Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -84.6%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $325M | $255M | $219M | $234M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $913M | $1.3B | $1.8B | $908M | $512M |
| Enterprise Value | $494M | $424M | $408M | $175M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $835M | $1.2B | $1.7B | $843M | $496M |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27.19 | 24.56 | 51.43 | 23.55 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.98 | 3.91 | 3.24 | 2.96 | 12.40 | 11.80 | 7.45 | 6.14 | 8.54 | 8.83 | 5.80 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.62 | 3.95 | 1.70 | 1.08 | 3.33 | 2.87 | 2.00 | 2.72 | 4.48 | 3.01 | 1.90 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 161.77 | 19.09 | 67.26 | 18.11 | 16.46 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 128.79 | 17.64 | 60.40 | 17.25 | 14.29 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.49 | 6.03 | 2.21 | 12.20 | 11.29 | 6.82 | 5.89 | 8.23 | 8.20 | 5.61 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.22 | 18.73 | 31.51 | 15.25 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 32.90 | 19.26 | 34.25 | 16.07 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 148.02 | 18.31 | 64.83 | 16.81 | 15.95 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 93.0% | 93.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -130.7% | -130.7% | -179.9% | -173.2% | -143.7% | -112.9% | -34.0% | 17.9% | 42.7% | 23.9% | 34.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -125.4% | -125.4% | -171.6% | -169.0% | -141.3% | -81.4% | -29.5% | 22.6% | 34.8% | 17.2% | 24.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -84.6% | -84.6% | -67.2% | -49.7% | -33.8% | -18.5% | -7.9% | 10.8% | 20.7% | 6.2% | 8.6% |
| ROA | -24.9% | -24.9% | -27.7% | -31.8% | -29.6% | -17.0% | -7.4% | 10.3% | 19.4% | 5.8% | 8.2% |
| ROIC | -23.2% | -23.2% | -38.4% | -44.6% | -28.4% | -22.6% | -7.9% | 7.4% | 23.4% | 7.5% | 9.9% |
| ROCE | -31.0% | -31.0% | -33.9% | -36.6% | -32.8% | -25.2% | -8.9% | 8.5% | 25.1% | 8.5% | 12.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.11 | 3.11 | 1.75 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.61 | 1.47 | -0.27 | -0.05 | -0.13 | -0.17 | -0.11 | -0.16 | -0.22 | -0.06 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.28 | -0.70 | -2.44 | -0.49 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | -13.74 | -0.77 | -2.42 | -1.30 | -0.52 |
| Interest Coverage | -9.88 | -9.88 | -9.77 | -24.45 | — | — | — | — | 18.20 | 615.35 | 685.36 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.21 | 4.21 | 5.21 | 6.73 | 10.45 | 8.82 | 18.08 | 17.77 | 23.74 | 11.33 | 29.43 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.21 | 4.21 | 5.21 | 6.73 | 10.45 | 8.82 | 18.08 | 17.77 | 23.74 | 11.33 | 29.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.89 | 3.89 | 4.31 | 5.89 | 8.36 | 6.75 | 16.01 | 14.83 | 19.27 | 10.66 | 26.63 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 38.45 | 208.55 | 182.57 | 207.73 | 228.73 | 70.01 | 91.27 | 118.72 | 37.68 | 53.10 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.7% | 4.1% | 1.9% | 4.2% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.6% | 5.2% | 1.5% | 5.5% | 6.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $21M | $21M | $21M | $21M | $20M | $20M | $21M | $21M | $19M | $19M |
Liquidity and financing risk
Based on Enanta's reported figures, the current price-to-sales multiple of 4.98 appears to reflect speculative optimism regarding the respiratory pipeline rather than the underlying reality of a contracting royalty stream, which has historically served as the primary, albeit declining, source of the company's valuation support.
The absence of meaningful earnings or positive free cash flow renders traditional P/E or EV/EBITDA metrics inapplicable, forcing investors to rely on P/S multiples that may be artificially inflated by the high gross margins inherent in the royalty model. This valuation suggests the market is pricing in a successful clinical breakthrough, yet the lack of a forward P/E indicates that analysts remain skeptical of near-term commercial viability.
As reported in financial statements, Enanta's ROIC has remained consistently negative, fluctuating between -3.2% and -7.4% over the last ten quarters, which underscores the company's inability to generate productive returns on the capital deployed into its high-burn research and development programs.
The persistent negative ROIC trend suggests that the capital allocated to the respiratory pipeline is not currently creating economic value, as the cost of research continues to outpace the diminishing returns from the legacy HCV royalty stream. Investors should monitor whether future clinical milestones can reverse this decay, as the current trajectory indicates a structural erosion of shareholder capital.
According to recent SEC filings, Enanta's asset turnover ratio remains extremely low at 0.05, reflecting a business model that is heavily reliant on intangible royalty assets rather than efficient utilization of physical capital to drive revenue growth in its core therapeutic focus areas.
The extremely low asset turnover highlights the company's status as a discovery-stage entity that has yet to achieve the operational scale necessary to convert its R&D investments into meaningful revenue. The volatility in DSO, which reached as high as 244 days, further suggests that the timing of royalty receipts from partners is inconsistent, complicating the company's ability to manage its short-term working capital needs.
Based on Enanta's reported figures, the current ratio of 3.84, while seemingly robust, masks a deteriorating cash position that is insufficient to sustain the company's high quarterly burn rate, signaling a heightened risk of near-term dilutive financing to maintain ongoing clinical trial operations.
While the current ratio appears healthy on the surface, the lack of recurring, self-sustaining revenue means that the company's liquidity is entirely dependent on the depletion of existing cash reserves. This vulnerability is exacerbated by the high fixed costs of clinical development, which leave little room for error should the company face unexpected delays in its respiratory programs.
Investors frequently misapply Enanta's 93% gross margin as a proxy for operational profitability, failing to recognize that this metric is an artifact of the royalty-based business model rather than a reflection of a scalable, self-sustaining commercial enterprise with low operating overhead.
This metric obscures the reality that the company's true cost structure is dominated by massive, non-discretionary R&D expenses that are not captured in the gross margin calculation. Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the remaining cash runway, as these metrics provide a more accurate assessment of the company's survival risk than the misleadingly high gross margin.
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ENTA stock.
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -3.6x. The historical average is 26.3x.
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -84.6%. The historical average is -6.2%.
Based on historical data, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -3.6x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has 93.0% gross margin and -130.7% operating margin.