Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -280.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -3.6%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $21.7B | $19.2B | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-55662751925 | $-58165730000 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -280.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 7.91 | 7.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 5.91 | 5.77 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 41.00 | 36.27 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 40.06 | 35.44 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -21.19 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | -109.81 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 8.7% | 8.7% | 23.6% | 29.4% | 32.3% | -30.5% | -46.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.3% | -3.3% | 10.0% | 18.6% | -4.9% | -101.4% | -200.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2.5% | -2.5% | 9.3% | 18.4% | -99.6% | -598.8% | 24.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -3.6% | -3.6% | 15.3% | 22.8% | -1388.4% | — | — |
| ROA | -0.1% | -0.1% | 0.4% | 0.7% | -1.7% | -2.1% | 0.1% |
| ROIC | -3.4% | -3.4% | 11.7% | 16.2% | -5.1% | -40.4% | — |
| ROCE | -3.5% | -3.5% | 9.9% | 20.0% | -4.9% | -36.7% | -58.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.09 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.19 | 0.20 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -23.23 | -1.24 | -0.21 | -41.60 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -3.26 | -1.01 | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -146.08 | -2.33 | -2.89 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -82.93 | -82.93 | 117.25 | 167.81 | -281.60 | -104.59 | -4.11 |
Net cash position: cash ($77.4B) exceeds total debt ($37M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.4% | 2.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $242M | $73M | $68M | $47M | $44M | $44M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CRCL stock.
Circle Internet Group's current P/E ratio is -280.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Circle Internet Group's return on equity (ROE) is -3.6%. The historical average is 11.5%.
Based on historical data, Circle Internet Group is trading at a P/E of -280.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Circle Internet Group has 8.7% gross margin and -3.3% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Provision volatility and fee concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple, Thin Equity Base
Trading at 4.88x book and 77.97x forward earnings, CRCL's valuation implies robust growth, yet its 4.5% equity-to-assets ratio suggests a leveraged balance sheet, per reported figures.
The market prices CRCL as a high-growth franchise, with a P/B of 4.88x versus peers like COIN at 2.89x and HOOD at 9.49x. However, the tangible book value per share of $10.41 in 2026Q2 is thin relative to the $67.05 share price, implying expectations of substantial future returns on equity. Given the historical ROE volatility, including a -22.7% quarter in 2025Q2, the current multiple appears to discount a significant improvement in profitability that has yet to materialize consistently.
Fee-Driven ROE, Leverage Amplifies
ROE swung from -22.7% in 2025Q2 to 7.9% in 2025Q3, driven by fee income and a thin equity base, as per financial statements, indicating high sensitivity to non-interest revenue.
With non-interest income constituting over 97% of revenue, CRCL's profitability is almost entirely fee-based, making NIM analysis irrelevant. The DuPont decomposition shows that ROE is amplified by a very low equity multiplier (equity/assets around 4-5%), which magnifies both gains and losses. The 2025Q2 loss of $482.1M, driven by a $910M provision, illustrates how a single quarter's credit costs can wipe out a significant portion of equity, underscoring the fragility of the current profitability model.
Efficiency Ratio Volatile, Fee Model
Efficiency ratio spiked to 36.3% in 2026Q2 from 9.7% in 2026Q1, per reported data, reflecting variable cost control and a fee-centric model with minimal interest income.
The efficiency ratio's volatility suggests that operating expenses are not tightly correlated with revenue, possibly due to variable compensation or provision-related costs. With NIM effectively zero, the bank's profitability hinges on fee generation and cost discipline. The 2026Q2 efficiency ratio of 36.3% indicates that costs consumed over a third of revenue, a significant increase from the prior quarter, which may signal rising operational expenses or one-time items. Investors should monitor whether this trend persists, as it could pressure future margins.
Thin Capital Buffer Improving
Equity-to-assets improved from 1.2% in 2024Q4 to 4.5% in 2026Q2, per balance sheet data, but remains low for a financial institution, limiting capital return capacity.
The equity-to-assets ratio of 4.5% is well below traditional bank levels, indicating a highly leveraged balance sheet. While the improvement from 1.2% is positive, the absolute level suggests limited capacity to absorb losses or return capital to shareholders. No dividends or buybacks have been paid, consistent with a retention strategy to build capital. However, the lack of disclosed CET1 or Tier 1 ratios makes it difficult to assess regulatory capital adequacy, and the thin equity base remains a key vulnerability.
Provision Swings Mask Credit Trends
Loan loss provisions swung from $910M in 2025Q2 to $412.5M in 2026Q2, per company reports, yet loan balances are undisclosed, obscuring underlying credit quality.
The dramatic swings in provisions, which drove a net loss in 2025Q2, suggest high credit risk, but without loan balance disclosures, it is impossible to calculate NPL ratios or coverage. The provision expense in 2026Q2 of $412.5M remains substantial relative to the equity base, indicating that credit costs are a major earnings driver. Investors should demand more transparency on the loan portfolio composition and reserve adequacy, as the current data does not allow for a thorough assessment of asset quality.
P/E Misleading Due to Provision Volatility
CRCL's negative trailing P/E of -231.21 and forward P/E of 77.97 are distorted by volatile provisions, per reported figures, making P/B a more reliable valuation metric.
The P/E ratio is commonly misapplied to CRCL because earnings are heavily influenced by non-recurring provision expenses, as seen in 2025Q2's loss. This volatility makes trailing P/E meaningless and forward P/E speculative. Instead, investors should focus on P/B and ROTCE, which better capture the bank's underlying value and return generation. Given the thin equity base, P/B of 4.88x may still overstate value if credit costs remain elevated, so a price-to-tangible-book analysis with adjustments for potential losses is warranted.