Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 33.9x · EV/EBITDA 9.7x · ROE 5.3%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.7B | $3.2B | $1.6B | $919M | $1.3B | $2.6B | $2.0B | $1.1B | $505M | $1.6B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $5.7B | $6.2B | $5.0B | $4.4B | $4.5B | $5.9B | $5.4B | $4.7B | $3.5B | $2.0B | $2.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 33.92 | 37.93 | — | — | 52.00 | 10.44 | 13.35 | — | — | 9.88 | 15.05 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.21 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.75 | 1.97 | 1.05 | 0.56 | 0.72 | 1.45 | 1.31 | 0.93 | 0.33 | 0.89 | 1.16 |
| P/FCF | 8.49 | 9.88 | 6.80 | — | 4.19 | 32.41 | 6.54 | 3.76 | 9.01 | 25.24 | 8.71 |
| P/OCF | 5.08 | 5.91 | 3.46 | 3.63 | 2.02 | 7.83 | 3.24 | 2.34 | 1.77 | 14.95 | 6.97 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.25 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.68 | 10.44 | 11.81 | 10.54 | 9.72 | 9.24 | 9.28 | 52.58 | 67.34 | 6.32 | 7.46 |
| EV / EBIT | 19.79 | 28.01 | — | 177.09 | 29.74 | 12.76 | 13.88 | — | — | 8.72 | 10.06 |
| EV / FCF | — | 19.16 | 21.06 | — | 14.92 | 74.14 | 17.68 | 16.48 | 62.47 | 30.43 | 10.36 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 13.5% | 13.5% | 13.3% | 13.6% | 13.6% | 14.5% | 14.6% | 14.6% | 14.4% | 14.9% | 15.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 1.2% | 1.1% | -0.7% | -0.9% | 2.2% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.3% | 0.3% | -0.4% | -0.4% | 0.1% | 0.9% | 0.6% | -1.0% | -1.3% | 1.6% | 1.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.3% | 5.3% | -7.4% | -6.6% | 1.4% | 15.0% | 11.2% | -20.7% | -17.0% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| ROA | 1.1% | 1.1% | -1.6% | -1.5% | 0.3% | 3.3% | 2.0% | -3.7% | -5.6% | 5.6% | 4.5% |
| ROIC | 4.5% | 4.5% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.3% | 5.3% | 4.6% | -3.1% | -4.4% | 8.0% | 8.2% |
| ROCE | 6.0% | 6.0% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 3.1% | 7.0% | 5.7% | -3.8% | -5.3% | 10.1% | 10.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.87 | 1.87 | 2.22 | 2.16 | 1.87 | 1.89 | 2.26 | 3.20 | 2.01 | 0.20 | 0.23 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.12 | 5.12 | 8.10 | 8.45 | 7.07 | 5.27 | 5.92 | 41.11 | 58.45 | 1.15 | 1.24 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.85 | 2.19 | 2.14 | 1.85 | 1.86 | 2.24 | 3.16 | 1.98 | 0.18 | 0.22 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.06 | 5.06 | 8.00 | 8.35 | 6.99 | 5.20 | 5.85 | 40.58 | 57.63 | 1.08 | 1.19 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 9.28 | 14.26 | — | 10.72 | 41.73 | 11.14 | 12.72 | 53.47 | 5.19 | 1.65 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.86 | 1.86 | -0.11 | 0.15 | 0.97 | 4.12 | 1.90 | -0.89 | -0.88 | 13.75 | 13.51 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.32 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.57 | 1.43 | 1.56 | 1.69 | 2.56 | 2.36 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.93 | 0.90 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 4.38 | 4.18 | 4.12 | 4.09 | 3.79 | 3.58 | 3.50 | 3.11 | 3.45 | 3.21 |
| Inventory Turnover | 13.85 | 13.85 | 13.16 | 12.29 | 11.41 | 10.51 | 10.24 | 9.94 | 9.15 | 7.67 | 7.60 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 10.79 | 12.55 | 11.23 | 10.72 | 15.32 | 14.94 | 15.13 | 17.05 | 20.69 | 20.69 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.9% | 2.6% | — | — | 1.9% | 9.6% | 7.5% | — | — | 10.1% | 6.6% |
| FCF Yield | 11.8% | 10.1% | 14.7% | — | 23.8% | 3.1% | 15.3% | 26.6% | 11.1% | 4.0% | 11.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.8% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.8% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $63M | $60M | $59M | $61M | $61M | $60M | $54M | $51M | $51M | $51M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UNFI stock.
United Natural Foods, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 33.9x. The historical average is 25.6x. This places it at the 84th percentile of its historical range.
United Natural Foods, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.4x.
United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.3%. The historical average is 7.5%.
Based on historical data, United Natural Foods, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 33.9x. This is at the 84th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
United Natural Foods, Inc. has 13.5% gross margin and 0.9% operating margin.
United Natural Foods, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cost-inflation risk to margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Cost Actions Lift Margins Without Pricing Power
Per UNFI's reported quarterly results, operating margin has climbed to 1.0% in 2026Q4 from -1.0% a year earlier while gross margin barely budged at 13.7%, indicating the recovery stems from SG&A reductions rather than pricing power in its food distribution operations.
The decomposition suggests the earnings turn is a cost-side event: gross margin has stayed inside a 12.6%-13.7% band for ten quarters, so the entire swing in operating margin, from -$1.0% to +1.0%, originates above the gross line. Investors should monitor whether this holds, because reported net margin of 0.5% and ROE of 2.2% remain far below the levels at which a distributor can comfortably fund depreciation on its $3.0B property base. Normalized earning power therefore still appears to be only marginally positive, with the risk that fuel and wage inflation absorbs the SG&A savings.
Returns Return Positive But Stay Below Cost
According to United Natural Foods' reported ratio data, return on invested capital has improved to 1.6% in 2026Q3 from -1.2% in 2025Q4, yet remains far below the 5.3%-14.9% range posted by Sysco, Performance Food Group and US Foods in the supplied peer set.
The trajectory is genuinely positive — ROIC and ROE have now printed four consecutive positive quarters after a string of negatives — but the level is what matters for capital allocation. An ROIC near 1%-1.6% against an asset base weighted roughly 42% toward property, plant and equipment appears below any reasonable cost of capital, implying the distribution network is still value-destructive at current margins even as it returns cash. The driver is margin, not efficiency: asset turnover has improved only modestly to 1.07, so any durable return improvement would require a structural shift in gross margin rather than further working-capital release.
Cash Cycle Tightening Signals Working-Capital Discipline
As reported in UNFI's financial statements, the cash conversion cycle compressed to 14 days in 2026Q4 from 20 days in 2024Q3 as days inventory outstanding fell to 27 from 32, while asset turnover climbed to 1.07 from 0.98.
The six-day reduction in the cash cycle, driven almost entirely by inventory velocity rather than customer or supplier terms, suggests management has been extracting cash from the perishable-heavy working capital base — consistent with the reported deleveraging of roughly $800M in debt over the window. This is likely a meaningful contributor to operating cash flow, but it may be partly non-recurring, since a distributor can only shrink inventory to a point before service levels to independent grocers suffer. With DSO held flat at 11-12 days and DPO at 23-25 days, there appears limited remaining customer-side leverage, so further cycle compression would need to come from inventory, not payment terms.
Debt Reduction Outpaces Earnings Coverage
Based on the latest UNFI metrics, debt-to-equity has eased to 1.87x from 2.36x ten quarters ago and interest coverage rebounded to 4.59x from -2.11x, though absolute debt of roughly $3.0B still exceeds total equity of about $1.6B.
The leverage picture has materially improved on the reported numbers, with coverage turning from negative to above 4.5x as operating income returned to positive territory, which reduces near-term refinancing pressure relative to the 2025 trough. However, equity has stayed flat near $1.6B while retained earnings slipped from $1.2B to $1.1B, suggesting the debt reduction reflects asset shrinkage and working-capital release rather than accumulated profitability. With D/EBITDA still printed at 19.5x on trailing figures, the capital structure remains dependent on continued operating cash flow, and investors should treat the current ratio of 1.29x, down from 1.51x, as thin cover for a balance sheet this heavily debt-financed.
Negative Trailing Earnings Distort Value Multiples
UNFI's reported multiples show a trailing P/E of -22.85 against a forward P/E of 13.28 and EV/EBITDA of 21.09 versus 8.72 forward, a gap driven by depressed trailing earnings rather than market anticipation of unusually strong growth.
The trailing and forward sets point in opposite directions, and the difference is arithmetic rather than predictive: trailing net income sits near break-even after four loss-making quarters, while forward multiples are calculated on a low, recently raised earnings base that has not yet been demonstrated over a full cycle. At 1.73x book against 1.87x debt-to-equity, the price-to-book multiple appears to price UNFI at a discount to Sysco's 14.02x and US Foods' 5.02x, which may reflect the market discounting earnings quality rather than assigning a going-concern discount. Given that peer P/Es of 21x-67x rest on 1.5%-2.1% net margins versus UNFI's 0.5%, the multiple gap looks structural, so the forward P/E should be tested against what margin expansion is actually achievable, not the reported guidance trajectory.
Price-to-Sales Invites the Wrong Value Read
Among distribution comparables, UNFI's 0.09x price-to-sales ratio, versus 2.1%-2.2% peer net margins, most frequently invites a deep-value reading that ignores gross margins held within a 12.6%-13.7% band and its sub-1% operating margin profile.
For a business that converts roughly 13 cents of gross margin into less than a cent of operating income, a price-to-sales comparison is structurally misleading: UNFI's sales base of about $32B carries almost none of the value retention seen at Sysco or US Foods, where scale, private label and foodservice mix convert a much larger share of revenue into profit. The correct read is that the 0.09x figure is an arithmetic consequence of a 0.05% net margin, not evidence of mispricing, and it should be replaced by an EV/EBITDA or P/FCF view tested against normalized, rather than guided, earnings. A second misapplied metric is ROE: UNFI's reported -7.4% trailing ROE is distorted by a near-zero earnings denominator against a modest $1.6B equity base, so it flatters volatility in both directions and should be read alongside ROIC of ~1.3% and interest coverage rather than in isolation.