Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -6.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -207.1%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.5B | $1.4B | $859M | $323M | $1.1B | $971M | $1.6B | $2.9B | $1.0B | $529M | $140M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.0B | $1.8B | $766M | $220M | $974M | $551M | $1.4B | $2.6B | $828M | $389M | $28M |
| P/E Ratio → | -6.51 | — | — | — | — | 2.95 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 74.64 | 85.48 | 31.68 | 20.37 | 9.95 | 1.85 | 42.83 | 393.68 | 91.03 | 40.33 | 5.59 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.27 | 6.92 | — | 1.55 | 2.23 | 1.63 | 6.59 | 8.87 | 5.72 | 5.88 | 2.20 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 3.59 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | 3.37 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 113.83 | 28.26 | 13.87 | 9.15 | 1.05 | 38.20 | 351.82 | 73.35 | 29.71 | 1.11 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 1.73 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | 1.77 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 2.04 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 89.5% | 89.5% | 32.4% | 14.0% | 96.9% | 95.2% | -226.3% | 100.0% | -547.5% | -414.3% | -189.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1166.8% | -1166.8% | -679.6% | -1785.5% | -134.4% | 59.3% | -334.3% | -1663.8% | -781.9% | -549.0% | -286.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1236.0% | -1236.0% | -883.4% | -1947.1% | -119.1% | 62.9% | -333.3% | -1705.8% | -738.2% | -613.3% | -292.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -207.1% | -207.1% | -238.5% | -90.2% | -23.7% | 78.5% | -44.1% | -49.4% | -61.8% | -104.7% | -75.5% |
| ROA | -28.8% | -28.8% | -34.5% | -40.1% | -16.7% | 57.3% | -31.7% | -34.4% | -34.5% | -40.3% | -32.3% |
| ROIC | -50.7% | -50.7% | -5422.5% | -85.6% | -37.9% | 189.6% | -211.8% | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -29.4% | -29.4% | -28.9% | -40.8% | -20.4% | 57.2% | -34.4% | -36.1% | -39.8% | -40.3% | -35.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.70 | 2.70 | — | 0.67 | 0.30 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.32 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 0.43 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.29 | — | -0.50 | -0.18 | -0.71 | -0.71 | -0.94 | -1.11 | -1.55 | -1.76 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | -1.32 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | -1.55 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -2.12 | -2.12 | -2.72 | -6.38 | -9.96 | 41.70 | -35.98 | -31.60 | -37.46 | -31.20 | -32.25 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 10.43 | 10.43 | 9.74 | 8.85 | 6.28 | 17.09 | 9.47 | 12.15 | 11.85 | 8.44 | 6.34 |
| Quick Ratio | 10.43 | 10.43 | 9.74 | 8.68 | 6.19 | 17.09 | 9.47 | 12.15 | 11.79 | 8.38 | 6.29 |
| Cash Ratio | 9.89 | 9.89 | 9.18 | 8.39 | 4.65 | 15.13 | 8.96 | 11.94 | 11.76 | 8.26 | 5.83 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.65 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | 1.13 | 0.48 | — | — | — | 65.47 | 59.18 | 72.98 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 132.94 | 79.15 | 96.60 | 350.92 | 40.94 | 64.39 | 47.47 | 7.54 | 44.17 | 133.50 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 33.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 27.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $58M | $49M | $48M | $47M | $47M | $44M | $40M | $36M | $27M | $25M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying QURE stock.
uniQure N.V.'s current P/E ratio is -6.5x. The historical average is 2.9x.
uniQure N.V.'s return on equity (ROE) is -207.1%. The historical average is -87.7%.
Based on historical data, uniQure N.V. is trading at a P/E of -6.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
uniQure N.V. has 89.5% gross margin and -1166.8% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash runway under two quarters
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Liquidity Masked by Volatile Cash
Current ratio stands at 10.01 in 2026Q2, but cash dropped to $80.2M in 2025Q4, implying under two quarters of runway. According to recent SEC filings, liquidity appears adequate only if funding is secured.
The current ratio of 10.01 in 2026Q2 appears robust, yet it is inflated by a surge in cash to $413.0M, likely from a convertible issuance. The prior quarter's cash of $80.2M against a quarterly burn exceeding $50M suggests a runway of less than two quarters, indicating that the current liquidity position is temporary and dependent on capital markets access. Investors should monitor the sustainability of this cash balance, as the quick ratio mirrors the current ratio, reflecting minimal inventory dependence.
Leverage Spikes on Convertible Debt
Debt-to-equity jumped to 2.70 in 2025Q4 from 0.29 in 2025Q3, as total debt reached $536.6M. Based on reported figures, interest coverage remains negative, indicating that debt service is not yet a burden but refinancing risk looms.
The spike in debt-to-equity to 2.70 in 2025Q4, following a period of minimal leverage, suggests a strategic but risky capital raise, likely via convertible notes. With interest coverage consistently negative (e.g., -1.81 in 2025Q4), the company is not generating operating income to service debt, though the cash infusion provides near-term liquidity. The elevated leverage, combined with a negative equity position in some quarters, indicates that the balance sheet is strained and future refinancing may be challenging without dilution or asset sales.
Working Capital Distorts Efficiency
DSO swung from 73 days in 2026Q2 to 241 days in 2025Q1, while DPO reached 2854 days in 2025Q1, reflecting milestone timing. As reported in financial statements, these metrics are unreliable for assessing operational efficiency.
The extreme volatility in DSO and DPO, with DPO exceeding 1000 days in several quarters, indicates that these ratios are driven by the timing of milestone payments and accruals rather than underlying working capital management. The cash conversion cycle is often negative or uncomputable, suggesting that the company is not efficiently converting revenue into cash, but this is a function of the project-based revenue model. Investors should focus on the recurring cash burn rate, which averaged -$42.7M per quarter, as a more reliable indicator of operational efficiency.
Margins Distorted by Milestone Mix
Gross margin swung from -78.0% in 2026Q2 to 93.9% in 2026Q1, while operating margin remained deeply negative at -1166.8% TTM. According to recent filings, these margins reflect licensing accounting, not operational efficiency.
The extreme volatility in gross margin, ranging from -78.0% to 93.9%, underscores that reported margins are an artifact of milestone revenue recognition, not a reflection of manufacturing cost structure. The TTM operating margin of -1166.8% indicates that R&D and SG&A expenses far outpace the minimal revenue, consistent with a clinical-stage biotech in heavy investment. The true earning power is negative, and profitability will only emerge if the pipeline assets, such as AMT-130, achieve commercial success, which remains unproven.
Returns Decay Amid Heavy Investment
ROIC deteriorated to -180.2% in 2026Q2 from -8.4% in 2024Q2, while ROE swung to -34.2%. Based on reported figures, returns are deeply negative, reflecting the high fixed-cost base and minimal revenue.
The return on invested capital has been consistently negative, with a dramatic worsening to -180.2% in 2026Q2, driven by a large net loss and a relatively small invested capital base. ROE has also been volatile, ranging from -2.5% to -71.7%, indicating that the company is destroying value as it invests heavily in R&D without generating commensurate returns. This pattern is typical for clinical-stage biotechs, but the magnitude of negative returns suggests that the market is pricing in significant future success, which is highly uncertain.
Misapplied P/S Ratio
The price-to-sales ratio of 190.63 is often cited, but it is misleading given the project-based revenue model. According to recent SEC filings, revenue is non-recurring milestones, so P/S does not reflect sustainable earning power.
The P/S ratio is commonly misapplied to uniQure because its revenue is not recurring product sales but rather milestone payments and royalties, which are volatile and non-recurring. A more appropriate metric would be the enterprise value to invested capital or the price-to-book ratio, which at 12.79 still reflects a premium but is less distorted by revenue timing. Alternatively, investors should focus on the cash burn rate and the potential value of the pipeline, as the current revenue base is too small to support meaningful sales multiples.