Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 49.8x · EV/EBITDA 31.5x · ROE 5.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.5B | $9.7B | $10.7B | $16.0B | $13.8B | $21.9B | $15.6B | $17.6B | $13.3B | $19.3B | $16.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $63.6B | $63.8B | $40.2B | $44.7B | $41.9B | $41.9B | $31.5B | $30.9B | $26.9B | $30.7B | $28.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 49.80 | 48.01 | 14.44 | 14.01 | 67.06 | 18.62 | — | 8.57 | 28.54 | 10.00 | 15.02 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 2.26 | 3.17 | 1.36 | 1.13 | 1.79 | 1.75 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.06 | 2.95 | 2.89 | 3.67 | 2.58 | 1.97 | 1.38 | 1.37 | 1.26 | 1.65 | 1.65 |
| P/FCF | 5.71 | 5.80 | 8.87 | 9.07 | 13.82 | 24.78 | — | 16.38 | 56.56 | 56.45 | — |
| P/OCF | 3.48 | 3.53 | 4.55 | 5.94 | 7.84 | 15.93 | — | 9.70 | 7.74 | 8.76 | 10.78 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.64 | 2.33 | 2.77 | 3.19 | 4.32 | 6.40 | 2.39 | 2.29 | 2.85 | 2.97 |
| EV / EBITDA | 31.50 | 31.57 | 17.31 | 16.53 | 8.52 | 12.21 | 55.42 | 5.89 | 10.17 | 11.36 | 9.58 |
| EV / EBIT | 63.50 | 91.11 | 25.76 | 28.24 | 27.98 | 18.51 | — | 8.36 | 20.24 | 19.50 | 14.38 |
| EV / FCF | — | 38.23 | 33.16 | 25.30 | 41.86 | 47.42 | — | 28.83 | 114.28 | 89.78 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 44.4% | 45.5% | 47.1% | 49.3% | 48.0% | 34.8% | 41.1% | 41.2% | 42.6% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 5.7% | 8.6% | 11.7% | 11.0% | 23.5% | -13.1% | 30.5% | 12.5% | 15.9% | 22.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.2% | 1.2% | 4.3% | 7.1% | 11.2% | 13.0% | -21.0% | 15.9% | 4.0% | 18.1% | 11.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.9% | 5.9% | 18.5% | 23.5% | 17.9% | 11.2% | -8.6% | 17.6% | 4.2% | 18.0% | 12.4% |
| ROA | 0.5% | 0.5% | 1.8% | 2.6% | 3.4% | 3.2% | -2.9% | 6.4% | 1.6% | 6.8% | 4.1% |
| ROIC | 1.7% | 1.7% | 3.4% | 4.3% | 3.3% | 5.9% | -1.8% | 11.8% | 4.7% | 5.8% | 7.7% |
| ROCE | 2.6% | 2.6% | 3.8% | 4.7% | 3.7% | 6.3% | -2.0% | 13.6% | 5.5% | 6.6% | 8.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 17.14 | 17.14 | 8.56 | 7.24 | 6.33 | 2.22 | 1.87 | 1.23 | 1.43 | 1.10 | 1.30 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 27.81 | 27.81 | 13.72 | 11.69 | 6.91 | 7.20 | 36.99 | 2.99 | 5.72 | 4.77 | 4.43 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 16.51 | 7.91 | 6.57 | 5.23 | 1.80 | 1.42 | 1.04 | 1.29 | 0.98 | 1.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 26.78 | 26.78 | 12.68 | 10.60 | 5.71 | 5.83 | 28.02 | 2.54 | 5.14 | 4.22 | 3.94 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 32.44 | 24.29 | 16.23 | 28.03 | 22.65 | — | 12.45 | 57.72 | 33.33 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.67 | 1.67 | 3.52 | 3.44 | 2.52 | 2.83 | -2.94 | 4.36 | 1.73 | 2.36 | 2.81 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.30 | 1.57 | 1.81 | 1.86 | 3.21 | 1.26 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.97 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.26 | 1.53 | 1.78 | 1.84 | 3.16 | 1.22 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.93 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.94 | 1.31 | 1.37 | 2.75 | 0.73 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.63 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.13 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.34 |
| Inventory Turnover | 78.27 | 78.27 | 66.83 | 60.37 | 52.77 | 52.20 | 36.32 | 73.90 | 62.43 | 60.54 | 56.23 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 27.95 | 28.13 | 24.17 | 25.72 | 32.34 | 41.56 | 38.90 | 21.27 | 19.77 | 20.96 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | 1.3% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | 0.3% | 0.4% | — | 13.2% | 55.8% | 12.9% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.0% | 2.1% | 6.9% | 7.1% | 1.5% | 5.4% | — | 11.7% | 3.5% | 10.0% | 6.7% |
| FCF Yield | 17.5% | 17.3% | 11.3% | 11.0% | 7.2% | 4.0% | — | 6.1% | 1.8% | 1.8% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 12.9% | 12.7% | 12.6% | 14.3% | 20.0% | 8.0% | 2.3% | 5.9% | 9.6% | 1.7% | 0.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 12.9% | 12.7% | 12.6% | 14.3% | 20.1% | 8.0% | 2.8% | 7.4% | 11.6% | 3.0% | 0.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $265M | $310M | $359M | $413M | $487M | $494M | $528M | $550M | $579M | $573M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MGM stock.
MGM Resorts International's current P/E ratio is 49.8x. The historical average is 22.6x. This places it at the 95th percentile of its historical range.
MGM Resorts International's current EV/EBITDA is 31.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.1x.
MGM Resorts International's return on equity (ROE) is 5.9%. The historical average is 6.6%.
Based on historical data, MGM Resorts International is trading at a P/E of 49.8x. This is at the 95th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MGM Resorts International has 44.4% gross margin and 5.7% operating margin.
MGM Resorts International's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 27.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High debt load
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Amid Record Quarter
Gross margin slipped 180 bps to 44.5% by Q2 2026, while net margin rebounded to 6.6% from a loss in Q3 2025. According to recent financial statements, operating leverage remains volatile, suggesting cost pressures persist.
The 44.5% gross margin in Q2 2026 is down from 46.3% in Q2 2024, indicating rising labor and occupancy costs that are eroding pricing power. Operating margin swung from -2.7% in Q3 2025 to 11.3% in Q2 2026, highlighting the extreme sensitivity of earnings to revenue fluctuations. Net margin of 6.6% in Q2 2026 is still below the 5.0% seen in Q1 2024, suggesting that despite the record revenue, profitability has not fully recovered to prior peaks.
Thin Returns on Massive Capital Base
ROIC averaged just 0.8% over the last ten quarters, with Q2 2026 at 1.2%, far below the cost of capital. As reported in financial statements, asset turnover of 0.11x indicates the capital-intensive model is generating minimal returns per dollar invested.
ROIC of 1.2% in Q2 2026, while improved from 0.5% in Q1 2026, remains negligible relative to the company's weighted average cost of capital, which is likely in the high single digits. ROE of 8.7% in Q2 2026 is misleadingly elevated due to the thin equity base of $2.5B, which has been eroded by buybacks and losses. The combination of low asset turnover and thin margins suggests that MGM is not compounding returns on its invested capital, a concern for long-term value creation.
Working Capital Efficiency Stable but Low Turnover
Cash conversion cycle improved to 14 days in Q2 2026 from 17 days in Q4 2024, driven by stable DSO and DPO. Based on reported figures, asset turnover of 0.11x remains persistently low, reflecting the heavy fixed-asset base.
The CCC of 14 days is favorable, indicating efficient management of receivables and payables, with DSO at 25 days and DPO at 15 days. However, asset turnover of 0.11x is among the lowest in the sector, underscoring the capital intensity of owning and leasing massive resort properties. This low turnover means that even modest improvements in margins have an outsized impact on returns, but it also limits the scalability of the model without significant additional capital.
Leverage Overhang Persists Despite Asset-Light Shift
Debt-to-equity spiked to 17.14 in Q4 2025 before settling at 8.84 in Q2 2026, while interest coverage improved to 5.05x. According to recent SEC filings, total debt of $29.8B remains a structural overhang, with lease obligations adding hidden fixed charges.
The D/E ratio of 8.84 in Q2 2026 is elevated relative to peers like LVS (8.34) and CZR (7.15), and the equity base has shrunk to $2.5B due to buybacks and losses. Interest coverage of 5.05x in Q2 2026 is an improvement from 1.96x in Q4 2025, but it remains vulnerable to any downturn in EBITDA. The asset-light model shifts depreciation to rent expenses, which are not captured in traditional leverage metrics, suggesting the true fixed-charge burden is higher than reported.
Liquidity Adequate but Cash Buffer Thin
Current ratio improved to 1.33 in Q2 2026, with quick ratio at 1.30, indicating minimal inventory dependence. As reported in financial statements, cash of $2.5B is modest relative to $29.8B in total debt, leaving limited cushion for shocks.
The current ratio of 1.33 is stable and above 1.0, suggesting the company can cover short-term obligations, but the quick ratio of 1.30 indicates that inventory is not a significant factor. However, the cash balance of $2.5B represents only about 8% of total debt, and with high fixed costs and lease obligations, a severe demand shock could strain liquidity. The improvement from 1.23 in Q4 2025 is positive, but the thin absolute cash buffer warrants monitoring.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in Asset-Light Era
EV/EBITDA of 32.48x appears stretched, but the metric is distorted by the asset-light model where rent replaces depreciation. According to recent financial statements, EBITDA understates true cash costs, making EV/EBITDA misleading for MGM.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for MGM is EV/EBITDA, which is widely used in the gaming sector. However, because MGM has sold many properties and leases them back from REITs, its EBITDA does not include the substantial rent expenses, making it appear artificially high relative to cash earnings. This inflates the EV/EBITDA multiple and understates leverage. Analysts should instead use EBITDAR (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and rent) or a cash-flow-based multiple like EV/EBITDAR to better capture the true economic burden of the lease obligations.