Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -9.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -141.3%. (2023–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.6B | $3.4B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3.1B | $2.9B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -9.91 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 22.50 | 21.26 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.80 | 2.86 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 18.23 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 15.6% | -18.7% | 48.2% |
| Operating Margin | -154.3% | -154.3% | -344.5% | -238.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -186.6% | -186.6% | -380.2% | -245.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -141.3% | -141.3% | — | — |
| ROA | -26.7% | -26.7% | -63.5% | -42.2% |
| ROIC | -26.2% | -26.2% | — | — |
| ROCE | -26.8% | -26.8% | -101.6% | -71.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.26 | 0.26 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.41 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -14.56 | -14.56 | -10.35 | -33.18 |
Net cash position: cash ($793M) exceeds total debt ($309M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.51 | 4.51 | 1.01 | 1.10 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.51 | 4.51 | 1.01 | 1.09 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.18 | 4.18 | 0.69 | 0.60 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.17 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | 115.93 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 105.33 | 6.03 | 17.87 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $152M | $144M | $144M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FLY stock.
Firefly Aerospace Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -9.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Firefly Aerospace Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -141.3%. The historical average is -141.3%.
Based on historical data, Firefly Aerospace Inc. is trading at a P/E of -9.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Firefly Aerospace Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.15%.
Firefly Aerospace Inc. has 15.6% gross margin and -154.3% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash burn outpaces revenue scaling
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Volatility Masks Structural Costs
Gross margin swung from 4.0% to 27.6% over six quarters, averaging 15.56% TTM, per reported financials, indicating pricing power but unstable cost absorption as launch cadence varies.
The wide quarterly swings in gross margin, from 4.0% in Q1 2025 to 27.6% in Q3 2025, suggest that the company's cost structure is highly sensitive to the mix of missions and milestone recognition, rather than reflecting a stable unit economics. Operating margin remains deeply negative at -80.9% in Q2 2026, indicating that R&D and SG&A costs are scaling faster than gross profit, which may imply that the current revenue base is insufficient to cover fixed overhead. Investors should monitor whether gross margin can stabilize above 20% as launch cadence increases, as this would be a prerequisite for any path to operating profitability.
Return on Capital Decays Despite Capital Infusion
ROIC worsened to -8.7% in Q2 2026 from -17.3% in Q4 2025, per reported figures, while ROE remained deeply negative at -7.9%, indicating that the massive equity raise has not yet translated into productive returns.
The improvement in ROIC from -17.3% to -8.7% is primarily a function of the expanded capital base from the equity raise, not operational efficiency, as the company's net operating losses continue to widen. ROE of -7.9% on a positive equity base of $1.2B suggests that the company is destroying shareholder value at a rate that, while improving sequentially, remains far from acceptable. The negative returns on capital are consistent with a company in a heavy investment phase, but the lack of any positive trend in operating income implies that the capital deployed is not yet generating a return, and investors should expect continued dilution before any inflection.
Working Capital Efficiency Remains Elusive
DSO improved to 47 days in Q2 2026 from 97 days a year earlier, per reported data, but DPO fell to 49 days from 251 days, indicating reduced supplier leverage and persistent cash conversion challenges.
The sharp reduction in DSO from 97 to 47 days suggests that the company is collecting milestone payments more quickly, which may reflect improved contract terms or a shift toward government customers with faster payment cycles. However, the collapse in DPO from 251 days to 49 days indicates that the company is paying suppliers more promptly, possibly to secure critical components for launch vehicles, which reduces its ability to finance operations through trade credit. The cash conversion cycle remains negative or unavailable, but the combination of high DSO volatility and low DPO suggests that working capital management is not yet a source of cash, and the company remains dependent on external funding.
Deleveraging Provides Breathing Room
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.04 in Q2 2026 from 0.26 in Q4 2025, per reported financials, with total debt down to $53.4M, indicating a strategic deleveraging that reduces near-term refinancing risk.
The dramatic reduction in leverage, driven by the equity raise and debt repayment, has transformed the balance sheet from a highly leveraged position to a nearly unlevered one, which provides significant financial flexibility for a company with deeply negative operating margins. Interest coverage remains negative at -50.48, but this is a function of operating losses rather than excessive debt service, as the low debt level means interest expense is minimal. The current capital structure appears adequate to support the company through its investment phase, but the ongoing cash burn of over $100M per quarter suggests that the company will need to raise additional capital before reaching profitability, which could reintroduce leverage or dilution.
Cash Buffer Strong but Burn Accelerates
Current ratio improved to 2.73 in Q2 2026 from 1.39 a year earlier, per reported data, with cash at $459.8M, providing roughly four quarters of runway at current burn rates.
The current ratio of 2.73, with a quick ratio at the same level, indicates that the company has ample short-term liquidity to cover its obligations, but this is largely a function of the recent equity raise rather than operational cash generation. The cash balance of $459.8M, combined with the $792M total cash position noted in the intelligence, suggests a runway of approximately four to five quarters at the current FCF burn rate of around $106M per quarter. While the liquidity position appears adequate for the near term, the accelerating burn rate and the need for continued investment in MLV development imply that the company will likely need to access capital markets within the next year, which could be dilutive to existing shareholders.
P/S Multiple Misleads on Growth Value
The P/S ratio of 27.92, per reported valuation data, is commonly misapplied to early-stage aerospace, obscuring that revenue growth is milestone-driven and not yet indicative of sustainable cash generation.
For a company with negative earnings and EBITDA, the P/S multiple is often used as a proxy for growth value, but in Firefly's case, this metric is misleading because a significant portion of revenue is tied to milestone payments from government contracts that do not correlate with recurring operational velocity. The 162.95% YoY revenue growth may reflect a single large contract milestone rather than a sustainable increase in launch frequency, as noted in the intelligence, which means the P/S ratio could be overstating the company's true growth potential. A more appropriate metric would be EV/invested capital or a multiple of forward backlog, as these better capture the value of the company's contracted future revenue and the capital required to execute on it, rather than relying on a revenue figure that is subject to lumpy recognition.