Total assets have contracted for six consecutive quarters to $3.3B, while equity has eroded 12.5% to $1.4B and cash reserves have plummeted 87.5% to $14.4M, signaling a defensive posture amid credit stress.
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) balance sheet — 14-year assets, liabilities & shareholders' equity history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 | Dec'16 | Dec'15 | Dec'14 | Dec'13 | Dec'12 |
|---|
| Cash & Short Term Investments | 250.9M | 43.21M | 61.8M | 52.36M | 39.6M | 33.76M | 32.14M | 9.41M | 6.11M | 11.61M | 4.57M | 22.71M | 8.61M | 7.41M | 1.54M |
| Cash & Due from Banks | 14.43M | 43.21M | 61.8M | 52.36M | 39.6M | 33.76M | 32.14M | 9.41M | 6.11M | 11.61M | 4.57M | 22.71M | 8.61M | 7.41M | 1.54M |
| Short Term Investments | 36.23M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Investments | 3.23B | 3.3B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100K | 19.81M | 1.37B | 1.25B | 1.16B | 1.08B | 44.9M | 907.37M | 493.42M | 49.96M |
| Investments Growth % | 0% | - | - | - | -100% | -99.5% | -98.56% | 9.79% | 7.45% | 7.35% | 2312.6% | -95.05% | 83.89% | 887.53% | - |
| Long-Term Investments | 12.95B | 3.3B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100K | 19.81M | 1.37B | 1.25B | 1.16B | 1.08B | 44.9M | 907.37M | 493.42M | 49.96M |
| Accounts Receivables | 23.89M | 26.93M | 28.09M | 38.53M | 31.78M | 23.28M | 24.19M | 5.7M | 6.97M | 8.3M | 7.84M | 10.4M | 8.7M | 3.64M | 267.64K |
| Goodwill & Intangibles | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Goodwill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Intangible Assets | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PP&E (Net) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Assets | 18.01M | 15.66M | 3.51B | 3.43B | 3.52B | 3.49B | 3.24B | 88.37M | 131.85M | 112.13M | 90.8M | 1.05B | 42.5M | 124.97M | 0 |
| Total Current Assets | 74.54M | 70.14M | 89.89M | 90.9M | 71.38M | 57.04M | 56.33M | 15.2M | 15.68M | 23.62M | 16.54M | 35.45M | 17.62M | 11.83M | 1.8M |
| Total Non-Current Assets | 3.21B | 3.31B | 3.51B | 3.43B | 3.52B | 3.49B | 3.26B | 1.46B | 1.38B | 1.27B | 1.17B | 1.1B | 949.87M | 618.39M | 49.96M |
| Total Assets | 3.29B | 3.38B | 3.6B | 3.52B | 3.59B | 3.55B | 3.31B | 1.48B | 1.4B | 1.3B | 1.19B | 1.13B | 967.49M | 630.22M | 51.77M |
| Asset Growth % | -18.82% | -6.11% | 2.29% | -1.91% | 1.14% | 7.2% | 124.53% | 5.6% | 7.58% | 9.08% | 5.1% | 17.08% | 53.52% | 1117.38% | - |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 1.75% | 3.41% | 1.76% | 5.51% | 1.54% | 5.61% | 7.36% | 2.52% | 3.98% | 3.98% | 3.5% | 4.44% | 4.62% | 5.27% | 5.92% |
| Accounts Payable | 0 | 61.57M | 74.07M | 62.67M | 59.59M | 60.75M | 55.85M | 20.47M | 20.53M | 19.75M | 17.92M | 16.77M | 35.73M | 12.41M | 0 |
| Total Debt | 1.85B | 1.88B | 1.93B | 1.83B | 2.01B | 1.86B | 1.63B | 769.73M | 659.1M | 542.53M | 498.15M | 419M | 700.73M | 4.99M | 0 |
| Net Debt | 1.84B | 1.83B | 1.87B | 1.77B | 1.97B | 1.83B | 1.59B | 760.32M | 652.99M | 530.92M | 493.59M | 396.29M | 692.12M | -2.42M | -1.54M |
| Long-Term Debt | 1.85B | 1.88B | 1.93B | 1.83B | 2.01B | 1.86B | 1.63B | 151.32M | 149.68M | 111.28M | 110.4M | 419M | 350M | 0 | 0 |
| Short-Term Debt | 2.36M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 618.41M | 509.42M | 431.25M | 387.75M | 0 | 350.73M | 4.99M | 0 |
| Other Liabilities | 79.85M | 8.65M | 27.24M | 31.53M | 16.66M | 14.41M | 14.31M | 5.5M | 3.43M | 7.83M | 5.89M | 4.6M | -346.56M | 2.78M | 280.42K |
| Total Current Liabilities | 71.75M | 73.59M | 74.07M | 62.67M | 59.59M | 60.75M | 55.85M | 642.33M | 533.97M | 453.66M | 409.11M | 20.51M | 389.47M | 19.66M | 65.83K |
| Total Non-Current Liabilities | 1.93B | 1.89B | 1.96B | 1.86B | 2.03B | 1.88B | 1.64B | 156.82M | 153.12M | 119.1M | 116.29M | 423.6M | 3.44M | 2.78M | 280.42K |
| Total Liabilities | 1.93B | 1.96B | 2.03B | 1.92B | 2.09B | 1.94B | 1.7B | 799.15M | 687.08M | 572.76M | 525.4M | 444.11M | 392.91M | 22.44M | 346.25K |
| Total Equity | 1.36B | 1.42B | 1.57B | 1.6B | 1.5B | 1.61B | 1.62B | 676.13M | 709.89M | 725.83M | 665.14M | 688.65M | 574.58M | 607.78M | 51.42M |
| Equity Growth % | -39.58% | -9.52% | -1.82% | 6.62% | -6.94% | -0.05% | 138.88% | -4.76% | -2.2% | 9.12% | -3.41% | 19.85% | -5.46% | 1081.94% | - |
| Equity / Assets (Capital Ratio) | 41.29% | 42.06% | 43.65% | 45.47% | 41.83% | 45.46% | 48.76% | 45.83% | 50.82% | 55.89% | 55.87% | 60.79% | 59.39% | 96.44% | 99.33% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 4.17% | 7.96% | 3.96% | 12.62% | 3.53% | 11.92% | 15.37% | 5.22% | 7.48% | 7.12% | 6.01% | 7.38% | 6.25% | 5.46% | 5.96% |
| Book Value per Share | 12.06 | 12.31 | 13.71 | 14.79 | 14.69 | 15.88 | 29.94 | 16.77 | 17.67 | 18.79 | 18.31 | 19.80 | 19.32 | 20.44 | 26.12 |
| Tangible BV per Share | 12.06 | 12.31 | 13.71 | 14.79 | 14.69 | 15.88 | 29.94 | 16.77 | 17.67 | 18.79 | 18.31 | 19.80 | 19.32 | 20.44 | 26.12 |
| Common Stock | 113K | 113K | 117K | 110K | 103K | 102K | 102K | 40K | 40K | 40K | 36K | 36K | 29K | 30K | 0 |
| Additional Paid-in Capital | 1.88B | 1.88B | 1.95B | 1.83B | 1.71B | 1.67B | 1.62B | 778.13M | 802.22M | 799.94M | 719.85M | 719.69M | 587.88M | 608.15M | 50.91M |
| Retained Earnings | -522.06M | -456.69M | -373.67M | -224.58M | -206.2M | -55.02M | -5.35M | -100.63M | -90.94M | -72.72M | 25.62M | 14.35M | 4.06M | 10K | -184.34K |
| Accumulated OCI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.42M | -1.42M | -1.42M | 24.2M | -29.66M | -11.91M | -1.41M | 862.55K |
| Treasury Stock | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Preferred Stock | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GSBD stock.
As of 2025, Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) had total assets of $3.38B including $70.1M in current assets.
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) carries total debt of $1.88B. Comparing total debt to cash helps evaluate the company's debt burden and net leverage.
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) has total shareholders' equity (book value) of $1.42B ($12.31 book value per share). Book value represents the net worth of the company belonging to common stock holders.
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) reported a current ratio of 0.95x. A current ratio above 1.0x indicates that the company has more current assets than current liabilities, suggesting sufficient short-term liquidity.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage amid credit deterioration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Asset Contraction Amid Credit Stress
Total assets have contracted for six consecutive quarters, declining 8.6% from a peak of $3.6B in 2024Q2 to $3.3B in 2026Q2, suggesting a defensive portfolio runoff rather than organic growth, as reported in the company's balance sheet filings.
The sustained decline in total assets, coupled with the recent emergence of significant loan loss provisions, indicates the portfolio is shrinking due to paydowns, sales, or mark-to-market losses rather than new originations. This trajectory is inconsistent with a growth-oriented BDC and suggests management is prioritizing liquidity and credit preservation over deployment, which may limit future earnings power.
Funding Profile Shifts Toward Costly Leverage
With a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.32x as of 2026Q2, GSBD is operating near the upper limit of typical BDC leverage, indicating a heavy reliance on external borrowings rather than organic equity growth to fund its portfolio, based on the latest balance sheet data.
Unlike a traditional bank, a BDC's 'deposit franchise' is its ability to issue debt and equity at favorable terms. The elevated leverage ratio, combined with a declining net interest margin, suggests the cost of this borrowed capital is rising faster than the yield on new assets, compressing the spread that funds operations. This structure becomes increasingly fragile if credit markets tighten or if the advisor's ability to source high-yielding deals diminishes.
Provision Surge Signals Deteriorating Credit
After eight quarters of zero provisions, GSBD recorded $31.2M in loan loss provisions over the last two quarters, with $21.9M in 2026Q2 alone, a dramatic reversal that appears to reflect emerging non-accruals or downgrades within the middle-market portfolio.
The sudden and material provision expense is the most critical development in the balance sheet analysis, directly eroding net income and consuming capital. This pattern suggests the advisor is now recognizing credit deterioration that was previously latent, and the pace of provisioning ($21.9M in a single quarter) warrants close monitoring for potential realized losses that could further impact net asset value.
Equity Buffer Eroding Under Losses
Total equity has declined from $1.6B in early 2024 to $1.4B in 2026Q2, a 12.5% reduction that appears driven by realized and unrealized losses, directly reducing the loss-absorption capacity available to support the leveraged portfolio.
The erosion of the equity base is particularly concerning given the concurrent rise in provisions and the elevated leverage ratio. This combination suggests the capital buffer is being consumed by credit costs, limiting the company's ability to absorb further losses without breaching regulatory or internal leverage limits. The declining equity also reduces the capacity for share buybacks or new investments without dilutive equity issuance.
Cash Reserves Depleted, Liquidity Tightening
Cash and cash equivalents have plummeted from $115.2M in 2025Q3 to just $14.4M in 2026Q2, an 87.5% decline that signals a significant tightening of immediate liquidity, as shown in the quarterly balance sheet.
The near-total depletion of the cash buffer, occurring alongside asset contraction and rising provisions, suggests the company is using available liquidity to meet obligations, fund dividends, or cover credit-related outflows. This leaves minimal cushion for unexpected margin calls on its borrowings or for funding new investment opportunities, potentially forcing the company into less favorable financing or asset sales.
Unrealized Losses Mask True Economic Value
The significant gap between the reported 91.1% net margin and the 1.7% ROE, combined with the sudden provision surge, suggests that unrealized losses within the Level 3 asset portfolio may be larger than currently reflected, potentially understating the true erosion of net asset value.
For a BDC holding illiquid, privately-rated debt, fair value accounting can obscure economic reality. The pattern of zero provisions followed by a sharp spike may indicate that mark-to-market adjustments are lagging actual credit deterioration. Investors should scrutinize the unrealized loss position within the investment portfolio, as further write-downs could trigger additional provisions and further compress the already-thin equity cushion.