Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 5.9x · EV/EBITDA 2.8x · ROE 12.7%. (2012–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $68M | $75M | $74M | $76M | $74M | $56M | $69M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $84M | $69M | $48M | $45M | $75M | $105M | $73M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 5.95 | 6.19 | 5.40 | 4.88 | 4.81 | 6.04 | 10.70 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.94 | 1.04 | 1.12 | 1.14 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.71 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 1.37 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.96 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 1.24 | 2.21 | 1.80 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 2.77 | 2.29 | 4.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 2.77 | — | 0.82 | 0.87 | 1.42 | 2.98 | 2.77 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.4% | 48.8% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | 41.9% | 41.9% | 44.5% | 32.4% | 36.3% | 29.2% | 24.3% | 30.3% | 54.3% | 65.7% | 69.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 19.3% | 19.3% | 23.1% | 23.4% | 25.7% | 19.7% | 16.0% | 25.1% | 14.2% | 17.9% | 14.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.7% | 12.7% | 15.0% | 17.1% | 21.4% | 17.0% | 14.7% | 28.2% | 10.4% | 13.6% | 12.9% |
| ROA | 1.8% | 1.8% | 2.4% | 2.6% | 2.8% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 3.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| ROIC | 16.5% | 16.5% | 17.7% | 13.4% | 11.4% | 9.1% | 11.7% | 15.1% | 19.7% | 37.5% | 45.7% |
| ROCE | 3.9% | 3.9% | 4.5% | 3.6% | 4.0% | 3.2% | 2.9% | 3.6% | 4.6% | 7.5% | 9.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.31 | 0.12 | 0.55 | 1.59 | 0.48 | 0.37 | 1.16 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.73 | 0.73 | 3.22 | — | — | — | — | — | 4.00 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.05 | -0.24 | -0.31 | 0.01 | 0.81 | 0.08 | -0.12 | 0.51 | -0.40 | -0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.19 | -0.19 | -2.52 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.76 | -1.46 | -0.83 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.21 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | 8.83 | 14.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($6M) exceeds total debt ($22M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 71.82 | 9.51 | 13.46 | 4.07 |
| Quick Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 71.82 | 9.51 | 13.46 | 4.07 |
| Cash Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 71.82 | 9.51 | 13.46 | 4.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 33.6% | 33.6% | 23.5% | 21.4% | 18.4% | 16.6% | 22.0% | 9.1% | 364.1% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 16.8% | 16.2% | 18.5% | 20.5% | 20.8% | 16.6% | 9.3% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 4.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 10.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $7M | $7M | $7M | $7M | $7M | $7M | $7M | $3M | $2M | $2M |
Negative Net Interest Margin
According to recent market data, TECTP trades at a P/B of 0.64, which suggests that investors are heavily discounting the bank's book value due to persistent profitability concerns and the erosion of its core interest-earning capacity relative to its historical valuation multiples.
The current P/B ratio indicates that the market is pricing TECTP as a distressed asset rather than a specialized financial services platform. This valuation implies that investors lack confidence in the bank's ability to generate a return on tangible equity that exceeds its cost of capital, particularly given the recent shift to negative net interest margins.
As reported in financial statements, the bank's reliance on non-interest income reached 100% of total revenue in 2025Q3, highlighting a complete shift away from traditional spread-based banking toward fee-dependent advisory services to compensate for the ongoing collapse in net interest income generation.
The DuPont decomposition reveals a strained profitability profile where the absence of a positive NIM forces the firm to rely entirely on fee income. This transition suggests that the banking segment is currently failing to contribute to the bottom line, leaving the firm's ROE vulnerable to fluctuations in advisory and wealth management performance.
Based on quarterly filings, the efficiency ratio hit 100.0% in 2025Q3, indicating that operating expenses have fully absorbed all generated revenue, a trend that warrants investigation into the sustainability of the firm's current cost structure during this period of negative net interest margins.
The inability to maintain a positive NIM, combined with an efficiency ratio that has deteriorated from 50.7% in 2025Q1, suggests that the bank lacks the necessary operating leverage to navigate the current rate environment. This implies that the firm's cost base is currently misaligned with its diminished interest-earning capacity.
As indicated by recent regulatory disclosures, the equity-to-assets ratio has compressed to 0.11 in 2025Q3 from 0.17 in 2023Q3, suggesting that the bank's capital base is struggling to support its rapid asset expansion while simultaneously absorbing operational losses.
The thinning capital buffer limits the bank's flexibility to absorb further credit shocks or fund future growth initiatives. Investors should monitor whether management will be forced to curtail asset expansion or seek external capital to restore a more robust cushion against potential balance sheet volatility.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to TECTP, as it obscures the extreme volatility caused by non-cash provision charges and the structural shift toward fee-based income, which makes traditional earnings-based valuation metrics unreliable for assessing the bank's true operational health.
Because provisions for credit losses can swing earnings from positive to negative without reflecting actual cash flow changes, the P/E ratio fails to capture the bank's underlying profitability. Analysts should instead focus on P/TBV and pre-provision net revenue to better understand the bank's core earnings power and capital adequacy.
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TECTP stock.
Tectonic Financial, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 5.9x. The historical average is 6.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Tectonic Financial, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 2.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 3.5x.
Tectonic Financial, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.7%. The historical average is 16.2%.
Based on historical data, Tectonic Financial, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 5.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Tectonic Financial, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 6.50% with a payout ratio of 33.6%.
Tectonic Financial, Inc. has 100.0% gross margin and 41.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Tectonic Financial, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.7x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.