | -121.1% | -157.6% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -80.6% | -80.6% | -101.6% | -134.4% | -74.3% | -77.6% | -80.5% | -53.1% | -70.4% | -49.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.60 | 0.19 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.29 | -0.57 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -12.84 | -12.84 | -4.46 | -7.04 | -5.03 | -11.54 | -12.79 | -31.92 | -72.11 | -3370.69 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.62 | 2.62 | 4.67 | 3.32 | 4.52 | 6.58 | 6.72 | 9.42 | 13.67 | 11.36 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.52 | 2.52 | 4.67 | 3.32 | 4.52 | 6.58 | 6.72 | 9.42 | 13.67 | 11.36 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.04 | 2.04 | 4.41 | 3.02 | 3.89 | 6.19 | 6.35 | 9.04 | 13.39 | 10.76 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.54 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.06 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.06 | 1.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 101.37 | 7.77 | 68.70 | 80.28 | 103.40 | — | 25.60 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 8.5% | 0.9% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 8.5% | 0.9% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $197M | $186M | $163M | $147M | $144M | $118M | $105M | $92M | $92M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BBIO stock.
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -17.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -17.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. has 94.4% gross margin and -113.3% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Commercial execution and cash burn
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margins Inflect but Losses Persist
Gross margin expanded to 101.8% in 2026Q2 from 64.6% in 2024Q4, yet operating margin remains deeply negative at -51.4%, reflecting heavy R&D and SG&A investment, as per reported financials.
The gross margin surge to 101.8% in 2026Q2, from 64.6% in 2024Q4, indicates a favorable product mix shift toward Attruby sales, but this has not translated into operating profitability. Operating margin improved from -120.1% in 2025Q4 to -51.4% in 2026Q2, suggesting early operating leverage, yet the absolute losses remain substantial. Net margin of -73.0% in 2026Q2, while improved from -127.9% in 2025Q4, still reflects significant non-operating charges and the high fixed-cost base of the hub-and-spoke model. Investors should monitor whether the pace of margin expansion can outpace the escalating SG&A and R&D costs as the commercial organization scales.
Working Capital Swings Distort Burn
Cash conversion cycle swung from -452 days in 2025Q1 to +56 days in 2026Q1, driven by volatile DSO and DPO, according to reported figures, indicating that working capital timing significantly distorts quarterly cash flow.
The cash conversion cycle (CCC) has been highly erratic, ranging from -452 days in 2025Q1 to +56 days in 2026Q1, with DSO spiking to 100 days in 2026Q2 and DPO fluctuating widely. This volatility suggests that milestone payments and supplier terms are creating large swings in working capital, masking the underlying cash burn. Asset turnover remains low at 0.16 in 2026Q2, reflecting the asset-light model where revenue is still small relative to the balance sheet base. The negative DIO in 2026Q2 (-1055 days) is likely an artifact of inventory accounting, but it underscores the need to focus on normalized cash burn rather than quarterly working capital movements.
Liquidity Cushion Thins Rapidly
Current ratio fell from 4.67 in 2024Q4 to 1.15 in 2026Q2, while cash declined to $677.9M, according to reported balance sheet data, indicating a shrinking liquidity buffer despite revenue growth.
The current ratio has deteriorated sharply from 4.67 in 2024Q4 to 1.15 in 2026Q2, as current liabilities have grown with the commercial build-out while cash has remained relatively flat. The quick ratio of 1.09 in 2026Q2 suggests that inventory is not a major liquidity concern, but the rapid decline in the current ratio indicates that the company is becoming more reliant on near-term cash flows to meet obligations. With a quarterly cash burn of approximately $71.5M in FCF in 2026Q2, the current cash position of $677.9M provides roughly 9-10 quarters of runway, assuming no additional financing. However, the negative equity of -$2.5B and the need to fund ongoing losses suggest that external capital will be required before reaching break-even, which may lead to further dilution.
Debt Refinancing Masks True Leverage
Total debt fell from $3.4B in 2026Q1 to $18.3M in 2026Q2, according to reported balance sheet data, suggesting a major conversion or repayment that may obscure the company's ongoing refinancing risk.
The dramatic reduction in total debt from $3.4B in 2026Q1 to $18.3M in 2026Q2 appears to reflect a major refinancing event, possibly a conversion of debt into equity, which would explain the deepening negative equity. While this reduces immediate interest expense and improves the debt-to-equity ratio on paper, the negative shareholders' equity of -$2.5B indicates that the company is still highly leveraged in a structural sense. Interest coverage remains negative at -1.35 in 2026Q2, meaning operating income is insufficient to cover interest costs, though the low debt level now reduces this risk. Investors should monitor the terms of any new financing, as the company's reliance on capital markets to fund operations suggests that future dilution or debt issuance is likely.
Peer Comparison Highlights Scale Gap
BridgeBio's P/S of 33.03 is far above peers like Vertex (P/S ~9.5) and Ultragenyx (P/S ~4.6), according to reported market data, reflecting market expectations for Attruby's growth but also pricing in significant execution risk.
BridgeBio's price-to-sales multiple of 33.03 is substantially higher than the peer group, including Vertex at ~9.5 and Ultragenyx at ~4.6, indicating that the market is pricing in a rapid revenue ramp for Attruby. However, the company's negative ROE and ROIC, which are in line with loss-making peers like Kymera and Arcus, suggest that the premium is based on future potential rather than current profitability. The gross margin of 101.8% is superior to most peers, reflecting the high-margin nature of rare disease drugs, but the operating margin of -51.4% is worse than some peers, indicating that the commercial infrastructure is still being built. The gap in profitability metrics may narrow if Attruby continues to gain market share, but the current valuation leaves little room for disappointment.
P/S Misleads in Pre-Commercial Biotech
The price-to-sales ratio of 33.03 is commonly misapplied to BridgeBio, as revenue is still driven by milestone payments and early Attruby sales, according to reported financials, obscuring the true earnings power.
The P/S ratio is often used to value biotech companies, but for BridgeBio, it is misleading because current revenue is not representative of steady-state earnings. In 2024Q4, revenue was only $5.9M, and the surge to $208.5M in 2026Q2 is largely due to the initial launch of Attruby, which may not be sustainable at the same growth rate. Additionally, the company's gross margin of 101.8% suggests that some revenue may include one-time milestone payments or other non-recurring items, which inflate the sales figure. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDA or a forward-looking revenue multiple that accounts for the potential peak sales of Attruby and the probability-adjusted value of the pipeline. Investors should also adjust for stock-based compensation and non-controlling interests to get a clearer picture of the underlying economics.