Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 61.9x · EV/EBITDA 38.5x · ROE 8.8%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.1B | $17.8B | $20.3B | $25.0B | $16.2B | $28.2B | $39.3B | $7.8B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $11.4B | $17.1B | $19.3B | $23.8B | $14.8B | $27.0B | $38.8B | $7.4B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 61.94 | 42.44 | 10.86 | — | — | 88.66 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.58 | 4.22 | 5.55 | 8.18 | 5.77 | 10.94 | 23.21 | 6.86 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.75 | 3.75 | 4.26 | 8.09 | 4.93 | 9.28 | 17.52 | 3.87 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 9.56 | 14.22 | 21.55 | 41.31 | 36.72 | 37.92 | 3439.28 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 9.39 | 13.87 | 21.00 | 40.77 | 34.45 | 37.47 | 1363.14 | 11929.40 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.05 | 5.29 | 7.80 | 5.27 | 10.49 | 22.93 | 6.48 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 38.49 | 49.56 | 95.99 | — | — | 76.45 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 35.50 | 38.35 | 67.11 | — | — | 81.84 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 13.66 | 20.53 | 39.38 | 33.58 | 36.35 | 3396.93 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 80.1% | 80.1% | 79.4% | 77.5% | 75.8% | 79.5% | 73.5% | 68.6% | 68.0% | 62.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 7.6% | 4.9% | -4.1% | -3.6% | 12.7% | -8.4% | -121.5% | -9.9% | -29.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 9.9% | 9.9% | 51.1% | -1.2% | -3.4% | 12.3% | -7.6% | -119.1% | -8.3% | -27.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.8% | 8.8% | 47.5% | -1.1% | -3.0% | 12.0% | -6.0% | -94.1% | -7.0% | -14.2% |
| ROA | 7.7% | 7.7% | 41.7% | -1.0% | -2.6% | 10.3% | -5.1% | -75.9% | -5.2% | -10.7% |
| ROIC | 6.1% | 6.1% | 4.7% | -4.9% | -4.0% | 13.5% | -6.4% | -83.5% | -6.4% | -12.2% |
| ROCE | 6.4% | 6.4% | 4.4% | -3.7% | -3.0% | 11.5% | -6.2% | -84.1% | -6.7% | -12.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.17 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.92 | — | — | 0.71 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.15 | -0.20 | -0.38 | -0.42 | -0.38 | -0.22 | -0.21 | 0.03 | -0.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.05 | -2.05 | -4.73 | — | — | -3.31 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.57 | -1.01 | -1.93 | -3.14 | -1.57 | -42.35 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | -4.65 | 35.07 | -199.03 | -635.80 | -61.88 | -1157.33 |
Net cash position: cash ($969M) exceeds total debt ($262M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 7.64 | 7.64 | 8.75 | 10.53 | 9.08 | 12.25 | 11.51 | 11.74 | 8.20 | 11.11 |
| Quick Ratio | 7.64 | 7.64 | 8.75 | 10.53 | 9.08 | 12.25 | 11.51 | 11.74 | 8.20 | 11.11 |
| Cash Ratio | 5.30 | 5.30 | 6.31 | 7.93 | 7.09 | 9.55 | 8.60 | 9.74 | 5.79 | 8.92 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.48 | 0.63 | 0.39 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 86.27 | 89.43 | 91.18 | 88.76 | 92.50 | 121.56 | 101.05 | 107.16 | 105.44 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.6% | 2.4% | 9.2% | — | — | 1.1% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 10.5% | 7.0% | 4.6% | 2.4% | 2.7% | 2.6% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 7.7% | 5.2% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 6.1% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.7% | 5.2% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 6.1% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $688M | $698M | $675M | $666M | $776M | $596M | $420M | $529M | $449M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PINS stock.
Pinterest, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 61.9x. The historical average is 47.3x. This places it at the 67th percentile of its historical range.
Pinterest, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 38.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 74.0x.
Pinterest, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.8%. The historical average is -6.4%.
Based on historical data, Pinterest, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 61.9x. This is at the 67th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Pinterest, Inc. has 80.1% gross margin and 7.6% operating margin.
Pinterest, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.8x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Ad cyclicality and TikTok competition
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Trailing Multiples Overstate Earnings Risk
Based on reported figures, PINS trades at 32.4x trailing earnings but only 9.8x forward earnings and 10.1x free cash flow, a gap that signals the market is discounting near-term GAAP profit volatility rather than the cash generation underneath.
The collapse from a 32.4x trailing P/E to a 9.8x forward P/E implies consensus expects a sharp normalization of net income, likely as recent GAAP losses in 2026Q1 and 2026Q2 reverse. The 10.1x price-to-free-cash-flow multiple is the more reliable anchor here because it sidesteps the distortion from stock-based compensation, though it still excludes the dilution that SBC represents. Investors should monitor whether forward earnings estimates hold, since the valuation case rests heavily on that recovery.
Gross Margin Strength Versus Thin Operating Returns
As reported in financial statements, Pinterest's gross margin held between 76% and 83% across ten quarters, yet operating margin swung from -4.1% to 22.8%, indicating that operating expense rather than cost of revenue governs earning power.
The stable gross margin points to a durable pricing position in digital advertising, but the volatility in operating margin shows that personnel and stock-based compensation absorb nearly all of the gross profit. The 2.6% operating margin in 2026Q3 leaves little buffer, suggesting that a modest revenue shortfall could push the business back into operating losses. Earning power is therefore better judged by free cash flow margin, which has stayed positive, than by the operating margin alone.
Returns Oscillate Around Breakeven
Based on Pinterest's reported figures, ROIC ranged from -0.9% to 6.7% over the period while ROE was distorted by a 48.3% spike in 2024Q4, suggesting that returns on invested capital have not yet compounded consistently.
The 2024Q4 ROE reading reflects a one-time earnings event rather than a sustained improvement, so the more representative figure is ROIC hovering in the low single digits. Compared to the peer set, Pinterest's returns trail Reddit's 18.4% ROIC and Yelp's 25.5%, which suggests the capital base is not yet generating economic returns above its cost of capital. Investors should monitor whether ROIC can sustain positive territory as the goodwill-heavy balance sheet grows.
Low Leverage Masks Rising Debt Load
According to recent SEC filings, Pinterest's debt-to-equity ratio remains near 0.39 in 2026Q3, yet total debt has climbed sharply from prior levels, suggesting leverage is modest but moving in a direction that warrants monitoring.
A debt-to-equity figure near 0.39 indicates the company still funds itself predominantly with equity, and the interest coverage ratio is not reported for the most recent periods, so debt service comfort cannot be fully confirmed. The rapid increase in debt, combined with buybacks that consume free cash flow, may indicate a shift toward a more levered capital structure. Investors should track whether the rising debt is matched by earnings growth or instead funds shareholder returns.
Misapplied Metric: Price-to-Sales Overstates Quality
Based on Pinterest's reported figures, the 2.98x price-to-sales ratio appears attractive against the peer group, but it obscures the substantial stock-based compensation that dilutes the economic value of each revenue dollar.
Price-to-sales is frequently used for ad platforms because revenue is more stable than earnings, yet it ignores the margin structure entirely, treating a dollar of revenue at a 2.6% operating margin the same as one at a 25% margin. For Pinterest, where stock-based compensation of roughly $230M to $292M per quarter sits against thin operating income, the metric flatters the business. A free-cash-flow-to-equity measure that deducts SBC as a real expense would give a more conservative and arguably more accurate view of value.