Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 31.1x · EV/EBITDA 20.5x · ROE 1.1%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.3B | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $972M | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $926M | $921M | $1.2B | $825M | $1.3B | $1.1B | $852M | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 31.07 | 95.93 | 10.88 | 8.85 | 24.65 | 9.92 | 8.11 | 8.64 | 9.90 | 14.51 | 12.22 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.33 | 1.21 | 1.47 | 1.23 | 1.67 | 1.68 | 1.37 | 1.63 | 1.75 | 1.84 | 1.67 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.19 | 1.09 | 1.21 | 1.03 | 1.26 | 0.98 | 0.80 | 1.17 | 1.37 | 1.55 | 1.55 |
| P/FCF | — | 24.52 | 18.05 | 22.14 | 12.28 | 164.38 | 35.36 | 12.31 | 8.22 | 10.95 | 11.09 |
| P/OCF | 23.41 | 23.31 | 16.89 | 21.15 | 11.96 | 109.58 | 29.46 | 11.09 | 7.76 | 10.32 | 10.63 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.07 | 1.39 | 0.97 | 1.82 | 1.60 | 1.20 | 1.46 | 1.65 | 1.77 | 1.63 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.48 | 39.70 | 8.16 | 5.38 | 21.29 | 7.29 | 5.46 | 6.02 | 7.49 | 9.29 | 8.52 |
| EV / EBIT | 77.14 | 73.68 | 8.36 | 5.35 | 21.94 | 7.63 | 5.75 | 6.28 | 7.70 | 9.73 | 8.93 |
| EV / FCF | — | 21.67 | 17.16 | 17.47 | 13.38 | 156.25 | 30.97 | 11.06 | 7.75 | 10.55 | 10.79 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 32.2% | 32.2% | 36.7% | 40.6% | 31.8% | 44.3% | 46.4% | 45.7% | 41.2% | 36.4% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | 1.4% | 16.7% | 17.4% | 7.8% | 20.9% | 20.8% | 23.2% | 21.2% | 18.0% | 18.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.3% | 1.3% | 13.5% | 13.9% | 6.8% | 17.0% | 16.8% | 18.8% | 17.7% | 12.7% | 13.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.1% | 1.1% | 11.4% | 12.1% | 4.5% | 9.8% | 10.1% | 14.4% | 14.4% | 11.3% | 13.3% |
| ROA | 0.3% | 0.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | 1.3% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 4.0% | 3.6% | 2.7% | 2.8% |
| ROIC | 1.0% | 1.0% | 12.2% | 12.1% | 3.8% | 9.8% | 10.4% | 14.8% | 13.9% | 12.7% | 13.7% |
| ROCE | 1.1% | 1.1% | 9.0% | 8.9% | 4.4% | 10.7% | 3.7% | 4.9% | 4.4% | 3.8% | 3.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.68 | 1.68 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 3.21 | 0.11 | 0.26 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.21 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.13 | -0.06 | -0.22 | 0.11 | -0.05 | -0.10 | -0.12 | -0.08 | -0.06 | -0.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -5.21 | -5.21 | -0.43 | -1.44 | 1.75 | -0.38 | -0.77 | -0.68 | -0.46 | -0.35 | -0.24 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.84 | -0.90 | -4.67 | 1.10 | -8.13 | -4.38 | -1.24 | -0.48 | -0.40 | -0.30 |
| Interest Coverage | 25.00 | 25.00 | 1468.00 | 26.59 | 16.94 | 295.00 | 370.25 | 324.00 | 114.00 | 103.86 | 88.94 |
Net cash position: cash ($160M) exceeds total debt ($39M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.82 | 0.82 | 1.24 | 1.18 | 1.28 | 1.29 | — | — | 27.02 | 1.40 | 1.70 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.82 | 0.82 | 1.24 | 1.18 | 1.28 | 1.29 | — | — | 44.60 | 29.96 | 84.53 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.91 | 0.63 | 0.96 | 0.98 | — | — | 3.41 | 1.40 | 53.68 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.6% | 2.9% | 2.3% | 2.8% | 7.6% | 2.5% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 0.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 276.9% | 276.9% | 25.5% | 25.1% | 186.6% | 24.3% | 25.5% | 18.0% | 18.9% | 19.5% | 10.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.2% | 1.0% | 9.2% | 11.3% | 4.1% | 10.1% | 12.3% | 11.6% | 10.1% | 6.9% | 8.2% |
| FCF Yield | — | 4.1% | 5.5% | 4.5% | 8.1% | 0.6% | 2.8% | 8.1% | 12.2% | 9.1% | 9.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 17.5% | 17.5% | 3.3% | 7.3% | 2.5% | 3.6% | 10.2% | 5.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 1.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 20.1% | 20.4% | 5.6% | 10.1% | 10.1% | 6.0% | 13.4% | 7.1% | 2.2% | 1.3% | 2.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $24M | $25M | $27M | $28M | $29M | $30M | $33M | $33M | $33M | $33M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EIG stock.
Employers Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 31.1x. The historical average is 15.4x. This places it at the 95th percentile of its historical range.
Employers Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 20.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.3x.
Employers Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 1.1%. The historical average is 20.8%.
Based on historical data, Employers Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 31.1x. This is at the 95th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Employers Holdings, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.62% with a payout ratio of 276.9%.
Employers Holdings, Inc. has 32.2% gross margin and 1.4% operating margin.
Employers Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Volatile underwriting results
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Trailing P/E Distorted by Earnings Trough
Based on EIG's reported figures, the trailing P/E of 105.11 and P/B of 1.19 at a $47.30 share price reflect depressed near-breakeven earnings rather than a premium franchise valuation, so book value anchors the assessment more reliably than earnings.
A P/B of 1.19 sits below the 1.5 to 2.2 range of several peers, which suggests the market is pricing EIG close to its reported equity base rather than paying for underwriting growth. The 105x trailing P/E mainly reflects a recent loss-making stretch, and the 20.13x forward P/E implies investors expect earnings recovery, a view investors should monitor against the still-volatile quarterly combined ratios.
Combined Ratio Swings Dominate Underwriting Story
As reported in quarterly figures, EIG's combined ratio moved from 81.6% in 2024Q2 to 117.3% in 2025Q4 before recovering to 91.7% in 2026Q3, leaving underwriting profitability inconsistent across the ten-quarter window.
Quarters below 100% indicate underwriting profit, but the 2025Q3 and 2025Q4 readings above 100% show that losses or expenses can overwhelm premium income within a single quarter. The expense ratio spike to 80.7% in 2025Q4 while the loss ratio fell to 36.6% suggests the period's swing may reflect classification or timing effects, which warrants further investigation before treating either ratio as a run-rate.
ROE Thin and Largely Underwriting-Driven
Based on EIG's reported ratios, ROE ranged from -2.3% to 3.4% over ten quarters and ROA from -0.7% to 0.9%, with investment income data unavailable to separate float yield from underwriting results.
Because ROE stayed in low single digits, the return on the equity base was thin even in the stronger 2024 and mid-2025 quarters. Without disclosed investment income, the contribution of float yield cannot be quantified, so the source of any profit remains an open question that investors should monitor.
Equity Shrinkage Lifts Effective Leverage
According to reported quarterly figures, shareholders' equity fell from roughly $1.1B in 2024Q4 to $785.6M in 2026Q3 while total liabilities stayed near $2.5B, which appears to raise underwriting leverage relative to capital.
A declining equity base against a largely stable liability load suggests less capital cushion per dollar of obligations, even though the reported D/E of 0.16 looks moderate. Premium-to-surplus cannot be computed from the supplied data, so the rating-agency view of leverage cannot be confirmed here and remains an area for further review.
Trailing P/E Misleads on Earnings Quality
The most commonly misapplied metric here is the trailing P/E, which at 105.11 captures a cyclical loss trough and obscures that combined ratio and reserve development drive results, not a stable earnings base.
A P/E this elevated is not a valuation signal; it reflects near-zero trailing earnings after volatile quarters. A more informative approach is to anchor on P/B against tangible equity and to examine the combined ratio excluding reserve development, which the supplied data does not disclose, so that underwriting quality can be separated from prior-year releases.