Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.6x · EV/EBITDA 7.0x · ROE 17.3%. (1991–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $155.2B | $139.2B | $56.1B | $54.2B | $37.2B | $37.6B | $32.9B | $37.1B | $35.1B | $57.0B | $44.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $141.4B | $127.1B | $140.6B | $151.0B | $67.6B | $79.1B | $70.8B | $103.5B | $78.7B | $110.8B | $114.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.60 | 13.79 | 5.79 | 7.06 | 6.13 | 8.76 | 35.29 | 11.87 | 6.96 | 18.48 | 13.54 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.69 | 3.77 | — | 1.62 | 1.33 | 1.63 | 1.48 | 1.59 | 1.49 | 2.21 | 1.71 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.38 | 2.25 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 1.07 | 0.81 |
| P/FCF | 10.36 | 10.58 | — | — | 1.75 | — | 0.86 | — | 4.90 | 79.81 | 9.56 |
| P/OCF | 9.11 | 9.30 | — | — | 1.57 | — | 0.84 | — | 4.05 | 27.73 | 6.74 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.44 | — | 4.52 | 2.41 | 3.44 | 3.18 | 4.45 | 3.34 | 4.31 | 4.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.00 | 7.16 | 8.30 | 10.92 | 5.83 | 9.33 | 10.83 | 12.27 | 9.15 | 13.33 | 14.58 |
| EV / EBIT | 7.66 | 7.83 | 9.13 | 12.16 | 6.58 | 10.92 | 13.48 | 14.68 | 10.40 | 15.99 | 17.83 |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.66 | — | — | 3.18 | — | 1.85 | — | 10.98 | 155.24 | 24.43 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 83.6% | 83.6% | 729.9% | 86.7% | 87.9% | 86.8% | 76.0% | 84.7% | 84.5% | 86.9% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 43.9% | 43.9% | -1689.1% | 37.2% | 36.6% | 31.5% | 23.6% | 30.3% | 32.1% | 26.9% | 24.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 28.5% | 28.5% | -1102.4% | 24.0% | 22.7% | 20.2% | 5.9% | 15.1% | 22.9% | 13.7% | 13.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.3% | 17.3% | 17.4% | 15.2% | 12.8% | 9.4% | 2.5% | 6.5% | 10.2% | 6.5% | 6.3% |
| ROA | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| ROIC | 7.0% | 7.0% | 5.3% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 3.3% | 2.4% | 3.2% | 3.6% | 3.1% | 2.6% |
| ROCE | 7.6% | 7.6% | 7.8% | 6.2% | 4.8% | 2.8% | 2.0% | 3.3% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.32 | 1.32 | 2.41 | 3.25 | 2.27 | 2.38 | 2.22 | 2.11 | 2.02 | 1.95 | 2.14 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.61 | 4.61 | 8.53 | 12.98 | 9.89 | 13.69 | 16.95 | 13.75 | 12.44 | 12.50 | 15.16 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.20 | 1.41 | 1.75 | 0.60 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 1.21 | 0.82 | 1.01 | 1.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.68 | -0.68 | 4.99 | 7.00 | 2.62 | 4.90 | 5.80 | 7.87 | 5.07 | 6.47 | 8.87 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.92 | — | — | 1.43 | — | 0.99 | — | 6.08 | 75.43 | 14.87 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
Net cash position: cash ($94.0B) exceeds total debt ($81.8B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.52 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.52 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.04 | -0.00 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.8% | 3.0% | 7.0% | 5.2% | 5.9% | 2.5% | 3.2% | 5.8% | 6.0% | 3.0% | 3.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 39.9% | 39.9% | 38.9% | 35.0% | 34.4% | 19.9% | 81.6% | 61.1% | 39.0% | 48.3% | 46.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.8% | 7.3% | 17.3% | 14.2% | 16.3% | 11.4% | 2.8% | 8.4% | 14.4% | 5.4% | 7.4% |
| FCF Yield | 9.7% | 9.5% | — | — | 57.2% | — | 116.3% | — | 20.4% | 1.3% | 10.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.5% | 1.4% | 2.7% | 4.0% | 8.0% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 2.9% | 4.8% | 2.9% | 4.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.3% | 4.4% | 9.7% | 9.2% | 13.9% | 5.2% | 5.7% | 8.7% | 10.8% | 5.9% | 8.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $6.0B | $5.8B | $6.0B | $6.2B | $6.4B | $6.7B | $6.6B | $6.6B | $6.7B | $6.6B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BBVA stock.
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.'s current P/E ratio is 14.6x. The historical average is 36.6x. This places it at the 40th percentile of its historical range.
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 19.6x.
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.'s return on equity (ROE) is 17.3%. The historical average is 12.6%.
Based on historical data, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. is trading at a P/E of 14.6x. This is at the 40th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.'s current dividend yield is 2.85% with a payout ratio of 39.9%.
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. has 83.6% gross margin and 43.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Turkish macro and FX volatility
Premium Multiple Reflects Rotating Value Driver
BBVA's P/B of 2.38 represents a significant premium to its European peers like Santander (1.76) and ING (1.76), as reported in market data, suggesting the market prices its Mexican franchise and digital efficiency at a premium to a standard balance sheet.
The premium valuation appears justified by an implied ROTCE materially above its cost of equity, but the key risk is that this multiple is increasingly dependent on the sustainability of Mexican profitability rather than broad-based European recovery. The PEG ratio of 0.23, combined with the recent revenue acceleration, suggests the market may be under-pricing the potential for sustained earnings growth from its core operations.
ROE Driven by Leverage and Digital Efficiency
BBVA's reported ROE of 4.9% in recent quarters is modest on the surface, but when annualized and decomposed, it reveals a business model leveraging a low 7% equity-to-assets ratio and an industry-leading efficiency ratio of 37.8% to generate returns, as per the latest quarterly data.
The DuPont profile shows profitability is highly sensitive to asset quality and leverage rather than pure net interest margin, which appears artificially suppressed in this dataset. The primary quality driver is the exceptional cost control embedded in the efficiency ratio, which has improved from the mid-40s a year ago, indicating that digital investments are now structurally lowering the operating cost base.
Cost Discipline Offset by Margin Compression
The efficiency ratio has improved dramatically to 37.8% from 42.0% just two quarters prior, a trend that, based on financial statements, reflects successful digital cost containment, but it is occurring against a backdrop of a structurally low NIM of 0.8%.
The bank's ability to generate an operating margin of approximately 44% with such a compressed NIM is a direct testament to its scale and digital operational leverage. However, the sustainability of this model requires stable or rising asset yields; any further NIM contraction, particularly from regulatory pressures in Mexico, would place significant stress on the earnings power that funds the efficiency gains.
Capital Position Constrained by Balance Sheet Composition
The equity-to-assets ratio of 7% indicates a highly leveraged balance sheet typical for a bank, but the massive investment securities portfolio, now over 84% of total assets, creates a material AOCI risk that could directly pressure CET1 ratios if interest rates rise further.
While not explicitly provided in the ratio table, the low equity multiplier suggests capital adequacy is being managed tightly to support growth and shareholder returns. The primary constraint on capital return is not regulatory minimums but the potential for unrealized losses in the securities book to impair tangible common equity, a risk that may not be fully reflected in the reported P/B multiple.
The Misleading Allure of the P/E Multiple
The P/E ratio of 14.57 is the most commonly misapplied metric to BBVA, as it obscures the quality of earnings and the true valuation of its tangible equity base, which is better captured by the P/B multiple.
Bank P/E ratios are distorted by volatile provisions, unrealized securities gains/losses, and one-off regulatory taxes, making them a poor proxy for recurring earnings power. For a bank like BBVA, where the core value driver is the spread between its cost of tangible equity and its return on that equity, the P/B and P/TBV multiples are the superior tools for assessing whether the market correctly prices the franchise's ability to generate excess returns over time.