Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 19.1x · EV/EBITDA 13.7x · ROE 10.0%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $40.6B | $45.6B | $43.8B | $38.1B | $37.0B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $50.3B | $52.8B | $51.7B | $46.5B | $46.7B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 19.11 | 28.08 | 29.81 | 34.29 | 33.33 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.78 | 4.13 | 3.90 | 3.37 | 3.40 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.88 | 2.77 | 2.70 | 2.28 | 2.25 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 15.57 | 23.11 | 21.34 | 21.61 | 21.30 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 13.43 | 19.93 | 19.02 | 18.15 | 17.91 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.79 | 4.60 | 4.12 | 4.30 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.73 | 19.11 | 21.51 | 20.19 | 22.12 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 15.74 | 20.90 | 22.29 | 22.79 | 24.64 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 26.80 | 25.19 | 26.38 | 26.92 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 63.3% | 63.3% | 61.9% | 61.6% | 60.6% | 62.3% | 59.7% | 56.6% |
| Operating Margin | 21.9% | 21.9% | 19.6% | 17.7% | 16.8% | 17.2% | 16.2% | 10.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 14.8% | 14.8% | 12.8% | 9.3% | 9.8% | 14.6% | 11.6% | 7.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0% | 10.0% | 8.8% | 6.3% | 4.9% | 5.3% | 4.3% | 2.4% |
| ROA | 4.9% | 4.9% | 4.2% | 3.0% | 3.1% | 4.1% | 3.3% | 1.8% |
| ROIC | 7.6% | 7.6% | 6.7% | 5.8% | 5.1% | 4.6% | 4.4% | 2.4% |
| ROCE | 8.6% | 8.6% | 7.6% | 6.7% | 6.0% | 5.4% | 5.2% | 2.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.11 | 3.11 | 4.21 | 4.10 | 4.94 | 0.52 | 0.26 | 0.55 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.63 | 2.63 | 3.29 | 3.65 | 4.62 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.26 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.69 | 3.86 | 4.77 | 5.62 | 0.55 | 0.14 | 0.56 |
| Interest Coverage | 7.60 | 7.60 | 5.88 | 4.93 | 5.46 | 121.44 | 62.62 | 32.49 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 1.04 | 0.93 | 1.24 | 1.25 | 1.36 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.08 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.24 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.75 | 3.75 | 3.60 | 3.08 | 3.18 | 3.78 | 4.20 | 3.04 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 70.13 | 61.87 | 43.66 | 49.99 | 146.27 | 49.74 | 171.91 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.9% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.0% | 7.3% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 36.7% | 36.7% | 39.5% | 37.0% | 253.0% | 82.6% | 207.1% | 175.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.2% | 3.6% | 3.4% | 2.9% | 3.0% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | 4.6% | 4.7% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.1% | 1.4% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.0% | 2.7% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 7.3% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $4.5B | $4.6B | $4.6B | $4.6B | $4.6B | $4.6B | $4.6B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HLN stock.
Haleon plc's current P/E ratio is 19.1x. The historical average is 31.4x.
Haleon plc's current EV/EBITDA is 13.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 20.7x.
Haleon plc's return on equity (ROE) is 10.0%. The historical average is 6.0%.
Based on historical data, Haleon plc is trading at a P/E of 19.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Haleon plc's current dividend yield is 1.93% with a payout ratio of 36.7%.
Haleon plc has 63.3% gross margin and 21.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Haleon plc's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory and shareholder overhang
Margin Expansion Drives Profitability
Gross margin improved to 66.0% in 2026Q2 from 61.4% in 2024Q4, as reported in financial statements, while operating margin reached 23.8%, indicating strong pricing power and cost discipline.
The sequential improvement in gross margin from 61.4% to 66.0% over six quarters suggests that Haleon is successfully executing on its standalone cost optimization, likely benefiting from supply chain efficiencies and a favorable product mix. Operating margin expansion to 23.8% in 2026Q2, up from 19.0% in 2024Q4, indicates that the company is leveraging its fixed cost base more effectively, with SG&A growth lagging gross profit gains. This margin trajectory appears sustainable given the company's focus on high-margin Power Brands, though investors should monitor whether the 22.44% operating margin can be maintained without the shared infrastructure of former parents.
Return on Capital Recovering Steadily
ROIC improved to 4.3% in 2026Q2 from 1.4% in 2022Q4, as per reported figures, while ROE rose to 4.7% from 1.6%, indicating a gradual recovery in capital efficiency.
The upward trend in ROIC from 1.4% in 2022Q4 to 4.3% in 2026Q2 reflects both margin expansion and improved asset turnover, which has stabilized at 0.17x. However, the absolute level of ROIC remains modest, partly due to the large goodwill base from the demerger, which inflates invested capital. The improvement in ROE to 4.7% from 1.6% over the same period suggests that the company is beginning to generate returns above its cost of capital, but the pace of improvement may be constrained by the need to service debt and the ongoing share overhang.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
Cash conversion cycle turned deeply negative at -93 days in 2026Q2, compared to -29 days in 2024Q4, according to recent filings, driven by extended payables and stable receivables.
The negative cash conversion cycle indicates that Haleon is effectively using supplier financing, with DPO extending to 179 days in 2026Q2 from 119 days in 2024Q4, while DSO remained stable around 36 days. This suggests strong bargaining power over suppliers, likely due to its scale and brand portfolio. The improvement in CCC from -29 to -93 days over six quarters implies that working capital is a source of cash, supporting free cash flow generation. However, the extended payables may strain supplier relationships if not managed carefully, and the seasonal swings in working capital, as seen in the prior cash flow analysis, warrant monitoring.
Deleveraging Progress Tempered by Thin Cash
Debt-to-equity improved to 0.50 in 2026Q2 from 0.63 in 2022Q4, with D/EBITDA falling to 5.41 from 17.01, as reported, but cash reserves remain thin at $821M.
The significant reduction in D/EBITDA from 17.01 in 2022Q4 to 5.41 in 2026Q2 indicates that Haleon has made substantial progress in reducing its debt burden relative to earnings, likely through a combination of debt repayment and EBITDA growth. Interest coverage has improved to 8.73 from 7.11 over the same period, suggesting that debt service is becoming more comfortable. However, the current ratio of 0.69 and quick ratio of 0.52 in 2026Q2 highlight a tight liquidity position, with cash of only $821M, which may limit flexibility in the face of seasonal working capital needs or unexpected expenses.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Thin
Current ratio fell to 0.69 in 2026Q2 from 0.92 in 2025Q4, as per balance sheet data, with cash at $821M, indicating a tight liquidity position that may strain during off-peak seasons.
The current ratio has deteriorated from 1.04 in 2023Q4 to 0.69 in 2026Q2, suggesting that current liabilities exceed current assets, which is typical for companies with strong supplier financing but also indicates limited short-term buffer. The quick ratio of 0.52 in 2026Q2, down from 0.71 in 2025Q4, further underscores the reliance on inventory and receivables to cover near-term obligations. While the negative cash conversion cycle provides some comfort, the thin cash position of $821M may not be sufficient to absorb a significant operational shock, such as a major regulatory fine or a sharp downturn in respiratory sales.
Misapplied Metric: P/E Ratio
The P/E ratio of 20.27 may mislead investors because Haleon's earnings are still affected by separation costs and amortization of intangibles, as noted in filings, obscuring underlying cash generation.
The P/E ratio is commonly used to value consumer health companies, but for Haleon, it may understate true earning power due to the significant amortization of intangibles from the demerger and one-off separation costs. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 14.40 is more comparable to peers like Kenvue (13.48) and reflects the company's cash-generating ability before non-cash charges. Additionally, P/FCF of 16.51 provides a clearer picture of valuation relative to actual cash flow, which is less distorted by accounting adjustments. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and P/FCF when comparing Haleon to its consumer health peers, as these metrics better capture the underlying economics of the business.