Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 19.9x · EV/EBITDA 15.4x · ROE N/A. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $169.3B | $219.0B | $209.3B | $217.1B | $195.4B | $201.5B | $161.0B | $151.2B | $139.5B | $140.4B | $104.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $223.4B | $273.0B | $260.1B | $265.6B | $241.5B | $246.2B | $209.0B | $197.8B | $169.7B | $167.4B | $129.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 19.94 | 25.58 | 25.45 | 25.65 | 31.64 | 26.70 | 34.01 | 25.08 | 23.55 | 27.02 | 22.37 |
| P/S Ratio | 6.30 | 8.14 | 8.07 | 8.52 | 8.43 | 8.68 | 8.38 | 7.07 | 6.56 | 6.15 | 4.26 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 23.56 | 30.47 | 31.37 | 29.93 | 35.60 | 28.38 | 34.81 | 26.39 | 33.02 | 37.96 | 24.73 |
| P/OCF | 16.05 | 20.75 | 22.15 | 22.59 | 26.45 | 22.05 | 25.69 | 18.61 | 20.02 | 25.29 | 17.30 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 10.15 | 10.04 | 10.42 | 10.42 | 10.60 | 10.88 | 9.26 | 7.98 | 7.34 | 5.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.35 | 18.76 | 18.84 | 19.50 | 21.48 | 20.14 | 23.03 | 18.51 | 16.47 | 15.34 | 13.99 |
| EV / EBIT | 18.02 | 21.88 | 21.95 | 22.36 | 26.73 | 23.87 | 28.40 | 21.64 | 19.29 | 17.63 | 16.72 |
| EV / FCF | — | 37.99 | 38.99 | 36.62 | 44.00 | 34.67 | 45.19 | 34.53 | 40.17 | 45.28 | 30.57 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 57.4% | 57.4% | 56.8% | 57.1% | 57.0% | 54.2% | 50.8% | 52.3% | 51.0% | 46.5% | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | 46.1% | 46.1% | 45.2% | 45.7% | 40.4% | 44.6% | 38.1% | 42.5% | 41.5% | 41.9% | 31.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 31.9% | 31.9% | 31.7% | 33.2% | 26.6% | 32.5% | 24.6% | 28.2% | 27.9% | 22.8% | 19.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 191.9% |
| ROA | 14.9% | 14.9% | 14.8% | 15.9% | 11.8% | 14.2% | 9.4% | 15.0% | 17.8% | 16.0% | 13.6% |
| ROIC | 18.7% | 18.7% | 19.3% | 20.8% | 17.5% | 19.4% | 14.0% | 21.8% | 27.7% | 30.9% | 25.2% |
| ROCE | 23.3% | 23.3% | 23.3% | 24.3% | 19.4% | 21.5% | 16.2% | 24.6% | 29.0% | 32.7% | 24.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.77 | 3.77 | 3.76 | 3.90 | 4.33 | 4.04 | 5.67 | 4.45 | 3.02 | 2.71 | 2.80 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.71 | 3.71 | 3.68 | 3.56 | 4.10 | 3.65 | 5.29 | 4.37 | 2.93 | 2.48 | 2.67 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 7.52 | 7.62 | 6.69 | 8.40 | 6.29 | 10.38 | 8.14 | 7.15 | 7.32 | 5.84 |
| Interest Coverage | 7.89 | 7.89 | 7.87 | 8.73 | 7.48 | 8.70 | 6.04 | 8.15 | 8.97 | 10.31 | 8.76 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.19 | 1.16 | 1.43 | 1.78 | 1.01 | 0.98 | 1.36 | 1.84 | 1.40 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.94 | 0.94 | 1.18 | 1.16 | 1.41 | 1.76 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 1.35 | 1.82 | 1.38 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 1.17 | 0.56 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.85 | 0.35 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.79 |
| Inventory Turnover | 187.70 | 187.70 | 200.18 | 206.25 | 191.83 | 191.42 | 185.04 | 202.89 | 204.02 | 207.48 | 244.77 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 33.48 | 33.56 | 35.62 | 33.30 | 29.43 | 40.10 | 38.00 | 41.92 | 31.61 | 21.85 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.0% | 2.3% | 2.3% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 2.3% | 2.4% | 2.3% | 2.2% | 2.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 59.7% | 59.7% | 59.2% | 53.5% | 67.5% | 51.9% | 79.3% | 59.4% | 55.0% | 59.5% | 65.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.0% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 3.7% | 2.9% | 4.0% | 4.2% | 3.7% | 4.5% |
| FCF Yield | 4.2% | 3.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | 2.8% | 3.5% | 2.9% | 3.8% | 3.0% | 2.6% | 4.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.2% | 0.9% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 2.0% | 0.4% | 0.6% | 3.3% | 3.7% | 3.3% | 10.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.2% | 3.3% | 3.7% | 3.5% | 4.1% | 2.4% | 2.9% | 5.7% | 6.1% | 5.5% | 13.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $716M | $722M | $732M | $741M | $752M | $750M | $765M | $786M | $816M | $861M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
Bull/bear thesis, analyst target revisions, and earnings execution.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MCD stock.
McDonald's Corporation's current P/E ratio is 19.9x. The historical average is 22.9x. This places it at the 33th percentile of its historical range.
McDonald's Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 15.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.9x.
Based on historical data, McDonald's Corporation is trading at a P/E of 19.9x. This is at the 33th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
McDonald's Corporation's current dividend yield is 3.00% with a payout ratio of 59.7%.
McDonald's Corporation has 57.4% gross margin and 46.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
McDonald's Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Elevated debt and consumer sensitivity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Franchise Economics Mask Margin Stability
Gross margin held at 58.0% in 2026Q2, with operating margin at 47.0%, according to reported figures, reflecting the high-margin franchise and rental model that underpins McDonald's profitability.
The stability in gross and operating margins across the last ten quarters, with gross margin ranging narrowly between 55.7% and 58.0%, underscores the structural advantage of the franchise-heavy model where rental income and royalties carry minimal cost of goods sold. The slight uptick in operating margin to 47.0% in 2026Q2 from 45.0% a year earlier suggests continued operating leverage, though the EPS miss in the same quarter indicates that non-operating items, possibly interest or tax, are pressuring the bottom line. Investors should monitor whether this divergence between operating and net margins persists, as it may signal a shift in the cost of debt or one-time charges.
ROIC Stability Belies Capital Intensity
ROIC has remained remarkably stable, hovering between 4.1% and 5.1% over the past ten quarters, as per reported data, indicating that the company is neither compounding nor decaying its returns on invested capital.
The narrow band of ROIC, despite significant capital deployment into share buybacks and real estate, suggests that the company's returns are mature and highly predictable, consistent with a business that has reached scale in its core markets. The stability is driven by consistent margins and asset turnover, with asset turnover holding at 0.11-0.13, reflecting the heavy asset base of owned real estate. However, the low absolute ROIC relative to peers like Yum! Brands (48.1% ROIC) highlights the capital intensity of McDonald's model, which may justify a lower multiple but also provides a more defensive cash flow stream.
Working Capital Efficiency Hides Real Estate Weight
The cash conversion cycle has been consistently near zero, with 2026Q2 at -0 days, according to reported figures, indicating that McDonald's collects cash from franchisees before paying suppliers, a sign of strong working capital management.
The negative or near-zero CCC, driven by DSO of 32 days and DPO of 34 days, shows that the company effectively uses its scale to finance operations with supplier credit, while franchisee receivables are collected quickly. However, this efficiency is a secondary factor to the real estate model; the true capital efficiency is better measured by ROIC, which remains modest due to the large PP&E base. The low DIO of 2 days reflects the minimal inventory held by the corporate entity, as most inventory is held by franchisees, further underscoring the asset-light operational model at the corporate level.
Debt Overhang Pressures Financial Flexibility
With long-term debt of $39.97B and D/EBITDA at 16.32 in 2026Q2, as per the balance sheet, McDonald's leverage remains elevated, though interest coverage of 8.18x suggests debt service is currently manageable.
The D/EBITDA ratio has fluctuated between 14.25 and 16.65 over the past ten quarters, indicating a persistently high leverage level that leaves little room for additional borrowing without straining credit metrics. Interest coverage of 8.18x in 2026Q2, while adequate, is sensitive to rising rates; a 100 basis point increase in the average interest rate could reduce coverage by roughly 0.5x, based on the current debt load. The negative book equity of -$1.0B, driven by aggressive share repurchases, further limits financial flexibility and may constrain the company's ability to weather a prolonged downturn without asset sales or equity issuance.
Thin Cash Buffer Amidst High Current Liabilities
The current ratio improved to 1.08 in 2026Q2 from 0.95 in 2025Q4, according to reported figures, but cash of $822M remains thin relative to short-term obligations, suggesting a modest liquidity cushion.
The quick ratio of 1.07 in 2026Q2 indicates that the company can cover its current liabilities with cash and receivables alone, which is reassuring given the minimal inventory. However, the absolute cash balance is small compared to the $54.6B total debt, and the current ratio has dipped below 1.0 in several quarters (2025Q4, 2024Q3, 2024Q1), highlighting periodic tightness. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a sharp decline in franchisee sales, the company's reliance on recurring royalties and rents could be impaired, and the thin cash buffer would offer limited protection without drawing on credit lines or asset sales.
Misapplied ROIC in a Real Estate Model
ROIC is the most commonly misapplied ratio for McDonald's, as it understates the value of owned real estate, which is carried at historical cost and operationally locked into the brand, per the balance sheet.
Standard ROIC calculations use book value of PP&E, which for McDonald's is $28.5B, but the market value of its prime locations is likely significantly higher, making the ratio appear artificially low. This misapplication can lead investors to undervalue the company's asset base and overstate its capital intensity relative to asset-light peers like Yum! Brands. A more appropriate metric would be a cash-on-cash return on the replacement cost of the real estate or an adjusted ROIC that capitalizes operating leases and revalues properties, providing a truer picture of the economic returns generated by the ground lease model.