Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 45.2x · EV/EBITDA 16.1x · ROE 8.0%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.0B | $4.0B | $4.3B | $3.0B | $2.8B | $4.1B | $4.4B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $6.0B | $5.1B | $5.2B | $3.9B | $3.8B | $4.7B | $4.5B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 45.24 | 36.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.83 | 1.47 | 1.77 | 1.29 | 1.53 | 5.42 | 5.50 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.99 | 2.41 | 4.06 | 2.44 | 2.06 | 2.77 | 4.43 | — |
| P/FCF | 47.71 | 38.51 | 26.02 | 60.30 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 21.29 | 17.19 | 15.79 | 18.24 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.87 | 2.15 | 1.72 | 2.07 | 6.19 | 5.65 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.13 | 13.58 | 17.82 | 21.13 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 33.15 | 20.98 | 118.63 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 48.82 | 31.64 | 80.19 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 60.1% | 60.1% | 60.1% | 58.2% | 55.1% | 37.5% | 33.3% | 58.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 6.7% | 4.7% | -0.3% | -10.7% | -73.4% | -94.2% | 9.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 4.0% | 4.0% | -5.7% | -2.8% | -1.4% | — | -77.4% | 6.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.0% | 8.0% | -12.2% | -4.9% | -1.7% | — | -46.1% | 8.0% |
| ROA | 2.6% | 2.6% | -3.7% | -1.6% | -0.6% | — | -21.0% | 4.3% |
| ROIC | 5.8% | 5.8% | 4.1% | -0.3% | -6.7% | -26.4% | -44.4% | 10.9% |
| ROCE | 5.7% | 5.7% | 4.0% | -0.3% | -5.9% | -20.4% | -32.7% | 8.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.91 | 0.91 | 1.38 | 1.20 | 0.95 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.14 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.03 | 4.03 | 4.99 | 7.80 | — | — | — | 0.68 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.65 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.39 | 0.12 | -0.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.87 | 2.87 | 3.16 | 5.24 | — | — | — | -0.75 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 10.31 | 5.61 | 19.90 | — | — | — | -1.57 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.55 | 2.55 | 0.38 | -0.03 | -1.93 | -11.32 | -27.11 | 13.87 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 1.60 | 1.43 | 1.52 | 1.81 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 1.60 | 1.43 | 1.52 | 1.81 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.39 | 0.72 | 1.02 | 0.70 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.44 | 0.19 | 0.29 | 0.68 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 136.17 | 95.66 | 125.92 | 165.25 | 211.44 | 66.28 | 114.55 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 43.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.2% | 2.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.1% | 2.6% | 3.8% | 1.7% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.5% | 1.8% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.5% | 1.8% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $524M | $463M | $458M | $419M | $419M | $419M | $129M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GBTG stock.
Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 45.2x. The historical average is 36.4x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 16.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 17.5x.
Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.0%. The historical average is -8.1%.
Based on historical data, Global Business Travel Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 45.2x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has 60.1% gross margin and 6.7% operating margin.
Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Goodwill impairment risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margins Stable but Operating Leverage Elusive
Gross margin held near 59% in 2026Q2, per financial statements, yet operating margin compressed to 2.8% from 5.4% a year earlier, indicating costs are scaling faster than revenue.
The stability in gross margin around 59% suggests the core travel services business retains pricing power, but the sharp decline in operating margin from 8.9% in 2025Q1 to 2.8% in 2026Q2 reveals that SG&A and R&D investments are outpacing gross profit growth. Net margin swung from -21.6% in 2024Q3 to 10.5% in 2025Q4, reflecting volatile non-operating items and tax effects that obscure underlying earning power. Investors should focus on operating margin as the truer measure of profitability, as it strips out these distortions and currently indicates that the company is buying growth at the expense of near-term earnings.
Returns on Capital Remain Subdued
ROIC has hovered between 0.4% and 2.1% over the past ten quarters, as reported, far below the cost of capital, suggesting the business is not yet compounding shareholder value.
Despite a growing asset base, ROIC has remained persistently low, with the latest quarter at 0.6%, indicating that acquisitions and organic investments are not generating sufficient incremental returns. ROE has been volatile, ranging from -11.1% in 2024Q3 to 6.9% in 2025Q1, but the trend is not consistently improving, reflecting thin net margins and high leverage. The gap between gross margin and net margin highlights that operating expenses and interest costs are consuming most of the gross profit, leaving little return for equity holders.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Strain
DSO rose from 103 days in 2025Q1 to 110 days in 2026Q2, per SEC filings, while DPO increased to 156 days, indicating the company is stretching supplier payments to fund receivables.
The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DIO data, but the divergence between DSO and DPO suggests that GBTG is relying on extended payment terms to manage cash flow. Asset turnover has been remarkably stable at 0.16-0.17 over the past ten quarters, implying that revenue growth is being matched by proportional asset growth, likely from acquisitions. The rising DSO may indicate slower collections from corporate clients, which could pressure liquidity if the trend continues, though the simultaneous increase in DPO provides some offset.
Leverage Eases but Coverage Remains Thin
Debt-to-equity improved from 1.38 to 0.95 over the past year, as reported, yet interest coverage fell to 0.96 in 2026Q2, indicating earnings barely cover interest expense.
While the D/E ratio has improved due to equity growth from reduced losses, the absolute debt level rose to $1.6B, and D/EBITDA remains elevated at 19.99 in 2026Q2, suggesting high leverage relative to cash earnings. Interest coverage of 0.96 in the latest quarter means operating income is insufficient to cover interest charges, a concerning sign that was also evident in 2025Q3 when coverage was negative. The improvement in D/E is partly a function of a larger equity base from share issuance and retained earnings improvements, but the underlying debt service burden remains heavy.
Liquidity Buffer Thins but Remains Adequate
Current ratio declined from 1.66 to 1.20 over the past year, per balance sheet data, while cash rose to $518M, suggesting a tighter but still manageable liquidity position.
The quick ratio equals the current ratio at 1.20, indicating that inventory is not a significant factor, which is typical for a travel services company. The decline in the current ratio reflects rising current liabilities, possibly from increased payables and accrued expenses, but the cash balance provides a cushion. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a prolonged downturn in business travel, the current ratio could fall below 1.0 if collections slow and payables come due, but the current cash position offers some buffer.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in Asset-Heavy Context
EV/EBITDA of 16.06 appears reasonable, but with D/EBITDA near 20 and goodwill at 33% of assets, this multiple understates leverage and overstates earnings quality.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is commonly used to compare travel companies, but for GBTG, EBITDA is likely inflated by significant non-cash charges and acquisition-related amortization, while the high debt load makes the enterprise value misleading. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBIT or EV/operating cash flow, which better captures the actual cash-generating ability and the burden of interest costs. Additionally, the large goodwill balance suggests that a portion of the enterprise value may be at risk of impairment, which would not be reflected in EBITDA-based multiples.