Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 25.2x · EV/EBITDA 16.6x · ROE 7.6%. (2008–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.0B | $6.9B | $6.2B | $7.1B | $5.8B | $7.9B | $4.7B | $4.0B | $2.6B | $2.5B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $10.3B | $10.2B | $9.2B | $9.7B | $8.3B | $10.1B | $6.4B | $5.6B | $3.9B | $3.6B | $2.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 25.23 | 25.18 | 32.52 | 36.69 | 32.31 | 41.70 | 23.73 | — | 27.64 | 118.83 | 82.31 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.34 | 8.18 | 8.04 | 10.01 | 8.80 | 14.00 | 9.67 | 9.77 | 7.36 | 8.17 | 6.76 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.89 | 1.88 | 1.75 | 2.06 | 1.67 | 2.32 | 1.69 | 1.68 | 1.55 | 1.74 | 1.59 |
| P/FCF | 17.53 | 17.22 | 16.45 | 19.02 | 17.25 | 44.77 | 26.09 | 143.05 | 29.52 | 36.79 | 36.89 |
| P/OCF | 15.20 | 14.93 | 13.40 | 18.13 | 14.90 | 23.41 | 15.90 | 17.00 | 13.06 | 15.13 | 12.49 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 12.06 | 11.98 | 13.74 | 12.61 | 17.97 | 13.22 | 13.85 | 11.11 | 11.99 | 10.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.64 | 16.44 | 16.33 | 18.68 | 17.10 | 24.78 | 17.83 | 18.75 | 15.47 | 16.82 | 16.17 |
| EV / EBIT | 32.42 | 24.48 | 30.01 | 33.33 | 31.85 | 38.87 | 23.74 | 53.37 | 26.89 | 48.33 | 34.58 |
| EV / FCF | — | 25.37 | 24.52 | 26.10 | 24.73 | 57.47 | 35.67 | 202.65 | 44.59 | 53.98 | 59.22 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 61.3% | 61.3% | 79.8% | 80.3% | 80.9% | 80.8% | 81.5% | 81.5% | 80.3% | 80.8% | 80.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.7% | 37.7% | 35.2% | 34.2% | 31.9% | 29.7% | 28.8% | 26.9% | 22.9% | 19.6% | 17.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 32.4% | 32.4% | 24.7% | 27.2% | 27.1% | 34.2% | 41.8% | 12.1% | 26.5% | 10.4% | 13.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.6% | 7.6% | 5.4% | 5.6% | 5.2% | 6.2% | 7.9% | 2.4% | 6.0% | 2.5% | 3.6% |
| ROA | 3.9% | 3.9% | 2.9% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 3.7% | 4.6% | 1.4% | 3.2% | 1.3% | 1.7% |
| ROIC | 3.5% | 3.5% | 3.2% | 3.0% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.3% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| ROCE | 4.9% | 4.9% | 4.5% | 4.2% | 3.7% | 3.4% | 3.3% | 3.2% | 3.0% | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.97 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.31 | 5.31 | 5.44 | 5.10 | 5.23 | 5.52 | 4.83 | 5.55 | 5.26 | 5.47 | 6.17 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.96 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.28 | 5.28 | 5.38 | 5.06 | 5.17 | 5.48 | 4.79 | 5.52 | 5.23 | 5.35 | 6.10 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.15 | 8.07 | 7.08 | 7.48 | 12.70 | 9.58 | 59.60 | 15.07 | 17.19 | 22.33 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.04 | 3.04 | 2.71 | 3.09 | 3.34 | 4.09 | 4.32 | 1.93 | 2.97 | 1.76 | 1.83 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.74 | 0.45 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.33 | 0.93 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.74 | 0.45 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.33 | 0.93 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.1% | 4.1% | 4.5% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 6.2% | 5.7% | 6.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 103.8% | 103.8% | 145.3% | 138.7% | 149.6% | 127.8% | 111.0% | 384.7% | 171.0% | 451.1% | 340.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.0% | 4.0% | 3.1% | 2.7% | 3.1% | 2.4% | 4.2% | — | 3.6% | 0.8% | 1.2% |
| FCF Yield | 5.7% | 5.8% | 6.1% | 5.3% | 5.8% | 2.2% | 3.8% | 0.7% | 3.4% | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.1% | 4.1% | 4.5% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 6.2% | 5.7% | 6.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $188M | $182M | $181M | $179M | $164M | $149M | $126M | $104M | $90M | $71M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying STAG stock.
STAG Industrial, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 25.2x. The historical average is 46.8x. This places it at the 22th percentile of its historical range.
STAG Industrial, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 16.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 17.1x.
STAG Industrial, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.6%. The historical average is -16.3%.
Based on historical data, STAG Industrial, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 25.2x. This is at the 22th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
STAG Industrial, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 4.10% with a payout ratio of 103.8%.
STAG Industrial, Inc. has 61.3% gross margin and 37.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Interest rate sensitivity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discount to Peers Persists
STAG trades at a P/FFO of 19.4x, a discount to EGP's 25.8x and FR's 22.8x, as per peer data, suggesting the market prices in secondary market risk.
The implied cap rate, derived from NOI and enterprise value, appears higher than gateway-focused peers, reflecting the perceived risk of secondary markets. However, the discount may be unwarranted given the portfolio's granular diversification and stable cash flows, which could offer a margin of safety.
NOI Margin Resilience Holds
NOI margin remained robust at 79.9% in Q2 2026, consistent with the 80% range over the past year, as reported in STAG's financial statements, indicating stable property-level profitability.
The high NOI margin reflects the triple-net lease structure where tenants bear most operating expenses. The slight dip from 80.5% in Q2 2025 suggests minor cost pressures, but the overall trend remains strong. FFO growth of 8.6% YoY appears driven by acquisitions and organic rent growth, though the Q2 EPS miss warrants monitoring for potential one-off items.
Payout Ratio Provides Buffer
FFO payout ratio of 56.1% in Q2 2026, as per quarterly data, indicates a comfortable dividend coverage, with AFFO payout at 55% based on AFFO per share of $0.55.
The payout ratio has fluctuated between 17% and 63% over the past ten quarters, with the Q1 2026 dip likely due to timing. The current level suggests a healthy retained cash flow for reinvestment. However, the reliance on external capital for acquisitions may pressure future AFFO if cap rates compress.
Leverage Creeps Higher
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.94 in Q2 2026 from 0.79 in Q1 2024, as per balance sheet data, indicating increased leverage to fund growth, while interest coverage remains adequate at 2.44x.
The rising leverage is a result of debt-funded acquisitions, but the interest coverage ratio, though down from 3.87x in Q1 2025, still provides a cushion. The debt maturity profile appears well-laddered, reducing refinancing risk. However, in a sustained high-rate environment, the cost of debt may compress acquisition spreads, potentially slowing growth.
Granular Portfolio Mitigates Risk
STAG's portfolio remains highly diversified across secondary markets, with no single market exceeding 10% of ABR, as per company disclosures, mitigating single-asset risk.
The single-tenant model introduces binary risk per property, but the law of large numbers across hundreds of buildings suggests stable cash flows. Occupancy rates appear stable, and the G&A cost efficiency is supported by the acquisition-focused model. However, the concentration in secondary markets may lead to longer vacancy periods during downturns compared to primary hubs.
P/E Misleads REIT Valuation
Standard P/E of 26.21 is distorted by depreciation, as GAAP earnings are less than half of FFO, per financial statements, making P/FFO the appropriate metric.
Investors often misapply P/E to REITs, ignoring the non-cash depreciation charge that reduces net income but not cash flow. For STAG, P/FFO of 19.4x provides a clearer picture of valuation relative to operating performance. Additionally, the debt-to-equity ratio using book value may understate leverage; using gross assets would be more appropriate for REITs.