Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 60.3x · EV/EBITDA 26.8x · ROE 29.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $24.3B | $19.8B | $14.5B | $14.2B | $18.0B | $16.3B | $19.0B | $19.0B | $13.7B | $19.4B | $19.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $21.2B | $16.8B | $12.9B | $11.0B | $15.1B | $14.3B | $17.5B | $17.2B | $12.6B | $18.5B | $19.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 60.28 | 15.41 | 460.47 | 23.69 | 52.84 | 17.19 | — | 42.60 | 124.69 | — | 185.69 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.03 | 3.86 | 3.43 | 3.84 | 5.30 | 5.46 | 7.11 | 8.80 | 7.29 | 12.61 | 17.60 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.65 | 3.84 | 4.22 | 2.73 | 4.12 | 4.32 | 7.26 | 7.31 | 7.12 | 11.88 | 46.40 |
| P/FCF | 35.41 | 14.63 | 58.38 | 30.57 | 20.16 | 28.67 | — | 30.04 | 52.19 | — | 105.51 |
| P/OCF | 17.16 | 14.02 | 43.36 | 28.57 | 18.55 | 21.75 | — | 26.74 | 40.78 | — | 63.87 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.27 | 3.04 | 2.98 | 4.44 | 4.78 | 6.56 | 7.98 | 6.69 | 12.04 | 17.60 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.80 | 11.69 | 67.69 | 14.92 | 22.86 | 22.20 | — | 37.75 | 68.32 | — | 95.68 |
| EV / EBIT | 15.81 | 10.08 | 40.44 | 13.16 | 28.35 | 24.96 | — | 35.27 | 107.66 | — | 133.18 |
| EV / FCF | — | 12.40 | 51.78 | 23.73 | 16.90 | 25.13 | — | 27.24 | 47.90 | — | 105.51 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 92.8% | 92.8% | 92.6% | 93.1% | 93.9% | 94.9% | 95.1% | 94.7% | 95.0% | 94.8% | 94.7% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 26.1% | 2.4% | 17.7% | 17.4% | 19.6% | -9.9% | 18.6% | 6.9% | -15.8% | 13.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 25.0% | 25.0% | 0.8% | 16.2% | 10.0% | 31.8% | -11.1% | 20.7% | 5.8% | -20.4% | 9.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 29.9% | 29.9% | 0.8% | 12.5% | 8.4% | 29.7% | -11.4% | 19.8% | 6.2% | -30.5% | 35.3% |
| ROA | 20.7% | 20.7% | 0.5% | 9.5% | 6.3% | 22.3% | -8.5% | 14.7% | 4.4% | -15.9% | 7.9% |
| ROIC | 51.1% | 51.1% | 4.0% | 28.3% | 27.6% | 30.3% | -20.1% | 37.1% | 12.5% | -31.1% | 31.6% |
| ROCE | 29.0% | 29.0% | 2.2% | 12.8% | 13.5% | 16.7% | -9.0% | 15.7% | 6.2% | -14.8% | 13.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.55 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.07 | — | 0.13 | 0.20 | — | 3.20 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.59 | -0.48 | -0.61 | -0.67 | -0.53 | -0.56 | -0.68 | -0.59 | -0.54 | -0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.11 | -2.11 | -8.63 | -4.30 | -4.41 | -3.13 | — | -3.88 | -6.12 | — | -0.00 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.24 | -6.60 | -6.84 | -3.26 | -3.54 | — | -2.80 | -4.29 | — | -0.00 |
| Interest Coverage | 686.52 | 686.52 | 139.87 | 328.01 | 199.47 | 299.97 | -105.82 | 263.42 | 75.76 | -44.26 | 3.77 |
Net cash position: cash ($3.1B) exceeds total debt ($69M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.32 | 3.32 | 1.97 | 3.75 | 3.54 | 3.65 | 3.74 | 4.83 | 4.31 | 4.01 | 3.64 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.25 | 3.25 | 1.94 | 3.69 | 3.50 | 3.62 | 3.71 | 4.81 | 4.29 | 3.99 | 3.62 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.36 | 2.36 | 1.31 | 2.95 | 2.80 | 2.75 | 2.85 | 4.13 | 3.38 | 3.12 | 2.96 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.68 | 3.68 | 5.30 | 4.05 | 4.93 | 5.41 | 7.99 | 10.02 | 13.51 | 12.26 | 14.17 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 72.73 | 73.42 | 73.44 | 69.34 | 75.33 | 65.97 | 52.21 | 59.66 | 63.27 | 49.11 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.7% | 6.5% | 0.2% | 4.2% | 1.9% | 5.8% | — | 2.3% | 0.8% | — | 0.5% |
| FCF Yield | 2.8% | 6.8% | 1.7% | 3.3% | 5.0% | 3.5% | — | 3.3% | 1.9% | — | 0.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 13.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 13.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $201M | $211M | $226M | $224M | $222M | $218M | $218M | $216M | $205M | $194M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying INCY stock.
Incyte Corporation's current P/E ratio is 60.3x. The historical average is 79.4x. This places it at the 63th percentile of its historical range.
Incyte Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 26.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 48.1x.
Incyte Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 29.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -26.1%.
Based on historical data, Incyte Corporation is trading at a P/E of 60.3x. This is at the 63th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Incyte Corporation has 92.8% gross margin and 26.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Incyte Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Jakafi patent cliff ahead
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Price in Pipeline Success
Based on reported figures, INCY trades at 18.41x trailing earnings but 37.76x forward earnings, a sharp compression implying the market expects near-term earnings to decline before any recovery is priced in.
The gap between trailing and forward P/E suggests analysts anticipate earnings volatility driven by R&D and SG&A timing rather than a steady growth trajectory. Against an EV/EBITDA of 14.55x that expands to 19.23x forward, the market appears to be paying a premium for pipeline outcomes rather than current cash generation. Investors should monitor whether forward estimates hold, since the valuation depends heavily on a recovery that the recent operating volatility has not yet demonstrated.
Gross Margin Stable, Operating Margin Erratic
As reported in the income statements, INCY's gross margin held between 91.8% and 93.7% across ten quarters while operating margin swung from -45.8% to 41.7%, indicating spending rather than product economics drives earnings.
The stability of gross margin points to durable pricing power in the core oncology and dermatology franchises. The volatility in operating margin, however, suggests that R&D intensity and launch-related SG&A determine reported profitability far more than revenue quality does. Earning power should therefore be assessed on normalized operating margins across a full cycle rather than on any single quarter.
Negligible Debt Eliminates Solvency Concern
Based on reported figures, INCY's debt-to-equity ratio held near 0.01 across all ten quarters, with total debt between $33.8M and $69.4M, leaving leverage immaterial relative to equity of roughly $6.3B.
Interest coverage is not a meaningful constraint, as the company carries minimal interest-bearing obligations. The leverage profile suggests refinancing and covenant risk is negligible, which preserves strategic flexibility for M&A or pipeline investment. The analytical question shifts from debt service to how efficiently the balance sheet's cash is deployed.
Cash Reserves Anchor Liquidity Position
According to reported balance sheet data, INCY's current ratio ranged from 1.87 to 4.66 over ten quarters, with quick ratio tracking closely, indicating near-term obligations are covered many times over by liquid assets.
The consistently high current and quick ratios, which move almost in lockstep, suggest inventory is a minor component of current assets, consistent with an asset-light model. Under severe stress, the position would likely hold given cash reserves of roughly $3.3B, although the more relevant question is whether that cash is deployed productively. A large idle balance may signal limited near-term reinvestment opportunities.
Asset Turnover Misleads on Royalty Model
Asset turnover is commonly misapplied to INCY because a large share of economic value flows from royalty and milestone income, which is not captured proportionally by reported revenue against a cash-heavy asset base.
Asset turnover appears low relative to traditional industrials, yet this reflects the company's cash-rich balance sheet and royalty-driven economics rather than operational inefficiency. Working capital metrics such as DSO and DIO are also distorted by collaboration timing and launch stocking patterns. A more informative lens would be R&D productivity and gross-to-net trends for the dermatology franchise, which better capture the drivers of durable earnings power.