Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 31.4x · EV/EBITDA 21.1x · ROE 43.5%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $68.0B | $48.4B | $51.6B | $41.5B | $28.4B | $27.1B | $21.9B | $18.6B | $16.0B | $13.7B | $14.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $70.6B | $51.0B | $53.8B | $43.6B | $30.8B | $29.6B | $24.0B | $20.4B | $17.6B | $15.7B | $16.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 31.37 | 28.50 | 27.23 | 22.70 | 18.38 | 25.94 | 31.56 | 21.90 | 20.42 | 23.58 | 23.53 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.51 | 2.70 | 3.01 | 2.52 | 1.87 | 2.08 | 1.86 | 1.62 | 1.42 | 1.31 | 1.39 |
| P/B Ratio | 16.70 | 11.70 | 13.95 | 12.07 | 10.39 | 12.52 | 10.48 | 9.02 | 7.63 | 7.49 | 7.41 |
| P/FCF | 39.62 | 36.39 | 32.90 | 26.18 | 26.39 | 39.67 | 23.68 | 22.64 | 19.51 | 16.72 | 19.66 |
| P/OCF | 33.76 | 24.04 | 24.47 | 20.44 | 21.32 | 28.87 | 19.53 | 17.84 | 15.10 | 12.97 | 14.09 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.84 | 3.13 | 2.65 | 2.02 | 2.27 | 2.03 | 1.78 | 1.57 | 1.51 | 1.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.14 | 17.32 | 18.72 | 15.69 | 12.73 | 17.05 | 19.95 | 13.71 | 12.47 | 11.97 | 11.77 |
| EV / EBIT | 26.23 | 20.32 | 20.22 | 16.82 | 13.98 | 19.05 | 23.04 | 15.87 | 15.09 | 15.33 | 14.84 |
| EV / FCF | — | 38.33 | 34.26 | 27.50 | 28.60 | 43.36 | 25.87 | 24.90 | 21.57 | 19.18 | 22.40 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 39.1% | 39.0% | 39.4% | 38.4% | 36.2% | 35.9% | 38.3% | 38.7% | 39.3% | 40.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 15.0% | 15.4% | 15.6% | 14.5% | 11.9% | 8.6% | 11.0% | 10.3% | 10.1% | 11.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 9.5% | 9.5% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 10.2% | 8.0% | 5.9% | 7.4% | 7.0% | 5.6% | 6.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 43.5% | 43.5% | 53.4% | 59.2% | 63.2% | 49.0% | 33.5% | 40.9% | 39.9% | 31.4% | 28.5% |
| ROA | 19.2% | 19.2% | 22.5% | 23.2% | 21.8% | 16.2% | 11.3% | 14.3% | 13.4% | 10.2% | 10.5% |
| ROIC | 32.1% | 32.1% | 34.7% | 36.1% | 33.9% | 26.4% | 19.0% | 24.6% | 22.8% | 20.4% | 21.2% |
| ROCE | 39.7% | 39.7% | 41.1% | 43.1% | 41.6% | 31.2% | 22.2% | 29.0% | 26.7% | 25.1% | 27.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.99 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.08 | 1.06 | 1.28 | 1.18 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.11 | 0.99 | 1.12 | 1.59 | 2.18 | 1.49 | 1.57 | 1.78 | 1.64 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.87 | 1.17 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 1.10 | 1.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.98 | 1.45 | 1.69 | 1.24 | 1.19 | 1.54 | 1.44 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.94 | 1.37 | 1.32 | 2.21 | 3.70 | 2.19 | 2.26 | 2.06 | 2.46 | 2.75 |
| Interest Coverage | 31.00 | 31.00 | 34.56 | 27.88 | 23.70 | 17.84 | 11.18 | 16.30 | 13.28 | 11.52 | 14.28 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.83 | 2.83 | 2.49 | 2.88 | 2.48 | 2.63 | 2.72 | 2.12 | 2.37 | 2.13 | 1.85 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.49 | 1.64 | 1.36 | 1.40 | 1.52 | 1.13 | 1.34 | 1.18 | 0.99 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.41 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.22 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.00 | 1.94 | 2.02 | 2.01 | 1.98 | 1.87 | 1.91 | 1.91 | 1.80 | 1.78 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.57 | 4.57 | 4.54 | 4.41 | 4.16 | 4.44 | 4.36 | 4.28 | 4.46 | 4.43 | 4.28 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 47.38 | 47.45 | 48.55 | 51.13 | 49.16 | 45.61 | 45.28 | 45.05 | 46.39 | 44.04 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.7% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.8% | 2.0% | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| Payout Ratio | 27.4% | 27.4% | 22.1% | 21.4% | 23.9% | 34.2% | 48.6% | 38.6% | 40.4% | 51.9% | 50.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.2% | 3.5% | 3.7% | 4.4% | 5.4% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 4.6% | 4.9% | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| FCF Yield | 2.5% | 2.7% | 3.0% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 2.5% | 4.2% | 4.4% | 5.1% | 6.0% | 5.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.5% | 2.2% | 2.3% | 2.0% | 2.1% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 3.8% | 2.7% | 4.4% | 5.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.2% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 3.4% | 3.9% | 4.3% | 5.5% | 4.6% | 6.6% | 7.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $48M | $49M | $50M | $51M | $52M | $54M | $55M | $57M | $58M | $61M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GWW stock.
W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 31.4x. The historical average is 21.4x. This places it at the 97th percentile of its historical range.
W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 21.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.7x.
W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 43.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 27.2%.
Based on historical data, W.W. Grainger, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 31.4x. This is at the 97th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.68% with a payout ratio of 27.4%.
W.W. Grainger, Inc. has 39.1% gross margin and 15.0% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Elevated multiple meets demand sensitivity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Prices in Durable Recovery
Based on the supplied figures, GWW trades at 40.7x trailing earnings and 30.96x forward earnings, a premium that implies the market expects sustained double-digit earnings growth to justify the multiple against a 4.5% trailing revenue growth rate.
The compression from roughly 41x trailing to 31x forward earnings reflects the market capitalizing the recent EPS recovery rather than paying for current top-line momentum alone. A PEG of 1.83 suggests the valuation is not extreme for a high-ROE distributor, but the premium relative to MSM at 31.7x and DXPE at 26.3x indicates investors are paying for the perceived durability of the High-Touch moat and digital mix shift. The implication is that the multiple leaves limited room for disappointment if margins mean-revert from the recent 16.0% operating level.
Operating Margin Recovery Drives Earnings Power
According to reported quarterly figures, GWW's operating margin expanded from 11.0% in 2025Q3 to 16.0% in 2026Q3 while gross margin held within a narrow 38.5% to 40.0% band, indicating the recovery is driven below the gross line.
Stable gross margins alongside rising operating margins point to operating leverage and cost discipline rather than pricing gains, which suggests the expansion may be partly cyclical. Net margin of 11.3% trails FAST's 15.3%, implying GWW's cost base is heavier than the purest high-touch peer. Investors should treat the 16% operating print as an upper-range outcome to be validated over additional quarters rather than as a settled run-rate.
ROIC Recovering but Below Peak Compounding
Based on the supplied ratio data, GWW's ROIC moved from 6.2% in 2025Q3 to 9.0% in 2026Q3, still well below FAST's 31.2%, suggesting the company's capital base is compounding at a materially lower rate than its best-in-class distribution peer.
The ROIC trajectory is recovering, yet the level remains modest relative to the 43.5% ROE, which signals that equity-level returns are heavily amplified by balance-sheet structure rather than operating capital efficiency. The gap versus Fastenal suggests structural differences in branch density and inventory intensity rather than a temporary shortfall. Investors should monitor whether ROIC can sustain a move toward low-double-digit levels as the Endless Assortment mix scales.
Low Leverage Supports Comfortable Debt Service
As reported in financial statements, GWW's debt-to-equity fell from 0.86 in 2024Q4 to 0.65 in 2026Q3 while interest coverage improved to 39.8x, indicating debt service has become substantially more comfortable over the period.
The declining debt-to-equity ratio reflects equity growth from retained earnings outpacing debt, which reduces refinancing pressure and preserves borrowing capacity. Interest coverage near 40x implies that financing costs are a negligible drag on earnings under current conditions. The main analytical question is whether the company is under-levered relative to peers, as MSM and DXPE carry higher leverage, which may indicate conservative capital structure rather than unused optionality.
ROE Flattered by Equity Base Structure
Based on reported figures, GWW's 43.5% return on equity appears elevated relative to its 9.0% ROIC, which may indicate that reported ROE overstates underlying earnings power because of the equity base's structure and buyback-driven shrinkage.
The wide spread between ROE and ROIC warrants investigation, since a sizable share of the equity-level return appears attributable to balance-sheet composition rather than operating performance. Ongoing buybacks of $227M to $462M per quarter may further reduce the equity denominator, which would mechanically lift ROE. Analysts applying ROE as a quality signal for GWW should instead anchor on ROIC and FCF yield to avoid overstating the franchise's capital efficiency.