Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.1x · EV/EBITDA 6.5x · ROE 31.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $636M | $827M | $452M | $326M | $336M | $75M | $45M | $90M | $152M | $181M | $266M |
| Enterprise Value | $665M | $856M | $498M | $417M | $432M | $181M | $175M | $255M | $318M | $367M | $490M |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.05 | 19.83 | — | 7.07 | 18.16 | — | — | — | 20.28 | 5.64 | 21.64 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.35 | 1.76 | 1.12 | 0.51 | 0.93 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.52 | 0.67 | 0.95 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.67 | 5.17 | 4.34 | 1.21 | 1.56 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.46 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 1.23 |
| P/FCF | 53.34 | 69.38 | 35.99 | — | 2256.06 | 3.78 | 1.40 | 33.16 | 9.25 | 5.48 | 14.20 |
| P/OCF | 7.84 | 10.19 | 6.86 | 5.48 | 6.21 | 1.57 | 0.85 | 2.35 | 2.96 | 2.93 | 4.37 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.82 | 1.23 | 0.66 | 1.19 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 1.09 | 1.37 | 1.76 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.50 | 8.37 | — | 3.16 | 5.59 | 5.32 | 4.09 | 4.59 | 5.02 | 5.59 | 6.32 |
| EV / EBIT | 10.89 | 13.78 | — | 6.98 | 15.35 | 37.75 | 97.82 | — | 16.03 | 13.59 | 20.45 |
| EV / FCF | — | 71.81 | 39.64 | — | 2898.87 | 9.06 | 5.48 | 93.98 | 19.30 | 11.14 | 26.16 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 18.6% | 18.6% | 55.8% | 52.2% | 26.3% | 19.7% | 23.9% | 6.6% | 11.1% | 14.7% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | 13.0% | 13.0% | -53.9% | 10.2% | 8.4% | -2.4% | 1.3% | 1.8% | 6.2% | 9.8% | 14.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.9% | 8.9% | -55.9% | 7.1% | 5.0% | -1.5% | -2.5% | -18.9% | 2.6% | 12.3% | 4.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 31.7% | 31.7% | -121.3% | 18.5% | 9.0% | -2.0% | -3.2% | -26.3% | 3.0% | 14.2% | 5.9% |
| ROA | 10.4% | 10.4% | -47.2% | 7.2% | 3.6% | -1.0% | -1.5% | -12.7% | 1.5% | 6.3% | 2.3% |
| ROIC | 27.0% | 27.0% | -64.1% | 14.5% | 7.6% | -1.5% | 0.7% | 1.1% | 3.1% | 4.5% | 7.0% |
| ROCE | 24.4% | 24.4% | -67.3% | 15.4% | 8.6% | -2.0% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 3.9% | 5.6% | 8.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.51 | 0.35 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 1.08 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.38 | 0.38 | — | 0.72 | 1.32 | 3.18 | 3.33 | 3.13 | 2.86 | 3.03 | 3.02 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.18 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.84 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 1.03 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.28 | 0.28 | — | 0.69 | 1.24 | 3.10 | 3.04 | 2.97 | 2.61 | 2.84 | 2.89 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.43 | 3.65 | — | 642.81 | 5.28 | 4.08 | 60.83 | 10.05 | 5.66 | 11.96 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.68 | 3.68 | -16.13 | 4.36 | 2.37 | 0.43 | 0.13 | -4.00 | 1.22 | 2.18 | 1.61 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.89 | 1.27 | 1.64 | 1.25 | 1.70 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 0.65 | 1.06 | 0.83 | 1.28 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.39 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.07 | 1.10 | 1.08 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.53 |
| Inventory Turnover | 8.99 | 8.99 | 2.36 | 4.89 | 3.41 | 11.23 | 5.54 | 7.40 | 8.61 | 10.01 | 11.31 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 10.88 | 13.93 | 11.46 | 49.87 | 20.02 | 21.54 | 29.41 | 23.05 | 22.81 | 29.19 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.8% | 5.5% | 3.2% | 2.7% | 1.8% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 64.8% | 14.8% | 38.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.1% | 5.0% | — | 14.1% | 5.5% | — | — | — | 4.9% | 17.7% | 4.6% |
| FCF Yield | 1.9% | 1.4% | 2.8% | — | 0.0% | 26.5% | 71.2% | 3.0% | 10.8% | 18.2% | 7.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 1.8% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.9% | 5.9% | 3.4% | 4.5% | 1.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $43M | $40M | $37M | $34M | $31M | $30M | $30M | $30M | $30M | $29M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HNRG stock.
Hallador Energy Company's current P/E ratio is 14.1x. The historical average is 22.9x. This places it at the 67th percentile of its historical range.
Hallador Energy Company's current EV/EBITDA is 6.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.1x.
Hallador Energy Company's return on equity (ROE) is 31.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 3.5%.
Based on historical data, Hallador Energy Company is trading at a P/E of 14.1x. This is at the 67th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Hallador Energy Company has 18.6% gross margin and 13.0% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Hallador Energy Company's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin volatility from power segment
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Structural Shift
Gross margin swung from 56.4% in 2026Q2 to -126.5% in 2025Q4, per quarterly filings, reflecting inventory and hedging impacts, indicating unstable profitability.
The extreme swings in gross margin, from 56.4% to -126.5%, suggest that the reported margins are heavily distorted by non-cash items such as inventory valuation adjustments and hedging activities, rather than reflecting underlying operational efficiency. The negative operating margin in 2026Q2 (-12.5%) and the positive 19.8% in 2025Q3 highlight the volatility in the power segment's contribution, which may be tied to MISO electricity price fluctuations. Investors should focus on normalized margins excluding these non-recurring items to assess the true earning power of the integrated model.
Return on Capital Decaying Amid Integration
ROIC swung from 14.8% in 2025Q3 to -5.7% in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, indicating that the Merom acquisition has yet to generate stable returns.
The return on invested capital has been highly volatile, with a peak of 14.8% in 2025Q3 followed by a sharp decline to -5.7% in 2026Q2, suggesting that the capital base expanded significantly with the Merom acquisition but earnings have not yet stabilized. The negative ROIC in recent quarters implies that the power generation assets are not yet generating sufficient returns to cover their cost of capital, possibly due to integration costs and operational inefficiencies. This trend warrants monitoring to see if management can improve asset utilization and cost absorption to restore positive returns.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens on Inventory
Cash conversion cycle extended to 105 days in 2026Q2 from 41 days in 2024Q1, per quarterly data, driven by a spike in days inventory outstanding to 147.
The cash conversion cycle has lengthened significantly, primarily due to a rise in days inventory outstanding to 147 days in 2026Q2, which may reflect the need to hold coal inventory for the power plant or seasonal build-up. This increase in inventory ties up cash and reduces operational efficiency, as evidenced by the negative free cash flow margin of -49.4% in the same quarter. The company's ability to manage inventory levels and align production with demand will be critical to improving working capital efficiency and cash generation.
Minimal Debt Provides Strategic Flexibility
Debt-to-equity ratio stands at 0.02 as of 2026Q2, per balance sheet data, indicating a near debt-free balance sheet that offers significant financial flexibility.
The company's leverage is exceptionally low, with total debt of only $3.7 million against equity of $190.3 million, resulting in a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.02. This conservative capital structure suggests that interest expense is minimal, and the company is well-positioned to weather margin volatility without the risk of debt service constraints. However, the negative interest coverage in 2026Q2 (-3.35) reflects operating losses, but with negligible debt, this is not a solvency concern. The low leverage provides optionality for future investments or strategic initiatives, but investors should monitor whether management maintains this discipline.
Thin Liquidity Despite Cash Build
Current ratio remains below 1 at 0.72 in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, indicating potential short-term liquidity strain despite a cash balance of $29.0M.
Although cash has increased to $29.0 million, the current ratio of 0.72 suggests that current liabilities exceed current assets, which could pose a liquidity risk if the company faces unexpected cash outflows. The quick ratio of 0.49 further highlights the reliance on inventory, which may not be easily convertible to cash in a stress scenario. This thin liquidity buffer is concerning given the volatility in operating cash flow, as seen in the -49.4% free cash flow margin in 2026Q2. The company may need to rely on its low leverage to access additional financing if needed, but the current position warrants close monitoring.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in Hybrid Model
EV/EBITDA of 7.60 may understate valuation for a hybrid coal-power model, as reported in valuation data, because EBITDA is distorted by non-cash items and the power segment's volatility.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is commonly used for coal miners, but for HNRG, which now operates both a mine and a power plant, this metric can be misleading. EBITDA in recent quarters has been highly volatile, swinging from positive to negative, due to inventory adjustments and hedging gains/losses, making the multiple unstable and not representative of sustainable cash flow. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBIT or EV/Operating Cash Flow, which better captures the underlying earnings power of the integrated business. Additionally, the forward EV/EBITDA of 21.17 suggests the market expects a significant recovery, but this may be overly optimistic given the operational challenges.