Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.9x · EV/EBITDA 10.6x · ROE 18.8%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.1B | $6.0B | $5.3B | $3.0B | $2.2B | $3.0B | $1.5B | $1.1B | $884M | $1.1B | $927M |
| Enterprise Value | $4.4B | $5.3B | $4.9B | $2.8B | $2.1B | $2.3B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $883M | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.95 | 21.45 | 29.29 | 35.26 | 19.97 | 10.87 | 37.10 | 10.38 | 17.70 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.67 | 3.18 | 3.60 | 2.32 | 1.61 | 1.54 | 1.27 | 1.40 | 1.25 | 1.35 | 1.25 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.19 | 3.82 | 3.75 | 2.32 | 1.76 | 2.47 | 1.62 | 1.38 | 1.21 | 1.49 | 1.14 |
| P/FCF | 7.26 | 8.66 | 17.83 | 11.34 | — | 4.41 | 1.97 | 18.18 | 1.79 | 4.93 | 24.54 |
| P/OCF | 6.92 | 8.25 | 16.94 | 10.93 | — | 4.28 | 1.93 | 16.44 | 1.73 | 4.76 | 19.00 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.82 | 3.34 | 2.15 | 1.51 | 1.15 | 1.09 | 1.44 | 1.25 | 1.82 | 2.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.59 | 12.95 | 20.06 | 17.46 | 12.56 | 4.69 | 10.41 | 8.30 | 9.68 | 14.57 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 11.34 | 13.87 | 22.54 | 22.79 | 15.46 | 5.14 | 18.82 | 9.64 | 12.19 | 18.73 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 7.67 | 16.54 | 10.52 | — | 3.31 | 1.69 | 18.71 | 1.79 | 6.63 | 39.17 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 93.8% | 93.8% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 20.3% | 14.8% | 9.4% | 9.8% | 22.4% | 5.8% | 14.9% | 10.2% | 9.7% | -4.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 14.8% | 14.8% | 12.3% | 6.6% | 8.1% | 14.1% | 3.4% | 14.0% | 8.1% | -7.6% | -3.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 18.8% | 18.8% | 13.3% | 6.7% | 8.9% | 25.9% | 4.7% | 14.5% | 7.8% | -8.0% | -2.7% |
| ROA | 11.6% | 11.6% | 8.2% | 4.0% | 4.7% | 12.2% | 2.2% | 7.5% | 3.4% | -3.0% | -1.0% |
| ROIC | 18.0% | 18.0% | 11.0% | 6.2% | 6.9% | 24.9% | 4.5% | 9.5% | 5.6% | 4.6% | -1.6% |
| ROCE | 16.2% | 16.2% | 10.3% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 20.0% | 3.9% | 10.4% | 7.9% | 6.4% | -2.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.07 | 0.56 | 0.73 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 1.03 | 1.42 | 0.44 | 2.38 | 2.04 | 0.55 | 4.07 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.44 | -0.27 | -0.17 | -0.10 | -0.62 | -0.23 | 0.04 | -0.00 | 0.51 | 0.68 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.68 | -1.68 | -1.56 | -1.37 | -0.79 | -1.56 | -1.72 | 0.23 | -0.00 | 3.74 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.99 | -1.29 | -0.82 | — | -1.10 | -0.28 | 0.52 | -0.00 | 1.70 | 14.63 |
| Interest Coverage | 79.64 | 79.64 | 38.45 | 12.08 | 14.17 | 41.13 | 4.75 | 10.14 | 4.38 | 3.91 | -1.37 |
Net cash position: cash ($809M) exceeds total debt ($116M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 22.75 | 22.75 | 23.03 | 2.83 | 12.19 | 9.41 | 42.11 | 9.88 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 22.75 | 22.75 | 23.03 | 2.83 | 12.19 | 9.41 | 42.11 | 9.88 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 19.91 | 19.91 | 13.33 | 2.83 | 6.06 | 7.05 | 27.32 | 4.35 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.77 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.35 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.3% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 2.8% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 1.9% | 3.2% | 5.3% | 1.7% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 40.6% | 40.6% | 40.7% | 98.8% | 97.2% | 35.7% | 69.6% | 31.9% | 82.7% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.6% | 4.7% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 5.0% | 9.2% | 2.7% | 9.6% | 5.7% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 13.8% | 11.5% | 5.6% | 8.8% | — | 22.7% | 50.7% | 5.5% | 55.9% | 20.3% | 4.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.5% | 2.1% | 1.3% | 2.3% | 8.5% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 4.5% | 8.0% | 2.3% | 7.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.7% | 4.0% | 2.6% | 5.1% | 13.3% | 5.6% | 3.3% | 7.7% | 13.4% | 4.0% | 7.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $71M | $71M | $69M | $68M | $68M | $60M | $56M | $54M | $51M | $51M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PIPR stock.
Piper Sandler Companies's current P/E ratio is 17.9x. The historical average is 21.7x. This places it at the 42th percentile of its historical range.
Piper Sandler Companies's current EV/EBITDA is 10.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.6x.
Piper Sandler Companies's return on equity (ROE) is 18.8%. The historical average is 4.6%.
Based on historical data, Piper Sandler Companies is trading at a P/E of 17.9x. This is at the 42th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Piper Sandler Companies's current dividend yield is 2.26% with a payout ratio of 40.6%.
Piper Sandler Companies has 93.8% gross margin and 20.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Piper Sandler Companies's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.3x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
M&A cycle dependency
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Valuation Reflects Cyclical Recovery
At a P/B of 3.40x, PIPR trades at a significant discount to pure-play peers like Moelis (7.97x) and Evercore (5.55x), yet its current ROE of 4.3% implies the market is pricing in a substantial return to historical profitability levels.
The current P/B multiple appears to embed expectations of a sustained recovery in deal activity, as the firm's trailing ROE is well below the peer median of ~20%. The valuation discount to higher-ROE peers like Evercore suggests the market may be discounting PIPR's earnings quality or its exposure to the FIG consolidation cycle. Investors should monitor whether the multiple can expand toward peers if ROE normalizes, or if the discount is structural due to its more diversified, less advisory-pure revenue mix.
ROE Recovery Driven by Operating Leverage
ROE expanded to 4.3% in 2026Q2 from a trough of 2.6% in 2024Q3, driven primarily by a dramatic improvement in the efficiency ratio to 75.3% as revenue scaled faster than compensation costs.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that the profitability improvement is almost entirely a function of asset utilization (revenue generation) and cost control, not leverage, as the equity-to-assets ratio has remained relatively stable. The high fee income ratio of 95.5% confirms that profitability is directly tied to the capital markets cycle. The recent emergence of a $21.5M provision expense, however, introduces a new headwind that could dampen future ROE expansion if it persists.
Fee Dominance Overshadows Modest NIM
While NIM improved to 1.0% in 2026Q2, it remains a negligible contributor to earnings, with the efficiency ratio's sharp decline to 75.3% from 91.6% a year ago being the primary driver of margin expansion.
The NIM trend is largely irrelevant to PIPR's core earnings power, as the balance sheet is used for liquidity management rather than traditional lending. The efficiency ratio improvement is the critical metric, demonstrating strong operating leverage as the firm scales its advisory and brokerage operations. The sustainability of this leverage depends on management's ability to control compensation costs as a percentage of net revenue during the next industry downturn.
Emerging Credit Risk in a Fee-Based Model
After eight quarters of zero provisions, PIPR recorded $21.5M in loan loss provisions in 2026Q2, a material shift that introduces unfamiliar credit risk to its traditionally fee-driven earnings profile.
The sudden appearance of provisions suggests either a strategic expansion into lending or a reclassification of certain balance sheet activities, which warrants close monitoring. The adequacy of the current reserve level is difficult to assess without data on the composition and vintage of the underlying loan portfolio. This development represents a new risk vector that could pressure net income if credit losses materialize, particularly in a slowing economic environment.
Valuation Discount to Advisory Pure-Plays
PIPR trades at a P/B of 3.40x, a significant discount to the peer median of 4.69x, which appears to reflect its lower ROE and more diversified, less advisory-concentrated revenue mix compared to firms like Evercore and Moelis.
The valuation gap is most pronounced versus the highest-ROE peers (Evercore at 45.8%, Moelis at 35.6%), suggesting the market is not assigning a premium for PIPR's FIG specialization. The firm's PEG ratio of 0.45 is attractive relative to peers like Houlihan Lokey (3.31), indicating the market may be underappreciating its growth potential if the M&A cycle sustains. However, the peer comparison highlights that PIPR's profitability lags the group, which justifies some valuation discount.
P/E Misleads on Cyclical Earnings Power
The trailing P/E of 19.09x is likely misleading as it incorporates a cyclical earnings trough; the more relevant metric is P/B, which at 3.40x prices the firm's balance sheet and franchise value independent of volatile deal-driven earnings.
For investment banks like PIPR, P/E is highly sensitive to the timing of success-fee recognition and can swing dramatically quarter-to-quarter, making it a poor indicator of sustainable earnings power. The P/B multiple is more appropriate as it values the firm's equity relative to its tangible book, which better reflects the franchise value of its advisory relationships and market position. Analysts should focus on ROTCE relative to the cost of equity, rather than P/E, to assess whether the current valuation adequately compensates for the firm's cyclical risk profile.