Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 26.1x · EV/EBITDA 16.1x · ROE 11.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $29.4B | $37.7B | $31.8B | $31.0B | $21.1B | $27.6B | $17.7B | $17.5B | $10.8B | $14.0B | $14.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $34.7B | $42.9B | $37.0B | $34.4B | $26.2B | $32.9B | $20.6B | $20.8B | $13.9B | $15.6B | $15.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 26.09 | 33.12 | 15.94 | 26.51 | 24.37 | 39.26 | 24.61 | 28.71 | 23.13 | 19.65 | 33.41 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.50 | 5.76 | 4.87 | 4.57 | 3.43 | 5.09 | 3.75 | 3.70 | 2.56 | 3.52 | 3.70 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.96 | 3.75 | 3.36 | 3.86 | 2.94 | 4.22 | 3.01 | 3.28 | 2.19 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| P/FCF | 30.11 | 38.52 | 52.68 | 35.29 | 41.50 | 38.59 | 25.67 | 30.62 | 32.95 | 56.49 | 46.90 |
| P/OCF | 16.50 | 21.10 | 21.81 | 20.28 | 21.31 | 24.24 | 16.87 | 18.15 | 15.38 | 21.24 | 20.53 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.56 | 5.65 | 5.08 | 4.25 | 6.07 | 4.35 | 4.38 | 3.28 | 3.92 | 4.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.07 | 19.88 | 11.27 | 16.33 | 15.29 | 23.05 | 14.72 | 16.53 | 13.45 | 15.59 | 16.40 |
| EV / EBIT | 22.80 | 28.30 | 13.36 | 20.77 | 20.79 | 32.91 | 20.45 | 23.67 | 19.52 | 21.89 | 22.92 |
| EV / FCF | — | 43.89 | 61.18 | 39.22 | 51.46 | 45.97 | 29.83 | 36.28 | 42.30 | 62.88 | 52.32 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 30.0% | 28.7% | 29.9% | 23.1% | 24.9% | 26.5% | 24.9% | 22.8% | 24.5% | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 23.3% | 41.4% | 23.6% | 19.6% | 18.0% | 21.3% | 18.7% | 16.3% | 17.7% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 17.4% | 17.4% | 30.5% | 17.2% | 14.1% | 13.0% | 15.2% | 12.9% | 11.1% | 18.0% | 11.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.7% | 11.7% | 22.8% | 15.4% | 12.6% | 11.3% | 12.8% | 11.9% | 9.8% | 16.2% | 10.4% |
| ROA | 6.2% | 6.2% | 12.0% | 7.8% | 5.9% | 5.6% | 7.0% | 6.2% | 5.1% | 8.8% | 6.0% |
| ROIC | 7.6% | 7.6% | 15.6% | 10.1% | 7.5% | 7.1% | 8.7% | 8.0% | 7.3% | 8.7% | 9.0% |
| ROCE | 8.7% | 8.7% | 17.4% | 11.6% | 8.9% | 8.2% | 10.4% | 9.8% | 8.1% | 9.3% | 10.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.41 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.47 | 2.47 | 1.77 | 2.24 | 3.17 | 3.88 | 2.21 | 2.59 | 3.02 | 3.03 | 1.75 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.43 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.49 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.34 | 0.39 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.43 | 2.43 | 1.57 | 1.64 | 2.96 | 3.70 | 2.06 | 2.58 | 2.97 | 1.58 | 1.70 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.37 | 8.50 | 3.93 | 9.96 | 7.38 | 4.17 | 5.66 | 9.35 | 6.39 | 5.42 |
| Interest Coverage | 6.62 | 6.62 | 16.36 | 10.05 | 7.46 | 7.00 | 8.53 | 6.79 | 5.20 | 7.76 | 8.43 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.57 | 3.57 | 2.50 | 3.35 | 1.99 | 2.69 | 3.34 | 1.70 | 1.74 | 3.79 | 1.99 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.36 | 2.36 | 1.40 | 2.50 | 1.39 | 1.69 | 1.92 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 2.92 | 1.03 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.66 | 1.09 | 0.25 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 2.08 | 0.09 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.52 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.25 | 4.25 | 4.18 | 4.81 | 5.42 | 5.40 | 4.90 | 5.15 | 4.94 | 4.98 | 5.57 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 40.33 | 37.86 | 40.56 | 46.56 | 52.18 | 44.38 | 44.19 | 45.00 | 44.85 | 43.77 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 1.1% | 0.8% | 0.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 17.3% | 17.3% | 9.5% | 14.9% | 18.5% | 21.0% | 19.5% | 21.2% | 24.8% | 15.3% | 24.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.8% | 3.0% | 6.3% | 3.8% | 4.1% | 2.5% | 4.1% | 3.5% | 4.3% | 5.1% | 3.0% |
| FCF Yield | 3.3% | 2.6% | 1.9% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 2.6% | 3.9% | 3.3% | 3.0% | 1.8% | 2.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.7% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 1.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.2% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 1.0% | 1.5% | 0.5% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 1.6% | 2.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $61M | $62M | $62M | $63M | $63M | $62M | $63M | $63M | $63M | $64M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MLM stock.
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 26.1x. The historical average is 27.3x. This places it at the 60th percentile of its historical range.
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 16.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.6x.
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 11.7%. The historical average is 12.8%.
Based on historical data, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 26.1x. This is at the 60th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.66% with a payout ratio of 17.3%.
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. has 30.0% gross margin and 23.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
EPS volatility and cost pressures
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Amid Cost Pressures
Gross margin fell to 25.4% in 2026Q2 from 30.0% a year earlier, while operating margin dropped to 19.5% from 25.3%, per quarterly filings, signaling cost headwinds.
The sequential decline in gross margin from 30.5% in 2025Q4 to 25.4% in 2026Q2 suggests that input costs, particularly energy and diesel, are eroding pricing power. Operating margin compression is more pronounced, indicating that SG&A and other operating expenses are not scaling with revenue, which may reflect integration costs from recent acquisitions. The 2026Q1 net margin spike to 111.1% is clearly non-recurring, likely from a one-time gain, and should be excluded when assessing underlying profitability. Investors should monitor whether the margin recovery in Q3 and Q4 of 2025 can be replicated, as the current trajectory suggests a potential structural shift in cost structure.
ROIC Volatility Masks Underlying Value
ROIC swung from 9.5% in 2024Q1 to 0.8% in 2026Q1, with a recent 1.7% in 2026Q2, per financial statements, indicating significant volatility in capital efficiency.
The wide swings in ROIC are partly due to the timing of acquisitions and the associated increase in invested capital, as total assets grew 31% over the period. The 2024Q1 ROIC of 9.5% likely benefited from a low capital base before major M&A, while the 2026Q1 figure of 0.8% reflects the full impact of the Lehigh Hanson acquisition and seasonal weakness. The recent 1.7% ROIC in 2026Q2 is below the cost of capital, suggesting that recent acquisitions have not yet generated sufficient returns. However, the company's high gross margins and pricing power in aggregates suggest that ROIC could improve as acquired assets are integrated and volumes recover, but this remains to be seen.
Working Capital Efficiency Deteriorates
Cash conversion cycle extended to 120 days in 2026Q1 from 101 days in 2024Q3, driven by rising DSO and DIO, per quarterly data, indicating slower cash conversion.
DSO increased from 42 days in 2026Q2 to 50 days in 2026Q1, and DIO rose from 75 to 98 days over the same period, while DPO remained relatively stable. This suggests that MLM is taking longer to collect receivables and holding more inventory, which may be a deliberate strategy to ensure supply chain resilience or a sign of slowing demand. The negative FCF margin in 2026Q2 (-0.8%) and the $390M working capital outflow in that quarter highlight the cash drag from these inefficiencies. Asset turnover has also declined to 0.09 in 2026Q2 from 0.12 in 2024Q3, indicating that the expanded asset base from acquisitions is not yet generating proportional revenue.
Leverage Creeps Higher with Debt-Funded M&A
D/EBITDA rose to 10.21 in 2026Q2 from 6.92 in 2024Q3, while interest coverage fell to 6.42 from 13.05, per balance sheet data, signaling increased financial risk.
The sharp increase in D/EBITDA from 6.92 to 10.21 over eight quarters reflects the debt-funded acquisitions, particularly the Lehigh Hanson West Region assets. Interest coverage has correspondingly weakened from 13.05 to 6.42, but remains at a level that suggests debt service is still manageable. The D/E ratio of 0.52 is low for the industry, but the absolute debt level of $6.0B is significant relative to cash of $112M. The 2026Q1 D/EBITDA of 17.29 was likely distorted by seasonally low EBITDA, but the trend is concerning. Investors should monitor whether EBITDA growth from acquisitions can restore coverage ratios to historical levels, as the current trajectory suggests a structural increase in leverage.
Liquidity Buffer Thins Despite Healthy Ratios
Current ratio fell to 1.40 in 2026Q2 from 1.86 in 2024Q2, while quick ratio dropped to 0.73, per balance sheet data, indicating reduced short-term flexibility.
The current ratio remains above 1.0, but the quick ratio of 0.73 in 2026Q2 suggests that MLM relies heavily on inventory to meet short-term obligations, which may be problematic if demand softens. Cash and cash equivalents are only $112M, which is minimal for a company of this size, and the negative FCF margin in 2026Q2 indicates that internal cash generation is insufficient to cover capital expenditures. The company's ability to weather a severe downturn may depend on its access to credit markets, which is not directly observable from the data. The thin liquidity position, combined with high leverage, suggests that MLM is operating with a tighter financial buffer than its historical norms.
Misapplied Metric: EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA of 17.31 appears rich, but for aggregates firms, this metric ignores the scarcity value of permitted reserves, which is a key driver of long-term value.
The market often treats aggregates as a commodity, but MLM's competitive advantage lies in its localized monopolies and the difficulty of obtaining new permits. EV/EBITDA fails to capture the value of the company's land and mineral reserves, which are not fully reflected in current EBITDA. A more appropriate metric would be EV/Reserves or EV/Per-ton capacity, which would better reflect the replacement cost of these assets. Additionally, the low P/FCF of 32.84 may understate the company's cash generation potential, as FCF is volatile due to heavy capex and working capital swings. Investors should adjust for the cyclicality of construction demand and the long-term pricing power inherent in the aggregates business when evaluating MLM's valuation.