Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 39.4x · EV/EBITDA 11.4x · ROE 4.9%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.8B | $4.1B | $4.0B | $4.5B | $4.6B | $5.3B | $2.7B | $3.1B | $2.6B | $4.2B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $9.5B | $10.9B | $10.7B | $8.5B | $8.2B | $9.2B | $4.1B | $4.7B | $3.8B | $5.0B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 39.42 | 50.28 | 84.67 | 14.35 | 13.15 | 29.95 | — | 14.21 | 8.68 | 12.79 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.55 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 1.13 | 1.21 | 2.26 | 2.99 | 1.67 | 1.29 | 2.45 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.23 | 2.84 | 2.12 | 2.12 | 2.15 | 2.65 | 7.14 | 5.39 | 4.20 | 8.10 | — |
| P/FCF | 11.98 | 17.80 | 21.94 | 18.92 | 7.12 | 35.12 | 55.63 | 37.45 | — | 13.58 | — |
| P/OCF | 9.18 | 13.65 | 13.00 | 14.37 | 6.19 | 31.36 | 33.80 | 21.18 | — | 11.78 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.13 | 2.15 | 3.92 | 4.63 | 2.53 | 1.92 | 2.93 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.43 | 13.04 | 11.10 | 9.46 | 8.78 | 14.69 | — | 12.72 | 8.17 | 13.70 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 16.99 | 22.37 | 23.03 | 13.54 | 13.24 | 24.50 | — | 14.73 | 8.87 | 14.83 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 47.28 | 58.51 | 35.81 | 12.69 | 61.09 | 86.18 | 56.76 | — | 16.23 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 56.7% | 56.7% | 56.9% | 30.9% | 33.2% | 36.6% | 17.0% | 28.7% | 34.3% | 32.6% | 32.8% |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | 11.1% | 14.0% | 17.2% | 18.1% | 21.3% | — | 17.1% | 21.7% | 19.7% | 20.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.9% | 7.9% | 9.2% | 7.5% | -22.5% | 11.8% | 14.9% | 19.1% | 10.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.9% | 4.9% | 2.3% | 14.7% | 17.0% | 14.9% | -42.6% | 36.4% | 52.6% | 95.5% | 550.8% |
| ROA | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 3.8% | 4.4% | 3.2% | -6.5% | 7.4% | 11.6% | 14.3% | 8.6% |
| ROIC | 5.0% | 5.0% | 7.1% | 8.6% | 8.9% | 9.7% | — | 11.7% | 20.3% | 19.1% | 20.8% |
| ROCE | 5.5% | 5.5% | 7.9% | 9.5% | 9.9% | 10.3% | — | 12.9% | 21.4% | 18.9% | 20.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 5.10 | 5.10 | 3.70 | 2.17 | 1.79 | 2.18 | 5.33 | 2.90 | 2.21 | 2.06 | 7.09 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.81 | 8.81 | 7.27 | 5.12 | 4.10 | 6.94 | — | 4.51 | 2.90 | 2.91 | 3.41 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 4.71 | 3.53 | 1.89 | 1.68 | 1.96 | 3.92 | 2.78 | 2.04 | 1.58 | 6.80 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 8.13 | 8.13 | 6.93 | 4.46 | 3.86 | 6.24 | — | 4.33 | 2.67 | 2.24 | 3.27 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 29.47 | 36.56 | 16.89 | 5.58 | 25.97 | 30.54 | 19.32 | — | 2.65 | 9.16 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.41 | 3.52 | 4.39 | 3.56 | -5.51 | 7.35 | 14.43 | 12.52 | 11.10 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.20 | 5.20 | 4.87 | 4.39 | 3.60 | 4.81 | 3.89 | 4.83 | 3.81 | 3.60 | 4.12 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.17 | 3.17 | 3.18 | 3.17 | 2.59 | 3.38 | 2.72 | 3.52 | 2.79 | 2.68 | 2.95 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.25 | 0.52 | 0.19 | 0.50 | 0.88 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.45 | 0.11 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.60 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.73 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.96 | 1.96 | 2.21 | 1.19 | 1.06 | 2.35 | 2.49 | 2.27 | 2.07 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 244.80 | 245.48 | 240.40 | 218.43 | 322.79 | 446.25 | 264.12 | 232.44 | 252.36 | 264.70 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.5% | 2.0% | 1.2% | 7.0% | 7.6% | 3.3% | — | 7.0% | 11.5% | 7.8% | — |
| FCF Yield | 8.4% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 5.3% | 14.1% | 2.8% | 1.8% | 2.7% | — | 7.4% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 21.8% | 14.7% | 10.8% | 8.2% | 5.9% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 9.2% | 7.1% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 21.8% | 14.7% | 10.8% | 8.2% | 5.9% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 9.2% | 7.1% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $92M | $103M | $112M | $120M | $101M | $85M | $89M | $98M | $100M | $99M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HGV stock.
Hilton Grand Vacations Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 39.4x. The historical average is 28.5x. This places it at the 75th percentile of its historical range.
Hilton Grand Vacations Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 11.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.5x.
Hilton Grand Vacations Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 4.9%. The historical average is 21.7%.
Based on historical data, Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. is trading at a P/E of 39.4x. This is at the 75th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. has 56.7% gross margin and 11.1% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Hilton Grand Vacations Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and EPS miss
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Leverage Creep Threatens Financial Flexibility
Debt-to-equity surged from 3.13 in 2024Q1 to 6.24 by 2026Q2, while interest coverage fell to 1.33x, indicating a strained capacity to service debt, as per reported balance sheet data.
The rapid increase in leverage, with total debt reaching $7.9B against a shrinking equity base of $1.1B, suggests that HGV's capital structure is becoming increasingly risky. Interest coverage of 1.33x in 2026Q2 is barely above the danger zone, implying that operating income is only marginally sufficient to cover interest expenses. This trend, combined with the recent EPS miss, may indicate that the company's high debt load is beginning to constrain its financial flexibility, potentially limiting future investment or buyback capacity.
Liquidity Buffer Thins Despite High Ratio
Current ratio fell from 5.20 in 2025Q4 to 2.24 in 2026Q2, while cash dropped to $272M, indicating a shrinking liquidity cushion, based on the latest quarterly data.
Although the current ratio remains above 2, the sharp decline from 5.20 to 2.24 within two quarters signals a rapid deterioration in liquidity. The quick ratio of 0.42 in 2026Q2 reveals that excluding inventory, the company's liquid assets cover less than half of current liabilities, highlighting a heavy reliance on inventory to meet short-term obligations. This suggests that under stress, HGV may face challenges in covering immediate liabilities without resorting to asset sales or additional borrowing.
Working Capital Swings Signal Financing Needs
Cash conversion cycle spiked to 257 days in 2026Q2, driven by DSO of 120 and DIO of 262, indicating significant cash tied up in receivables and inventory, as reported in financial statements.
The extended cash conversion cycle, averaging over 300 days in recent quarters, reflects the capital-intensive nature of vacation ownership sales, where cash is tied up in financing customer receivables and holding inventory. The negative working capital changes, averaging -$127M per quarter, suggest that HGV's operations require substantial external funding to support its sales model. This inefficiency, while partly structural, may be exacerbated by the recent disposition and could pressure liquidity if not managed carefully.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Earning Power
Gross margin swung from 89.1% in 2025Q4 to 44.3% in 2026Q2, while net margin remained thin at 0.8%, indicating volatile profitability, according to recent SEC filings.
The extreme volatility in gross margins, ranging from 19.4% to 152.5% over the past ten quarters, reflects the lumpy recognition of vacation ownership sales and the impact of one-time items. The average net margin of 1.6% is well below the asset-light peers, suggesting that HGV's high fixed costs and interest burden are eroding profitability. Investors should focus on the recurring fee-for-service and management fee income, which may provide a more stable earnings base than the volatile sales segment.
Returns on Capital Remain Subdued
ROIC has hovered between 0.8% and 1.8% over the past ten quarters, with ROE turning negative in some periods, indicating weak capital efficiency, as per reported figures.
Despite a large asset base, HGV's return on invested capital has consistently been below 2%, which is significantly lower than its cost of capital, suggesting that the company is not creating value for shareholders. The low ROE, which dipped to -0.9% in 2025Q1, reflects both thin margins and high leverage, as interest expenses consume a large portion of operating income. This pattern indicates that the company's growth strategy, including the Diamond acquisition, has not yet translated into improved returns, and investors should monitor whether the recent disposition can unlock value.
Misapplied P/E Obscures True Earnings Power
The trailing P/E of 52.91 is misleading due to volatile earnings; forward P/E of 9.50 better reflects normalized earnings, but investors should adjust for one-time items, as per analyst estimates.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for HGV is the trailing P/E, which is distorted by the significant swings in net income caused by one-time charges and the disposition. The forward P/E of 9.50 appears more reasonable, but it relies on management's guidance, which has proven unreliable given the recent EPS miss. A more appropriate valuation metric would be EV/EBITDA, which at 12.56 is closer to peers and better captures the company's operating performance, excluding the impact of financing and non-cash items. Investors should also consider the embedded value of the financing portfolio and recurring management fees, which are not fully reflected in traditional earnings multiples.