Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 15.9x · EV/EBITDA 8.3x · ROE N/A. (2010–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $754M | $788M | $840M | $869M | $755M | $722M | $642M | $622M | $486M | $804M | $841M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 15.88 | 18.90 | 42.31 | 21.71 | 12.17 | 33.44 | 5.98 | 34.71 | 94.40 | 42.41 | 114.50 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 0.45 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | 28.26 | 9.54 | 12.77 | 5.85 | 7.93 | 4.38 | 4.71 | 3.81 |
| P/FCF | 8.39 | 14.13 | 13.66 | 10.54 | 5.76 | 13.47 | 9.52 | 13.03 | 6.40 | 10.51 | 14.33 |
| P/OCF | 8.24 | 8.61 | 9.57 | 7.42 | 4.68 | 7.56 | 6.14 | 8.60 | 5.42 | 9.04 | 10.58 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.44 | 0.67 | 0.74 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.33 | 5.72 | 11.91 | 10.74 | 9.52 | 15.01 | 7.29 | 13.02 | 10.63 | 15.68 | 15.99 |
| EV / EBIT | 8.05 | 17.23 | 24.46 | 19.97 | 17.43 | 46.65 | 11.58 | 29.22 | 30.52 | 42.90 | 41.94 |
| EV / FCF | — | 30.35 | 28.39 | 21.52 | 12.84 | 31.92 | 19.94 | 26.85 | 14.20 | 18.43 | 23.60 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.2% | 9.2% | 9.7% | 8.7% | 7.6% | 7.7% | 11.0% | 7.2% | 7.1% | 7.7% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 5.6% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 1.9% | 1.0% | 6.0% | 2.0% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 0.6% | 5.6% | 0.8% | 0.2% | 1.1% | 0.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | 666.6% | 73.0% | 91.3% | 26.1% | 114.3% | 19.1% | 3.7% | 11.8% | 4.4% |
| ROA | 4.0% | 4.0% | 1.7% | 3.3% | 4.8% | 1.8% | 10.5% | 2.0% | 0.6% | 2.5% | 1.2% |
| ROIC | 18.1% | 18.1% | 5.8% | 6.8% | 7.0% | 2.9% | 11.2% | 4.5% | 3.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% |
| ROCE | 23.4% | 23.4% | 7.2% | 8.4% | 8.5% | 3.4% | 13.0% | 5.3% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 3.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 29.61 | 11.92 | 17.62 | 6.41 | 8.43 | 5.38 | 3.57 | 2.47 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.07 | 3.07 | 6.20 | 5.51 | 5.34 | 8.74 | 3.82 | 6.72 | 5.88 | 6.78 | 6.30 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 29.45 | 11.72 | 17.48 | 6.41 | 8.41 | 5.35 | 3.55 | 2.47 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.06 | 3.06 | 6.18 | 5.48 | 5.25 | 8.68 | 3.81 | 6.70 | 5.85 | 6.74 | 6.28 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 16.22 | 14.73 | 10.98 | 7.08 | 18.45 | 10.42 | 13.81 | 7.81 | 7.92 | 9.28 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.04 | 2.04 | 1.36 | 2.03 | 3.01 | 2.01 | 7.00 | 1.62 | 1.08 | 1.18 | 1.45 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.56 | 0.42 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 3.80 | 3.68 | 3.71 | 3.95 | 2.67 | 1.79 | 2.25 | 2.82 | 2.21 | 2.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | 55.80 | 55.80 | 58.57 | 76.49 | 97.06 | 71.63 | 73.98 | 320.19 | 161.41 | 127.90 | 130.22 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 2.98 | 2.94 | 2.71 | 2.62 | 3.57 | 5.81 | 7.55 | 3.86 | 7.36 | 8.24 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 10.6% | 10.2% | 9.5% | 9.2% | 10.6% | 11.0% | 12.1% | 11.6% | 15.5% | 10.4% | 9.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 191.9% | 191.9% | 401.4% | 198.8% | 128.5% | 367.4% | 72.5% | 400.2% | 1439.0% | 361.7% | 747.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.3% | 5.3% | 2.4% | 4.6% | 8.2% | 3.0% | 16.7% | 2.9% | 1.1% | 2.4% | 0.9% |
| FCF Yield | 11.9% | 7.1% | 7.3% | 9.5% | 17.4% | 7.4% | 10.5% | 7.7% | 15.6% | 9.5% | 7.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 10.6% | 10.2% | 9.5% | 9.2% | 10.6% | 11.0% | 12.1% | 11.6% | 15.5% | 10.4% | 9.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $38M | $38M | $38M | $38M | $38M | $37M | $34M | $34M | $34M | $33M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CAPL stock.
CrossAmerica Partners LP's current P/E ratio is 15.9x. The historical average is 43.2x. This places it at the 17th percentile of its historical range.
CrossAmerica Partners LP's current EV/EBITDA is 8.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.0x.
Based on historical data, CrossAmerica Partners LP is trading at a P/E of 15.9x. This is at the 17th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
CrossAmerica Partners LP's current dividend yield is 10.62% with a payout ratio of 191.9%.
CrossAmerica Partners LP has 9.2% gross margin and 5.6% operating margin.
CrossAmerica Partners LP's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Volume erosion with negative equity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Distribution Yield Drives Valuation Framing
Based on the supplied multiples, CAPL trades at 18.14 trailing P/E and 5.61 EV/EBITDA with a 10.6% distribution yield, suggesting investors price it on income rather than growth, against peer GLP at 10.76x EV/EBITDA.
The gap between trailing P/E of 18.14 and forward P/E of 14.36 implies the market expects earnings to improve, though the 10.6% revenue decline argues against assuming that recovery is secure. The trailing EV/EBITDA of 5.61 sits well below the forward figure of 9.08, a divergence that may reflect depressed current-period EBITDA rather than a cheap asset, so investors should monitor whether forward estimates hold. The yield-driven framing appears consistent with the MLP peer group, and the discount to larger peers such as DINO and SUN is plausibly explained by CAPL's narrower geographic footprint and thinner margins.
Thin Spreads Cap Earning Power
Based on the reported ratio table, CAPL's gross margin held in a 9.2% to 12.4% band while operating margin ranged from 0.2% to 5.9%, leaving net margin near 1.1% in the latest comparable period.
The narrow gross margin band is consistent with a cents-per-gallon model where profit depends on spread rather than absolute fuel prices, and the wide operating margin swings indicate fixed overhead absorbs much of gross profit movement. Net margin of 1.1% leaves limited cushion, so a modest rise in interest expense or a compression in spread could push earnings toward breakeven. Operating margin appears to be the more reliable gauge of earning power here, since net margin is distorted by non-operating items and interest.
Returns Compressed Below Peer Levels
Per the quarterly ratio data, ROIC fell from 3.7% in Q2 2025 to 2.1% in Q4 2025 before recovering to 4.6% in Q1 2026, while ROA has moved within a 0.8% to 2.4% range, lagging peers such as GLP at 5.2% ROIC.
The erratic ROIC path suggests returns are being driven more by margin volatility than by any sustained improvement in capital efficiency, and returns remain below the cost of capital typical for leveraged energy distributors. The equity base is negative, so ROE figures are not meaningful as a measure of shareholder economics, a point analysts should keep in mind when comparing to peers with positive book equity. The pattern suggests returns are decaying rather than compounding, which warrants monitoring of whether the recent recovery in Q1 2026 persists.
Leverage Easing From a High Base
According to the supplied balance sheet data, total debt declined from $937.1 million to $827.2 million over the period, while interest coverage moved between 0.17x and 3.09x, indicating debt service comfort is uneven.
The gradual debt reduction is a constructive signal, yet the negative equity base means the debt-to-equity ratio is structurally distorted and offers limited comfort on its own. Interest coverage dipping to 0.17x in Q1 2025 suggests that in weaker quarters operating earnings barely covered financing costs, raising refinancing sensitivity. Investors should monitor whether continued deleveraging can offset the revenue contraction that appears to be eroding the earnings base.
Thin Current Ratio Signals Dependence
Based on EDBL's reported figures, CAPL's current ratio has stayed between 0.71 and 0.93 and quick ratio between 0.33 and 0.55, indicating current liabilities consistently exceed liquid current assets.
A current ratio below 1.0 across all ten quarters is typical of fuel distributors that turn inventory quickly, but it leaves little room under severe stress such as a sharp volume drop or a credit-line disruption. The quick ratio near 0.36 implies the business depends heavily on continued inventory turnover and receivable collection to meet near-term obligations. Analysts should treat the liquidity position as adequate only while operating cash flow remains steady.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA on Negative Equity
Per the supplied multiples, the trailing EV/EBITDA of 5.61 may look inexpensive, but for a negative-equity distributor with thin net margins, it can obscure how much value is absorbed by debt service and distributions before equity holders see cash.
Investors may be tempted to anchor on the low trailing EV/EBITDA as evidence of undervaluation, yet the wide gap to the forward figure of 9.08 suggests the multiple is highly sensitive to a single period of EBITDA. A distributable cash flow or price-to-distributable-cash-flow framework, adjusted for maintenance capex, would better reflect what unitholders actually receive. This warrants further investigation of whether the reported cash conversion holds once reinvestment needs are reflected.