Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 7.9x · EV/EBITDA 6.2x · ROE 13.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.6B | $36.9B | $119.6B | $81.8B | $65.5B | $69.7B | $77.8B | $60.4B | $30.4B | $28.3B | $23.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $54.9B | $65.2B | $143.3B | $103.8B | $86.1B | $90.1B | $97.6B | $81.4B | $36.0B | $32.8B | $28.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 7.86 | 10.59 | 38.18 | 26.67 | 25.92 | 52.16 | 81.33 | 67.62 | 25.61 | 22.69 | 25.55 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.25 | 1.74 | 5.85 | 4.29 | 3.69 | 4.30 | 5.24 | 5.93 | 5.22 | 4.96 | 4.32 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.06 | 1.43 | 4.32 | 2.67 | 2.07 | 2.18 | 2.33 | 1.73 | 13.26 | 10.35 | 9.36 |
| P/FCF | 6.12 | 8.49 | 23.62 | 21.68 | 20.86 | 24.25 | 23.96 | 29.14 | 25.51 | 23.64 | 20.86 |
| P/OCF | 4.36 | 6.04 | 18.03 | 15.85 | 14.18 | 17.28 | 18.76 | 21.62 | 19.59 | 19.07 | 16.63 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.08 | 7.01 | 5.44 | 4.86 | 5.55 | 6.57 | 7.99 | 6.17 | 5.77 | 5.10 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.20 | 7.36 | 15.97 | 12.77 | 12.47 | 16.43 | 19.28 | 24.98 | 15.64 | 16.75 | 15.04 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.64 | 11.25 | 24.95 | 21.18 | 23.54 | 38.15 | 51.72 | 51.22 | 20.61 | 21.43 | 19.51 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.02 | 28.31 | 27.52 | 27.44 | 31.35 | 30.06 | 39.26 | 30.16 | 27.47 | 24.59 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 59.4% | 60.8% | 59.8% | 54.9% | 49.9% | 47.4% | 47.9% | 47.3% | 46.9% | 46.2% |
| Operating Margin | 26.9% | 26.9% | 28.7% | 26.3% | 21.1% | 14.1% | 12.5% | 15.8% | 30.1% | 26.9% | 26.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 16.4% | 16.4% | 15.3% | 16.1% | 14.3% | 8.2% | 6.5% | 8.8% | 20.4% | 21.9% | 16.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.0% | 13.0% | 10.7% | 9.8% | 8.0% | 4.1% | 2.8% | 4.8% | 47.3% | 47.3% | 35.8% |
| ROA | 4.4% | 4.4% | 3.7% | 3.5% | 3.2% | 1.8% | 1.3% | 2.0% | 11.0% | 12.4% | 9.7% |
| ROIC | 8.1% | 8.1% | 8.5% | 7.2% | 5.4% | 3.3% | 2.5% | 3.8% | 17.4% | 16.3% | 16.1% |
| ROCE | 10.2% | 10.2% | 10.5% | 8.7% | 6.5% | 3.9% | 3.1% | 4.5% | 19.9% | 18.8% | 18.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.90 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 2.60 | 1.79 | 1.80 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.29 | 3.29 | 2.78 | 2.86 | 3.12 | 3.87 | 4.09 | 6.72 | 2.59 | 2.50 | 2.44 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.10 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 2.42 | 1.68 | 1.68 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.20 | 3.20 | 2.64 | 2.71 | 2.99 | 3.72 | 3.91 | 6.44 | 2.41 | 2.33 | 2.28 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.52 | 4.69 | 5.84 | 6.58 | 7.10 | 6.09 | 10.13 | 4.65 | 3.83 | 3.74 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.78 | 3.78 | 4.64 | 4.88 | 4.90 | 3.39 | 2.64 | 3.14 | 9.23 | 8.76 | 8.82 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.02 | 0.95 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.02 | 0.95 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.13 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.57 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 71.11 | 75.41 | 68.48 | 73.77 | 64.33 | 61.00 | 99.68 | 65.75 | 63.89 | 59.81 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 12.7% | 9.4% | 2.6% | 3.7% | 3.9% | 1.9% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 3.9% | 4.4% | 3.9% |
| FCF Yield | 16.3% | 11.8% | 4.2% | 4.6% | 4.8% | 4.1% | 4.2% | 3.4% | 3.9% | 4.2% | 4.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 22.2% | 16.0% | 4.9% | 5.9% | 4.1% | 4.0% | 2.3% | 0.9% | 6.4% | 4.3% | 5.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 22.2% | 16.0% | 4.9% | 5.9% | 4.1% | 4.0% | 2.3% | 0.9% | 6.4% | 4.3% | 5.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $549M | $582M | $616M | $648M | $672M | $683M | $523M | $414M | $431M | $448M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FISV stock.
Fiserv, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 7.9x. The historical average is 28.7x.
Fiserv, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.2x.
Fiserv, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 13.0%. The historical average is 17.4%.
Based on historical data, Fiserv, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 7.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Fiserv, Inc. has 59.4% gross margin and 26.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Fiserv, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression and EPS miss
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Erosion Signals Structural Shift
Gross margin collapsed from 61.2% in Q2 2024 to 19.2% in Q2 2026, per reported financials, while operating margin halved to 19.2%, suggesting a fundamental change in revenue mix or cost structure.
The dramatic decline in gross margin, from 61.2% to 19.2% over eight quarters, far exceeds typical cyclical variation and appears to reflect a strategic pivot toward lower-margin, volume-based processing or a one-time cost shock. Operating margin followed a similar trajectory, contracting from 31.8% in Q4 2024 to 19.2% in Q2 2026, indicating that the company has lost its historical operating leverage. This compression may indicate that Fiserv is absorbing competitive pricing pressure or experiencing a shift toward hardware or pass-through revenue, which would dilute margins. Investors should monitor whether this is a temporary reset or a new baseline, as it directly impacts the sustainability of earnings.
Return on Capital Decays Amidst Leverage
ROIC fell from 2.4% in Q4 2024 to 1.4% in Q2 2026, as per quarterly data, while ROE dropped to 2.4%, indicating that the company is generating diminishing returns on its invested capital.
ROIC has been on a downward trajectory, declining from 2.4% in Q4 2024 to 1.4% in Q2 2026, despite a relatively stable asset base. This suggests that the incremental capital deployed, particularly in acquisitions and organic investments, is yielding lower returns. ROE similarly weakened, falling to 2.4% in Q2 2026 from 3.3% in Q4 2024, reflecting both margin compression and the impact of rising debt levels. The combination of declining returns and increasing leverage (D/E rose from 0.83 to 1.04 over the same period) implies that the company is not compounding shareholder value at the rate it once did. This trend warrants close attention, as sustained low ROIC could signal capital allocation inefficiencies or a deteriorating competitive position.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Strain
DSO rose from 65 days in Q2 2024 to 68 days in Q2 2026, per reported figures, while DPO fell from 24 to 20 days, indicating a slight deterioration in cash conversion efficiency.
The cash conversion cycle, though not fully calculable due to missing DIO data, appears to be lengthening as DSO increases and DPO decreases. This suggests that Fiserv is taking longer to collect receivables while paying suppliers more quickly, which could indicate weakening bargaining power or a shift in customer mix. The current ratio remains tight at 1.04, reflecting a thin liquidity buffer, and the quick ratio is identical, implying minimal inventory reliance. These trends, combined with the volatile free cash flow margin (ranging from 2.8% to 34.7% over the past ten quarters), suggest that working capital management is becoming less predictable, potentially straining liquidity in a downturn.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Coverage Thins
D/E rose from 0.83 in Q1 2024 to 1.04 in Q2 2026, while interest coverage fell from 4.87 to 3.09, as per balance sheet data, indicating reduced financial flexibility.
Fiserv's debt-to-equity ratio has increased steadily, reaching 1.04 in Q2 2026, while interest coverage has declined from 4.87 in Q2 2024 to 3.09 in Q2 2026. This indicates that the company's earnings are becoming less sufficient to cover interest expenses, a trend exacerbated by the recent EPS miss and margin compression. The D/EBITDA ratio has also risen sharply, from 10.29 in Q4 2024 to 20.96 in Q2 2026, suggesting that EBITDA is declining relative to debt, which could raise refinancing risk. While the company maintains an investment-grade profile, the trajectory suggests that leverage is becoming a more significant constraint on capital allocation, particularly if cash flows remain volatile.
Thin Liquidity Buffer Raises Concern
Current ratio stands at 1.04 with cash of only $627M against $27.9B debt, as reported in Q2 2026, indicating a tight liquidity position that could be vulnerable to stress.
Fiserv's current ratio has remained near 1.0 for the past ten quarters, reflecting a minimal excess of current assets over current liabilities. The quick ratio is identical, suggesting that the company does not rely on inventory, but the cash balance of $627M is negligible relative to its $27.9B debt load. This thin liquidity buffer, combined with volatile free cash flow margins, implies that the company would have limited capacity to absorb a sudden operational shock or fund unplanned obligations without accessing capital markets. While the recurring nature of revenue provides some stability, the lack of a cash cushion warrants monitoring, especially given the recent earnings miss and lowered guidance.
Misapplied Metric: P/E Obscures Cash Generation
P/E of 8.29 appears cheap, but heavy amortization from the First Data acquisition distorts earnings, making EV/EBITDA or P/FCF more relevant, as per reported financials.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Fiserv is the P/E multiple, which is misleading due to significant non-cash amortization expenses stemming from the First Data merger. These charges depress net income, artificially inflating the P/E ratio and making the stock appear more expensive than its cash-generating ability suggests. In contrast, EV/EBITDA of 6.36 and P/FCF of 6.46 provide a clearer picture of valuation, as they adjust for these non-cash items. Investors should focus on free cash flow yield and EV/EBITDA when comparing Fiserv to peers like FIS and GPN, as these metrics better reflect the underlying economics of the business. The low PEG of 0.24 also suggests that the market is pricing in minimal growth, which may be overly pessimistic given the company's recurring revenue streams.