Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -44.9%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.7B | $909M | $1.1B | $184M | $127M | $423M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.8B | $1.0B | $1.2B | $260M | $194M | $481M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -4.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 8.03 | 2.71 | 3.58 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 3.08 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.27 | 0.86 | — | 3.49 | 1.82 | 3.95 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | 149.69 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.11 | 3.90 | 1.07 | 1.21 | 3.50 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 5.2% | 5.2% | 14.6% | 23.8% | 17.9% | 21.3% | 21.1% | 21.0% |
| Operating Margin | -68.5% | -68.5% | -13.9% | -6.4% | -91.2% | -51.0% | -15.0% | -16.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -67.6% | -67.6% | -37.6% | -11.2% | -81.4% | -44.7% | -27.3% | -17.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -44.9% | -44.9% | -24959.6% | -44.4% | -147.5% | -84.1% | -89.7% | — |
| ROA | -26.0% | -26.0% | -40.5% | -10.3% | -50.3% | -29.4% | -18.8% | -33.2% |
| ROIC | -27.8% | -27.8% | -36.7% | -8.8% | -72.8% | -40.2% | -15.0% | — |
| ROCE | -32.0% | -32.0% | -27.9% | -9.7% | -78.4% | -42.1% | -13.8% | -215.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.22 | 0.22 | — | 2.00 | 1.36 | 0.73 | 2.03 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.13 | — | 1.43 | 0.96 | 0.54 | 1.47 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.09 |
| Interest Coverage | -5.34 | -5.34 | -2.45 | -1.45 | -5.67 | -6.75 | -16.20 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.62 | 1.62 | 0.84 | 0.98 | 1.02 | 1.08 | 1.17 | 1.13 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 1.16 | 1.13 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.66 | 1.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.23 | 1.04 | 0.90 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.37 | 1.88 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.70 | 5.70 | 115.97 | 122.58 | 89.76 | 157.30 | 137.27 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 88.45 | 78.75 | 104.81 | 132.89 | 76.12 | 100.35 | 4.57 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.4% | 7.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.4% | 7.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $120M | $66M | $65M | $64M | $63M | $60M | $60M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RDW stock.
Redwire Corp's current P/E ratio is -4.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Redwire Corp's return on equity (ROE) is -44.9%. The historical average is -82.1%.
Based on historical data, Redwire Corp is trading at a P/E of -4.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Redwire Corp has 5.2% gross margin and -68.5% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent negative operating margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Masks Structural Losses
Gross margin rebounded to 27.8% in 2026Q2 from -30.9% a year earlier, per financial statements, yet operating margin remains deeply negative at -18.9%, indicating persistent cost overhang.
The sharp gross margin improvement suggests better cost absorption or product mix, but operating losses persist as SG&A and R&D scale with revenue. Net margin of -35.0% in 2026Q2, though improved from -157.0% in 2025Q2, still reflects significant non-cash charges like stock-based compensation. Investors should monitor whether revenue growth can eventually outpace fixed cost growth to achieve operating leverage.
Capital Efficiency Remains Elusive
ROIC improved to -1.4% in 2026Q2 from -10.2% in 2025Q2, as reported in quarterly filings, but remains negative, indicating the company is still destroying value on invested capital.
The improvement is largely due to a massive equity raise that expanded the capital base, not operational profitability. Asset turnover of 0.07x is extremely low, suggesting the $1.9B asset base, including $772.2M goodwill, is not yet generating sufficient revenue. ROE of -3.0% in 2026Q2, while improved from -17.2% in 2025Q2, still indicates that shareholder equity is not being deployed profitably.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens
Cash conversion cycle extended to 103 days in 2026Q2 from 36 days in 2024Q1, per SEC filings, driven by rising DSO and DIO, indicating deteriorating working capital efficiency.
DSO rose to 72 days and DIO to 83 days in 2026Q2, while DPO remained at 52 days, suggesting the company is tying up more cash in receivables and inventory. This may reflect acquisition integration challenges or slower collections from government customers. The lengthening CCC amplifies cash burn, as evidenced by the -38.3% FCF margin in 2026Q2.
Deleveraging After Equity Infusion
Debt-to-equity collapsed to 0.05 in 2026Q2 from 11.26 in 2024Q3, as reported in balance sheet data, reflecting a strategic equity raise that reduced financial risk.
Total debt fell to $87.1M from $333.7M in 2025Q3, and interest coverage remains negative at -48.13, but this is due to operating losses, not debt service burden. The equity raise boosted cash to $557.7M, providing a substantial buffer, but the company still relies on external funding to sustain operations. Investors should monitor whether the improved liquidity is sufficient to bridge to profitability.
Liquidity Fortress Post-Raise
Current ratio surged to 3.92 in 2026Q2 from 0.84 in 2024Q4, per recent financial statements, with quick ratio at 3.48, indicating a strong short-term liquidity position.
The improvement is driven by the $557.7M cash balance from the equity raise, which provides a significant cushion against ongoing cash burn. However, the company's negative FCF margin of -38.3% suggests that without continued funding, liquidity could deteriorate rapidly. The high current ratio may overstate true liquidity if inventory (DIO of 83 days) becomes difficult to convert to cash.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Metric
EV/EBITDA is not calculable for Redwire due to negative EBITDA, as shown in the data, making P/S or EV/Sales more relevant for assessing valuation in this growth stage.
Commonly, investors use EV/EBITDA for aerospace firms, but Redwire's negative EBITDA renders it meaningless. Instead, EV/Sales (implied by P/S of 9.61) is more informative, but it must be interpreted with caution given the acquisition-driven revenue growth. A more appropriate metric may be EV/forward revenue or EV/backlog, which better captures the potential of the company's contract pipeline, though backlog data is not provided.