Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.3x · EV/EBITDA 9.5x · ROE 33.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $16.9B | $22.4B | $27.1B | $24.0B | $16.2B | $22.8B | $16.0B | $15.1B | $10.0B | $14.9B | $6.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $16.1B | $21.6B | $25.6B | $21.9B | $14.7B | $21.8B | $14.8B | $14.7B | $9.9B | $14.8B | $7.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.31 | 16.71 | 16.14 | 15.11 | 9.38 | 18.44 | 17.73 | 17.22 | 12.51 | 27.67 | 16.11 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.63 | 2.17 | 2.57 | 2.52 | 1.54 | 2.54 | 2.12 | 2.04 | 1.39 | 2.36 | 1.17 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.96 | 5.79 | 6.45 | 5.51 | 4.61 | 7.59 | 5.15 | 6.46 | 5.51 | 9.26 | 5.25 |
| P/FCF | 15.37 | 20.41 | 20.18 | 16.32 | 8.74 | 18.62 | 17.58 | 17.93 | 14.18 | 27.11 | 18.92 |
| P/OCF | 15.04 | 19.96 | 19.75 | 16.05 | 8.65 | 18.35 | 17.27 | 17.46 | 13.79 | 26.15 | 17.82 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.09 | 2.42 | 2.30 | 1.39 | 2.44 | 1.96 | 1.98 | 1.37 | 2.34 | 1.21 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.49 | 12.75 | 12.74 | 11.91 | 6.71 | 14.65 | 14.80 | 15.14 | 10.77 | 18.01 | 10.95 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.63 | 12.07 | 11.92 | 11.20 | 6.40 | 13.29 | 12.94 | 13.97 | 10.02 | 17.02 | 10.33 |
| EV / FCF | — | 19.71 | 19.00 | 14.87 | 7.92 | 17.82 | 16.27 | 17.39 | 14.01 | 26.99 | 19.47 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 23.0% | 25.5% | 26.0% | 27.3% | 24.5% | 21.3% | 21.0% | 20.7% | 21.0% | 19.2% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 16.2% | 18.9% | 19.1% | 20.6% | 16.4% | 13.0% | 12.8% | 12.5% | 12.7% | 10.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.0% | 13.0% | 16.0% | 16.7% | 16.4% | 13.8% | 11.9% | 11.9% | 11.1% | 8.5% | 7.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 33.2% | 33.2% | 39.2% | 40.4% | 53.0% | 40.5% | 33.1% | 42.3% | 46.7% | 36.9% | 33.4% |
| ROA | 21.9% | 21.9% | 25.9% | 26.0% | 30.0% | 21.3% | 18.8% | 25.2% | 25.9% | 19.1% | 16.5% |
| ROIC | 43.8% | 43.8% | 61.7% | 65.0% | 81.1% | 56.1% | 38.6% | 39.7% | 41.6% | 39.4% | 32.0% |
| ROCE | 32.9% | 32.9% | 37.5% | 36.8% | 47.6% | 31.7% | 25.3% | 34.9% | 38.8% | 39.0% | 33.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.46 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 1.07 | 1.59 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.20 | -0.38 | -0.49 | -0.43 | -0.33 | -0.38 | -0.20 | -0.06 | -0.04 | 0.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.45 | -0.45 | -0.79 | -1.17 | -0.69 | -0.66 | -1.19 | -0.47 | -0.12 | -0.08 | 0.31 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.69 | -1.18 | -1.46 | -0.82 | -0.80 | -1.31 | -0.54 | -0.16 | -0.13 | 0.56 |
| Interest Coverage | 62.10 | 62.10 | 77.14 | 70.52 | 58.01 | 30.91 | 27.97 | 41.38 | 39.22 | 35.97 | 31.43 |
Net cash position: cash ($2.0B) exceeds total debt ($1.2B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.95 | 3.95 | 5.07 | 4.90 | 4.53 | 4.35 | 4.96 | 4.37 | 3.76 | 3.40 | 3.04 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.12 | 2.12 | 3.29 | 3.31 | 2.97 | 2.78 | 3.38 | 2.66 | 2.11 | 1.82 | 1.57 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.08 | 2.08 | 2.27 | 2.59 | 2.20 | 2.07 | 2.56 | 1.45 | 0.94 | 0.85 | 0.53 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.76 | 1.65 | 1.44 | 1.86 | 1.54 | 1.31 | 1.94 | 2.27 | 2.11 | 2.21 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.61 | 4.61 | 3.81 | 3.62 | 4.28 | 3.47 | 3.47 | 4.34 | 4.54 | 4.00 | 4.31 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 1.16 | 1.13 | 1.11 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 1.16 | 1.19 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.0% | 6.0% | 6.2% | 6.6% | 10.7% | 5.4% | 5.6% | 5.8% | 8.0% | 3.6% | 6.2% |
| FCF Yield | 6.5% | 4.9% | 5.0% | 6.1% | 11.4% | 5.4% | 5.7% | 5.6% | 7.1% | 3.7% | 5.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 10.9% | 8.2% | 7.6% | 4.5% | 9.3% | 6.7% | 2.3% | 4.6% | 8.5% | 2.8% | 6.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 10.9% | 8.2% | 7.6% | 4.5% | 9.3% | 6.7% | 2.3% | 4.6% | 8.5% | 2.8% | 6.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $3M | $3M | $4M | $4M | $4M | $4M | $4M | $4M | $4M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NVR stock.
NVR, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 14.3x. The historical average is 15.2x. This places it at the 47th percentile of its historical range.
NVR, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.8x.
NVR, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 33.2%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 41.9%.
Based on historical data, NVR, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 14.3x. This is at the 47th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
NVR, Inc. has 23.0% gross margin and 16.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
NVR, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.7x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Off-balance-sheet land commitments
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Signals Structural Shift
Gross margin fell 530 basis points from 26.2% in 2024Q1 to 20.9% in 2026Q2, as reported in quarterly filings, indicating input cost pressures and reduced pricing power amid demand contraction.
The sequential decline in gross margin from 25.4% in 2024Q4 to 20.9% in 2026Q2, per reported data, suggests that cost inflation in lots and labor is outpacing the company's ability to pass through price increases. Operating margin followed a similar trajectory, dropping from 18.7% to 13.3% over the same period, which may indicate that fixed SG&A costs are not flexing down with volume, amplifying the earnings impact. This margin compression appears more structural than cyclical, as it persists across multiple quarters and aligns with the revenue decline, warranting close monitoring of whether NVR can stabilize margins through pricing or cost initiatives.
ROIC Decay Reflects Asset-Light Limits
ROIC fell from 14.8% in 2024Q4 to 7.6% in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, indicating a significant deterioration in capital efficiency despite the asset-light model's historical advantages.
The decline in ROIC from 14.8% to 7.6% over six quarters, per reported data, suggests that the asset-light model is not immune to cyclical pressures, as lower margins and revenue contraction directly impact returns on invested capital. ROE also weakened from 10.8% to 6.9% in the same period, reflecting the combined effect of margin compression and reduced asset turnover. While the LPO strategy limits land risk, the current environment shows that returns are still highly sensitive to volume and pricing, and the market may be reassessing the durability of NVR's premium returns.
Working Capital Swings Distort Efficiency
Cash conversion cycle lengthened from 77 days in 2024Q4 to 86 days in 2026Q2, per reported data, driven by higher inventory days, while asset turnover fell from 0.44 to 0.42, indicating reduced operational efficiency.
The increase in DIO from 93 days to 103 days over the same period, as reported in financial statements, suggests that homes are taking longer to sell or that NVR is holding more work-in-progress inventory, which ties up cash. The slight decline in asset turnover from 0.44 to 0.42, per reported data, indicates that revenue is falling faster than the asset base, reflecting the demand slowdown. These efficiency metrics, combined with the negative FCF margin in 2026Q2, highlight that working capital management is becoming more challenging as the cycle turns.
Minimal Debt Masks Off-Balance-Sheet Risk
Debt-to-equity stands at 0.31% as of 2026Q2, per financial statements, with interest coverage of 14.86, indicating ample debt service capacity, but off-balance-sheet lot option commitments are not captured in this metric.
The extremely low leverage and high interest coverage, as reported in quarterly data, suggest that NVR has significant untapped borrowing capacity and faces minimal refinancing risk. However, the asset-light model's reliance on lot option deposits and VIEs, as noted in prior analysis, means that the true financial commitment to land is understated, potentially masking future cash outflows. Investors should monitor the total value of controlled lots and the health of third-party developers, as a disruption in lot supply could strain the balance sheet despite the low reported debt.
Cash Buffer Thins but Remains Strong
Current ratio declined from 5.08 in 2024Q1 to 3.38 in 2026Q2, per reported data, while cash fell from $2.9B to $1.2B, yet the quick ratio of 1.21 still indicates a solid liquidity cushion.
The reduction in cash and current ratio, as reported in financial statements, reflects aggressive share repurchases and slowing reinvestment, but the absolute levels remain robust for a homebuilder. The quick ratio of 1.21 in 2026Q2, per reported data, suggests that NVR can cover short-term obligations without relying on inventory sales, which is crucial during a demand downturn. However, the declining cash position warrants monitoring, as it may limit flexibility for opportunistic land purchases or buybacks if the cycle worsens.
Misapplied Metric: Debt-to-Equity
The debt-to-equity ratio of 0.31% is commonly cited as proof of a fortress balance sheet, but it obscures NVR's off-balance-sheet land commitments, as reported in financial statements, understating true leverage.
Analysts often use D/E to compare NVR's risk profile with peers, but the asset-light model's reliance on lot options and VIEs means that significant future cash outflows are not captured in this metric. A more appropriate measure would be the total value of controlled lots relative to equity, or a leverage ratio that includes off-balance-sheet commitments, to assess the true financial risk. The market may be overvaluing NVR's safety based on reported D/E, while ignoring the potential for lot supply disruptions that could strain liquidity.