Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 20.0x · EV/EBITDA 39.7x · ROE 15.3%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $278.6B | $206.5B | $170.9B | $111.2B | $130.0B | $148.4B | $100.0B | $116.2B | $105.7B | $115.2B | $93.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $808.4B | $954.1B | $827.7B | $752.7B | $648.7B | $522.2B | $483.6B | $549.8B | $497.8B | $425.6B | $377.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 19.97 | 10.40 | 10.76 | 7.74 | 8.36 | 9.40 | 8.95 | 9.22 | 8.71 | 10.34 | 9.22 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.91 | 3.10 | 2.97 | 2.16 | 2.67 | 3.00 | 2.12 | 2.54 | 2.49 | 2.87 | 2.45 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.85 | 1.48 | 1.34 | 0.97 | 1.20 | 1.50 | 1.15 | 1.39 | 1.32 | 1.55 | 1.30 |
| P/FCF | 7.42 | 3.90 | 8.19 | 4.76 | 6.69 | 2.52 | 0.73 | 9.68 | 6.82 | 3.17 | 3.65 |
| P/OCF | 7.12 | 3.74 | 7.39 | 4.27 | 5.93 | 2.43 | 0.72 | 8.15 | 6.05 | 3.05 | 3.48 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 14.34 | 14.40 | 14.59 | 13.30 | 10.54 | 10.27 | 12.01 | 11.71 | 10.61 | 9.92 |
| EV / EBITDA | 39.70 | 33.21 | 36.23 | 35.78 | 28.50 | 22.48 | 28.39 | 30.80 | 28.59 | 26.13 | 25.43 |
| EV / EBIT | 44.47 | 37.19 | 41.67 | 41.40 | 32.26 | 25.31 | 33.61 | 34.55 | 31.59 | 29.01 | 28.39 |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.01 | 39.68 | 32.24 | 33.37 | 8.87 | 3.55 | 45.80 | 32.13 | 11.70 | 14.75 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 93.4% | 93.4% | 94.4% | 95.2% | 99.0% | 101.5% | 90.8% | 95.9% | 96.9% | 97.1% | 95.9% |
| Operating Margin | 38.6% | 38.6% | 34.5% | 35.2% | 41.2% | 41.6% | 30.5% | 34.8% | 37.1% | 36.6% | 34.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 30.6% | 30.6% | 28.2% | 28.3% | 32.4% | 32.4% | 24.3% | 28.1% | 29.2% | 28.5% | 27.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.3% | 15.3% | 13.4% | 13.1% | 15.3% | 17.3% | 13.4% | 15.7% | 16.1% | 15.7% | 15.4% |
| ROA | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% |
| ROIC | 2.0% | 2.0% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 2.0% | 2.4% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 2.4% | 2.6% | 2.5% |
| ROCE | 3.5% | 3.5% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 3.2% | 3.9% | 4.1% | 3.7% | 3.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.13 | 6.73 | 6.46 | 5.74 | 6.24 | 5.96 | 5.74 | 4.99 | 4.57 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 29.06 | 29.06 | 34.13 | 36.82 | 30.72 | 24.43 | 31.78 | 27.92 | 26.35 | 22.80 | 22.03 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 5.37 | 5.16 | 5.57 | 4.80 | 3.78 | 4.42 | 5.18 | 4.90 | 4.17 | 3.97 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 26.02 | 26.02 | 28.75 | 30.49 | 22.79 | 16.09 | 22.52 | 24.29 | 22.52 | 19.05 | 19.14 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 14.11 | 31.49 | 27.48 | 26.68 | 6.35 | 2.82 | 36.12 | 25.31 | 8.54 | 11.10 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 1.11 | 2.53 | 1.02 | 0.74 | 1.05 | 1.50 | 1.68 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.18 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.18 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.2% | 4.3% | 3.9% | 5.0% | 5.4% | 4.3% | 6.3% | 5.2% | 5.3% | 4.6% | 5.4% |
| Payout Ratio | 43.2% | 43.2% | 40.9% | 38.0% | 44.1% | 40.0% | 55.4% | 46.9% | 45.5% | 46.5% | 48.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.0% | 9.6% | 9.3% | 12.9% | 12.0% | 10.6% | 11.2% | 10.8% | 11.5% | 9.7% | 10.9% |
| FCF Yield | 13.5% | 25.7% | 12.2% | 21.0% | 15.0% | 39.7% | 136.2% | 10.3% | 14.7% | 31.6% | 27.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.4% | 6.5% | 3.9% | 3.7% | 8.7% | 4.2% | 7.2% | 6.5% | 7.0% | 6.9% | 6.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.7% | 10.8% | 7.8% | 8.7% | 14.0% | 8.5% | 13.5% | 11.7% | 12.3% | 11.5% | 11.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.5B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
Bull/bear thesis, analyst target revisions, and earnings execution.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RY stock.
Royal Bank of Canada's current P/E ratio is 20.0x. The historical average is 10.7x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Royal Bank of Canada's current EV/EBITDA is 39.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 19.5x.
Royal Bank of Canada's return on equity (ROE) is 15.3%. The historical average is 15.5%.
Based on historical data, Royal Bank of Canada is trading at a P/E of 20.0x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Royal Bank of Canada's current dividend yield is 2.22% with a payout ratio of 43.2%.
Royal Bank of Canada has 93.4% gross margin and 38.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Royal Bank of Canada's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 29.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Canadian mortgage renewal cliff
Premium Valuation Reflects Quality Franchise
At a P/B of 2.95, Royal Bank trades at a significant premium to its Canadian peers, suggesting the market prices in its superior ROE and more diversified, fee-heavy revenue streams relative to the domestic oligopoly.
The current P/B multiple of 2.95 is well above the Canadian peer average of approximately 2.1, indicating investors are willing to pay for RY's structural advantages in wealth management and capital markets. This premium appears justified by the bank's consistent top-quartile ROE, but it also implies that any sustained deterioration in return on tangible equity, perhaps from a prolonged drag at City National or a sharp credit cycle turn, could lead to a meaningful multiple compression.
Fee Surge Masks NIM and Efficiency Pressures
While quarterly ROE has stabilized around 4.0%, the latest quarter's 57.9% fee income contribution, as reported in financial statements, is masking underlying NIM compression to 0.3% and a deteriorating efficiency ratio of 58.0%.
The DuPont decomposition reveals a shift in profitability drivers. The bank's return on equity is increasingly reliant on non-interest income from capital markets and wealth management, which is more volatile than net interest income. Concurrently, the efficiency ratio has worsened from 52.6% to 58.0% over the past two quarters, suggesting that non-interest expenses are growing faster than the record revenue, which may indicate integration costs or operational scaling challenges.
NIM Troughs as Efficiency Deteriorates
Net interest margin has compressed to a cycle low of 0.3% in Q3 2026, while the efficiency ratio has deteriorated to 58.0%, indicating a dual pressure on core banking profitability from both funding costs and operating leverage.
The NIM compression to 0.3% suggests the bank is facing a squeeze between asset yields and deposit costs, potentially as it competes for funding or as its asset mix shifts. This trend is concerning when paired with the efficiency ratio's deterioration, as it implies the bank is generating less net interest income per dollar of assets while simultaneously spending more to generate each dollar of total revenue. Investors should monitor whether this is a temporary phenomenon related to the HSBC integration or a more structural challenge.
Robust Capital Supports Shareholder Returns
With an equity-to-assets ratio consistently at 6%, Royal Bank maintains a substantial capital base that has supported aggressive share buybacks, including $5.7 billion returned in Q3 2026 alone, as per recent SEC filings.
The stable 6% equity-to-assets ratio, while appearing low in isolation, is typical for a large, well-capitalized bank and provides a significant buffer above regulatory minimums. This capital strength is the primary enabler for the bank's capital return program, which has been aggressive. However, the capacity for future buybacks and dividends may be constrained by potential increases to OSFI's Domestic Stability Buffer or the need to further capitalize City National.
P/E Multiple Obscures Provision-Driven Volatility
The reported P/E of 20.67 is the most commonly misapplied metric for Royal Bank, as it is heavily distorted by the volatile Provision for Credit Losses under IFRS 9, which can swing earnings independent of core operational performance.
For banks like RY, the P/E ratio is unreliable because provisions for credit losses are based on forward-looking macroeconomic models, not incurred losses, creating significant non-cash volatility in reported net income. This can make the stock appear expensive during periods of high provisioning (like the current cycle) even if underlying cash earnings are strong. A more appropriate metric is the Price-to-Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) ratio, which focuses on the balance sheet's core value and is less affected by income statement volatility from provisioning.