Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.1x · EV/EBITDA 18.6x · ROE 6.5%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $38.1B | $42.7B | $53.3B | $45.8B | $89.3B | $108.9B | $136.6B | $52.3B | $30.1B | $60.3B | $35.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $31.8B | $187M | $34.7B | $42.3B | $75.5B | $72.2B | $82.1B | $49.3B | $10.3B | $58.4B | $44.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.14 | 2.22 | 1.29 | 1.90 | 8.74 | — | 2.77 | 4.29 | — | 517.75 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.20 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.92 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.33 | 0.44 | 0.62 | 3.62 | 0.39 | 1.15 | 0.87 |
| P/FCF | 53.28 | 8.89 | 1.20 | 1.16 | 2.49 | 4.59 | 3.92 | 2.46 | — | 4.48 | 8.28 |
| P/OCF | 13.49 | 2.25 | 0.92 | 0.77 | 1.54 | 2.57 | 3.21 | 2.11 | 1.44 | 2.43 | 4.07 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.61 | 0.02 | 0.75 | 1.23 | 2.80 | 6.96 | 4.46 | 3.33 | 3.49 | 17.85 | 36.30 |
| EV / EBIT | 77.00 | 0.01 | 0.88 | 1.23 | 4.72 | — | 1.58 | 3.42 | — | 53.85 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 0.04 | 0.78 | 1.07 | 2.11 | 3.04 | 2.35 | 2.32 | — | 4.34 | 10.34 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 9.3% | 9.8% | 14.7% | 14.1% | 13.6% | 14.6% | 14.6% | 14.3% | 14.0% | 15.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | 0.2% | 3.3% | 2.4% | 1.9% | 0.4% | 1.7% | 1.6% | -0.6% | -0.2% | -0.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.5% | 1.5% | 3.6% | 2.2% | 1.0% | -0.4% | 6.6% | 2.1% | -0.5% | 0.0% | -0.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.5% | 6.5% | 13.6% | 8.5% | 4.0% | -1.5% | 41.9% | 26.7% | -3.9% | 0.3% | -5.6% |
| ROA | 2.8% | 2.8% | 6.2% | 3.9% | 1.9% | -0.8% | 21.5% | 9.9% | -1.3% | 0.1% | -1.6% |
| ROIC | 0.8% | 0.8% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 6.3% | 1.6% | 10.4% | 19.7% | -3.7% | -1.2% | -4.6% |
| ROCE | 0.7% | 0.7% | 10.2% | 7.5% | 6.5% | 1.6% | 9.3% | 17.1% | -3.4% | -1.4% | -4.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.45 | 0.69 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 9.34 | 9.34 | 1.93 | 1.99 | 2.41 | 3.29 | 1.71 | 0.19 | 4.90 | 7.27 | 23.34 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.14 | -0.06 | -0.01 | -0.05 | -0.15 | -0.25 | -0.21 | -0.26 | -0.04 | 0.21 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -3.71 | -3.71 | -0.40 | -0.10 | -0.51 | -3.53 | -2.96 | -0.20 | -6.75 | -0.57 | 7.22 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -8.85 | -0.42 | -0.09 | -0.39 | -1.54 | -1.56 | -0.14 | — | -0.14 | 2.06 |
| Interest Coverage | 10.03 | 10.03 | 13.66 | 11.99 | 7.58 | -1.13 | 46.17 | 19.89 | -1.78 | 1.13 | -2.04 |
Net cash position: cash ($149.7B) exceeds total debt ($107.2B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.29 | 1.16 | 1.32 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.74 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.46 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.26 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.88 | 1.66 | 1.72 | 1.76 | 1.92 | 1.77 | 15.47 | 2.21 | 1.97 | 1.62 |
| Inventory Turnover | 11.71 | 11.71 | 11.70 | 13.59 | 11.54 | 10.88 | 10.80 | 58.61 | 9.00 | 7.47 | 7.63 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 8.22 | 9.58 | 7.54 | 9.32 | 6.67 | 6.74 | 1.09 | 11.25 | 32.53 | 24.51 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.8% | 24.3% | 15.5% | 14.7% | 14.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 52.9% | 52.9% | 20.0% | 27.9% | 126.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.1% | 44.9% | 77.6% | 52.8% | 11.4% | — | 36.2% | 23.3% | — | 0.2% | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.9% | 11.2% | 83.0% | 86.3% | 40.1% | 21.8% | 25.5% | 40.7% | — | 22.3% | 12.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 8.4% | 50.1% | 48.6% | 5.5% | 2.0% | 4.8% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 15.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 12.2% | 74.4% | 64.1% | 20.2% | 16.7% | 4.8% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 15.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.4B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying JD stock.
JD.com, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 14.1x. The historical average is 3.5x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
JD.com, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 18.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.7x.
JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 6.5%. The historical average is -15.2%.
Based on historical data, JD.com, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 14.1x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
JD.com, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 3.82% with a payout ratio of 52.9%.
JD.com, Inc. has 9.3% gross margin and 0.2% operating margin.
JD.com, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 9.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression from price wars
Deep Value Pricing Amidst Structural Uncertainty
JD trades at a forward P/E of 1.27 and a P/B of 0.96, suggesting the market is pricing in minimal future earnings growth and significant risk to its asset base, a stark contrast to PDD's forward P/E of 8.65.
The extreme discount on forward earnings multiples implies the market views JD's current profitability as unsustainable or its growth trajectory as severely impaired. The P/B below 1.0 indicates the market values the company's equity at less than the book value of its assets, which is unusual for a business with a dominant logistics network and suggests deep skepticism about the return on those assets. This valuation appears to embed a conglomerate discount and a pessimistic outlook for the core retail business.
Razor-Thin Margins Under Competitive Siege
JD's operating margin of 1.2% in 2026Q2 is a dramatic compression from the 4.6% seen in 2024Q3, indicating that the 'Low Price' strategy is directly eroding the company's core earning power.
The gross margin recovery to 17.0% in 2026Q2 from a negative reading in 2025Q4 appears driven by non-recurring items or accounting adjustments rather than sustainable operational improvement, as the operating margin remains near breakeven. This suggests that SG&A and fulfillment costs are consuming nearly all gross profit, leaving no buffer for investment or shareholder returns. The structural ceiling imposed by the 1P model makes meaningful margin expansion unlikely without a fundamental shift in revenue mix.
Capital Returns Decaying Toward Cost of Capital
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) has deteriorated from a healthy 3.1% in 2024Q3 to just 1.1% in 2026Q2, indicating the company is barely generating returns above its likely cost of capital.
The decline in ROIC is driven by both margin compression and a less efficient use of the growing asset base, as evidenced by the falling asset turnover ratio. This trend suggests that recent capital expenditures, particularly in logistics and new businesses, are not yet generating commensurate returns. For a company with a fortress balance sheet, this decay in capital efficiency is a critical concern, as it implies value may be being destroyed rather than compounded.
Working Capital Leverage Masks Core Inefficiency
JD's negative Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) of -23 days in 2026Q2, driven by a Days Payable Outstanding (DPO) of 66, highlights its strong supplier financing, but this masks underlying asset turnover weakness.
The negative CCC is a structural advantage of the 1P model, allowing JD to fund inventory with supplier credit. However, the asset turnover ratio has declined from 0.52 in 2024Q2 to 0.49 in 2026Q2, suggesting that despite the working capital efficiency, the company is generating less revenue per dollar of assets. This divergence indicates that the core operational efficiency of converting assets into sales is deteriorating, even as the company maintains its favorable payment terms.
Conservative Leverage Amidst Strategic Shift
Despite a 50% increase in total debt to $105.3B, JD's Debt-to-Equity ratio of 0.37 remains conservative, and interest coverage of 5.85x suggests debt service is comfortable.
The strategic build-up of debt appears to be funding shareholder returns and new ventures rather than core operations, as evidenced by the concurrent decline in cash reserves and equity. While the leverage metrics are not alarming, the trend warrants monitoring, especially if operating margins remain compressed. The company's strong cash position provides a significant buffer, but the shift from a net cash position to a more leveraged structure changes the risk profile.
The Misleading Power of the Negative CCC
The negative Cash Conversion Cycle is the ratio most commonly misapplied to JD, as it obscures the true capital intensity of its 1P model and the declining efficiency of its asset base.
Analysts often highlight the negative CCC as a sign of superior efficiency, but for JD, it is a structural feature of its 1P retail model, not a sign of operational excellence. This metric masks the significant capital tied up in property, plant, and equipment (PPE) and the declining asset turnover. A more appropriate metric for assessing true operational efficiency would be Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) or Asset Turnover, which better capture the return generated from the company's substantial fixed asset base.