Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.8x · EV/EBITDA 8.0x · ROE 24.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35.9B | $36.6B | $32.4B | $13.7B | $12.4B | $14.1B | $12.1B | $22.9B | $23.2B | $20.5B | $24.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $61.0B | $61.7B | $57.2B | $44.4B | $41.7B | $35.2B | $33.6B | $40.6B | $41.3B | $33.4B | $33.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.83 | 10.94 | 10.28 | 5.23 | 16.91 | — | — | 7.61 | 10.87 | 9.60 | 10.64 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.79 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.66 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.37 | 2.39 | 2.55 | 1.47 | 1.80 | 2.80 | 2.03 | 1.99 | 2.31 | 2.34 | 2.78 |
| P/FCF | 14.05 | 14.30 | 8.45 | — | 9.98 | — | — | 9.62 | 11.06 | — | 10.38 |
| P/OCF | 4.26 | 4.34 | 3.43 | 1.98 | 2.05 | 6.82 | — | 3.31 | 3.76 | 5.89 | 4.34 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.04 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 1.43 | 2.19 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.92 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.98 | 8.06 | 7.13 | 6.45 | 8.70 | 24.04 | — | 6.16 | 7.65 | 5.79 | 5.32 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.95 | 13.41 | 10.27 | 8.60 | 15.66 | — | — | 8.90 | 12.68 | 9.34 | 7.68 |
| EV / FCF | — | 24.11 | 14.94 | — | 33.45 | — | — | 17.04 | 19.70 | — | 14.49 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 64.1% | 64.1% | 34.0% | 28.3% | 23.7% | 2.9% | -32.8% | 28.8% | 26.8% | 28.5% | 32.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 8.0% | 8.9% | 7.8% | 5.2% | -4.1% | -41.4% | 9.9% | 7.8% | 9.6% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.7% | 5.7% | 5.5% | 4.9% | 1.6% | -8.0% | -46.0% | 7.0% | 5.1% | 5.7% | 6.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 24.0% | 24.0% | 28.6% | 32.3% | 12.4% | -35.7% | -80.8% | 27.9% | 22.6% | 24.6% | 25.7% |
| ROA | 4.5% | 4.5% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 1.1% | -3.1% | -12.6% | 5.9% | 4.6% | 5.2% | 5.6% |
| ROIC | 9.1% | 9.1% | 9.9% | 8.3% | 5.6% | -2.9% | -16.8% | 11.2% | 9.7% | 13.6% | 18.1% |
| ROCE | 9.3% | 9.3% | 10.2% | 8.7% | 4.8% | -2.1% | -15.1% | 11.8% | 10.0% | 12.6% | 15.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.03 | 2.03 | 2.65 | 3.94 | 5.28 | 7.83 | 5.50 | 1.77 | 1.97 | 1.65 | 1.35 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.06 | 4.06 | 4.19 | 5.34 | 7.60 | 26.91 | — | 3.10 | 3.67 | 2.50 | 1.85 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.64 | 1.96 | 3.29 | 4.24 | 4.19 | 3.60 | 1.53 | 1.80 | 1.48 | 1.10 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.28 | 3.28 | 3.10 | 4.46 | 6.11 | 14.41 | — | 2.68 | 3.35 | 2.24 | 1.51 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 9.81 | 6.49 | — | 23.47 | — | — | 7.43 | 8.64 | — | 4.11 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.77 | 3.77 | 3.97 | 2.91 | 1.59 | -0.62 | -7.89 | 7.06 | 5.38 | 6.48 | 7.27 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 1.19 | 1.16 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.59 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.95 | 1.14 | 1.09 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.52 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.82 | 1.01 | 0.92 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.36 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.36 | 0.26 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.91 |
| Inventory Turnover | 13.62 | 13.62 | 23.95 | 24.68 | 30.94 | 24.33 | 21.87 | 28.72 | 30.69 | 29.23 | 28.47 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 14.77 | 13.84 | 12.90 | 14.62 | 24.64 | 30.78 | 11.51 | 12.60 | 12.94 | 11.74 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.2% | 9.1% | 9.7% | 19.1% | 5.9% | — | — | 13.1% | 9.2% | 10.4% | 9.4% |
| FCF Yield | 7.1% | 7.0% | 11.8% | — | 10.0% | — | — | 10.4% | 9.0% | — | 9.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.8% | 1.7% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.9% | 7.2% | 5.3% | 9.0% | 10.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.8% | 1.7% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.8% | 7.2% | 5.3% | 9.0% | 10.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $327M | $333M | $332M | $330M | $322M | $279M | $260M | $277M | $304M | $330M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UAL stock.
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 10.8x. The historical average is 11.7x. This places it at the 53th percentile of its historical range.
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.2x.
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 24.0%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 21.4%.
Based on historical data, United Airlines Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 10.8x. This is at the 53th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
United Airlines Holdings, Inc. has 64.1% gross margin and 8.0% operating margin.
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and fuel exposure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discounted Multiple Reflects Cyclical Risk
UAL trades at 12.1x trailing earnings and 8.5x EV/EBITDA, below Delta's 11.7x P/E but at a discount to its own historical average, per recent filings, suggesting market skepticism about earnings durability.
The forward EV/EBITDA of 4.7x implies the market expects significant EBITDA growth or a re-rating, but given the cyclicality of airline earnings, this multiple may be justified by the risk of margin compression. Compared to peers, UAL's P/E is in line with DAL but its EV/EBITDA is lower than AAL and LUV, indicating the market assigns a lower multiple to its earnings power, possibly due to higher leverage and fuel sensitivity.
Margin Recovery Masks Underlying Volatility
Operating margin improved to 6.2% in 2026Q2 from 0.8% in 2024Q1, as reported in financial statements, but gross margin swings from 21.9% to 67.7% highlight fuel cost volatility that distorts true earning power.
The recent gross margin expansion to 67.7% in 2026Q2 is largely a function of lower fuel prices, as evidenced by the 2024Q1 trough when fuel costs spiked. Net margin of 4.6% in 2026Q2 is still below the 8.8% peak in 2024Q2, suggesting that while profitability is recovering, it remains sensitive to input costs. Investors should focus on operating margin excluding fuel, which appears more stable, but the data does not isolate that metric.
Return on Capital Remains Subdued
ROIC improved to 2.1% in 2026Q2 from 0.2% in 2024Q1, but remains well below the cost of capital, as per SEC filings, indicating that UAL is not yet generating sufficient returns on its heavy asset base.
Despite a strong equity rebuild, ROE of 4.9% in 2026Q2 is far below the 13.4% seen in 2024Q2, and ROIC of 2.1% is insufficient to cover the cost of debt and equity. The asset-heavy model, with PPE constituting 64% of total assets, requires high utilization to generate adequate returns. The improvement from the 2024Q1 trough is encouraging, but the absolute level suggests that capital efficiency is still a challenge.
Negative Cash Cycle Reflects Advance Sales
UAL's cash conversion cycle improved to -48 days in 2026Q2 from -9 days in 2024Q4, as reported in financial statements, driven by a surge in deferred revenue to $18.8B, indicating strong advance ticket sales.
The negative CCC is a structural advantage for airlines, as customers pay in advance, but the dramatic improvement from -9 to -48 days is notable. DPO increased to 89 days from 37 days, suggesting UAL is stretching payables, while DSO remained low at 13 days. This working capital efficiency provides a source of cash, but the sustainability depends on maintaining strong forward bookings, which the deferred revenue growth supports.
Leverage Eases but Debt Burden Persists
Debt-to-equity improved to 2.02 in 2026Q2 from 3.79 in 2024Q1, as per financial statements, but D/EBITDA of 18.1x remains elevated, indicating that debt service is still a significant claim on cash flows.
Interest coverage of 3.2x in 2026Q2 is thin, though it improved from 0.4x in 2025Q1, reflecting stronger operating income. The absolute debt level of $33.7B is substantial, and while the trend is positive, any fuel price spike or demand shock could pressure coverage ratios. The improvement in D/E is partly due to equity growth from retained earnings, but the high D/EBITDA suggests that EBITDA must remain robust to service debt.
Liquidity Cushion Remains Thin
Current ratio improved to 0.78 in 2026Q2 from 0.65 in 2025Q4, as reported in SEC filings, but remains below 1.0, indicating that UAL relies on cash flows and credit lines to meet short-term obligations.
The quick ratio of 0.72 in 2026Q2 shows that even without inventory, liquid assets cover only 72% of current liabilities. However, the airline's negative CCC and strong advance bookings provide a buffer, as deferred revenue represents cash received before services are rendered. Under a severe demand shock, the current ratio could deteriorate, but the $10.2B cash balance offers some resilience.
Misapplied Metric: EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA is commonly misapplied to airlines because EBITDA excludes aircraft rent and maintenance costs, which are significant for UAL, as per industry practice, obscuring true cash flow obligations.
For UAL, EV/EBITDA of 8.5x appears low, but EBITDA does not capture the full cost of operating leases and heavy capital expenditures. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDAR or EV/operating cash flow, which would provide a clearer picture of earnings power. Investors should adjust for fleet-related costs to avoid underestimating the company's true leverage and valuation.