Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.7x · EV/EBITDA 11.4x · ROE 7363.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.4B | $13.3B | $15.9B | $15.1B | $10.8B | $17.6B | $14.5B | $13.8B | $9.0B | $14.0B | $10.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $16.2B | $16.1B | $18.5B | $17.8B | $13.8B | $19.9B | $16.2B | $16.1B | $11.4B | $15.9B | $12.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.66 | 16.44 | 19.30 | 16.66 | 12.86 | 43.35 | 18.13 | 21.81 | 12.23 | 26.47 | 21.51 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.78 | 1.76 | 2.03 | 1.90 | 1.25 | 2.10 | 2.02 | 2.06 | 1.35 | 1.83 | 1.42 |
| P/B Ratio | 190.85 | 177.69 | — | 130.50 | — | 225.96 | 34.45 | — | 130.10 | 76.35 | — |
| P/FCF | 15.52 | 15.39 | 17.52 | 12.94 | 17.58 | 21.98 | 17.28 | 20.60 | 11.04 | 24.17 | 19.11 |
| P/OCF | 13.15 | 13.04 | 14.78 | 10.71 | 12.89 | 18.95 | 15.22 | 16.59 | 8.70 | 18.61 | 14.37 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.13 | 2.36 | 2.23 | 1.59 | 2.37 | 2.25 | 2.40 | 1.71 | 2.08 | 1.69 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.43 | 11.35 | 12.14 | 11.96 | 9.41 | 12.41 | 11.30 | 12.69 | 9.09 | 11.75 | 9.85 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.76 | 13.04 | 14.66 | 13.21 | 10.62 | 24.84 | 12.67 | 15.00 | 10.73 | 13.65 | 11.73 |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.61 | 20.37 | 15.17 | 22.44 | 24.77 | 19.26 | 23.99 | 14.03 | 27.45 | 22.79 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 35.5% | 36.3% | 35.2% | 31.3% | 34.2% | 36.0% | 35.2% | 34.7% | 33.8% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | 16.8% | 17.5% | 16.8% | 15.2% | 17.3% | 18.0% | 16.4% | 16.2% | 15.7% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.7% | 10.7% | 10.5% | 11.4% | 9.7% | 4.8% | 8.5% | 9.4% | 10.9% | 6.9% | 6.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7363.6% | 7363.6% | 2609.5% | 782.8% | — | 162.7% | 335.9% | 9707.7% | 577.0% | 1320.0% | — |
| ROA | 15.9% | 15.9% | 15.8% | 17.2% | 15.6% | 7.2% | 11.3% | 12.1% | 13.4% | 9.9% | 9.0% |
| ROIC | 35.4% | 35.4% | 39.1% | 36.5% | 39.1% | 49.4% | 45.2% | 34.9% | 35.4% | 45.2% | 42.5% |
| ROCE | 35.9% | 35.9% | 38.5% | 38.4% | 38.2% | 38.8% | 35.4% | 30.5% | 28.5% | 31.8% | 32.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 45.81 | 45.81 | — | 28.03 | — | 40.63 | 7.09 | — | 43.17 | 16.86 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.42 | 2.42 | 2.11 | 2.19 | 2.35 | 1.98 | 2.09 | 2.34 | 2.38 | 2.29 | 2.37 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 37.19 | — | 22.56 | — | 28.76 | 3.94 | — | 35.17 | 10.33 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.70 | 1.76 | 2.04 | 1.40 | 1.16 | 1.79 | 1.94 | 1.40 | 1.59 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.22 | 2.84 | 2.24 | 4.86 | 2.80 | 1.97 | 3.39 | 2.99 | 3.27 | 3.68 |
| Interest Coverage | 12.24 | 12.24 | 12.73 | 12.68 | 12.05 | 2.88 | 8.85 | 6.75 | 6.81 | 4.18 | 4.63 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.81 | 1.81 | 1.75 | 1.68 | 1.56 | 1.76 | 1.80 | 1.75 | 1.64 | 1.97 | 2.01 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.15 | 1.08 | 0.91 | 1.14 | 1.35 | 1.26 | 1.08 | 1.49 | 1.52 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.69 | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.80 | 0.82 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.45 | 1.56 | 1.49 | 1.67 | 1.50 | 1.24 | 1.33 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 1.43 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.66 | 4.66 | 5.32 | 5.05 | 4.83 | 4.53 | 5.25 | 5.77 | 4.60 | 6.35 | 6.92 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 49.62 | 48.26 | 49.94 | 48.32 | 51.03 | 57.79 | 54.26 | 54.31 | 50.90 | 45.49 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.8% | 2.0% | 1.6% | 1.7% | 2.4% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 1.2% |
| Payout Ratio | 32.2% | 32.2% | 30.9% | 28.3% | 30.6% | 52.0% | 23.7% | 22.8% | 18.4% | 24.4% | 26.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.7% | 6.1% | 5.2% | 6.0% | 7.8% | 2.3% | 5.5% | 4.6% | 8.2% | 3.8% | 4.6% |
| FCF Yield | 6.4% | 6.5% | 5.7% | 7.7% | 5.7% | 4.6% | 5.8% | 4.9% | 9.1% | 4.1% | 5.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 4.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | 2.3% | 8.4% | 5.8% | 5.0% | 6.5% | 7.3% | 2.4% | 4.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.1% | 6.2% | 6.3% | 4.0% | 10.8% | 7.0% | 6.0% | 7.5% | 8.8% | 3.3% | 5.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $210M | $219M | $226M | $232M | $251M | $264M | $288M | $307M | $318M | $330M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MAS stock.
Masco Corporation's current P/E ratio is 17.7x. The historical average is 21.2x. This places it at the 44th percentile of its historical range.
Masco Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 11.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.5x.
Masco Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 7363.6%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 33.5%.
Based on historical data, Masco Corporation is trading at a P/E of 17.7x. This is at the 44th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Masco Corporation's current dividend yield is 1.82% with a payout ratio of 32.2%.
Masco Corporation has 35.5% gross margin and 16.8% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Masco Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.4x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Home Depot concentration and revenue contraction
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Defies Volume Decline
Gross margin surged to 43.6% in Q2 2026, up 590 bps YoY, while operating margin hit 23.6%, per reported figures, suggesting pricing power and cost discipline despite revenue contraction.
The sequential improvement from 35.8% gross margin in Q1 2026 to 43.6% in Q2 2026 is striking, but it may reflect favorable input costs or one-time benefits rather than sustainable pricing power. Operating margin expansion to 23.6% from 16.5% in the prior quarter indicates strong operating leverage, yet with revenue down 3.4% YoY, the sustainability of these margins is questionable. Investors should monitor whether this is a structural shift or a temporary peak, especially given the company's reliance on big-box retail pricing dynamics.
ROIC Volatility Masks Underlying Efficiency
ROIC improved to 12.2% in Q2 2026 from 8.2% in Q1, per financial statements, but remains below the 15%+ levels seen in 2024, indicating cyclical pressure on capital efficiency.
The ten-quarter ROIC trend shows a range of 6.9% to 12.2%, with the latest quarter benefiting from margin expansion. However, the negative equity base complicates ROE interpretation, as ROE spiked to 135.8% in Q4 2025 due to a small denominator. ROIC is a more reliable metric here, and its improvement suggests that management's portfolio simplification is enhancing returns on invested capital, though the absolute level still lags peers like AWI (24.9%) and SHW (17.2%).
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens Slightly
Cash conversion cycle extended to 75 days in Q2 2026 from 67 days a year earlier, per reported data, driven by higher DIO (86 days) and DSO (61 days), indicating slower inventory turnover.
The increase in DIO from 74 to 86 days over the past year suggests inventory buildup, possibly due to softer demand or deliberate stocking ahead of price increases. DSO also rose from 57 to 61 days, which may indicate slower collections or channel stuffing. While the CCC remains manageable, the trend warrants monitoring as it could signal deteriorating working capital efficiency if revenue continues to decline.
Leverage Elevated but Coverage Comfortable
Debt/EBITDA rose to 6.89x in Q2 2026 from 7.20x a year earlier, per reported figures, while interest coverage improved to 16.82x, indicating manageable debt service despite high leverage.
The D/E ratio spiked to 122.3 in Q1 2026 due to negative equity, but D/EBITDA is a more meaningful measure. At 6.89x, leverage is high relative to peers like MHK (0.29x) and AWI (0.59x), but interest coverage of 16.82x provides ample cushion. The negative equity base, driven by aggressive buybacks and retained losses, distorts traditional leverage metrics, so investors should focus on cash flow coverage and debt maturity profile.
Liquidity Buffer Adequate but Thin
Current ratio improved to 1.86 in Q2 2026 from 1.74 a year earlier, per balance sheet data, while quick ratio rose to 1.22, indicating a modest liquidity cushion against operational shocks.
The current ratio remains above 1.5, suggesting the company can cover short-term obligations, but the quick ratio of 1.22 indicates reliance on inventory. With cash of $548M and volatile FCF, the liquidity position is adequate but not robust. In a severe downturn, the company may need to draw on credit lines or reduce buybacks, which could pressure the stock.
Misapplied Metric: P/B Ratio
P/B of 205.21 is meaningless due to negative equity, per reported figures, and should be disregarded; instead, investors should use EV/EBITDA or P/FCF to value MAS.
The negative equity balance of -$365M makes the P/B ratio nonsensical, as it implies an infinite multiple. This metric is commonly misapplied to MAS, leading to confusion about valuation. A more appropriate approach is to use EV/EBITDA (12.14x) or P/FCF (16.69x), which better reflect the company's earnings power and cash generation. The market appears to value MAS as a diversified industrial, trading at a discount to pure-play coatings peers like SHW, which may be justified given its cyclical plumbing exposure.