Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -208.9%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $126962 | $2M | $2M | $2M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2M | $3M | $2M | $6M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.12 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.43 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.26 | 0.15 | 0.40 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -1.6% | -1.6% | 16.7% | 5.9% | 3.2% | 6.2% | 14.3% | 22.5% |
| Operating Margin | -123.3% | -123.3% | -66.9% | -70.3% | -77.9% | -47.2% | -40.3% | -71.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -135.3% | -135.3% | -79.8% | -72.5% | -107.8% | -52.7% | -39.3% | -70.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -208.9% | -208.9% | -580.7% | — | — | — | -347.7% | -94.7% |
| ROA | -106.6% | -106.6% | -119.0% | -149.6% | -227.3% | -130.8% | -58.5% | -48.5% |
| ROIC | -128.3% | -128.3% | -173.3% | -189.3% | -254.1% | -230.6% | -64.3% | — |
| ROCE | -164.5% | -164.5% | -196.2% | -335.4% | -421.5% | — | -90.9% | -63.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.93 | — | — | — | — | 0.61 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.13 | 0.07 | — | — | — | — | 0.61 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -11.10 | -11.10 | -8.07 | -25.12 | -5.13 | -7.98 | -32.15 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.82 | 0.82 | 1.19 | 0.91 | 0.39 | 0.17 | 0.43 | 0.66 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.94 | 0.68 | 0.26 | 0.12 | 0.31 | 0.38 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.57 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.62 | 1.16 | 2.11 | 1.66 | 2.63 | 2.11 | 0.69 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.99 | 6.99 | 7.48 | 19.51 | 19.09 | 27.39 | 25.75 | 8.33 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 54.31 | 51.84 | 32.45 | 34.91 | 26.64 | 24.32 | 39.13 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | 0.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.6% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.6% | 0.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $6394 | $485 | $15 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EDBL stock.
Edible Garden AG Incorporated's current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Edible Garden AG Incorporated's return on equity (ROE) is -208.9%. The historical average is -217.1%.
Based on historical data, Edible Garden AG Incorporated is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Edible Garden AG Incorporated has -1.6% gross margin and -123.3% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Liquidity and solvency crisis
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Distressed Valuation Reflects Operational Uncertainty
According to recent market data, EDBL trades at a P/S multiple of 0.09, a figure that suggests investors are pricing the company as a distressed entity rather than a growth-stage agricultural firm, especially when compared to the more stable valuation multiples observed in the broader produce sector.
The extremely low P/S ratio indicates that the market assigns minimal value to the company's revenue stream, likely due to the persistent inability to convert top-line figures into positive earnings. This valuation level implies that the market expects further dilution or potential asset impairment rather than a near-term turnaround in profitability.
Persistent Capital Destruction Remains Evident
Based on reported financial statements, EDBL's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -41.1% in 2026Q1, which highlights a fundamental failure to generate returns on invested capital that exceed the cost of funding the company's capital-intensive controlled environment agriculture facilities.
The consistent decay in ROIC suggests that the company's investments in infrastructure have not yet achieved the necessary scale to drive operational efficiency. Investors should monitor whether the shift toward shelf-stable products can eventually improve these returns, though current trends suggest significant ongoing value destruction.
Working Capital Management Lacks Consistency
As indicated by quarterly filings, EDBL's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated wildly, moving from -10 days in 2024Q2 to 20 days in 2026Q1, which reveals an underlying instability in the company's ability to manage its supplier and customer leverage effectively.
The volatility in the CCC suggests that the company is forced to rely on aggressive timing of payables to manage its limited liquidity. This lack of operational rhythm makes it difficult to forecast cash needs and underscores the structural challenges inherent in the company's current distribution model.
Liquidity Constraints Threaten Operational Continuity
According to the most recent balance sheet data, EDBL's current ratio has deteriorated to 0.72 in 2026Q1, a level that warrants further investigation into the company's ability to meet its short-term obligations without resorting to additional dilutive financing or operational curtailment.
The decline in the quick ratio to 0.55 confirms that the company's liquid assets are insufficient to cover its immediate liabilities. This liquidity profile leaves the firm highly vulnerable to any unexpected shocks in the retail inventory cycle or further increases in input costs.
Revenue Growth Misleads Market Expectations
As reported in financial filings, the market often misapplies revenue growth as a primary indicator of success for EDBL, failing to account for the fact that the company is currently in a contractionary phase of shedding unprofitable produce lines to survive.
Investors should prioritize gross margin and cash burn metrics over top-line growth, as the latter is currently being artificially influenced by the divestiture of low-margin segments. Focusing on revenue growth obscures the reality that the company is shrinking its footprint to mitigate losses rather than expanding its market share.