Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 80.0x · EV/EBITDA 18.4x · ROE 1.3%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15.0B | $9.9B | $13.0B | $7.1B | $4.6B | $6.0B | $391M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $18.7B | $13.6B | $15.8B | $9.0B | $6.4B | $7.3B | $736M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 80.00 | 124.50 | 116.30 | 135.45 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.54 | 3.67 | 5.98 | 4.30 | 3.50 | 7.58 | 1.73 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.05 | 1.64 | 2.24 | 1.35 | 0.83 | 1.03 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 12.52 | 8.29 | 13.89 | 8.08 | 6.93 | 21.84 | 85.37 | — |
| P/OCF | 11.95 | 7.91 | 12.99 | 7.50 | 6.31 | 21.44 | 74.74 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.03 | 7.28 | 5.45 | 4.86 | 9.11 | 3.26 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.40 | 13.40 | 17.94 | 14.35 | 24.89 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 29.78 | 24.57 | 26.76 | 28.00 | 611.39 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.35 | 16.91 | 10.23 | 9.64 | 26.26 | 160.62 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 55.4% | 55.7% | 49.7% | 34.7% | -81.7% | 3.6% | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | 21.9% | 21.9% | 26.4% | 18.4% | -0.2% | -112.5% | -23.5% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.7% | 2.7% | 4.8% | 3.1% | -0.7% | -45.7% | -31.2% | 12.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.3% | 1.3% | 2.0% | 1.0% | -0.2% | -14.1% | — | — |
| ROA | 0.7% | 0.7% | 1.1% | 0.6% | -0.1% | -9.0% | -87.3% | 40.5% |
| ROIC | 5.0% | 5.0% | 5.7% | 3.2% | -0.0% | -20.0% | — | — |
| ROCE | 5.7% | 5.7% | 6.3% | 3.7% | -0.0% | -22.9% | -92.9% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.22 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.81 | 3.81 | 3.38 | 3.18 | 7.26 | — | — | 10.18 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.61 | 0.49 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.21 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.61 | 3.61 | 3.21 | 3.02 | 7.00 | — | — | 9.92 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.06 | 3.02 | 2.15 | 2.71 | 4.41 | 75.24 | 6.52 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.38 | 3.38 | 4.85 | 4.25 | 0.19 | -67.45 | -2.47 | 4.11 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 2.52 | 1.44 | 1.32 | 1.27 | 1.80 | 0.43 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 2.52 | 1.44 | 1.32 | 1.27 | 1.80 | 0.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.51 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 2.05 | 3.36 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 8.6% | 5.5% | 0.2% | 3.5% | 4.0% | 2.5% | 20.0% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 693.4% | 693.4% | 21.1% | 456.1% | — | — | — | 1394.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.7% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 8.0% | 12.1% | 7.2% | 12.4% | 14.4% | 4.6% | 1.2% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.9% | 6.0% | 0.5% | 3.7% | 5.7% | 2.5% | 20.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $665M | $558M | $478M | $433M | $405M | $34M | $320M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OWL stock.
Blue Owl Capital Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 80.0x. The historical average is 125.4x.
Blue Owl Capital Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 18.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 17.6x.
Blue Owl Capital Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 1.3%. The historical average is -2.0%.
Based on historical data, Blue Owl Capital Inc. is trading at a P/E of 80.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Blue Owl Capital Inc.'s current dividend yield is 8.57% with a payout ratio of 693.4%.
Blue Owl Capital Inc. has 55.4% gross margin and 21.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Blue Owl Capital Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Provision volatility and negative NII
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple, Discounted Forward
Blue Owl trades at 1.28x book versus peers like Blackstone at 5.06x, yet its forward P/E of 13.16 implies market skepticism about earnings sustainability, according to current market data.
The wide gap between trailing P/E of 97.08 and forward P/E of 13.16 suggests the market expects a dramatic earnings normalization, likely reflecting the recent provision spike. At 1.28x P/B, the market prices OWL as a commodity asset manager rather than a premium franchise, despite its fee-based model. Investors appear to be discounting future growth due to credit concerns, which may present an opportunity if provisions prove cyclical.
Fee Engine, Thin Returns
ROE averaged 0.4% over the last four quarters, with non-interest income comprising over 98% of revenue, indicating a fee-driven model that generates minimal accounting profits, as per financial statements.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that asset utilization is high due to fee income, but leverage is low (equity/assets around 0.46) and net margins are thin, resulting in sub-1% ROE. This suggests that while the fee engine is robust, the balance sheet is not being leveraged to enhance returns. The provision expense of $492.6M in 2026Q2, which exceeded net income, underscores that credit costs are the primary drag on profitability.
Negative NII, Volatile Efficiency
Net interest margin has been negative for eight consecutive quarters, reaching -0.3% in 2026Q1, while the efficiency ratio swung from 73.5% to 25.5% in 2026Q2, based on reported figures.
The negative NIM indicates that interest expense exceeds interest income, a structural feature for an asset manager with no deposit base. The efficiency ratio volatility suggests that costs are not well controlled, with the 73.5% reading in 2026Q1 implying significant operating leverage challenges. However, the 25.5% in 2026Q2 shows that revenue growth can outpace costs when fee income is strong, but this is inconsistent.
Thinning Equity Cushion
Equity-to-assets declined from 0.58 in 2024Q1 to 0.46 in 2026Q2, while total equity grew to $2.0B, indicating a modest reduction in capital buffer, as per financial statements.
The declining equity ratio suggests that asset growth is outpacing retained earnings, which may be a concern given the provision volatility. However, the absolute equity level of $2.0B provides a cushion, and the negative tangible book value per share (e.g., -$3.96 in 2026Q2) indicates that intangible assets are significant. Investors should monitor whether the capital base can absorb further credit losses without diluting shareholders.
Provision Spike Clouds Credit
Loan loss provisions surged to $492.6M in 2026Q2, a 65% increase from the prior quarter, while cumulative provisions over four quarters reached $1.08B, according to recent disclosures.
The provision expense is far exceeding net income, suggesting that credit quality is deteriorating or that the company is building reserves aggressively. With cumulative provisions of $1.08B against cumulative net income of $130M, the adequacy of current reserves is questionable. If provisions continue at this pace, they could erode capital and force a reduction in dividends, which currently yield 7.1%.
P/E Misleads on Earnings
The trailing P/E of 97.08 is distorted by provision volatility, while the forward P/E of 13.16 may overstate earnings quality, as provisions are non-cash but signal real credit risk, based on reported data.
For asset managers, P/E is often misapplied because earnings are heavily influenced by non-cash provisions and mark-to-market changes. A better metric is P/B adjusted for tangible book value, but OWL's tangible book is negative, making P/B less meaningful. Instead, investors should focus on fee-related earnings (FRE) and distributable earnings, which exclude provision volatility, to assess the underlying profitability of the fee-based model.