Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2019–2023 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 6.2% | 6.2% | 13.5% | -32.2% | -112.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -572.3% | -572.3% | -345.4% | -2418.7% | -1811.7% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -647.0% | -647.0% | -401.9% | -2929.2% | -2060.0% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | -266.3% | -1627.7% | -183.4% | 0.4% |
| ROA | -90.4% | -90.4% | -51.3% | -342.4% | -113.2% | 0.4% |
| ROIC | -164.1% | -164.1% | -105.7% | -1656.4% | -156.6% | — |
| ROCE | -501.7% | -501.7% | -65.2% | -335.7% | -114.1% | -0.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 1.33 | 0.20 | 0.04 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 1.28 | -0.33 | -0.49 | -0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -7.36 | -7.36 | -6.48 | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.91 | 3.54 | — |
| Quick Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.91 | 3.54 | — |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.57 | 1.18 | 1.67 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.04 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 24.97 | 22.37 | 56.60 | 214.31 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $65M | $56M | $47M | $60M | $4M |
Imminent liquidity and dilution
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's gross margin has exhibited extreme volatility, reaching a low of -7.5% in 2023Q2, which underscores the difficulty of maintaining a proprietary content strategy when direct production costs frequently exceed the revenue generated from media and event assets.
The persistent inability to achieve positive operating margins, which have remained deeply negative, suggests that the current cost structure is fundamentally misaligned with the platform's monetization capacity. Investors should monitor whether the integration of the AGBA financial services arm can provide the high-margin revenue stream necessary to offset the structural losses inherent in the legacy media business.
Based on historical quarterly data, the company's ROIC has consistently remained in negative territory, plummeting to -135.1% in 2023Q4, which indicates that capital deployed into the business is currently destroying rather than creating economic value for shareholders.
The extreme volatility in return metrics reflects a business model that has struggled to find a stable path to profitability, with capital efficiency hampered by high fixed costs and recurring restructuring charges. This trend suggests that the company is not currently compounding value, and the recent merger warrants further investigation into whether the new asset base can reverse this long-term decay.
According to quarterly filings, the company's asset turnover ratio has remained stagnant at approximately 0.04, signaling that the firm is failing to generate meaningful revenue from its asset base compared to industry peers who typically leverage their platforms for much higher velocity.
The exceptionally high days sales outstanding, which reached 2833 in 2024Q2, suggests significant friction in the cash collection process and potential issues with the quality of receivables. This inefficiency in working capital management further exacerbates the company's liquidity constraints, as cash remains trapped in the operating cycle rather than funding growth.
As indicated by the most recent balance sheet data, the current ratio has hovered near 0.02, which highlights a severe lack of short-term liquidity to cover immediate obligations and suggests that the firm is highly dependent on external financing to maintain basic operations.
The company's reliance on external capital is underscored by its minimal cash reserves, which appear insufficient to support the current burn rate without further dilutive events. Investors should be wary of the company's ability to meet its debt service requirements, as the lack of a robust liquidity buffer leaves little room for operational error or market volatility.
Market participants often misapply traditional price-to-sales multiples to this business model, failing to account for the fact that a significant portion of reported revenue may be tied to non-cash barter transactions or volatile project-based events rather than recurring, high-quality digital platform income.
Using P/S ratios to value this entity obscures the underlying cash burn and the structural weakness of the gross margin, which is the more critical metric for assessing the viability of the content-heavy business model. Analysts should instead focus on cash-burn-adjusted valuation metrics or a sum-of-the-parts approach that separates the legacy media business from the newly acquired financial services arm.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ILLRW stock.
Triller Group Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Triller Group Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Triller Group Inc. has 6.2% gross margin and -572.3% operating margin.