Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 706.7x · EV/EBITDA 15.6x · ROE 0.5%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.3B | $6.2B | $6.3B | $4.7B | $4.1B | $4.4B | $3.0B | $2.2B | $1.3B | $963M | $512M |
| Enterprise Value | $6.4B | $7.3B | $7.1B | $5.6B | $4.7B | $5.0B | $3.5B | $2.8B | $1.8B | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 706.67 | 816.17 | 460.04 | 185.78 | 77.00 | 106.77 | 33.31 | 69.74 | 189.93 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.89 | 3.39 | 4.05 | 3.74 | 3.78 | 4.95 | 3.92 | 2.97 | 1.90 | 1.61 | 0.91 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.44 | 3.97 | 4.06 | 4.62 | 8.25 | 10.42 | 8.39 | 17.99 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 62.69 | 73.50 | 80.68 | 60.42 | 47.54 | 74.03 | 95.50 | 161.58 | 31.31 | 27.18 | 27.01 |
| P/OCF | 16.10 | 18.88 | 22.40 | 20.27 | 18.89 | 24.08 | 21.71 | 18.90 | 10.41 | 8.96 | 6.36 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.00 | 4.58 | 4.45 | 4.33 | 5.60 | 4.52 | 3.76 | 2.72 | 2.41 | 1.80 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.64 | 17.87 | 20.32 | 18.62 | 18.77 | 23.83 | 21.40 | 18.07 | 13.03 | 11.19 | 8.38 |
| EV / EBIT | 72.05 | 101.89 | 95.02 | 71.83 | 46.94 | 59.29 | 61.44 | 51.50 | 55.02 | — | 30.40 |
| EV / FCF | — | 86.66 | 91.24 | 71.90 | 54.43 | 83.82 | 110.07 | 204.76 | 44.76 | 40.74 | 53.72 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 17.1% | 18.9% | 20.7% | 21.7% | 22.9% | 21.7% | 20.8% | 20.7% | 22.0% | 21.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 4.9% | 6.7% | 8.4% | 9.4% | 9.5% | 8.5% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 8.8% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.9% | 2.0% | 4.9% | 4.6% | 11.8% | 4.3% | 1.0% | -3.6% | -1.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.5% | 0.5% | 1.1% | 3.3% | 11.5% | 10.5% | 37.6% | 59.2% | — | — | — |
| ROA | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 1.3% | 3.9% | 3.3% | 8.6% | 3.8% | 1.0% | -3.5% | -1.1% |
| ROIC | 2.6% | 2.6% | 3.6% | 5.3% | 7.3% | 6.9% | 6.4% | 7.1% | 8.1% | 8.6% | 7.1% |
| ROCE | 2.9% | 2.9% | 4.0% | 6.0% | 8.5% | 7.7% | 7.1% | 8.2% | 9.1% | 9.8% | 8.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 1.09 | 1.34 | 1.46 | 1.71 | 4.83 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.02 | 3.02 | 3.44 | 3.71 | 2.66 | 2.95 | 3.78 | 3.83 | 3.94 | 3.74 | 4.19 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.71 | 0.53 | 0.88 | 1.19 | 1.38 | 1.28 | 4.81 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.72 | 2.72 | 2.35 | 2.97 | 2.37 | 2.78 | 2.83 | 3.81 | 3.91 | 3.72 | 4.17 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 13.17 | 10.56 | 11.48 | 6.88 | 9.80 | 14.57 | 43.17 | 13.44 | 13.56 | 26.71 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.39 | 1.90 | 3.98 | 3.23 | 3.05 | 2.21 | 1.23 | -0.45 | 0.86 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.26 | 1.26 | 2.00 | 1.53 | 1.17 | 0.96 | 1.88 | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.17 | 1.17 | 1.93 | 1.46 | 1.09 | 0.90 | 1.82 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.89 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.42 | 0.42 | 1.25 | 0.79 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 1.18 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 0.97 | 0.89 |
| Inventory Turnover | 62.55 | 62.55 | 58.60 | 56.15 | 63.05 | 70.51 | 77.08 | 76.63 | 80.07 | 71.52 | 90.30 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 35.38 | 41.06 | 46.30 | 33.94 | 35.70 | 35.07 | 40.00 | 42.65 | 40.49 | 39.95 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 3.0% | 1.4% | 0.5% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.6% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 1.0% | 0.6% | 3.2% | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $64M | $60M | $55M | $52M | $52M | $49M | $48M | $44M | $42M | $41M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CWST stock.
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 706.7x. The historical average is 71.1x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.9x.
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 0.5%. The historical average is -34.3%.
Based on historical data, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 706.7x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Casella Waste Systems, Inc. has 17.1% gross margin and 4.9% operating margin.
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Thin margins and integration drag
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Masks Cash Generation
Despite 18% revenue growth, net margin sits at 0.7% in 2026Q2, per reported figures, far below peers like WM at 10.7%, suggesting integration costs and pricing pressures are compressing bottom-line profitability.
Gross margin swung dramatically from 15.4% in 2026Q1 to 32.9% in 2026Q2, per reported data, indicating significant volatility that may reflect seasonal or one-time factors rather than a stable trend. Operating margin at 3.7% remains thin, implying that revenue growth is not translating into proportional profit expansion, likely due to elevated depreciation and acquisition-related expenses. The gap between operating cash flow and net income, with cash conversion exceeding 18x, suggests that reported profitability understates the underlying cash-generating ability of the landfill assets.
ROIC Trapped by Acquisition Spree
ROIC averaged just 0.8% over the last four quarters, per reported figures, versus 10.7% for WM and 13.5% for RSG, indicating that heavy M&A spending has yet to generate commensurate returns on invested capital.
ROIC has remained below 1.5% for the past ten quarters, per the data, despite a 44% expansion in total assets, suggesting that acquisition integration is diluting returns. The increase in goodwill and intangibles to 39% of total assets, per the balance sheet analysis, implies that a significant portion of invested capital is tied up in acquired assets that may not be generating adequate incremental returns. Investors should monitor whether management can improve internalization rates and pricing power to lift ROIC toward peer levels, as the current trajectory suggests capital deployment is not yet compounding efficiently.
Working Capital Efficiency Holds Steady
DSO improved to 33 days in 2026Q2 from 42 days in 2024Q1, per reported figures, while CCC remained stable around 15-18 days, indicating disciplined receivables management despite rapid acquisition-driven growth.
Asset turnover has remained flat at 0.14-0.16 over the past ten quarters, per the data, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of landfill operations and the dilutive effect of acquired assets. The stable CCC, with DPO around 27 days, suggests that Casella is effectively managing its working capital cycle, though the lack of DIO data limits full assessment. The improvement in DSO indicates that the company is collecting receivables faster, which is positive given the integration of new contracts, but the overall efficiency gains are modest relative to the scale of asset growth.
Leverage Creeps Higher with Debt-Funded Deals
D/EBITDA rose to 13.32 in 2026Q2 from 11.09 in 2025Q4, per reported figures, while interest coverage fell to 1.19, indicating that debt service is becoming less comfortable as acquisitions are funded with leverage.
Total debt increased to $1.4B in 2026Q2, per the balance sheet analysis, and the D/E ratio, though reported at 0.91, appears understated given the capital-intensive nature of the business. Interest coverage of 1.19 in 2026Q2, per the data, is barely above 1.0, suggesting that operating income is only marginally sufficient to cover interest expenses, which could become a concern if rates rise or margins remain thin. The elevated D/EBITDA, far above the 3-4x typical for mature waste peers, indicates that the company is operating with a high leverage burden, and investors should monitor refinancing risk and covenant headroom.
Liquidity Cushion Shrinks Rapidly
Current ratio fell to 0.99 in 2026Q2 from 2.55 in 2024Q3, per reported figures, while cash dropped from $519M to $25.5M, indicating a deteriorating liquidity position that may strain operations under stress.
The quick ratio of 0.99 in 2026Q2, per the data, suggests that current assets barely cover current liabilities, leaving little buffer for unexpected operational shocks. The sharp decline in cash reserves, per the balance sheet analysis, reflects aggressive deployment into acquisitions and capital expenditures, which may limit financial flexibility. While the company generates positive operating cash flow, the thin liquidity position warrants monitoring, especially if recycling commodity prices or regional volumes weaken, as the company may need to rely on external financing.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in Waste Sector
EV/EBITDA of 16.55 appears reasonable versus peers, per reported figures, but it obscures the value of scarce landfill airspace and the impact of high depreciation, making adjusted EBITDA a more relevant metric for Casella.
The market often compares Casella's EV/EBITDA to national peers like WM and RSG, but this fails to account for the unique scarcity value of its permitted landfill capacity in the Northeast, which is not reflected in book values. Additionally, the high depreciation and amortization from acquisitions inflate EBITDA relative to cash flow, so investors should focus on adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow yield to assess true earning power. The P/FCF of 67.07, per the data, suggests that the market is pricing in significant future cash flow growth, which may be optimistic given the thin margins and integration risks.