Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 44.8x · EV/EBITDA 25.5x · ROE 8.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.2B | $19.9B | $25.1B | $17.9B | $13.7B | $22.7B | $18.1B | $12.0B | $7.5B | $6.9B | $5.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $12.9B | $19.5B | $25.0B | $18.4B | $14.5B | $23.8B | $17.5B | $11.8B | $7.3B | $6.8B | $5.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 44.83 | 63.05 | 95.31 | 107.76 | 83.31 | 140.82 | 93.07 | 82.20 | 50.49 | 40.98 | 48.89 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.67 | 8.53 | 11.73 | 9.16 | 7.39 | 14.27 | 16.23 | 11.08 | 7.97 | 8.27 | 7.36 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.82 | 5.37 | 7.40 | 6.09 | 5.21 | 9.78 | 9.13 | 7.44 | 5.63 | 5.95 | 6.08 |
| P/FCF | 20.74 | 31.20 | 41.52 | 54.61 | 41.26 | 71.88 | 55.50 | 56.57 | 33.47 | 45.50 | 36.09 |
| P/OCF | 20.23 | 30.43 | 40.15 | 47.00 | 35.84 | 61.13 | 51.05 | 47.24 | 29.80 | 35.50 | 28.99 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.38 | 11.68 | 9.43 | 7.86 | 14.95 | 15.71 | 10.88 | 7.83 | 8.04 | 7.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.48 | 38.67 | 55.27 | 47.30 | 37.45 | 67.69 | 68.92 | 50.73 | 34.33 | 31.30 | 30.49 |
| EV / EBIT | 36.01 | 49.45 | 79.52 | 83.00 | 67.33 | 130.59 | 100.24 | 73.97 | 46.97 | 41.37 | 42.16 |
| EV / FCF | — | 30.66 | 41.34 | 56.24 | 43.89 | 75.30 | 53.72 | 55.59 | 32.86 | 44.29 | 35.92 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.0% | 44.0% | 41.0% | 40.3% | 39.0% | 41.8% | 46.6% | 45.6% | 45.3% | 45.9% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 15.3% | 14.0% | 11.2% | 11.7% | 12.9% | 15.5% | 14.4% | 16.3% | 19.4% | 17.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.5% | 13.5% | 12.3% | 8.5% | 8.9% | 10.1% | 17.4% | 13.5% | 15.8% | 19.5% | 14.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.9% | 8.9% | 8.3% | 6.0% | 6.6% | 7.5% | 10.8% | 10.0% | 11.8% | 15.7% | 12.4% |
| ROA | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.3% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 4.4% | 8.1% | 7.4% | 8.7% | 11.1% | 8.1% |
| ROIC | 8.1% | 8.1% | 6.7% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 6.4% | 9.2% | 9.0% | 10.5% | 13.1% | 11.1% |
| ROCE | 8.9% | 8.9% | 7.7% | 5.8% | 5.6% | 6.9% | 9.3% | 10.3% | 11.8% | 14.8% | 13.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.40 | 0.60 | 0.01 | 0.01 | — | — | 0.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.41 | 1.79 | 2.69 | 3.95 | 0.09 | 0.10 | — | — | 0.06 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.09 | -0.03 | 0.18 | 0.33 | 0.46 | -0.29 | -0.13 | -0.10 | -0.16 | -0.03 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.67 | -0.67 | -0.24 | 1.36 | 2.25 | 3.07 | -2.28 | -0.90 | -0.63 | -0.86 | -0.14 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.53 | -0.18 | 1.62 | 2.63 | 3.41 | -1.78 | -0.98 | -0.60 | -1.22 | -0.17 |
| Interest Coverage | 79.14 | 79.14 | 52.96 | 9.39 | 7.61 | 7.82 | — | — | — | — | 65.72 |
Net cash position: cash ($1.0B) exceeds total debt ($676M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.35 | 0.86 | 0.95 | 1.16 | 1.97 | 1.34 | 1.22 | 1.30 | 0.78 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.35 | 0.86 | 0.95 | 1.16 | 1.97 | 1.34 | 1.22 | 1.30 | 0.78 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.44 | 1.20 | 0.53 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 0.16 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.56 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 103.69 | 102.37 | 115.89 | 113.88 | 123.60 | 132.03 | 127.86 | 118.49 | 111.81 | 98.11 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.2% | 1.6% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 0.7% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 2.0% | 2.4% | 2.0% |
| FCF Yield | 4.8% | 3.2% | 2.4% | 1.8% | 2.4% | 1.4% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 3.0% | 2.2% | 2.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 2.0% | 0.1% | 2.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 2.0% | 0.1% | 2.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $44M | $43M | $43M | $42M | $42M | $42M | $40M | $40M | $39M | $39M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TYL stock.
Tyler Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 44.8x. The historical average is 60.0x. This places it at the 42th percentile of its historical range.
Tyler Technologies, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 25.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 29.7x.
Tyler Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.9%. The historical average is 6.2%.
Based on historical data, Tyler Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 44.8x. This is at the 42th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Tyler Technologies, Inc. has 44.0% gross margin and 15.3% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Tyler Technologies, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cloud transition margin pressure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Tempered by Costs
Gross margin improved to 47.6% in Q2 2026 from 43.5% a year earlier, yet operating margin fell to 14.7% from 16.0%, per the latest quarterly data. This divergence suggests cost escalation is offsetting product mix gains.
The gross margin expansion likely reflects a higher mix of recurring SaaS and transactional revenue, but the simultaneous decline in operating margin indicates that R&D and SG&A expenses are growing faster than gross profit. As reported in the income statement, R&D and SG&A grew 23.6% and 18.3% year-over-year, respectively, outpacing revenue growth of 8.2%. This suggests that the cloud transition and integration of NIC are consuming incremental gross profit, and investors should monitor whether operating leverage resumes once these investments stabilize.
ROIC Dips Despite Asset-Light Model
ROIC fell to 2.1% in Q2 2026 from 2.1% a year earlier, while ROE improved to 2.8% from 2.4%, based on reported figures. The low absolute levels reflect a goodwill-heavy asset base from acquisitions.
TYL's ROIC and ROE are modest on a quarterly basis, but this is partly due to the large equity base built from years of acquisitions, with goodwill representing 48% of total assets. The stability of ROIC around 2% suggests that the company is not currently compounding returns on invested capital, but rather maintaining them. The slight uptick in ROE in Q2 2026 may be driven by the debt-funded capital raise, which increased leverage and boosted returns on equity, though this is a one-time effect. Investors should assess whether the NIC acquisition and cloud investments will eventually lift ROIC above historical levels.
Working Capital Swings Distort Efficiency
DSO rose to 94 days in Q2 2026 from 92 days in Q1, while DPO fell to 49 days from 78 days, per the latest balance sheet data. These swings drive significant quarterly cash flow volatility.
The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DIO data, but the volatility in DSO and DPO suggests that TYL's working capital is heavily influenced by the timing of government contract milestones and payments. The sharp drop in DPO from 78 to 49 days indicates that TYL is paying suppliers faster, possibly to secure implementation resources or due to the debt issuance. This, combined with DSO hovering near 90 days, implies that TYL is not extracting significant supplier leverage, and its cash conversion cycle is likely positive, tying up cash in receivables. The quarterly swings in working capital are the primary driver of the volatile OCF/NI ratio, which ranged from 0.69 to 3.72 over the past year.
Debt Spike Raises Coverage Questions
D/E jumped to 0.48 in Q2 2026 from 0.01 in Q1, while interest coverage fell to 41.56 from 86.43, based on reported figures. The debt increase appears strategic, but coverage remains comfortable.
The surge in total debt to $1.5B from $48M in Q1 2026, alongside a rise in cash to $895.4M, suggests a deliberate capital raise, possibly to fund acquisitions or buybacks. Despite the higher leverage, interest coverage of 41.56 remains robust, indicating that TYL can easily service its debt from operating income. However, the D/EBITDA ratio of 21.93 is elevated, though this is distorted by the recent debt issuance and may normalize as EBITDA grows. Investors should monitor whether this leverage is a one-time event or signals a shift toward a more levered capital structure, which could increase financial risk if the cloud transition faces headwinds.
Liquidity Strengthens with Cash Infusion
Current ratio improved to 1.55 in Q2 2026 from 1.00 in Q1, while cash surged to $895.4M, per the latest balance sheet. This provides a strong buffer against operational shocks.
The improvement in the current ratio is largely due to the $1.5B debt issuance, which boosted cash and current assets. With a quick ratio of 1.55, TYL has ample liquid assets to cover short-term obligations, and the cash balance alone covers over half of total debt. This liquidity position appears robust, even under stress scenarios such as a prolonged economic downturn or unexpected implementation delays. However, the reliance on debt to fund this liquidity means that the company's balance sheet is now more leveraged than in prior quarters, and investors should watch whether the cash is deployed efficiently to generate returns.
P/E Misleads on SaaS Transition
The P/E ratio of 42.58 appears rich, but the forward P/E of 23.58 suggests the market expects significant earnings growth, per current valuation data. This gap reflects the SaaS transition's impact on reported earnings.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for TYL is the trailing P/E, which fails to account for the SaaS headwind that depresses current earnings as revenue shifts from upfront licenses to ratable subscriptions. The forward P/E of 23.58 implies that the market is pricing in a substantial earnings recovery, likely as the cloud transition matures and operating leverage returns. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 24.16 (or 18.18 forward) better captures the company's cash-generating ability and is more comparable to peers like Roper Technologies. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and free cash flow yield rather than P/E when evaluating TYL, as the latter understates the underlying earnings power during this transition.