Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 35.9x · EV/EBITDA 21.2x · ROE 43.5%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $60.0B | $48.4B | $51.6B | $41.5B | $28.4B | $27.1B | $21.9B | $18.6B | $16.0B | $13.7B | $14.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $62.6B | $51.0B | $53.8B | $43.6B | $30.8B | $29.6B | $24.0B | $20.4B | $17.6B | $15.7B | $16.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 35.89 | 28.50 | 27.23 | 22.70 | 18.38 | 25.94 | 31.56 | 21.90 | 20.42 | 23.58 | 23.53 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.34 | 2.70 | 3.01 | 2.52 | 1.87 | 2.08 | 1.86 | 1.62 | 1.42 | 1.31 | 1.39 |
| P/B Ratio | 14.73 | 11.70 | 13.95 | 12.07 | 10.39 | 12.52 | 10.48 | 9.02 | 7.63 | 7.49 | 7.41 |
| P/FCF | 45.07 | 36.39 | 32.90 | 26.18 | 26.39 | 39.67 | 23.68 | 22.64 | 19.51 | 16.72 | 19.66 |
| P/OCF | 29.77 | 24.04 | 24.47 | 20.44 | 21.32 | 28.87 | 19.53 | 17.84 | 15.10 | 12.97 | 14.09 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.84 | 3.13 | 2.65 | 2.02 | 2.27 | 2.03 | 1.78 | 1.57 | 1.51 | 1.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.25 | 17.32 | 18.72 | 15.69 | 12.76 | 17.06 | 20.05 | 13.72 | 12.50 | 12.02 | 11.77 |
| EV / EBIT | 23.25 | 20.32 | 20.22 | 16.82 | 13.98 | 19.05 | 23.04 | 15.87 | 15.09 | 15.33 | 14.84 |
| EV / FCF | — | 38.33 | 34.26 | 27.50 | 28.60 | 43.36 | 25.87 | 24.90 | 21.57 | 19.18 | 22.40 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 39.1% | 39.0% | 39.4% | 38.4% | 36.2% | 35.9% | 38.3% | 38.7% | 39.3% | 40.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 15.0% | 15.4% | 15.6% | 14.5% | 11.9% | 8.6% | 11.0% | 10.3% | 10.1% | 11.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 9.5% | 9.5% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 10.2% | 8.0% | 5.9% | 7.4% | 7.0% | 5.6% | 6.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 43.5% | 43.5% | 53.4% | 59.2% | 63.2% | 49.0% | 33.5% | 40.9% | 39.9% | 31.4% | 28.5% |
| ROA | 19.2% | 19.2% | 22.5% | 23.2% | 21.8% | 16.2% | 11.3% | 14.3% | 13.4% | 10.2% | 10.5% |
| ROIC | 32.1% | 32.1% | 34.7% | 36.1% | 33.9% | 26.4% | 19.0% | 24.6% | 22.8% | 20.4% | 21.2% |
| ROCE | 39.7% | 39.7% | 41.1% | 43.1% | 41.6% | 31.2% | 22.2% | 29.0% | 26.7% | 25.1% | 27.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.99 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.08 | 1.06 | 1.28 | 1.18 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.11 | 0.99 | 1.12 | 1.59 | 2.19 | 1.49 | 1.57 | 1.79 | 1.64 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.87 | 1.17 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 1.10 | 1.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.99 | 1.45 | 1.70 | 1.24 | 1.19 | 1.54 | 1.44 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.94 | 1.37 | 1.32 | 2.21 | 3.70 | 2.19 | 2.26 | 2.06 | 2.46 | 2.75 |
| Interest Coverage | 31.00 | 31.00 | 34.56 | 27.88 | 23.70 | 17.84 | 11.18 | 16.30 | 13.28 | 11.52 | 14.28 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.83 | 2.83 | 2.49 | 2.88 | 2.48 | 2.63 | 2.72 | 2.12 | 2.37 | 2.13 | 1.85 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.49 | 1.64 | 1.36 | 1.40 | 1.52 | 1.13 | 1.34 | 1.18 | 0.99 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.41 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.22 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.00 | 1.94 | 2.02 | 2.01 | 1.98 | 1.87 | 1.91 | 1.91 | 1.80 | 1.78 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.57 | 4.57 | 4.54 | 4.41 | 4.16 | 4.44 | 4.36 | 4.28 | 4.46 | 4.43 | 4.28 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 47.38 | 47.45 | 48.55 | 51.13 | 49.16 | 45.61 | 45.28 | 45.05 | 46.39 | 44.04 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.8% | 2.0% | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| Payout Ratio | 27.4% | 27.4% | 22.1% | 21.4% | 23.9% | 34.2% | 48.6% | 38.6% | 40.4% | 51.9% | 50.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.8% | 3.5% | 3.7% | 4.4% | 5.4% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 4.6% | 4.9% | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| FCF Yield | 2.2% | 2.7% | 3.0% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 2.5% | 4.2% | 4.4% | 5.1% | 6.0% | 5.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.7% | 2.2% | 2.3% | 2.0% | 2.1% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 3.8% | 2.7% | 4.4% | 5.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.5% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 3.4% | 3.9% | 4.3% | 5.5% | 4.6% | 6.6% | 7.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $48M | $49M | $50M | $51M | $52M | $54M | $55M | $57M | $58M | $61M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GWW stock.
W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 35.9x. The historical average is 21.4x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 21.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.7x.
W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 43.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 27.2%.
Based on historical data, W.W. Grainger, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 35.9x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.77% with a payout ratio of 27.4%.
W.W. Grainger, Inc. has 39.1% gross margin and 15.0% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin sustainability amid macro uncertainty
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Masks Volume Concerns
According to the latest quarterly data, GWW's operating margin expanded to 16.1% in 2026Q2 from 14.9% a year earlier, while net margin reached 11.4%, suggesting pricing power and cost discipline.
The sequential improvement in operating margin from 14.3% in 2025Q4 to 16.1% in 2026Q2 indicates that the company is leveraging its fixed cost base effectively as revenue accelerates. However, the recent EPS beat was driven more by margin expansion than volume growth, with revenue up 10.3% YoY but EPS up 19.9%, implying that the sustainability of this margin profile depends on continued pricing power and cost control. Investors should monitor whether gross margin can hold near 39.5% as the lower-margin Endless Assortment segment grows, as mix shifts could pressure consolidated profitability.
ROIC Recovery Signals Efficiency Gains
Based on reported figures, ROIC improved to 9.2% in 2026Q2 from 8.4% in 2025Q2, while ROE remained elevated at 12.9%, indicating that the company is generating solid returns on its invested capital.
The recovery in ROIC from a cyclical low of 6.2% in 2025Q3 to 9.2% in 2026Q2 suggests that the company is becoming more efficient in deploying its capital, likely due to improved asset turnover and margin expansion. ROE has been consistently above 12% in most quarters, reflecting a strong balance sheet and disciplined capital allocation, though the 43.5% ROE cited in recent context appears to be a trailing figure that may be inflated by share buybacks. The stability of ROIC around 9% over the past year indicates that the company is compounding returns at a healthy rate, though it remains below the levels seen in 2024, warranting close monitoring of capital efficiency.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens Slightly
As reported in the latest financial statements, GWW's cash conversion cycle extended to 83 days in 2026Q2 from 87 days a year earlier, driven by a slight increase in days sales outstanding to 49 days.
The cash conversion cycle has remained relatively stable in the low-to-mid 80s over the past year, indicating that the company is managing its working capital efficiently despite its distribution-heavy model. The slight improvement in DIO from 76 days in 2025Q2 to 71 days in 2026Q2 suggests better inventory management, which is critical given the risk of SKU bloat in the Endless Assortment segment. However, DPO has remained flat at around 37 days, suggesting that the company is not extending supplier payment terms to fund operations, which may reflect its strong supplier relationships but also limits potential cash flow optimization.
Leverage Declines as Equity Grows
According to the balance sheet data, GWW's debt-to-equity ratio improved to 0.62 in 2026Q2 from 0.77 in 2024Q1, while interest coverage remained strong at 40.9x, indicating a comfortable debt service position.
The reduction in leverage is driven by retained earnings growth outpacing debt accumulation, with total debt hovering around $2.8B while equity expanded to $4.1B. Interest coverage of 40.9x in 2026Q2 is well above the 32.0x seen in 2025Q4, reflecting both higher operating income and lower interest expense, which suggests that the company has ample capacity to service its debt even if rates rise. The low debt-to-equity ratio, combined with a current ratio of 2.81, indicates that the balance sheet is a source of strength, providing flexibility for potential acquisitions or share repurchases.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Robust
Based on the latest quarterly data, GWW's current ratio improved to 2.81 in 2026Q2 from 2.19 in 2024Q1, with a quick ratio of 1.70, indicating a strong liquidity position to weather potential downturns.
The current ratio has been consistently above 2.5 over the past year, and the quick ratio of 1.70 suggests that the company can cover its short-term obligations even if inventory becomes illiquid. This liquidity buffer is particularly important given the cyclicality of the industrial sector, as it provides a cushion against demand shocks. However, the company's reliance on inventory (DIO of 71 days) means that a sharp slowdown could tie up cash, but the current ratio suggests that GWW is well-positioned to manage such stress.
P/E Misleads on Growth Potential
The most commonly misapplied ratio for GWW is the P/E multiple, which at 36.86 TTM appears expensive, but this fails to account for the company's high ROIC and defensive MRO business model.
The P/E ratio is often compared to the broader market or industrial peers, but GWW's business model generates high returns on capital with low cyclicality, justifying a premium multiple. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 21.79 reflects the company's operating performance and is more comparable to peers like Fastenal (32.75) and MSC (17.71). Additionally, the P/E is distorted by the company's share buyback program and LIFO accounting, which can depress earnings during inflationary periods. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and ROIC to assess GWW's true value creation, rather than relying solely on P/E.