Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 33.3x · EV/EBITDA 16.6x · ROE 21.4%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $42.9B | $39.1B | $36.0B | $43.1B | $39.1B | $55.0B | $34.9B | $30.8B | $24.2B | $21.8B | $11.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $57.1B | $53.3B | $48.5B | $55.6B | $50.8B | $66.1B | $46.0B | $42.0B | $34.3B | $31.1B | $17.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 33.26 | 28.75 | 26.24 | 31.74 | 35.82 | 57.00 | 125.29 | 160.95 | 93.69 | 16.65 | 100.07 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.63 | 2.40 | 2.34 | 2.88 | 2.71 | 3.97 | 3.08 | 2.78 | 2.32 | 2.25 | 1.70 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.82 | 5.90 | 5.94 | 7.05 | 6.77 | 9.11 | 5.56 | 4.92 | 3.48 | 2.61 | 1.30 |
| P/FCF | 20.93 | 19.07 | 17.05 | 28.74 | 24.62 | 23.90 | 26.02 | 36.93 | 30.42 | 36.26 | 16.61 |
| P/OCF | 16.17 | 14.74 | 13.27 | 20.06 | 17.28 | 18.70 | 17.83 | 21.76 | 19.29 | 22.47 | 13.44 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.27 | 3.15 | 3.71 | 3.53 | 4.76 | 4.05 | 3.79 | 3.29 | 3.20 | 2.58 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.65 | 15.54 | 14.62 | 17.93 | 17.36 | 24.87 | 22.81 | 21.25 | 18.23 | 17.95 | 18.86 |
| EV / EBIT | 24.98 | 22.98 | 20.73 | 26.10 | 28.58 | 43.97 | 58.34 | 52.62 | 46.23 | 48.53 | 31.36 |
| EV / FCF | — | 25.99 | 22.94 | 37.08 | 32.06 | 28.71 | 34.27 | 50.35 | 43.15 | 51.68 | 25.23 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 26.3% | 26.3% | 34.9% | 35.0% | 34.9% | 33.5% | 34.0% | 34.2% | 35.2% | 35.1% | 30.3% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | 14.0% | 14.3% | 13.2% | 12.5% | 10.0% | 6.4% | 7.0% | 7.1% | 7.4% | 9.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.3% | 8.3% | 8.9% | 9.1% | 7.6% | 7.0% | 2.5% | 1.7% | 2.5% | 13.5% | 1.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 21.4% | 21.4% | 22.5% | 22.9% | 18.5% | 15.7% | 4.4% | 2.9% | 3.4% | 15.2% | 2.6% |
| ROA | 4.8% | 4.8% | 5.1% | 5.2% | 4.4% | 3.9% | 1.2% | 0.8% | 1.1% | 6.0% | 0.9% |
| ROIC | 8.7% | 8.7% | 8.9% | 8.2% | 7.8% | 6.1% | 3.1% | 3.4% | 3.2% | 3.3% | 5.9% |
| ROCE | 11.0% | 11.0% | 11.0% | 9.9% | 9.2% | 7.1% | 3.7% | 4.1% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 6.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.44 | 2.44 | 2.33 | 2.27 | 2.26 | 2.06 | 2.05 | 1.92 | 1.58 | 1.22 | 0.81 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.71 | 4.71 | 4.27 | 4.48 | 4.44 | 4.68 | 6.39 | 6.08 | 5.85 | 5.91 | 7.73 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.14 | 2.05 | 2.05 | 2.05 | 1.83 | 1.77 | 1.79 | 1.45 | 1.11 | 0.68 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.14 | 4.14 | 3.76 | 4.04 | 4.03 | 4.17 | 5.50 | 5.66 | 5.38 | 5.36 | 6.45 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.92 | 5.89 | 8.35 | 7.44 | 4.81 | 8.26 | 13.42 | 12.72 | 15.42 | 8.62 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.18 | 3.18 | 3.49 | 3.17 | 4.28 | 4.01 | 1.90 | 1.79 | 1.79 | 1.85 | 3.89 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.12 | 1.05 | 1.10 | 1.22 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.12 | 1.05 | 1.10 | 1.22 | 1.23 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.46 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.32 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 76.69 | 76.77 | 83.14 | 74.98 | 68.64 | 79.24 | 86.84 | 86.34 | 80.66 | 93.25 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.0% | 3.5% | 3.8% | 3.2% | 2.8% | 1.8% | 0.8% | 0.6% | 1.1% | 6.0% | 1.0% |
| FCF Yield | 4.8% | 5.2% | 5.9% | 3.5% | 4.1% | 4.2% | 3.8% | 2.7% | 3.3% | 2.8% | 6.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.9% | 3.2% | 3.7% | 2.3% | 3.0% | 0.7% | 1.3% | 3.1% | 5.8% | 12.0% | 9.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.9% | 3.2% | 3.7% | 2.3% | 3.0% | 0.7% | 1.3% | 3.1% | 5.8% | 12.0% | 9.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $174M | $183M | $186M | $191M | $195M | $195M | $200M | $208M | $223M | $152M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IQV stock.
IQVIA Holdings Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 33.3x. The historical average is 57.4x. This places it at the 54th percentile of its historical range.
IQVIA Holdings Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 16.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 17.5x.
IQVIA Holdings Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 21.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 13.0%.
Based on historical data, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is trading at a P/E of 33.3x. This is at the 54th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
IQVIA Holdings Inc. has 26.3% gross margin and 14.0% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
IQVIA Holdings Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Elevated leverage and EPS volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Pricing for Hybrid Model
IQV trades at 29.98x trailing P/E and 15.41x EV/EBITDA, per recent filings, a premium to CRO peers like ICON (11.06x) but a discount to Medpace (28.17x), reflecting its data moat and growth expectations.
The forward P/E of 18.14x implies the market expects meaningful earnings growth, consistent with the PEG of 0.74 suggesting undervaluation relative to growth. However, the EV/EBITDA multiple of 15.41x is above ICON's 11.06x, indicating investors are paying up for IQV's integrated data and analytics capabilities. This premium appears justified if the TAS segment continues to deliver high-margin recurring revenue, but it leaves little room for execution missteps.
Margin Compression Masks Cash Power
Gross margin fell to 32.9% in 2026Q2 from 34.8% in 2024Q4, while operating margin slipped to 11.6%, as per SEC filings, yet operating cash flow consistently exceeds net income, highlighting non-cash amortization's drag on reported profitability.
The narrow gap between gross and operating margins (21.3 points) indicates high SG&A intensity, which may reflect continued investment in technology and sales infrastructure. However, the OCF/NI ratio averaging 2.1x over ten quarters suggests that GAAP net income understates true earning power due to substantial non-cash charges from prior acquisitions. Investors should focus on adjusted EBITDA and cash flow metrics rather than GAAP margins when assessing profitability.
ROIC Stagnant Amid Heavy Goodwill
ROIC has hovered near 2% over the past ten quarters, as reported in financial statements, despite revenue growth, indicating that returns on invested capital are being diluted by a goodwill-heavy balance sheet and rising debt.
With goodwill alone representing 55% of total assets, the capital base is inflated by acquisition premiums, suppressing ROIC. The slight uptick to 2.7% in 2025Q4 appears to be an anomaly due to the unusual gross margin of 6.7% that quarter. The company is not compounding returns on capital; rather, it is maintaining a stable but low ROIC, which may be acceptable given the defensive nature of its data assets but warrants monitoring for any deterioration.
Working Capital Leverage on Display
DSO improved to 76 days in 2026Q2 from 84 days in 2024Q1, while DPO extended to 112 days, per balance sheet data, resulting in a negative cash conversion cycle that supports cash flow despite thin liquidity.
The negative CCC, driven by high DPO, indicates IQV is effectively using supplier financing to fund its operations, which is a source of cheap capital. However, the current ratio of 0.71 suggests that short-term obligations exceed current assets, a common trait for companies with strong supplier relationships but a risk if access to credit tightens. The efficiency gains in DSO are modest and may reflect improved billing processes, but the overall working capital management appears stable.
Debt Load Constrains Flexibility
Net debt-to-EBITDA stands at approximately 4.9x, with total debt of $15.2B versus $1.8B cash, as per recent filings, while interest coverage has fallen to 2.53x in 2026Q2 from 4.18x in 2024Q4, indicating rising debt service pressure.
The D/E ratio of 2.58x is elevated, and the trend in interest coverage is concerning, as it has declined by nearly 40% over six quarters. This suggests that IQV's operating income is becoming less sufficient to cover interest expenses, particularly in a rising-rate environment. While the company's cash flow generation remains robust, the high leverage limits financial flexibility and increases vulnerability to any downturn in biopharma R&D spending. Investors should monitor deleveraging progress closely.
Thin Liquidity Buffer
Current ratio fell to 0.71 in 2026Q2 from 0.88 in 2024Q1, as per balance sheet data, with cash of $1.9B against $16.2B debt, indicating a tight liquidity position that relies on ongoing cash flow and credit availability.
The quick ratio equals the current ratio at 0.71, suggesting minimal inventory dependence, which is typical for a services company. However, the thin liquidity buffer means that any significant working capital outflow or disruption in cash collection could strain the company's ability to meet short-term obligations. The negative CCC provides some cushion, but the reliance on external financing is a risk if credit markets tighten.
Hybrid Model Priced Between Peers
IQV's EV/EBITDA of 15.41x sits between ICON's 11.06x and Medpace's 28.17x, as per peer data, while its ROE of 4.0% lags Medpace's 110.1%, reflecting the capital intensity of its data assets.
The valuation gap versus ICON likely reflects IQV's proprietary data and analytics, which command a premium, but the discount to Medpace suggests the market sees less growth potential or higher risk. IQV's ROE is depressed by its large equity base from acquisitions, whereas Medpace's asset-light model generates exceptional returns. This structural difference means IQV's returns are unlikely to converge to Medpace's levels, and investors should compare IQV to a blend of CRO and data analytics peers.
Misapplied ROE Metric
ROE is commonly misapplied to IQV because its goodwill-heavy balance sheet and acquisition-driven equity base distort the metric, as per financial statements, making ROIC or cash flow return on invested capital more meaningful.
IQV's ROE of 4.0% appears weak relative to Medpace's 110.1%, but this comparison is misleading due to differing capital structures and business models. The heavy goodwill from acquisitions inflates equity, suppressing ROE, while Medpace's minimal intangibles produce outsized returns. Analysts should instead use ROIC or cash flow return on invested capital, which better capture the economic returns of IQV's data and clinical assets, and adjust for non-cash amortization to assess true earning power.