Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 9.5x · EV/EBITDA 7.6x · ROE 21.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $34.7B | $39.5B | $32.7B | $25.0B | $25.0B | $24.4B | $17.7B | $22.2B | $16.2B | $20.9B | $18.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $38.9B | $43.7B | $36.8B | $29.3B | $29.1B | $29.2B | $21.9B | $26.8B | $20.7B | $25.7B | $23.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 9.50 | 10.35 | 10.57 | 10.09 | 13.94 | 10.43 | 10.29 | 10.74 | 8.96 | — | 20.99 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.23 | 1.40 | 1.24 | 1.03 | 1.14 | 1.13 | 0.87 | 1.08 | 0.86 | 1.21 | 1.15 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.91 | 2.08 | 1.99 | 1.63 | 1.83 | 1.37 | 0.95 | 1.36 | 1.24 | 1.55 | 1.11 |
| P/FCF | 6.03 | 6.86 | 5.67 | 6.25 | 6.52 | 6.17 | 4.70 | 6.55 | 5.95 | 10.77 | 10.21 |
| P/OCF | 5.86 | 6.67 | 5.53 | 5.93 | 6.23 | 5.97 | 4.56 | 6.36 | 5.69 | 9.54 | 9.11 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.55 | 1.40 | 1.20 | 1.33 | 1.35 | 1.08 | 1.31 | 1.11 | 1.50 | 1.41 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.55 | 8.48 | 8.76 | 8.14 | 10.08 | 8.14 | 8.15 | 8.91 | 9.34 | 22.88 | 27.20 |
| EV / EBIT | 8.18 | 8.82 | 9.57 | 9.48 | 12.87 | 10.05 | 10.31 | 9.52 | 10.11 | 24.71 | 29.69 |
| EV / FCF | — | 7.60 | 6.39 | 7.31 | 7.60 | 7.37 | 5.82 | 7.93 | 7.62 | 13.26 | 12.48 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | 46.1% | 15.0% | 13.0% | 9.4% | 11.4% | 11.5% | 13.4% | 10.2% | 6.1% | 4.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | 16.8% | 14.6% | 12.7% | 10.4% | 13.4% | 10.4% | 12.5% | 9.3% | 4.2% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.6% | 13.6% | 11.8% | 10.3% | 8.3% | 11.0% | 8.5% | 10.2% | 9.6% | -18.2% | 5.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 21.7% | 21.7% | 19.6% | 17.3% | 11.6% | 13.0% | 10.0% | 14.2% | 13.6% | -20.6% | 5.2% |
| ROA | 4.6% | 4.6% | 4.1% | 3.5% | 2.4% | 3.1% | 2.4% | 3.1% | 1.3% | -1.4% | 0.4% |
| ROIC | 16.3% | 16.3% | 14.4% | 12.4% | 8.4% | 9.6% | 7.3% | 10.0% | 7.3% | 2.8% | 1.5% |
| ROCE | 5.7% | 5.7% | 6.7% | 5.8% | 4.5% | 10.2% | 2.9% | 5.9% | 9.9% | 3.8% | 2.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.29 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.85 | 0.85 | 1.04 | 1.21 | 1.51 | 1.38 | 1.62 | 1.61 | 2.11 | 4.45 | 5.81 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.99 | 1.18 | 1.43 | 1.32 | 1.57 | 1.55 | 2.05 | 4.29 | 4.93 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.06 | 1.08 | 1.20 | 1.12 | 1.38 | 1.67 | 2.49 | 2.26 |
| Interest Coverage | 24.92 | 24.92 | 19.34 | 15.52 | 10.62 | 12.41 | 8.98 | 10.88 | 6.88 | 3.29 | 2.37 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 17.65 | 17.65 | 16.69 | 0.33 | 24.79 | — | — | 5.97 | 0.88 | 0.24 | 0.02 |
| Quick Ratio | 17.65 | 17.65 | 16.69 | 0.33 | 24.79 | — | — | 5.97 | 0.88 | 0.24 | 0.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 7.33 | 7.33 | 6.92 | 0.00 | 1.94 | 1.00 | — | 36.06 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.18 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.6% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.6% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 15.4% | 15.4% | 17.9% | 21.1% | 27.8% | 20.5% | 26.3% | 20.8% | 21.0% | — | 37.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 10.5% | 9.7% | 9.5% | 9.9% | 7.2% | 9.6% | 9.7% | 9.3% | 11.2% | — | 4.8% |
| FCF Yield | 16.6% | 14.6% | 17.6% | 16.0% | 15.3% | 16.2% | 21.3% | 15.3% | 16.8% | 9.3% | 9.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 4.7% | 4.1% | 4.6% | 5.6% | 6.2% | 7.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 4.9% | 7.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.3% | 5.6% | 6.3% | 7.7% | 8.2% | 8.9% | 3.4% | 2.9% | 2.3% | 6.6% | 8.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $287M | $299M | $312M | $330M | $354M | $361M | $365M | $364M | $371M | $395M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HIG stock.
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 9.5x. The historical average is 15.0x. This places it at the 13th percentile of its historical range.
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.8x.
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 21.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 8.3%.
Based on historical data, The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 9.5x. This is at the 13th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.63% with a payout ratio of 15.4%.
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. has 46.1% gross margin and 16.8% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.8x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Social inflation and reserve adequacy
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Combined Ratio Volatility Masks Core Strength
HIG's combined ratio improved to 91.3% in 2026Q2 from 85.9% in 2024Q2, but the 2026Q2 loss ratio of 65.4% suggests normalization after favorable reserve development, per HIG's financial statements.
The combined ratio trajectory shows a sharp improvement from 85.8% in 2024Q1 to a low of 80.7% in 2025Q4, followed by a rise to 91.3% in 2026Q2. This recent uptick appears driven by a higher loss ratio (65.4% vs. 51.1% in 2025Q4), likely reflecting a return to more normalized loss costs after a period of favorable prior-year reserve development. The expense ratio has remained relatively stable around 29-30%, indicating consistent cost control. Investors should monitor whether the loss ratio stabilizes near 65% or continues to climb, as social inflation pressures could push it higher.
ROE Expansion Driven by Underwriting and Leverage
ROE rose to 6.7% in 2026Q2 from 4.9% in 2024Q1, supported by a strong underwriting margin of 8.7% and a P/B of 2.14, as reported in HIG's quarterly data.
The decomposition of ROE shows that underwriting profitability, as measured by the underwriting margin, has been the primary driver, improving from 14.2% in 2024Q1 to a peak of 19.3% in 2025Q4 before settling at 8.7% in 2026Q2. This volatility reflects the impact of catastrophe losses and reserve development. Investment income, while not explicitly shown, likely contributes meaningfully given the large float and rising rate environment. The P/B of 2.14 implies a market expectation of strong future ROE, but the recent ROE of 6.7% is below the peer average, suggesting the market may be pricing in a recovery. Investors should assess whether the underwriting margin can sustain above 10% to justify the valuation.
Expense Ratio Stability Signals Operational Discipline
HIG's expense ratio has remained in a tight 25.9%-30.0% band over the past ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at 25.9%, indicating consistent cost control, according to HIG's financial disclosures.
The expense ratio has shown remarkable stability, hovering around 29-30% for most quarters, with a notable dip to 25.9% in 2026Q2. This suggests that HIG is effectively managing its acquisition and administrative costs, likely benefiting from its proprietary small business platform and AARP affinity partnership, which lower customer acquisition costs. The slight improvement in 2026Q2 may reflect scale benefits from premium growth. Compared to peers, HIG's expense ratio appears competitive, though direct comparisons are limited. The stability of this ratio is a positive signal for underwriting profitability, as it indicates that margin expansion is not reliant on cost-cutting that could be unsustainable.
Underwriting Leverage Remains Conservative
HIG's premium-to-surplus ratio, implied by a P/B of 2.14 and D/E of 0.22, suggests conservative underwriting leverage, with the balance sheet positioned to absorb shocks, based on HIG's reported figures.
While the premium-to-surplus ratio is not directly provided, the low D/E of 0.22 and strong equity growth to $19.6B in 2026Q2 indicate a solid capital base relative to premium volume. The P/B of 2.14 is higher than CNA's 1.23 but lower than TRV's 2.59, suggesting HIG is moderately leveraged compared to peers. The conservative leverage provides flexibility for reserve strengthening if social inflation pressures materialize. Investors should monitor the premium growth rate relative to surplus growth; if premiums accelerate faster than capital, leverage could increase, potentially straining rating agency capital requirements.
Valuation Discount to Travelers Justified by Mix
HIG trades at a P/B of 2.14 and P/E of 10.65, below Travelers' 2.59 and 13.65, reflecting its higher personal lines exposure and legacy liabilities, as per peer comparison data.
HIG's valuation multiples are at a discount to Travelers (TRV) and Chubb (CB), which is consistent with its higher exposure to personal auto and legacy asbestos liabilities. However, HIG's ROE of 6.7% in 2026Q2 is significantly below TRV's 25.6% and CB's 14.5%, which may justify the lower P/B. The market appears to be pricing in a recovery in ROE, as the forward P/E of 11.13 is only slightly higher than the trailing P/E, suggesting expectations of stable earnings. The discount to TRV may also reflect the market's skepticism about the sustainability of HIG's underwriting margins, given the recent combined ratio volatility. Investors should compare HIG's combined ratio and ROE trajectory to peers to assess whether the discount narrows or widens.
Combined Ratio Misleads Without Reserve Adjustments
The combined ratio, while a key metric, can mislead investors if prior-year reserve development is ignored; HIG's 2026Q2 combined ratio of 91.3% may understate true underwriting performance, per HIG's financials.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for insurers is the combined ratio, especially when it is taken at face value without adjusting for reserve development and catastrophe losses. For HIG, the combined ratio improved dramatically in 2025, but this was partly due to favorable prior-year reserve development, as evidenced by the unusually low loss ratios (51-58%) during that period. In 2026Q2, the loss ratio rose to 65.4%, suggesting a normalization. Investors should use the underlying combined ratio, which excludes reserve development and catastrophes, to assess current underwriting discipline. Additionally, the P/E ratio can be distorted by investment gains and losses, so P/B is a more stable valuation metric for insurers. Analysts should focus on the trend in the underlying combined ratio and the adequacy of reserves, especially given social inflation risks.