Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -16.1x · EV/EBITDA 13.5x · ROE 4.5%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.1B | $7.7B | $7.9B | $11.9B | $15.6B | $15.0B | $8.8B | $8.3B | $11.3B | $9.0B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $12.1B | $12.7B | $12.1B | $15.6B | $18.7B | $18.6B | $13.0B | $12.6B | $15.0B | $12.1B | $13.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | -16.14 | 14.17 | 44.69 | 10.21 | 4.36 | 9.20 | 13.15 | — | 23.94 | — | 34.51 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 1.21 | 1.01 | 0.93 | 1.18 | 1.22 | 1.44 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.96 | 1.28 | 1.39 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 1.06 | 0.93 | 1.07 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 166.30 | 11.85 | 5.81 | 16.69 | 21.30 | — | 24.68 | 78.03 | 24.39 |
| P/OCF | 8.62 | 9.31 | 6.07 | 4.95 | 3.97 | 6.86 | 5.54 | 7.58 | 7.78 | 9.62 | 8.15 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.05 | 1.08 | 1.14 | 0.98 | 1.51 | 1.49 | 1.41 | 1.56 | 1.63 | 1.88 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.46 | 6.04 | 7.32 | 6.77 | 3.27 | 5.68 | 10.27 | — | 8.26 | 10.68 | 13.07 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.54 | 8.85 | 22.11 | 10.27 | 3.88 | 7.70 | 32.79 | — | 19.51 | 22.15 | 35.14 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 254.43 | 15.48 | 6.95 | 20.74 | 31.44 | — | 32.73 | 104.66 | 31.82 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 15.1% | 15.1% | 13.6% | 16.1% | 30.1% | 25.9% | 12.3% | 10.1% | 15.6% | 11.4% | 11.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 8.7% | 5.6% | 9.8% | 25.0% | 20.0% | 4.8% | -12.3% | 9.7% | 6.3% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 4.5% | 4.5% | 1.6% | 8.5% | 18.7% | 13.2% | 7.7% | -12.0% | 4.9% | -1.4% | 4.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.5% | 4.5% | 1.5% | 9.5% | 31.2% | 15.9% | 7.0% | -10.7% | 4.6% | -1.1% | 3.1% |
| ROA | 2.3% | 2.3% | 0.8% | 5.0% | 15.8% | 7.8% | 3.4% | -5.4% | 2.4% | -0.6% | 1.7% |
| ROIC | 4.8% | 4.8% | 2.9% | 6.4% | 24.2% | 13.1% | 2.2% | -5.9% | 5.2% | 2.7% | 1.9% |
| ROCE | 5.3% | 5.3% | 3.3% | 7.2% | 27.3% | 14.6% | 2.5% | -6.4% | 5.4% | 2.9% | 2.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.38 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.41 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.54 | 0.40 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.51 | 2.51 | 2.70 | 1.74 | 0.67 | 1.34 | 3.77 | — | 2.50 | 4.62 | 3.71 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.38 | 2.38 | 2.54 | 1.59 | 0.54 | 1.11 | 3.31 | — | 2.03 | 2.72 | 3.05 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 88.12 | 3.63 | 1.14 | 4.05 | 10.14 | — | 8.05 | 26.64 | 7.44 |
| Interest Coverage | 6.58 | 6.58 | 2.37 | 8.02 | 28.50 | 12.45 | 1.84 | -4.82 | 3.56 | 3.18 | 2.72 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.08 | 1.22 | 1.18 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.43 | 1.71 | 2.27 | 2.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 1.51 | 1.13 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.34 | 1.06 | 0.46 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.82 | 0.56 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.40 | 0.43 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.04 | 3.04 | 3.77 | 4.55 | 3.77 | 3.34 | 4.38 | 3.86 | 3.56 | 4.24 | 4.57 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 39.65 | 44.24 | 41.00 | 36.06 | 48.97 | 44.67 | 32.95 | 31.97 | 38.62 | 39.45 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.9% | 3.6% | 3.4% | 3.0% | 1.3% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 2.3% | 3.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 51.9% | 51.9% | 154.8% | 30.2% | 5.5% | 6.4% | 11.4% | — | 8.2% | — | 129.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | 7.1% | 2.2% | 9.8% | 22.9% | 10.9% | 7.6% | — | 4.2% | — | 2.9% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 0.6% | 8.4% | 17.2% | 6.0% | 4.7% | — | 4.1% | 1.3% | 4.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.0% | 6.4% | 10.7% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.9% | 3.6% | 6.4% | 9.3% | 11.9% | 3.4% | 0.9% | 2.6% | 0.3% | 2.3% | 4.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $319M | $321M | $333M | $356M | $382M | $381M | $384M | $386M | $351M | $352M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MOS stock.
The Mosaic Company's current P/E ratio is -16.1x. The historical average is 21.3x.
The Mosaic Company's current EV/EBITDA is 13.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.8x.
The Mosaic Company's return on equity (ROE) is 4.5%. The historical average is 3.2%.
Based on historical data, The Mosaic Company is trading at a P/E of -16.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The Mosaic Company's current dividend yield is 3.93% with a payout ratio of 51.9%.
The Mosaic Company has 15.1% gross margin and 8.7% operating margin.
The Mosaic Company's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Sulfur-driven phosphate margin compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Trough Earnings Distort Headline Multiples
Based on reported figures, MOS trades at 13.14 trailing P/E and 5.43 EV/EBITDA, below NTR at 7.52 EV/EBITDA, yet a forward P/E of 62.97 signals that investors are pricing in a very weak near-term earnings base.
The low trailing P/E reflects earnings from a stronger 2025 period that is now rolling off, so it understates the current cost of the multiple. The forward P/E of 62.97 versus a trailing 13.14 implies consensus expects earnings to stay depressed for an extended period, which makes trailing multiples unreliable as a value anchor. A price-to-book of 0.58 and a 3.9% dividend yield suggest the market is valuing the asset base at a steep discount, which may reflect doubts about the durability of phosphate returns rather than a mispricing alone.
Gross Margin Collapse Overwhelms Revenue Growth
As reported in quarterly statements, MOS gross margin fell from 18.6% in 2025Q1 to 2.7% in 2026Q3, a roughly 16 point compression that exceeds the impact of any revenue movement over the period.
Operating margin swung from 12.9% to -3.1% over the same span, indicating that fixed SG&A and depreciation are absorbing a shrinking gross profit pool. Net margin of -2.3% in the latest quarter, against a positive 9.1% a year earlier, points to input cost inflation, particularly sulfur, as the dominant driver rather than one-time items. Investors should monitor whether gross margin stabilizes, since sustained sub-5% gross margins would leave little cushion for the capital intensity of the mining base.
Returns Decaying Below Cost of Capital
Based on reported figures, ROIC has moved from 1.6% in 2025Q1 to -0.4% in 2026Q3, while ROE turned negative at -0.6%, compared with a peer CF Industries ROIC of 18.7%.
The shift from modestly positive to negative ROIC suggests the capital base built around Florida phosphate and potash infrastructure is not currently generating returns above its cost. The gap versus CF Industries largely reflects differences in business mix and margin structure rather than a single operational lapse, so the comparison is directional rather than exact. Whether returns recover depends primarily on sulfur and ammonia costs normalizing, since efficiency gains alone are unlikely to close the gap.
Rising Debt Against Shrinking Equity
According to reported figures, MOS debt-to-equity climbed from 0.36 in 2024Q3 to 0.52 in 2026Q3 as equity declined, while interest coverage turned negative at -0.74 in the latest quarter.
Leverage has risen through two channels at once: total debt increased while the equity base eroded through accumulated losses. Negative interest coverage in recent quarters indicates that operating earnings are not currently covering interest expense, which warrants close attention even though the balance sheet remains adequate. Debt-to-EBITDA of 30.28 in 2026Q3, versus 7.79 in 2025Q3, shows how sharply earnings capacity has compressed relative to the debt load.
Working Capital Carries a Thin Cash Buffer
As reported in balance sheet data, MOS holds a current ratio of 1.50 and quick ratio of 0.54, but cash of roughly $273 million against $5.9 billion of total debt leaves limited immediate liquidity.
The current ratio is supported largely by inventory and receivables rather than cash, and the quick ratio of 0.54 indicates heavy dependence on inventory conversion. Days inventory of 32 to 46 across recent quarters and a cash conversion cycle near 106 days suggest working capital is tied up for long periods. Under a severe stress scenario with prolonged margin weakness, the reliance on working capital conversion rather than cash reserves would likely become the binding constraint.
Misapplied Trailing Multiples Mask Cyclical Trough
Based on reported figures, the most misapplied metric for MOS is the trailing P/E, which at 13.14 appears inexpensive against a forward P/E of 62.97 and a 2026Q3 net margin of -2.3%.
Applying a trailing earnings multiple to a commodity fertilizer producer in a margin trough can make a stressed business look optimally priced, since trailing earnings still embed prior-cycle profitability. A more informative approach would normalize earnings across a full cycle or use EV-to-replacement-value and asset-based measures, given the 0.58 price-to-book. This suggests investors should monitor sulfur and ammonia cost trends alongside the forward estimate gap rather than relying on headline P/E.