Revenue growth has reversed from +17.2% in Q4 FY2024 to -9.7% in Q4 FY2026 with gross margin eroding 470 basis points to 34.0%, while three of the last five quarters posted negative EPS including a $159.7M net loss in Q2 FY2026.
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) annual income statement — 11-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | Aug'26 | Aug'25 | Aug'24 | Aug'23 | Aug'22 | Aug'21 | Aug'20 | Aug'19 | Aug'18 | Aug'17 | Dec'16 |
|---|
| Sales/Revenue | 1.36B | 1.45B | 1.33B | 1.24B | 1.17B | 1.01B | 816.64M | 523.76M | 431.43M | 396.17M | 427.86M |
| Revenue Growth % | -6.51% | 8.98% | 7.13% | 6.33% | 16.22% | 23.14% | 55.92% | 21.4% | 8.9% | -7.41% | - |
| Cost of Goods Sold | 914.14M | 942.07M | 836.67M | 806.67M | 740.4M | 612.83M | 507.57M | 313.57M | 258.56M | 225.56M | 0 |
| COGS % of Revenue | 67.39% | 64.93% | 62.85% | 64.91% | 63.35% | 60.94% | 62.15% | 59.87% | 59.93% | 56.93% | - |
| Gross Profit | 442.36M | 508.85M | 494.65M | 436M | 428.28M | 392.78M | 309.07M | 210.19M | 172.87M | 170.62M | 0 |
| Gross Margin % | 32.61% | 35.07% | 37.15% | 35.09% | 36.65% | 39.06% | 37.85% | 40.13% | 40.07% | 43.07% | - |
| Gross Profit Growth % | -13.07% | 2.87% | 13.45% | 1.8% | 9.04% | 27.09% | 47.04% | 21.59% | 1.32% | - | - |
| Operating Expenses | 622.08M | 290.21M | 273.63M | 231.06M | 224.95M | 211.86M | 195.22M | 129.87M | 108.73M | 119.42M | 487.09K |
| OpEx % of Revenue | 45.86% | 20% | 20.55% | 18.59% | 19.25% | 21.07% | 23.91% | 24.8% | 25.2% | 30.14% | 0.11% |
| Selling, General & Admin | 273.35M | 290.21M | 268.23M | 226.75M | 220.85M | 208.36M | 191.22M | 127.67M | 106.23M | 116.97M | 487.09K |
| SG&A % of Revenue | 20.15% | 20% | 20.15% | 18.25% | 18.9% | 20.72% | 23.42% | 24.38% | 24.62% | 29.53% | 0.11% |
| Research & Development | 0 | 5.5M | 5.4M | 4.3M | 4.1M | 3.5M | 4M | 2.2M | 2.5M | 2.3M | 0 |
| R&D % of Revenue | - | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.49% | 0.42% | 0.58% | 0.58% | - |
| Other Operating Expenses | 348.73M | -5.5M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 141K | 0 |
| Operating Income | -179.72M | 218.63M | 221.02M | 204.95M | 203.32M | 180.93M | 113.85M | 80.31M | 64.14M | 51.2M | -487.09K |
| Operating Margin % | -13.25% | 15.07% | 16.6% | 16.49% | 17.4% | 17.99% | 13.94% | 15.33% | 14.87% | 12.92% | -0.11% |
| Operating Income Growth % | -182.2% | -1.08% | 7.84% | 0.8% | 12.38% | 58.92% | 41.76% | 25.21% | 25.28% | 10611.4% | - |
| EBITDA | -155.46M | 242.4M | 249M | 231.93M | 229.24M | 204.15M | 133.7M | 87.81M | 71.64M | 60.82M | -192.5K |
| EBITDA Margin % | -11.46% | 16.71% | 18.7% | 18.66% | 19.62% | 20.3% | 16.37% | 16.77% | 16.61% | 15.35% | -0.04% |
| EBITDA Growth % | -164.13% | -2.65% | 7.36% | 1.17% | 12.29% | 52.69% | 52.27% | 22.57% | 17.79% | 31692.75% | - |
| D&A (Non-Cash Add-back) | 24.25M | 23.76M | 27.98M | 26.98M | 25.92M | 23.23M | 19.86M | 7.5M | 7.5M | 9.62M | 0 |
| EBIT | -176.68M | 159.15M | 212.08M | 205.76M | 172.45M | 112.42M | 111.78M | 5.1M | 65.64M | 27.21M | -192.5K |
| Net Interest Income | -18.51M | -20.59M | -21.72M | -28.92M | -21.87M | -31.47M | -31.3M | -9.8M | -12.55M | 0 | 294.59K |
| Interest Income | 2.94M | 2.66M | 4.31M | 1.14M | 15K | 84K | 1.52M | 3.83M | 0 | 0 | 294.59K |
| Interest Expense | 21.45M | 23.25M | 26.03M | 30.07M | 21.88M | 31.56M | 32.81M | 13.63M | 12.55M | 0 | 0 |
| Other Income/Expense | -18.41M | -82.73M | -34.97M | -29.26M | -52.76M | -100.07M | -34.88M | -88.84M | -11.05M | -48.38M | 294.59K |
| Pretax Income | -198.12M | 135.9M | 186.05M | 175.69M | 150.57M | 80.86M | 78.96M | -8.52M | 53.09M | 2.83M | -192.5K |
| Pretax Margin % | -14.61% | 9.37% | 13.97% | 14.14% | 12.88% | 8.04% | 9.67% | -1.63% | 12.31% | 0.71% | -0.04% |
| Income Tax | -42.22M | 32.29M | 46.74M | 42.12M | 41.99M | 39.98M | 13.33M | 16.71M | -17.36M | 4.86M | 0 |
| Effective Tax Rate % | 21.31% | 23.76% | 25.12% | 23.97% | 27.89% | 49.44% | 16.88% | -196.07% | -32.71% | 172.04% | 0% |
| Net Income | -155.9M | 103.61M | 139.31M | 133.57M | 108.57M | 40.88M | 65.64M | -25.23M | 70.45M | -2.04M | -192.5K |
| Net Margin % | -11.49% | 7.14% | 10.46% | 10.75% | 9.29% | 4.07% | 8.04% | -4.82% | 16.33% | -0.51% | -0.04% |
| Net Income Growth % | -250.47% | -25.62% | 4.29% | 23.03% | 165.59% | -37.72% | 360.12% | -135.82% | 3562.16% | -957.13% | - |
| Net Income (Continuing) | -155.9M | 103.61M | 139.31M | 133.57M | 108.57M | 40.88M | 65.64M | -25.23M | 70.45M | -2.04M | -192.5K |
| Discontinued Operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minority Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EPS (Diluted) | -1.69 | 1.02 | 1.38 | 1.32 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 0.35 | -0.30 | 0.51 | -0.03 | -0.02 |
| EPS Growth % | -265.69% | -26.09% | 4.55% | 22.22% | 157.14% | 20% | 216.67% | -158.82% | 1870.83% | -67.44% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | -1.69 | 1.03 | 1.39 | 1.34 | 1.10 | 0.43 | 0.37 | -0.30 | 0.53 | -0.03 | -0.02 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 92.37M | 101.51M | 101.28M | 100.88M | 100.59M | 97.37M | 98.34M | 85.24M | 73.68M | 70.63M | 11.2M |
| Basic Shares Outstanding | 92.37M | 100.7M | 99.93M | 99.44M | 98.75M | 95.74M | 93.97M | 85.24M | 70.58M | 70.63M | 11.2M |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SMPL stock.
For fiscal year 2026, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) reported total revenue of $1.36B. This represents a 217.0% increase compared to $427.9M in 2016.
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) reported a net loss of $155.9M for the fiscal year ending 2026.
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) reported an operating income of $-179.7M, resulting in an operating profit margin of -13.2%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) generated $442.4M in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 32.6%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Revenue contraction and margin erosion accelerating
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Growth Reversal Signals Demand Weakness
Revenue growth has swung from +17.2% in Q4 FY2024 to -9.7% in Q4 FY2026, with four consecutive quarters of year-over-year contraction, suggesting what may be a structural demand problem rather than a temporary soft patch. As disclosed in SEC filings, TTM revenue of ~$1.45B masks accelerating quarterly deterioration.
The trajectory is unambiguously deteriorating: the four most recent quarters posted -9.4%, -6.3%, -9.7% growth sequentially, a pattern consistent with sustained volume loss rather than a one-time comparison issue. The enrichment data flags continued Atkins brand attrition as a recurring headwind, and these figures appear to confirm that legacy decline is now outpacing Quest's ability to fill the gap. The fact that management declined to provide forward guidance at the October 2026 earnings report compounds the concern, as it removes visibility into whether the contraction is stabilizing or deepening.
Gross Margin Compression Undermines Pricing Power
Gross margin has eroded approximately 470 basis points from 38.7% in Q3 FY2024 to 34.0% in Q4 FY2026, a sustained decline that suggests raw material cost pass-through has been inadequate or promotional intensity has risen materially. According to reported financial statements, the sequential recovery from 30.3% in Q2 FY2026 to 34.0% in Q4 FY2026 may reflect temporary input cost relief rather than structural improvement.
The margin trend is consistent with the co-manufacturing model described in the enrichment, where whey protein and packaging input costs directly compress the ~35% gross margin band. However, the fact that margins declined even during periods when revenue growth was still positive in 2025 (e.g., 37.0% in Q1 FY2025 falling to 33.1% by Q4 FY2025) suggests trade spending and promotional discounting may be rising to defend shelf space — a dynamic that typically worsens before it stabilizes. Relative to Freshpet's 38.6% or Vital Farms' 37.6%, SMPL's margin profile now sits mid-pack, eroding the premium that had supported the blended valuation.
Non-Operating Charges Distort Earnings Profile
The $159.7M net loss in Q2 FY2026 despite $44.9M of positive operating income implies approximately $205M of below-the-line charges, likely acquisition-related or impairment costs tied to the OWYN transaction. Based on reported financial statements, three of the last five quarters have posted negative EPS, a stark reversal from consistent profitability through FY2024 and early FY2025.
This divergence between operating and net income is the single most important earnings quality flag in the dataset. The enrichment notes SPAC-originated tax structure complexities and Quest acquisition intangible amortization as known distortions, but a $205M below-the-line swing in a single quarter appears to reflect a discrete, potentially non-recurring event — likely acquisition costs, inventory step-up, or goodwill impairment associated with OWYN. Investors should treat core earnings power as closer to the $25-41M range seen in stable quarters and separately assess whether the Q2 FY2026 charge signals overpayment or asset quality concerns that could recur.
SG&A Spike Exposes Operating Leverage Fragility
Q3 FY2026 SG&A surged to $79.6M (22.3% of revenue) versus a historical range of $63-73M, directly driving a -$49.9M operating loss despite $116.1M in gross profit. According to SEC filings, this appears to represent acquisition integration or restructuring costs layered on top of an already elevated fixed cost base.
The Q3 FY2026 anomaly illustrates a structural vulnerability: the company's operating cost base is sufficiently fixed that a single quarter of elevated spending is enough to swing the entire segment into a loss, even with acceptable gross profit. However, excluding this quarter, operating leverage has generally functioned — Q4 FY2026 SG&A normalized to $63.0M against $113.3M gross profit, yielding 13.8% operating margin. The concern is that with revenue now contracting, the denominator effect will pressure operating margins even if absolute spending is held flat, and the market has no forward guidance to assess whether management is adjusting the cost structure accordingly.
The Bear Case Rests on Brand Portfolio Decay
The strongest bear thesis is that SMPL is experiencing simultaneous weakness across both brand pillars — not just Atkins attrition — as evidenced by four consecutive quarters of negative revenue growth and 470 bps of gross margin compression. Based on recent SEC filings, the absence of forward guidance following the October 2026 earnings report may indicate management visibility into continued near-term pressure.
If the revenue contraction were purely an Atkins issue offset by Quest momentum, consolidated growth would not be uniformly negative across every recent quarter. The data instead suggests either Quest growth has decelerated materially or both brands are facing the same consumer trade-down pressure in a GLP-1-influenced snacking environment. The GLP-1 counter-narrative — that SMPL is a 'companion' beneficiary — is not supported by the reported revenue trajectory to date, and while Q4 FY2026 showed sequential margin recovery, the year-over-year revenue decline of -9.7% argues that any GLP-1 tailwind has yet to materialize in reported financials. Investors should monitor whether the OWYN acquisition in plant-based RTD protein can reopen a growth vector before the current contraction compounds into structural share loss.