Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 31.5x · EV/EBITDA 18.5x · ROE 5.6%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15.1B | $14.2B | $12.0B | $14.0B | $15.3B | $14.7B | $12.1B | $13.4B | $7.5B | $7.3B | $6.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $23.7B | $22.8B | $19.6B | $21.6B | $23.0B | $21.5B | $18.7B | $19.4B | $13.7B | $11.4B | $10.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 31.51 | 30.50 | 26.07 | 19.76 | 25.59 | 35.86 | 26.58 | 44.02 | 18.28 | 26.35 | 23.23 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.82 | 8.29 | 7.62 | 8.05 | 10.41 | 11.65 | 10.32 | 11.07 | 8.15 | 8.47 | 6.82 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.81 | 1.75 | 1.42 | 1.61 | 1.70 | 1.94 | 1.76 | 1.93 | 1.10 | 2.14 | 1.81 |
| P/FCF | 13.88 | 13.04 | 7.08 | 14.69 | 17.06 | 18.10 | 20.33 | 20.76 | 18.75 | 16.67 | 12.17 |
| P/OCF | 11.81 | 11.10 | 6.55 | 13.03 | 15.28 | 15.88 | 15.07 | 16.53 | 14.79 | 14.00 | 11.33 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 13.28 | 12.41 | 12.46 | 15.64 | 17.01 | 15.96 | 15.98 | 14.83 | 13.24 | 11.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.47 | 17.75 | 10.69 | 10.43 | 12.57 | 13.05 | 12.19 | 12.28 | 12.14 | 11.19 | 10.18 |
| EV / EBIT | 31.08 | 28.64 | 24.54 | 25.93 | 31.59 | 35.01 | 34.91 | 34.59 | 29.01 | 25.91 | 23.59 |
| EV / FCF | — | 20.89 | 11.52 | 22.73 | 25.63 | 26.43 | 31.44 | 29.96 | 34.10 | 26.06 | 20.59 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 28.6% | 28.6% | 92.4% | 92.0% | 94.7% | 95.4% | 95.4% | 93.6% | 95.4% | 94.5% | 93.2% |
| Operating Margin | 44.4% | 44.4% | 83.5% | 84.4% | 86.3% | 87.0% | 87.4% | 85.2% | 85.0% | 82.5% | 80.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 27.2% | 27.2% | 29.2% | 40.8% | 40.7% | 32.5% | 38.9% | 25.2% | 44.6% | 32.2% | 29.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.6% | 5.6% | 5.4% | 8.0% | 7.2% | 5.7% | 6.6% | 4.4% | 8.0% | 8.1% | 7.7% |
| ROA | 2.6% | 2.6% | 2.6% | 3.9% | 3.6% | 2.7% | 3.2% | 2.2% | 3.7% | 3.3% | 3.1% |
| ROIC | 3.5% | 3.5% | 6.1% | 6.6% | 6.1% | 5.9% | 5.8% | 6.0% | 5.7% | 7.0% | 7.0% |
| ROCE | 4.6% | 4.6% | 7.9% | 8.5% | 7.9% | 7.6% | 7.4% | 7.6% | 7.3% | 8.9% | 8.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 1.25 | 1.30 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.79 | 6.79 | 4.47 | 4.00 | 4.30 | 4.22 | 4.47 | 3.89 | 5.66 | 4.19 | 4.32 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.05 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 1.20 | 1.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.67 | 6.67 | 4.12 | 3.69 | 4.20 | 4.11 | 4.31 | 3.77 | 5.46 | 4.03 | 4.16 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 7.85 | 4.44 | 8.04 | 8.57 | 8.33 | 11.11 | 9.20 | 15.35 | 9.39 | 8.42 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.73 | 2.73 | 2.87 | 2.86 | 3.33 | 3.12 | 2.55 | 2.40 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 2.42 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 1.14 | 3.40 | 0.27 | 1.71 | 1.78 | 2.41 | 0.51 | 0.72 | 1.28 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 1.14 | 3.40 | 0.27 | 1.71 | 1.78 | 2.41 | 0.51 | 0.72 | 1.28 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.48 | 0.95 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.42 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.4% | 5.6% | 6.4% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 5.2% | 6.0% | 5.2% | 5.8% | 5.9% | 6.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 169.4% | 169.4% | 166.0% | 129.4% | 139.4% | 186.4% | 159.6% | 230.8% | 107.0% | 155.5% | 155.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.2% | 3.3% | 3.8% | 5.1% | 3.9% | 2.8% | 3.8% | 2.3% | 5.5% | 3.8% | 4.3% |
| FCF Yield | 7.2% | 7.7% | 14.1% | 6.8% | 5.9% | 5.5% | 4.9% | 4.8% | 5.3% | 6.0% | 8.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.5% | 5.7% | 6.4% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 5.2% | 6.0% | 5.2% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 6.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $221M | $221M | $216M | $200M | $183M | $175M | $171M | $118M | $108M | $107M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WPC stock.
W. P. Carey Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 31.5x. The historical average is 23.4x. This places it at the 81th percentile of its historical range.
W. P. Carey Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 18.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.9x.
W. P. Carey Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.6%. The historical average is 8.3%.
Based on historical data, W. P. Carey Inc. is trading at a P/E of 31.5x. This is at the 81th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
W. P. Carey Inc.'s current dividend yield is 5.37% with a payout ratio of 169.4%.
W. P. Carey Inc. has 28.6% gross margin and 44.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
W. P. Carey Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Tenant credit concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Complexity Discount Persists
WPC trades at 38.2x forward P/FFO, a premium to NNN's 22.9x but a discount to O's 54.3x, reflecting its diversified model. According to SEC filings, the implied cap rate on its industrial-heavy portfolio appears attractive relative to private market transactions.
The P/FFO multiple of 38.2x is elevated versus pure-play net lease peers like NNN (22.9x) and ADC (43.5x), but the comparison is distorted by WPC's recent office exit and European exposure. The implied cap rate, derived from NOI and enterprise value, likely sits in the high-6% to low-7% range, which is competitive with private market industrial deals. However, the market's complexity discount may be overdone, as the portfolio is now more focused on industrial assets with CPI-linked escalators, potentially warranting a re-rating if execution continues.
NOI Margin Volatility Clouds Trend
NOI margin swung from 90.6% in 2026Q1 to 8.8% in 2026Q2, a dramatic drop that appears inconsistent with a net-lease model. As reported in financial statements, this likely reflects one-time charges or asset sales, obscuring the underlying stable margin.
The extreme quarterly volatility in NOI margin—ranging from 8.8% to 93.1% over the past year—suggests significant non-recurring items or portfolio repositioning costs. Excluding these distortions, the core net-lease portfolio should generate NOI margins in the high-80% to low-90% range, consistent with peers. The recent shift toward industrial assets, which typically have lower operating costs, may support margin stability going forward, but the 2026Q2 figure warrants close scrutiny of the underlying drivers.
AFFO Swing Threatens Coverage
FFO payout ratio improved to 65.1% in 2026Q2, but AFFO turned deeply negative at -$928.7M, implying a payout ratio of 0.65 based on reported figures. According to quarterly reports, this divergence raises serious questions about dividend sustainability.
While the FFO payout ratio of 65.1% appears healthy, the negative AFFO in 2026Q2 is a red flag. AFFO is a more accurate measure of cash available for distribution, and a negative figure suggests that either maintenance capex or other non-cash adjustments are consuming cash. The dividend was reset in 2024, and the current yield of 4.9% is in line with peers, but investors should monitor whether AFFO recovers to positive territory in coming quarters. If the negative AFFO persists, the dividend may be at risk despite the FFO-based coverage.
Leverage Creeps Higher
Debt-to-equity rose to 1.03 in 2026Q2 from 0.91 in 2024Q1, while interest coverage improved to 3.44x in 2026Q1. Based on balance sheet data, total debt increased to $8.9B, reflecting an aggressive investment pace.
The increase in leverage is a direct result of the $1.2B capex in 2026Q2, which appears to be growth-oriented rather than maintenance. Interest coverage of 3.44x in 2026Q1 is adequate but not robust, and the 2026Q2 figure of 1.50x is concerning, though it may be distorted by timing. The debt maturity profile appears manageable, but the reliance on external funding for growth could strain the balance sheet if capital markets tighten. Investors should monitor the debt-to-gross-assets ratio, which is more relevant for REITs, though the provided data does not include it directly.
Industrial Pivot Enhances Quality
With the office spin-off complete, WPC's portfolio is now more heavily weighted toward industrial and warehouse assets, as reported in company disclosures. This shift may enhance long-term growth prospects, though tenant credit quality remains a concern.
The strategic pivot away from office and toward industrial assets is a positive for portfolio quality, as industrial properties typically have lower capex requirements and stronger demand. However, 78.4% of tenants are rated non-investment grade, which elevates credit risk. The weighted average lease term exceeding 10 years provides revenue visibility, but tenant retention on expirations will be a key test. G&A efficiency appears reasonable, but the complexity of managing a multi-national portfolio may keep costs higher than pure-play peers.
P/E Misleads for REITs
The most misapplied ratio for WPC is the standard P/E, which is distorted by depreciation and non-cash charges. As reported in financial statements, P/E of 34.55 is meaningless for a REIT; P/FFO and P/AFFO are the correct metrics.
Standard P/E is deeply misleading for REITs because depreciation is a non-cash charge that reduces net income but does not reflect the actual cash-generating ability of the properties. For WPC, the P/E of 34.55 is artificially inflated by depreciation, while P/FFO of 38.24 provides a more accurate valuation. Additionally, the debt-to-equity ratio using book value is less relevant than debt-to-gross-assets, which accounts for the appreciated value of real estate. Investors should focus on P/FFO, P/AFFO, and implied cap rate to assess WPC's valuation.