Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -16.5%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6M | $20M | $184M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-4624542 | $9M | $179M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.21 | 0.68 | 3.56 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.12 | 1.06 | 13.23 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.32 | 3.48 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.8% | 0.8% | 1.3% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 0.4% |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | -10.5% | -1.7% | 0.2% | 0.1% | -0.1% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -9.2% | -9.2% | -1.5% | 0.2% | -0.1% | -0.0% | -0.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -16.5% | -16.5% | -10.0% | 20.8% | -9.9% | -2.2% | -31.4% |
| ROA | -14.4% | -14.4% | -6.9% | 1.5% | -0.4% | -0.2% | -4.3% |
| ROIC | -25.9% | -25.9% | -13.5% | — | — | — | -65.2% |
| ROCE | -18.6% | -18.6% | -11.7% | 15.5% | 25.7% | -21.1% | -35.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.13 | — | — | 0.61 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 0.89 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.57 | -0.30 | -1.08 | -1.67 | -10.45 | -0.60 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | -7.41 | -11.82 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | -4.22 | -0.77 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -87.22 | -87.22 | -46.10 | 193.27 | — | 66.28 | -18.62 |
Net cash position: cash ($11M) exceeds total debt ($397291)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 10.24 | 10.24 | 5.75 | 1.22 | 1.02 | 1.03 | 1.16 |
| Quick Ratio | 10.24 | 10.24 | 5.75 | 1.22 | 1.02 | 1.03 | 1.16 |
| Cash Ratio | 7.60 | 7.60 | 1.66 | 0.34 | 0.07 | 0.33 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.41 | 3.07 | 19.43 | 3.78 | 29.36 | 10.62 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 2.79 | 2.80 | 1.02 | 1.19 | 5.48 | 10.52 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $291781 | $63125 | $60000 | $57829 | $37500 | $37500 |
Structural margin collapse
According to recent market data, UBXG trades at a P/S ratio of 0.20, a valuation level that suggests investors are pricing the firm as a distressed service provider rather than a high-growth technology entity, given the persistent negative earnings and the 42.49% year-over-year revenue decline.
The current P/S multiple reflects a significant discount compared to broader software peers, indicating that the market has largely abandoned the growth narrative previously associated with the company's algorithmic suite. This valuation appears to be a rational response to the lack of a clear path to profitability, as the company's negative P/E of -0.77 underscores the absence of fundamental earnings support.
As reported in financial statements, UBXG's gross margin has stagnated at a critical low of 0.85%, which, when compared to industry standards for software-infrastructure firms, suggests that the company lacks the pricing power required to generate sustainable returns on its core service offerings.
The inability to expand gross margins beyond this nominal level implies that the company's cost of revenue is almost entirely variable, effectively neutralizing any potential for operating leverage. Investors should monitor whether this margin profile is a permanent structural feature of the business model or a temporary consequence of intense competition within the Chinese insurance intermediary market.
Based on reported figures, UBXG's ROIC has trended into deeply negative territory, reaching -43.4% in 2026Q2, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its investments in technology and service infrastructure.
The sharp decline in return on capital suggests that the company's capital allocation strategy has failed to generate sufficient returns to cover the cost of its operations. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's recent investments in property and equipment are yielding any tangible improvements in operational efficiency or if they are merely adding to the existing burden of negative returns.
According to historical data, UBXG's asset turnover ratio has plummeted from 9.31 in 2022Q2 to 0.39 in 2026Q2, signaling a significant deterioration in the company's ability to utilize its asset base to generate revenue within its current business environment.
This sharp decline in efficiency suggests that the company's asset base is growing faster than its ability to generate top-line results, which may indicate an over-investment in non-productive assets. The lack of improvement in this metric implies that the company is struggling to maintain its operational relevance, potentially due to a loss of market share or a fundamental shift in customer demand.
The most commonly misapplied metric for UBXG is the P/S ratio, which, when used to value the company as a software firm, obscures the reality that its financials more closely resemble a low-margin service intermediary with minimal pricing power and high variable costs.
Investors should instead focus on net revenue or commission-based metrics that strip out the pass-through costs of bundled services, as the current gross revenue figures artificially inflate the company's scale. Relying on standard software valuation multiples risks ignoring the structural margin constraints that prevent the company from achieving the profitability typically expected in the technology sector.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UBXG stock.
U-BX Technology Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -0.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
U-BX Technology Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -16.5%. The historical average is -8.2%.
Based on historical data, U-BX Technology Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -0.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
U-BX Technology Ltd. has 0.8% gross margin and -10.5% operating margin.