Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -18.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -20.3%. (2017–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $770M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $758M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -18.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 97.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 90.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.6% | 39.6% | 82.3% | 70.8% | 77.0% | 75.5% | 84.7% | 82.6% | 65.7% |
| Operating Margin | -38.9% | -38.9% | -51.4% | -39.3% | -38.3% | -41.3% | 27.6% | 37.9% | 30.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -24.4% | -24.4% | -38.1% | -32.1% | -24.3% | -25.4% | 26.3% | 39.0% | 24.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -20.3% | -20.3% | -18.3% | -20.9% | -13.4% | -8.5% | 17.9% | 36.7% | 23.8% |
| ROA | -12.8% | -12.8% | -12.0% | -13.0% | -10.3% | -7.2% | 15.2% | 30.9% | 19.7% |
| ROIC | -22.4% | -22.4% | -16.7% | -17.2% | -14.8% | -10.1% | 14.1% | 26.8% | 22.3% |
| ROCE | -25.1% | -25.1% | -21.9% | -23.4% | -20.2% | -13.6% | 18.8% | 35.7% | 29.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.06 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.03 | -0.69 | -0.61 | -0.72 | -0.71 | -0.94 | -0.53 | -0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | -6.55 | -1.59 | -1.13 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.50 | — | — | — | — | -4.06 | -2.37 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | 59.61 | — | 21.57 |
Net cash position: cash ($296M) exceeds total debt ($216M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.80 | 2.80 | 9.59 | 2.36 | 3.10 | 8.27 | 6.16 | 6.66 | 5.59 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.80 | 2.80 | 9.59 | 2.36 | 3.10 | 8.27 | 6.16 | 6.66 | 5.59 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 6.83 | 1.16 | 2.00 | 6.02 | 4.99 | 3.20 | 1.67 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.28 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.30 | 0.42 | 0.73 | 0.81 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $60M | $60M | $60M | $60M | $60M | $57M | $56M | $56M |
Inorganic growth integration failure
According to recent market data, MAAS trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 4.41, a valuation that appears to price in significant future growth while ignoring the company's current negative earnings profile and the substantial execution risks inherent in its recent aggressive inorganic expansion strategy.
The negative TTM P/E of -18.06 highlights the disconnect between the firm's current loss-making operations and the market's growth expectations. Investors should note that this valuation multiple is likely unsupported by fundamental earnings power, suggesting that the stock is currently priced as a speculative turnaround play rather than a mature financial services provider.
As reported in financial statements, the company's operating margin of -38.87% indicates that the costs associated with scaling the business are currently far exceeding the revenue generated, suggesting that the firm has yet to achieve the necessary operational leverage to convert its top-line growth into sustainable profitability.
While the gross margin of 39.63% provides a baseline for the commission-based model, the deeply negative operating margin reveals that fixed overhead and integration expenses are eroding value. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company can optimize its agent network costs before its cash reserves are exhausted.
Based on the company's reported $295 million cash reserve, the firm maintains a liquidity buffer, yet as noted in recent filings, the high cash burn rate associated with its current negative operating margin suggests that this position could become vulnerable if integration efforts do not yield immediate improvements.
The company's liquidity position is highly sensitive to the success of its recent rebranding and consolidation activities. Investors should monitor the cash burn rate closely, as the lack of positive free cash flow generation implies that the firm may face future financing needs if the current operational trajectory persists.
Market participants frequently misapply the 935% revenue growth figure as a proxy for organic success, whereas institutional analysis suggests this metric is primarily an artifact of consolidation, which obscures the underlying volatility and potential for future revenue reversals inherent in the firm's commission-based insurance distribution model.
Relying on top-line growth as a primary indicator of health is misleading for this business model, as it ignores the high probability of policy clawbacks and the transient nature of agent-driven sales. A more appropriate metric for assessing the firm's true health would be the net take-rate after agent commissions and the persistence rate of the underlying insurance policies.
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MAAS stock.
Maase Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -18.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Maase Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -20.3%. The historical average is -0.4%.
Based on historical data, Maase Inc. is trading at a P/E of -18.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Maase Inc. has 39.6% gross margin and -38.9% operating margin.