Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 15.4x · EV/EBITDA 8.5x · ROE 18.8%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.7B | $6.0B | $5.3B | $3.0B | $2.2B | $3.0B | $1.5B | $1.1B | $884M | $1.1B | $927M |
| Enterprise Value | $4.0B | $5.3B | $4.9B | $2.8B | $2.1B | $2.3B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $883M | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 15.40 | 21.45 | 29.29 | 35.26 | 19.97 | 10.87 | 37.10 | 10.38 | 17.70 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.24 | 3.18 | 3.60 | 2.32 | 1.61 | 1.54 | 1.27 | 1.40 | 1.25 | 1.35 | 1.25 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.96 | 3.82 | 3.75 | 2.32 | 1.76 | 2.47 | 1.62 | 1.38 | 1.21 | 1.49 | 1.14 |
| P/FCF | 5.13 | 8.66 | 17.83 | 11.34 | — | 4.41 | 1.97 | 18.18 | 1.79 | 4.93 | 24.54 |
| P/OCF | 6.36 | 8.25 | 16.94 | 10.93 | — | 4.28 | 1.93 | 16.44 | 1.73 | 4.76 | 19.00 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.82 | 3.34 | 2.15 | 1.51 | 1.15 | 1.09 | 1.44 | 1.25 | 1.82 | 2.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.46 | 12.95 | 20.06 | 17.46 | 12.56 | 4.69 | 10.41 | 8.30 | 9.68 | 14.57 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 10.29 | 13.87 | 22.54 | 22.79 | 15.46 | 5.14 | 18.82 | 9.64 | 12.19 | 18.73 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 7.67 | 16.54 | 10.52 | — | 3.31 | 1.69 | 18.71 | 1.79 | 6.63 | 39.17 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 93.8% | 93.8% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 20.3% | 14.8% | 9.4% | 9.8% | 22.4% | 5.8% | 14.9% | 10.2% | 9.7% | -4.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 14.8% | 14.8% | 12.3% | 6.6% | 8.1% | 14.1% | 3.4% | 14.0% | 8.1% | -7.6% | -3.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 18.8% | 18.8% | 13.3% | 6.7% | 8.9% | 25.9% | 4.7% | 14.5% | 7.8% | -8.0% | -2.7% |
| ROA | 11.6% | 11.6% | 8.2% | 4.0% | 4.7% | 12.2% | 2.2% | 7.5% | 3.4% | -3.0% | -1.0% |
| ROIC | 18.0% | 18.0% | 11.0% | 6.2% | 6.9% | 24.9% | 4.5% | 9.5% | 5.6% | 4.6% | -1.6% |
| ROCE | 16.2% | 16.2% | 10.3% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 20.0% | 3.9% | 10.4% | 7.9% | 6.4% | -2.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.07 | 0.56 | 0.73 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 1.03 | 1.42 | 0.44 | 2.38 | 2.04 | 0.55 | 4.07 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.44 | -0.27 | -0.17 | -0.10 | -0.62 | -0.23 | 0.04 | -0.00 | 0.51 | 0.68 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.68 | -1.68 | -1.56 | -1.37 | -0.79 | -1.56 | -1.72 | 0.23 | -0.00 | 3.74 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.99 | -1.29 | -0.82 | — | -1.10 | -0.28 | 0.52 | -0.00 | 1.70 | 14.63 |
| Interest Coverage | 79.64 | 79.64 | 38.45 | 12.08 | 14.17 | 41.13 | 4.75 | 10.14 | 4.38 | 3.91 | -1.37 |
Net cash position: cash ($809M) exceeds total debt ($116M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 22.75 | 22.75 | 23.03 | 2.83 | 12.19 | 9.41 | 42.11 | 9.88 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 22.75 | 22.75 | 23.03 | 2.83 | 12.19 | 9.41 | 42.11 | 9.88 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 19.91 | 19.91 | 13.33 | 2.83 | 6.06 | 7.05 | 27.32 | 4.35 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.77 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.35 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.4% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 2.8% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 1.9% | 3.2% | 5.3% | 1.7% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 40.6% | 40.6% | 40.7% | 98.8% | 97.2% | 35.7% | 69.6% | 31.9% | 82.7% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.5% | 4.7% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 5.0% | 9.2% | 2.7% | 9.6% | 5.7% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 19.5% | 11.5% | 5.6% | 8.8% | — | 22.7% | 50.7% | 5.5% | 55.9% | 20.3% | 4.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.7% | 2.1% | 1.3% | 2.3% | 8.5% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 4.5% | 8.0% | 2.3% | 7.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.1% | 4.0% | 2.6% | 5.1% | 13.3% | 5.6% | 3.3% | 7.7% | 13.4% | 4.0% | 7.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $71M | $71M | $69M | $68M | $68M | $60M | $56M | $54M | $51M | $51M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PIPR stock.
Piper Sandler Companies's current P/E ratio is 15.4x. The historical average is 21.7x. This places it at the 37th percentile of its historical range.
Piper Sandler Companies's current EV/EBITDA is 8.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.6x.
Piper Sandler Companies's return on equity (ROE) is 18.8%. The historical average is 4.6%.
Based on historical data, Piper Sandler Companies is trading at a P/E of 15.4x. This is at the 37th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Piper Sandler Companies's current dividend yield is 2.43% with a payout ratio of 40.6%.
Piper Sandler Companies has 93.8% gross margin and 20.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Piper Sandler Companies's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.3x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Volatile fee-driven earnings
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Rests on Peak Earnings
Based on reported figures, PIPR trades at 2.96 times book and roughly 16.65 times trailing earnings, a multiple that sits near the middle of its advisory peer set while its tangible book per share has compounded from $13.24 to $16.25 over ten quarters.
The P/B of 2.96 sits well below Moelis at 6.63 and Evercore at 5.45, which suggests the market is not pricing PIPR as a premium franchise but as a cyclical broker with volatile fee income. The trailing P/E of 16.65 looks reasonable only if the 2025Q4 earnings peak is treated as partly normalized rather than repeatable. Investors should monitor whether tangible book growth translates into sustained ROTCE above the low-teens before the valuation discount narrows.
ROE Swings Driven by Fee Volatility
As reported in quarterly statements, PIPR's ROE moved from 7.5 percent in 2025Q4 to 3.5 percent in 2026Q3, with fee income running at 100.7 percent of net revenue and net interest margin turning negative at -0.1 percent.
Because net interest income contributes almost nothing to the revenue base, the DuPont decomposition collapses largely into fee-driven operating margin and balance sheet leverage, leaving ROE highly sensitive to transaction timing. The negative NIM in 2026Q3 suggests the balance sheet is generating a net funding cost rather than a spread, which reduces the offset to advisory weakness. The current 3.5 percent ROE indicates that the late-2025 peak profitability has not been sustained and warrants further investigation into the durability of the fee base.
Efficiency Erosion Outpaces Margin Recovery
Based on PIPR's reported figures, the efficiency ratio deteriorated from 66.9 percent in 2025Q4 to 79.6 percent in 2026Q3, while net interest margin remained near zero throughout the period.
A rising efficiency ratio alongside a flat, near-zero NIM indicates that cost absorption, primarily compensation, is not flexing down quickly enough as revenue declined from its peak. This pattern suggests weakening operating leverage rather than a temporary timing effect. Investors should monitor whether compensation ratios reset in subsequent quarters, as persistent efficiency above 75 percent would meaningfully compress through-cycle returns.
Equity Cushion Thins Against Growing Liabilities
As reported in PIPR's financial statements, equity to assets fell from 0.76 in 2025Q1 to 0.64 in 2026Q3 while total liabilities climbed to $869.5M, reducing the capital cushion relative to the asset base.
The decline in the equity-to-assets ratio appears to reflect balance sheet growth outpacing retained equity rather than any regulatory capital shortfall, which cannot be assessed from the supplied data. A thinner equity cushion may limit flexibility for funding growth or absorbing a sharper fee downturn. Warrants monitoring of whether liability growth is driven by trading or financing activity, as that distinction materially affects the risk profile.
Price-to-Book Misreads Advisory Economics
Based on the supplied data, P/B is the most commonly misapplied multiple for PIPR, since its book value is dominated by liquidity and trading balances rather than loans that drive bank-style returns.
P/B treats the balance sheet as a loan-and-deposit franchise, but PIPR's assets are largely cash, securities and receivables tied to advisory and trading activity, so a low P/B may reflect the market discounting those assets rather than undervaluing the franchise. A more useful alternative is normalized earnings power adjusted for fee cyclicality, measured against peers on a through-cycle basis. The metric obscures the difference between a stable book value and a highly variable earnings stream, which investors should weigh more heavily.